Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Successful TPU-ECD replication !  (Read 1139038 times)

bob.rennips

  • elite_member
  • Full Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 182
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #510 on: June 21, 2007, 08:11:58 AM »
It seems the lower the hertz the higher the voltage. I tried 2Hz and got 100+kv.

I'm thinking this is simulator stuff up now...

kokomoj0

  • Guest
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #511 on: June 21, 2007, 08:16:03 AM »
another RANT
« Last Edit: June 22, 2007, 05:45:01 AM by kokomoj0 »

Bruce_TPU

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1437
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #512 on: June 21, 2007, 08:16:38 AM »
Well, that is okay, Bob! :)  LOL

It was fun to play with....who wants to try their replication at 7.23 Hz as one of their frequencies??  It made me a little shy! LOL

kokomoj0

  • Guest
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #513 on: June 21, 2007, 08:18:01 AM »
the only  thing i know how to do is RANT
« Last Edit: June 22, 2007, 05:45:25 AM by kokomoj0 »

bob.rennips

  • elite_member
  • Full Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 182
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #514 on: June 21, 2007, 08:21:56 AM »
@ Bob R.

HELP...please verify!!!

I did an edit of somethings:

3.5 volts input
Square Wave
7.23 Hz         <------ I have said this frequency is in the TPU because of the clues!!
OUTPUT
30.36 KV


What do I say, I am speechless!

so you put 3.5 volts in at 7 htz and got 30,000 volts out?


What was the input current and the output current?

kokomojo, put brain in gear before operating mouth!
It's clear from the last few thread posts that we're talking about the simulator.

Get off the case with the input/output stuff. It's getting boring.

At this point we're examining anomalies.
We believe that identifying and then fully utilising these anomalies will result FURTHER DOWN THE ROAD, in an overunity device.

I can categorically say that now the device is NOT OVERUNITY in its present form.




kokomoj0

  • Guest
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #515 on: June 21, 2007, 08:32:41 AM »
MORE RANT
« Last Edit: June 22, 2007, 05:47:05 AM by kokomoj0 »

bob.rennips

  • elite_member
  • Full Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 182
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #516 on: June 21, 2007, 08:48:31 AM »
Yes, Darren,

Wave watcher , Fantastic stuff, but Please do another thread! This one is for Otto and Roberto replication.

All else here, I urge you to do the replication.
You have the document??
What's stopping you?

It may not be a running generator yet but Please If have the skill its is time to do something..Common ground you know.

A walK to first base?

Before long most of  the discussions will only be relevent to those who have a little tornado...and some "seeds".

Threads  may become a bit disjointed as new people parachute in!

Great Days!!



Lindsay Mannix



please describe for us what exactly a tornado is and how one can produce it?

Is that something taken from maxwell's sets of equations?



Yes, the tornado is part of maxwell's equations.

Please Kokomo, if you have blatant disdain for what we are doing, why do you torture yourself here?



Awesome!    I guess i must have either overlooked it or we are using different text books?

Would you please be so kind as to give me the ISDN number or the title and publisher of your reference for that so I can go to the library and look it up?   Or URL i am not picky.....   I would very much appreciate it because I cannot find it in my stuff.  TIA

Then what about "kick" and "seed" and finally that long unanswered question of "how can harmonics be lined up"?

Who did the work on them, Lorentz? Faraday? Hertz? Tesla?   I have not been able to find reference to any of them either and maybe you can help me better understand what is going on here by either explaining exactly what those are or by providing me with the appropriate references so that i may do my own research and look them up for myself.   Again TIA.


No not disdain or torture at all.  i have no idea how asking for references and definitions would possibly be interpreted as disdain, do you use a different dictionary than the rest of the world?

I simply want to know what all that means before i consider winding a coil.

A kick (in the ass) is something my father did when we were naughty children.

A seed is something we planted in the garden and a plant would grown.

Harmonics is garbage as a result of the fundamental.

So you can imagine how totally confused i am when i hear all these terms thrown around that simply do not make any sense to me, so that is why i am asking.

Very simple questions i would think for researchers like yourselves. no?


Kokomojo,

I think you would agree that ALL the knowledge and understanding of the world of electricity and magnetism is by definition only a MODEL. It is NOT THE ACTUAL thing itself BY DEFINITION.

I agree that the model is very, very good, but it would be completely arrogant of anyone to say that the model and the actual thing are identical in every respect. THEY ARE NOT.

The start to improvements to the model occur when a researcher, experimentor, inventor, or layman observes something that they believe to be different from expected.

