Author Topic: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity? (Read 371765 times)

wattsup · « **Reply #390 on:** July 08, 2007, 03:53:43 AM »

Quote from: hartiberlin on July 08, 2007, 12:50:53 AM

Hmm,
any other idea how we can bring BRnBrade to speak more to us ?

I don?t want to ban or chase him away over here, but his lack in
answering any questions is a bit annoying...

@stefan

Thanks alot. I guess when the moderator of the board comes out and says stuff like the above, any self respecting person would do as Bnrbrade has done and remove all his posts. Why deal with all this noise.

Just when I got up to 7.46 vdc after trying about 100 cap combos. But no problem. It's only time and life.

@Brnbrade

If you speak with Erfinder, please tell him I would like some lessons also. I can be reached via my e-mail. Have a good life. Now go have another bear. You earned it.

hartiberlin · « **Reply #391 on:** July 08, 2007, 04:34:05 AM »

Hmm,
indeed he has removed his postings...
why ?

Anyway,I had stored fortunately his pics to my harddrive,
here they are again.

hartiberlin · « **Reply #392 on:** July 08, 2007, 04:36:55 AM »

And here is the one with the light bulb:

hartiberlin · « **Reply #393 on:** July 08, 2007, 04:40:32 AM »

I have added the pictures to the first page as inline pictures.

I am curious, if Brnbrade will ever come back and report more findings ?

Bruce_TPU · « **Reply #394 on:** July 08, 2007, 05:00:10 AM »

Hi Stefan,

First off, please do not feel too bad. There was not many posts to delete, or very much information.

He is a young high schooler who needs to mature and realize you can not make a claim like that and not answer any questions. And the questions were easy.

Lastly, when he asked me to post initially, I told him then, that I would not do it unless he had every thing ready and answers to a list of questions I had sent him that he would be asked. He promised he would. Well he did not keep that promise. And was so quick to go off onto another new invention, instead of studying, with everyones help, the coil he already said worked.

I would encourage those who have wound coils to continue to report any progress and we will see what comes of it.

Just my 2 cents...

Cheers,
Bruce

Bruce_TPU · « **Reply #395 on:** July 08, 2007, 05:16:43 AM »

Hey guys, also as an addendum, I just noticed something.

If you look at the pictures above, where the two orange wires come to the bulb. And you see the two battery cables that lead to the stereo, Think of those out of phase frequencies opposing one another as they travel in opposite directions in the coil. As I have said, quoting Tesla, opposing identical signals, different sources, do not cancel. They do not even know the other is there except for the magnetics.

Now those with coils might try stereo, no ground hooked to the coil, and input them where young brnbrade did in the picture with the lit bulb and see what you get, left channel to one wire, and right channel to the other.....

Cheers,
Bruce

brnbrade · « **Reply #396 on:** July 08, 2007, 07:45:00 AM »

@ btentzer
Ha ha.
Sinto muito mais ? um oportunista grande.
Aprendendo com voc?s. Quando um T.P.U. estiver pronto funcionando talvez reenvendico minha parte nele.
Eu sei virar campo magnetico. cof.. cof... E voc?? Aprendi com seus pr?prios erros. Eu sei oscilar campo magnetico... e voc??
Aprendendo comigo meu amigo.
? facil por ovo em p?, eu aprendi... E voc?? Vai copiar minha id?ia... Eu vi a turbina girar e voc?.
Claro, Algum dia voc?s v?o trope?ar na verdade.

@ Jacob

Sinto muito. Nada a declarar para voc?. Venha ver meu despositivo trabalhando.
? facil levantar um nome e apontar um dedo. Eu iria postar meu diagrama como prometido em duas ou tres semanas, mais n?o sabem esperar.
Copiar ideias ? f?cil. E fazer funcionar? Eu consegui...
? engra?ado. Todos que est?o tendo sucesso est?o sendo devorados vivos por alguns. Alguns que s? teorizam. bal bla bla
SM foi grandioso e astuto, mas n?o vejo sua tecnologia disponivel para n?s.

@ Wattup

Obrigado. Talvez foi o ?nico que conseguiu enchergar um pouco do que eu estou tentando fazendo aqui.

