Author Topic: Successful TPU-ECD replication ! (Read 1145508 times)

dlwammo · « **Reply #495 on:** June 21, 2007, 02:11:32 AM »

Is this anything that might help?

US Patent#: 6,496,047
One of the inventors names is "Stephen Mark" Iskander ???
Filed: June 23, 1999

SOLID STATE SWITCH WITH PULSE CONTROL

Seems rather interesting.....

Dan

z_p_e · « **Reply #496 on:** June 21, 2007, 03:20:25 AM »

For those that may be interested, below is a circuit that should work well for a harmonic divider. I specifically altered it to provide a fundamental, 2nd harmonic, and 3rd harmonic.

The frequency you put in, is the f3 (higher) frequency. f1 and f2 are generated from this.

Dave has built this circuit and verified it works. Below the circuit you will see the simulated output waveforms, which also verify it works.

Please note however, that the f2 output is 66% duty cycle, not 50%.

Darren

z_p_e · « **Reply #497 on:** June 21, 2007, 04:29:09 AM »

Quote from: ronotte on June 20, 2007, 06:44:09 PM

@Darren,

Yes, in that sense we are speaking of the same final effect which is important.

For what I've seen the 'Seed' is created by a sweet combination of the 3 frequencies and from the catalyst field produced by the Mobius loops which MUST accelerate any particles (electrons, ions...) that appear to be in the nearings (tested experimentally: if you increase the heath sink modules distance from the ring...the Seed disappears!). Then saying how is the creation process is really for now impossible. I urge every body to think about this!

Roberto

I was wondering if anyone else picked up on something Roberto said in his post above. I've highlighted the important point.

The possibility that RFI feedback from the wire loops is causing the "seeds", should not be dismissed.

I do believe this is what is causing the seeds. The effect is proximity dependant. With the FETs far enough away from the loops, the seeds disappear.

A piece of wire driven with high current transients and high frequencies, no longer is strictly a piece of wire. Inductive reactance is going to be present in the FET gate, and this coupled with the high input resistance seen looking into the Gate could be causing the artifact being labeled as "the seed".

It is quite evident from the tests done so far that there is significant RFI being radiated by the loops, which makes this hypothesis quite plausible. The large metalic surface area of the heat sinks are probably acting as good receiving antennas, and re-radiating the RFI.

See the annotated diagram below.

Regards,
Darren

c0mster · « **Reply #498 on:** June 21, 2007, 04:35:18 AM »

Also scope your Fets an look at the BEMF spikes, turn your probe to *10, those fets are getting hit hard.

I added a small cap to my primary and it increased the output of the light. Why because now the primary is acting more like a tank ctc and oscillates giving the secondary more punch.

Cam

kokomoj0 · « **Reply #499 on:** June 21, 2007, 04:43:03 AM »

Quote from: bobinaccounting on June 21, 2007, 02:04:12 AM

Quote from: MeggerMan on June 21, 2007, 12:39:44 AM
@Wavewatcher,

Here's another thought I have been having:
Maybe the three coils can setup a magnetic magnifying lens that pulls in a massive concentration of magnetic earths field from above and below the ring. This magnetic field (vortex) induces the power in the output coils of the TPU.

Thats what I said, vortexes!

so how much "massive earths magnetic flux" do you need to run a tpu?

Then does the earth just sit here and constantly resonate at 7.8htz or can it made to resonate where its resonant freq is 7.8 htz?

kokomoj0 · « **Reply #500 on:** June 21, 2007, 04:47:58 AM »

z_p_e · « **Reply #501 on:** June 21, 2007, 05:10:18 AM »

A further note to the harmonic divider circuit I posted.

I recommend you follow the outputs with a positive edge-triggered one-shot pulse generator. Make it variable pulse width and you're set. The 66% duty cycle of f2 then is of no consequence.

Darren

gn0stik · « **Reply #502 on:** June 21, 2007, 05:31:16 AM »

Quote from: kokomoj0 on June 21, 2007, 04:47:58 AM

Quote from: Mannix on June 21, 2007, 12:23:33 AM
Yes, Darren,

Wave watcher , Fantastic stuff, but Please do another thread! This one is for Otto and Roberto replication.

All else here, I urge you to do the replication.
You have the document??
What's stopping you?

It may not be a running generator yet but Please If have the skill its is time to do something..Common ground you know.

A walK to first base?

Before long most of the discussions will only be relevent to those who have a little tornado...and some "seeds".

Threads may become a bit disjointed as new people parachute in!

Great Days!!

Lindsay Mannix

please describe for us what exactly a tornado is and how one can produce it?

Is that something taken from maxwell's sets of equations?