When this occurs in all endeavours, when trying to explain the anomaly there will be a mismatched between the available concepts and words, because they are based on the model, and not on what people are trying to explain.

BY DEFINITION, the words aren't available. Albeit on this forum there is a tendency to use words without considering their direct formal meaning to get across an idea of the direction of what they are seeing and in some cases physically feeling. Theories abound without so much a nary whiff of evidence. But this is all part of the mix. Ignore what is rubbish, and hold on to those things that appear strange.

So by saying "show me the references", you are showing that you haven't comprehended one the basic concepts of science, that knowledge is a model. So rather than, in your mind, taking the high road, you are in fact, trawling in the gutter, and displaying to the world your ignorance concering what knowledge really is.

This is not a university lab. This is a bunch of guys with varying backgrounds, languages and education trying to tweeze out the anomalies from the scant information concerning the Steve Mark's TPU.

If you cannot comprehend that such a diverse bunch of people will have trouble communicating their observations then what does that say about you ?

At the end of the day you either believe something is anomalous with the Steven Mark's TPU or you don't. If you don't then why are you here ?

If you do, then accept that what people write is the 'flavour' of what they are observing, it's not the complete recipe. Words WILL be used in the wrong context; gut feelings WILL be presented as FACTS; current scientific concepts WILL be mangled and twisted way beyond their formal meaning; but this is the nature of a FORUM.

If you cannot comprehend the bigger picture of what is happening on this forum and why that nature of the communication, is how it is, then this really is YOUR problem.

Bob.

PS. It is still frustrating as hell, but as time goes on, I'm getting better at ignoring what I don't comprehend, even if I think they are sometimes randomly linking scientific words together. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter. Take what you can, experiement, and put back what you can.

Bruce_TPU

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1437
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #517 on: June 21, 2007, 08:49:36 AM »
Posted by: kokomoj0
i simpy dont get it?


LOL 
That says it all! :)

Good night guys!

Cheers,
Bruce

bob.rennips

  • elite_member
  • Full Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 182
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #518 on: June 21, 2007, 08:53:22 AM »
@ Bob R.

HELP...please verify!!!

I did an edit of somethings:

3.5 volts input
Square Wave
7.23 Hz         <------ I have said this frequency is in the TPU because of the clues!!
OUTPUT
30.36 KV


What do I say, I am speechless!

so you put 3.5 volts in at 7 htz and got 30,000 volts out?


What was the input current and the output current?

kokomojo, put brain in gear before operating mouth!
It's clear from the last few thread posts that we're talking about the simulator.

Get off the case with the input/output stuff. It's getting boring.

At this point we're examining anomalies.
We believe that identifying and then fully utilising these anomalies will result FURTHER DOWN THE ROAD, in an overunity device.

I can categorically say that now the device is NOT OVERUNITY in its present form.





my apologies.  Just curious man...  My multisim indicates input and output.

Not sure why that is such a problem for everyone since that is how "over unity" is determined after all. 

Yeh and that is anoth4er thing that is confusing to me;  if it is not over unity how can anyone claim a "successful replication of the tpu ecd" as the title of this thread says?  i simpy dont get it?

You got a link, the text file and instructions. A 1 minute exercise. GO!

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #519 on: June 21, 2007, 09:43:12 AM »
hey koko:

Why waste the Forum space? You know this bunch of folks will not be discussing SM's TPU if we really understood what caused these anomalies. Right? You know darn well this is not a OU device, so what continue to drag the input power vs output power argument, seed and tornados? At this stage. We're all trying to pull our brains and coil winding experiments just to try to reproduce and understand these 'unknown' anomalies. What is so wrong with our efforts?

Please, try to help if you are able to or simply find yourself another playground. Is that too much to ask?

Cheers
chrisC

ForeverBlissed

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #520 on: June 21, 2007, 10:18:51 AM »
I'm a total newbee here but completely captivated by this thread.

I've downloaded all the PDF files... watched the videos, and am totally excited about this potential.

The question that I have however is simple...

Why doesn't anyone simply contact Steven Mark and ask him for help?

FB

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #521 on: June 21, 2007, 10:22:15 AM »
I'm a total newbee here but completely captivated by this thread.

I've downloaded all the PDF files... watched the videos, and am totally excited about this potential.

The question that I have however is simple...

Why doesn't anyone simply contact Steven Mark and ask him for help?