@ Stefan

A pouco n?o postarei mais nada no forum.
Mais estarei aqui aprendendo com seus pr?prios erros.

nutekk · « **Reply #397 on:** July 08, 2007, 07:52:58 AM »

greetings!
built 2 sets today.

i have wired it the way wattsup did and am experiencing the same creeping voltage gain.
i didn't charge the cap (4700 uf 35v) at all...just used a stack of ceramic magnets to start.
took around an hour to get .59 volts.

maybe its just picking up some grid interference? ...but maybe it is not.
more tomorrow.
i need to build that diode protection circuit so i can use sound card as a scope.
(http://libsyn.com/images/nutekk/5.jpg)

z_p_e · « **Reply #398 on:** July 08, 2007, 08:10:00 AM »

brnbade,

Perhaps you might try putting yourself in the shoes of the people here that had faith in what you were saying to them from the beginning. They did not question your authenticity. They gave you the benefit of the doubt, and you let them down.

So, if you were them, how would you be feeling right now?

Talvez voc? p?de tentar p?r-se nas sapatas dos povos aqui que tiveram a f? em o que voc? lhes dizia do come?o. N?o questionaram seu authenticity (genu?no). Deram-lhe o benef?cio da d?vida, e voc? deixou-os traga.

Assim, se voc? fosse eles, como voc? estaria sentindo direito agora?

brnbrade · « **Reply #399 on:** July 08, 2007, 08:30:57 AM »

Quote from: z_p_e on July 08, 2007, 08:10:00 AM

brnbade,

Perhaps you might try putting yourself in the shoes of the people here that had faith in what you were saying to them from the beginning. They did not question your authenticity. They gave you the benefit of the doubt, and you let them down.

So, if you were them, how would you be feeling right now?

Talvez voc? p?de tentar p?r-se nas sapatas dos povos aqui que tiveram a f? em o que voc? lhes dizia do come?o. N?o questionaram seu authenticity (genu?no). Deram-lhe o benef?cio da d?vida, e voc? deixou-os traga.

Assim, se voc? fosse eles, como voc? estaria sentindo direito agora?

Eu n?o nunca reenvidiquei nada.
Eu apenas estava testando meu dispositivo e obtendo resultados satisfat?rios. (COP acima de 10)
com apenas pouca entrada.
Alguns est?o vendo que esse dispositivo por ele mesmo enchendo de poder. S? postei os testes. Tenho outro projeto na frente deste. Maior que este. Meu tempo ? maior parte nele. Este cook McFarland s?o testes e provas de conceitos.

nutekk · « **Reply #400 on:** July 08, 2007, 08:33:29 AM »

i have now added a led to the circuit.
it is continuing to rise @ .79 volts now
seems to me at some point this led will light?
i guess as someone said voltage with no amperage is nothing

once the correct voltage is attained will it drain the cap?
is an led always using something
tempted to stay up now...

z_p_e · « **Reply #401 on:** July 08, 2007, 08:50:37 AM »

brnbade,

If you were only testing your device, that is ok.
If you were getting a COP of 10 with your device, that is ok.
If you did not want to tell people how exactly to make the device you were showing, that is ok too.

If you are achieving a COP of 10, then of course people here will want to build it too. But if you do not want to provide the complete instructions, then you must say that also. If you do not say this, people will expect that you will provide the information.

Do you see why the problems resulted? It is important to state your intention at the start.

Se voc? estiver testando somente seu dispositivo, aquele ? aprovado. Se voc? estiver conseguindo um ganho de 10 com seu dispositivo, aquele ? aprovado. Se voc? n?o quiser dizer a povos como exatamente o fazer ao dispositivo estavam mostrando, isso ? aprovado tamb?m.

Se voc? estiver conseguindo um ganho de 10, a seguir naturalmente os povos aqui querer?o construi-lo tamb?m. Mas se voc? n?o quiser fornecer as instru??es completas, ent?o voc? deve dizer aquele tamb?m. Se voc? n?o disser este, os povos esperar?o que voc? fornecer? a informa??o.

Voc? v? porque os problemas resultaram? ? importante indicar sua inten??o no in?cio.

brnbrade · « **Reply #402 on:** July 08, 2007, 08:59:37 AM »

Quote from: z_p_e on July 08, 2007, 08:50:37 AM

brnbade,

If you were only testing your device, that is ok.
If you were getting a COP of 10 with your device, that is ok.
If you did not want to tell people how exactly to make the device you were showing, that is ok too.