Yes, the tornado is part of maxwell's equations.

Please Kokomo, if you have blatant disdain for what we are doing, why do you torture yourself here?

WaveWatcher · « **Reply #503 on:** June 21, 2007, 05:45:40 AM »

The opposite of distain! I did not want to take wind away from anyone. Right now I wish I kept my mouth shut.
If ANYONE wants to query me - look for a new thread. I'll make one. Don't bother asking me for info about my current project on this thread. I will not respond.
I have already started my own TPU because the amount and quality being learned here would be a great asset for my project. At some point info from mine may aid in a TPU design. If so I'll post - no need to ask for it.

The work on this thread is to important and the TPU appears likely to be a much better method to achieve same. Self-running doesn't mean squat if the thing wants to explode.

Any ideas/reports I post here will only have to do with Otto and Roberto's work or the replication thereof.

gn0stik · « **Reply #504 on:** June 21, 2007, 05:52:46 AM »

Quote from: WaveWatcher on June 21, 2007, 05:45:40 AM

The opposite of distain! I did not want to take wind away from anyone. Right now I wish I kept my mouth shut.
If ANYONE wants to query me - look for a new thread. I'll make one. Don't bother asking me for info about my current project on this thread. I will not respond.
I have already started my own TPU because the amount and quality being learned here would be a great asset for my project. At some point info from mine may aid in a TPU design. If so I'll post - no need to ask for it.

The work on this thread is to important and the TPU appears likely to be a much better method to achieve same. Self-running doesn't mean squat if the thing wants to explode.

Any ideas/reports I post here will only have to do with Otto and Roberto's work or the replication thereof.

Not you wavewatcher. Please see who I was actually quoting. I changed it to make more clear, sorry for the crossed wires. (pun intended)

I'll check your thread for sure.

Rich

WaveWatcher · « **Reply #505 on:** June 21, 2007, 05:59:28 AM »

Argh! Supposedly I have an IQ that scares folks but that doesn't mean I'm not stupid.

gn0stik · « **Reply #506 on:** June 21, 2007, 06:06:24 AM »

Quote from: WaveWatcher on June 21, 2007, 05:59:28 AM

Argh! Supposedly I have an IQ that scares folks but that doesn't mean I'm not stupid.

double negative. Man you're on a roll.

bob.rennips · « **Reply #507 on:** June 21, 2007, 07:11:29 AM »

I simulated Otto's circuit in the falstad circuit simulator app. Given the ANDed nature of the FETS, I used only one FET input.

Interesting that it came up that in ideal circumstances that the output should be 2.2 kv very sharp spikes and yes that is Kilo volts!!

Note that the sim. assumes standard transformers not air coils. Also to get this output I needed to put a small inductance rather than pure resistance across the output. This I think is fair as a standard bulb will have some inductance.

Increase this inductance and you get massive spikes.

Word of warning. This could EASILY be a simulator artifact. After all the nature of the circuit is very unusual. BUT I find it more than interesting that it simulated an ideal output of large high voltage spikes. Both high rise times and high voltage are known features of an SM devices.

Playing around with the values can easily move the circuit into infinite uncalculatable status from the simulator's perspective.

To use:

1. Goto http://www.falstad.com/circuit/
2. Open the attached text file and copy the contents.
3. Paste into the IMPORT section of the circuit simulator applet.

YOU MUST PRESS THE RESET BUTTON AFTER IMPORTING.

Cheers, Bob.

Bruce_TPU · « **Reply #508 on:** June 21, 2007, 07:53:59 AM »

@ Bob R.

HELP...please verify!!!

I did an edit of somethings:

3.5 volts input
Square Wave
7.23 Hz <------ I have said this frequency is in the TPU because of the clues!!
OUTPUT
30.36 KV

What do I say, I am speechless!

kokomoj0 · « **Reply #509 on:** June 21, 2007, 08:07:39 AM »

Quote from: btentzer on June 21, 2007, 07:53:59 AM

@ Bob R.

HELP...please verify!!!

I did an edit of somethings:

3.5 volts input
Square Wave
7.23 Hz <------ I have said this frequency is in the TPU because of the clues!!
OUTPUT
30.36 KV

What do I say, I am speechless!

so you put 3.5 volts in at 7 htz and got 30,000 volts out?

What was the input current and the output current?

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Successful TPU-ECD replication ! (Read 1145508 times)

dlwammo

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

z_p_e

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

z_p_e

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

c0mster

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

kokomoj0

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

kokomoj0

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

z_p_e

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

gn0stik

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

WaveWatcher

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

gn0stik

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

WaveWatcher

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

gn0stik

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

bob.rennips

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

Bruce_TPU

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

kokomoj0

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !