Author Topic: Successful TPU-ECD replication ! (Read 1145195 times)

Kingostewar · « **Reply #1650 on:** January 24, 2010, 12:20:57 AM »

otto, could you please tell about parameters of the input signals for your tpu-ecd setup?

i`ve build it and have got a problem with irf7307 fet: i input plus/minus 2V meander from generator, and +6V DC as supply, and got only +1V meander on the output of the IRF7307 so no amplification detected. What`s wrong?

otto · « **Reply #1651 on:** January 25, 2010, 07:13:21 AM »

Hello all,

@Kingostewar

from my square wave generators (3 of them) I have 5 - 12V square waves and feed them directly into IRFP 460 MOSFETS. Thats all.

From the power supply or battery 12V DC.

Otto

angryScientist · « **Reply #1652 on:** January 25, 2010, 07:14:34 PM »

I'm thinking that the capacitive effect, between two wires, could be the source of vibration.
From what I understand, if you put a capacitor in a magnetic field and charge it rapidly the force will not go at the same angle that it should or would rather. Where the force should be kept between the two capacitive elements, under a magnetic field it would be bent 90 degrees.
Maybe I have too much desire to build a flying saucer.

otto · « **Reply #1653 on:** February 11, 2010, 08:22:50 AM »

Hello all,

I see my document is downloaded a lot of times.

Fine, just fine.

Any comments?

It seems that the TPU "elite" is gone?

Otto

Operator · « **Reply #1654 on:** February 11, 2010, 10:04:50 AM »

Hello Otto!

I don't think the "elite" is gone. I'm sure that many people are following your ideas and searching for the solution but they're disorganized. Many people are trying to do the same things as the other already did, thus they have nothing new to post here. This is the cause of the silence. Present research style is a waste of time in general and what we need is collaboration and an accurate research plan.

As for me... At the moment my research plan consists of two general parts: 1) find a simplest "over unity" setup even if it would have efficiency factor 1,00001. 2) find a method of transforming sine wave to square wave without using of semiconductors. I will post here all the information on my experiments as soon as I find something new and significant.

otto · « **Reply #1655 on:** February 11, 2010, 10:21:21 AM »

Hello Operator,

1. maybe, just maybe to read my docu and to try it?
2. I hope you mean to convert squares into sines? This is how "mother nature works but "mother nature" cant give you squares from sines. THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE!!! And now Im again at point 1. Maybe, just maybe .....

Otto

Operator · « **Reply #1656 on:** February 11, 2010, 11:18:43 AM »

Quote from: otto on February 11, 2010, 10:21:21 AM

1. maybe, just maybe to read my docu and to try it?

I read your document many times. Should I say how much did it impress me? I take your ECD setup as the departing point. My goal is to show something simple which demonstrates "over unity" to my so serious scientific friends from a local university to get them involved. Till then they will keep considering me as another simple-minded who believes it's possible to create a perpetuum mobile. The Mark's videos doesn't mean anything to them. Why I do this? I respect their knowledge very much. I hope they could find the key.

Quote from: otto on February 11, 2010, 10:21:21 AM

2. I hope you mean to convert squares into sines? This is how "mother nature works but "mother nature" cant give you squares from sines. THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE!!!

Somehow it is possible when using semiconductors. But FETs are too slow and too noisy. I haven't tried tubes yet. On the other hand I don't see anything like tubes on the Mark's videos. That's why I think there's another way.

otto · « **Reply #1657 on:** February 11, 2010, 11:37:52 AM »

Hello all,

@Operator

Im sorry to say this but....hmmmm......your friends from a local university should find the key to a TPU??

I think youre joking!!! They will find a big NOTHING! Sorry to say this in public but.....never mind.

FETs are slow and noisy??

Youre joking all the time with me!! Ha,ha.

Not the FETS are noisy but the wrong made coils are noisy!! This is the problem.

And we are again at my previous post: maybe, just maybe....point 1 of my post.

Otto

Operator · « **Reply #1658 on:** February 11, 2010, 12:09:36 PM »

Otto,

First of all I'm not joking with you. I respect you and your work.

Concerning the big nothing... I have no doubt there still are strong individuals in science. Unfortunately my special subject has nothing to do with the field theory and quantum mechanics. I'm looking for help because I'm not disappointed in scientific people as it seems you do.

Okay. I'll build my own clone of your ECD and see everything myself, then I'll raise a topic, post pictures, etc. But what's next? Will it help anybody?

otto · « **Reply #1659 on:** February 11, 2010, 12:35:33 PM »

Operator,

dont build the ECD!! Build what you can see in my document!!

OK??

Yes, it will help people and trust me you dont need help if you have some ideas. I mean after you make just 1 of this coils and see what happens.

yes, Im deeply dissapointed with the so called scientists. The TPU exists since...at least 20 years. Do you really think that the last 10 ( or much more) years not one of the scientists was working on a TPU? At least on a theory? Yes, I think a lot of them wanted to figure out how such a device works.

