Hey,

The Cook patent number is NOT what you wrote!            It is 119825 and it is available either the patent offices or here: http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3962.msg72150.html#msg72150   

Now you may ponder on what on earth US118825 patent was all about... that is missing indeed.


PS:  by the way read more carefully this thread because the Cook patent turns out not to be a really free energy setup...

Hi,

I would like to notice that his Amper values shown on the analog meter are very much in doubt (or should be treated with suspicion), especially when the meter is placed right on the iron core of the PM Holder.  The reason is that such analog meters have a horse shoe magnet inside which is sensitive to nearby iron materials and thus change the flux around the inside moving coil, hence the calibration of the meter can go away anywhere... so I do not believe there is 6A current flowing with disconnected cables.

I do not mean you abandon tinkering with this setup at all, I wished to point out my observation. I noticed similar meter behavior in my practice too, (not with this setup). Just be careful when using such moving coil meters near or close to magnetizable metals.

rgds,  Gyula

Hi,

Ok, I was meant this picture: http://www.keelynet.com/energy/meter4.jpg

and just above this picture this is written:
 
    "After disconnecting charger needle remains at 6 amps"

and just below this picture this is written:

    "Showing disconnected cables & reading 6 amps"

So if the charger and ITS CABLES were disconnected, ok, but then it is possible that I misunderstand how he connected the Amp meter into the circuit ?  Do you know? Please clarify.


Logic for me says he connected the meter in series with one of the charger's output, as I would do when checking currents.

But if he meant "magnetic currents" flowing in the core, then probably he simply placed the meter on top of the core (without any wire connection) and the strong magnetic field near the core (when the charger was ON) deflected the meter's needle to the 25A point in the scale in one direction and only to 10A in the other "circulation" direction, and the needle showed 6A when the charger was OFF.  In this case he used the meter as a magnetic field strength INDICATOR device, NOT a Amp meter, only he was not aware that the 6A indication was due to the closeness to the core. Had he lifted up the meter with his hand 10-15cm above the core, the needle would not have shown 6A but zero.
Sorry but this is what I think from the text descriptions and the pictures.

You wrote:

"The most important think is start up our set." ...in proper way!!!

I understand that the core can have remanent magnetism in it when you stop the DC ampers flow in the coils (you simply magnetize the core temporalily) and how long this magnetism remains depends on the physical material properties of the core, different for a 4% Silicon laminated transformer core or for a Hypersil type core or for steel types etc. 

Your combination of the 'motion holder' with 'McFarlands battery' is interesting and hopefully you find or have already found the "proper way to start them up".  Looking forward to your findings.

rgds,  Gyula

Nor can I... 

But this is one thing, nobody has to be an EE or a professor, what is more lack of special electrical knowledge to stumble on something unusual may bring success more easily..., I hope Mr "Brnbrade"  who is still a member here did really find out something useful with the combination of the TPU and the Farland setup etc. Too bad he does not write about it.
I hope your combination of motion holder with the McFarland setup brings some juice.

rgds Gyula

Hi wattsup,

Yes I have noticed him too, and he was just logged-on when I mentioned him in my previous post. 
Hopefully one day ego or greed or proudness or whatever will be defeted in him... provided he has any useful setup at all.

Gyula

...

...