FB


@FB
Obviously you didn't read what you downloaded! Takes a few weeks to digest all this stuff. Good luck.

cheers
chrisC

z_p_e

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 651
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #522 on: June 21, 2007, 02:22:07 PM »
kokomoj0,

I would encourage you, if you are genuinly interested in the TPU, to go back, read and re-read the SM material, and formulate an interpretation of your own. This is what I have done over the past year, and it is still a work in progress.

You're intelligent, and I know that you already know the answer to some or most of your questions, but perhaps you're being a sillybugger at times with them? Give them some leeway with their terms etc. I get the sense that you want to contribute here, so keep on doing so.

The rest here, why not give koko some breathing room, take it with a grain if you must. No real harm done. Without skeptics in the world, perhaps our egos and assumptions would be out of control? It keeps us in check, and makes us go back and contemplate our results. I'm a skeptic at times too, but hopefully in a positive way...at least that is my intention.

Regards,
Darren


Bruce_TPU

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1437
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #523 on: June 21, 2007, 04:27:21 PM »
@ ZPE
I agree, and skeptics and critiques are good, even some rants, BUT NOT on this thread.  Stefan has plenty of space for another Koko thread for his rants and critiques.  There he can say his peace, etc.

@ Koko
Please start a new thread of rants and critiques.  Thank you. 
Unless you prefer "read only mode".  :)

gn0stik

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 302
Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !
« Reply #524 on: June 21, 2007, 04:46:40 PM »
Yes, Darren,

Wave watcher , Fantastic stuff, but Please do another thread! This one is for Otto and Roberto replication.

All else here, I urge you to do the replication.
You have the document??
What's stopping you?

It may not be a running generator yet but Please If have the skill its is time to do something..Common ground you know.

A walK to first base?

Before long most of  the discussions will only be relevent to those who have a little tornado...and some "seeds".

Threads  may become a bit disjointed as new people parachute in!

Great Days!!



Lindsay Mannix



please describe for us what exactly a tornado is and how one can produce it?

Is that something taken from maxwell's sets of equations?



Yes, the tornado is part of maxwell's equations.

Please Kokomo, if you have blatant disdain for what we are doing, why do you torture yourself here?



Awesome!    I guess i must have either overlooked it or we are using different text books?

Would you please be so kind as to give me the ISDN number or the title and publisher of your reference for that so I can go to the library and look it up?   Or URL i am not picky.....   I would very much appreciate it because I cannot find it in my stuff.  TIA

Then what about "kick" and "seed" and finally that long unanswered question of "how can harmonics be lined up"?

Who did the work on them, Lorentz? Faraday? Hertz? Tesla?   I have not been able to find reference to any of them either and maybe you can help me better understand what is going on here by either explaining exactly what those are or by providing me with the appropriate references so that i may do my own research and look them up for myself.   Again TIA.


No not disdain or torture at all.  i have no idea how asking for references and definitions would possibly be interpreted as disdain, do you use a different dictionary than the rest of the world?

I simply want to know what all that means before i consider winding a coil.

A kick (in the ass) is something my father did when we were naughty children.

A seed is something we planted in the garden and a plant would grown.

Harmonics is garbage as a result of the fundamental.

So you can imagine how totally confused i am when i hear all these terms thrown around that simply do not make any sense to me, so that is why i am asking.

Very simple questions i would think for researchers like yourselves. no?

Ok, seems I have misinterpreted your queries, or having called you on your mocking of us, you are now backpeddaling, either way it doesn't matter.

So, yeah, I guess you couldn't tell that I was being sarcastic as well. Maxwell's equations don't have anything about a tornado, as it's a metaphor for the spinning field that SM's devices utilize. So there won't be anything in it about that, aside from the simple relationship between electricity and magnetic fields.

For more information on spinning magnetic fields, go pop open a dc motor. Tesla's patent is 390721 I believe.

As for the seed, it's just an artifact on the scope that seems to do some interesting things when it joins up with other waveforms that are being produced. Sharp DC spikes seem to convert into sinusoidal ones. This is also a metaphor. Can you think of why someone would use seed in this scenario? The kicks are just dc spikes of a fairly large amplitude (according to otto and roberto's interpretation). (oh we believe kick is also a metaphor for a sharp spike of energy)

Did you read their doc?

Thing is, we're not completely sure what a kick is in reading SM's posts and thier docs, and after having done considerable experimentation, we know that a kick has a mechanical component, as well as an electrical one.

Try shorting battery cables to a battery. That's SM's first experiemnt givent to us.

So that's TPUOLOGY 101.

the glossary anyway.

Rich