Their results?

I suppose that this was the real reason why the TPU "story" was posted in public: much more people, some with a Dr. in front of their family names, some, like me, only little people.....

A TPU is something totally new. Something where the education is not important. The more TPU builders are able to think "outside the box", the better for them. Books or the internet cant help you in such a case. A lot of times posted various patents are useless. You cant find 1 word that can describe the TPU!!

What counts is your work, your tests, your ideas, your time spent on the workbench with your coils, all the time learning, learning.....

And forget that you could get help from very "clever" people.

In short, youre ALLONE, as Im the last 3 years. But...you know what??

Im happy. Yes, Im very happy.

Otto

havuhung · « **Reply #1660 on:** February 11, 2010, 02:16:42 PM »

Hello All,

@Operator

If the research work on using TPU without the vacuum tube or transistor or FET such as Transistors; no electronic circuits will enable the initial TPU can never work. In the Videoclips and photos from SM-TPU electronic circuits manufacturers have been hiding, I think so. . .

If a direction that the work of the TPU is used under principles of nuclear magnetic resonance, or in some way similar probably will again become more difficult reality.

samedsoft · « **Reply #1661 on:** February 13, 2010, 08:46:40 PM »

Dear Otto,

Can you make an updated document how to replicate your work step by step with all circuit details.

So that we focus on a standard project and then discuss further about bigger versions?

Thanks for your help to humanity!

ÐŸÐ’Ð · « **Reply #1662 on:** February 14, 2010, 11:05:24 AM »

Operator · « **Reply #1663 on:** February 14, 2010, 11:39:04 AM »

Quote from: ÐŸÐ’Ð on February 14, 2010, 11:05:24 AM

Ð ÐµÐ±ÑÑ‚Ð° Ð²ÑÐµ Ñ€Ð°Ð±Ð¾Ñ‚Ð°ÐµÑ‚!!!!! Ð’Ð½Ð¸Ð¼Ð°Ñ‚ÐµÐ»ÑŒÐ½Ð¾ Ð¿Ñ€Ð¾Ñ‡Ð¸Ñ‚Ð°Ð² Ð²ÑÑ‘ Ñ‡Ñ‚Ð¾ ÑÐ´ÐµÑÑŒ Ð½Ð°Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐ°Ð½Ð¾http://selftrans.narod.ru/v3_1/brus/brus72/brus72.html,Ð¸ Ð½ÐµÐ¼Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð¿Ð¾Ð´ÑƒÐ¼Ð°Ð² ÐºÐ°Ðº ÑÑ‚Ð¾ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ð½Ð° ÑÐ¾ÐµÐ´ÐµÐ¸Ñ‚ÑŒ Ð² ÐµÐ´Ð¸Ð½Ð¾Ðµ Ñ†ÐµÐ»Ð¾Ðµ, Ð²Ñ‹ Ð¿Ð¾Ð»ÑƒÑ‡Ð¸Ñ‚Ðµ Ñ‚Ð¾ Ñ‡Ñ‚Ð¾ Ñ…Ð¾Ñ‡ÐµÑ‚Ðµ.Ð Ð³ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ€Ð°Ñ‚Ð¾Ñ€ Ñ ÑÐµÐ¹Ñ‡Ð°Ñ Ð²Ð°Ð¼ ÑÐºÐ¸Ð½Ñƒ,Ð½Ð¾ Ñ‚Ð¾Ð»ÑŒÐºÐ¾ Ð½Ð°Ð´ Ð½Ð¸Ð¼ Ñ‚Ð¾Ð¶Ðµ Ð½Ð°Ð´Ð¾ Ð¿Ð¾Ñ€Ð°Ð±Ð¾Ñ‚Ð°Ñ‚ÑŒ,Ñ…Ð¾Ñ‚Ñ Ð¾Ð½ Ð¸ Ñ€Ð°Ð±Ð¾Ñ‚Ð°ÐµÑ‚!!!!!!

Quote from: ÐŸÐ’Ð on February 14, 2010, 11:05:24 AM

Guys!!! Everything works fine!!!!! After reading http://selftrans.narod.ru/v3_1/brus/brus72/brus72.html and a bit of thinking of how to put it all together you can finally get what you want. This is a schema of a working generator which needs some improvements nevertheless.

In my own opinion it is yet another piece of crap. I suggested him to show us a working device first.

ÐŸÐ’Ð · « **Reply #1664 on:** February 14, 2010, 11:57:08 AM »

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Successful TPU-ECD replication ! (Read 1145195 times)

Kingostewar

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

otto

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

angryScientist

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

otto

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

Operator

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

otto

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

Operator

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

otto

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

Operator

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

otto

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

havuhung

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

samedsoft

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

ÐŸÐ’Ð

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

Operator

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !

ÐŸÐ’Ð

Re: Successful TPU-ECD replication !