If you are achieving a COP of 10, then of course people here will want to build it too. But if you do not want to provide the complete instructions, then you must say that also. If you do not say this, people will expect that you will provide the information.

Do you see why the problems resulted? It is important to state your intention at the start.

Se voc? estiver testando somente seu dispositivo, aquele ? aprovado. Se voc? estiver conseguindo um ganho de 10 com seu dispositivo, aquele ? aprovado. Se voc? n?o quiser dizer a povos como exatamente o fazer ao dispositivo estavam mostrando, isso ? aprovado tamb?m.

Se voc? estiver conseguindo um ganho de 10, a seguir naturalmente os povos aqui querer?o construi-lo tamb?m. Mas se voc? n?o quiser fornecer as instru??es completas, ent?o voc? deve dizer aquele tamb?m. Se voc? n?o disser este, os povos esperar?o que voc? fornecer? a informa??o.

Voc? v? porque os problemas resultaram? ? importante indicar sua inten??o no in?cio.

Sim, os problemas aparecem porque n?o esperou o tempo certo.
Eu ia postar em duas ou tr?s semanas o diagrama. Mais a citua??o ? hostil
pela falta de pasci?ncia, comunica??o e tempo.

z_p_e · « **Reply #403 on:** July 08, 2007, 09:16:57 AM »

brnbade wrote:

Quote

Yes, the problems appear because I did not wait the certain time. I am going to post in two or three weeks the diagram. More the situation is hostile for the lack of patience, communication and time.

Yes you have assessed the situation correctly.

But, it is important to say at the beginning that you will provide diagrams in two or three weeks. You must understand that people would like to build your device at the moment you tell them, not three weeks later.

So next time, I encourage you to state your intention with your first post. Be honest and say that you will not provide the diagrams until you are ready.

Sim voc? avaliou a situa??o corretamente.

Mas, ? importante dizer no come?o que voc? fornecer? diagramas em duas ou tr?s semanas. Voc? deve compreender que os povos gostariam de construir seu dispositivo neste momento que voc? lhes diz, n?o tr?s semanas mais tarde.

Vez assim seguinte, eu incentivo-o indicar sua inten??o com seu primeiro borne. Seja honesto e diga que voc? n?o fornecer? os diagramas at? que voc? esteja preparado.

Darren

brnbrade · « **Reply #404 on:** July 08, 2007, 09:24:41 AM »

Quote from: z_p_e on July 08, 2007, 09:16:57 AM

brnbade wrote:

Quote
Yes, the problems appear because I did not wait the certain time. I am going to post in two or three weeks the diagram. More the situation is hostile for the lack of patience, communication and time.

Yes you have assessed the situation correctly.

But, it is important to say at the beginning that you will provide diagrams in two or three weeks. You must understand that people would like to build your device at the moment you tell them, not three weeks later.

So next time, I encourage you to state your intention with your first post. Be honest and say that you will not provide the diagrams until you are ready.

Sim voc? avaliou a situa??o corretamente.

Mas, ? importante dizer no come?o que voc? fornecer? diagramas em duas ou tr?s semanas. Voc? deve compreender que os povos gostariam de construir seu dispositivo neste momento que voc? lhes diz, n?o tr?s semanas mais tarde.

Vez assim seguinte, eu incentivo-o indicar sua inten??o com seu primeiro borne. Seja honesto e diga que voc? n?o fornecer? os diagramas at? que voc? esteja preparado.

Darren

N?o postarei mais. Diante desta situa??o me calarei.
Melhor ser bom observador.
Estarei aqui montando o resto do quebra cabe?a, mas n?o postarei mais nada.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity? (Read 371765 times)

wattsup

Re: The Ever Silent Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

hartiberlin

Re: The Ever Silent Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

hartiberlin

Re: The Ever Silent Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

hartiberlin

Re: The Ever Silent Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

Bruce_TPU

Re: The Ever Silent Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

Bruce_TPU

Re: The Ever Silent Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

brnbrade

Re: The Ever Silent Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

nutekk

Re: The Ever Silent Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

z_p_e

Re: The Ever Silent Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

brnbrade

Re: The Ever Silent Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

nutekk

Re: The Ever Silent Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

z_p_e

Re: The Ever Silent Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

brnbrade

Re: The Ever Silent Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

z_p_e

Re: The Ever Silent Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

brnbrade

Re: The Ever Silent Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?