Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Chas Campbell free power motor  (Read 668157 times)

Offline ashtweth_nihilisti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 727
    • Panacea-BOCAF
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #915 on: October 08, 2007, 04:20:11 AM »
dear ash,
i often here conspiracy theories and no funding available for research.
have a look at this site 104 million in funding projects , many solar research even one tyrning sea plants into light crude.
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/atp_2007_awards.html
i know other projects including magnetic motors recieving multi million funding.
My question to you (I am trying to be helpful) is what is common amoungst all of them.
I feel the biggest is credability.
The second is they have valid data supporting there research
If you read the projects being funded many will have a big impact on delivering cheap alternative energy products ..one I know of reducing solar panel costs to less than 25c a watt.
Like I said, just trying to be helpful.
PS these projects are funded by the USA government
Mark

before i go , @ mark

Ask the USA government who funded Focus Fusion why there is no more funding, Credibility  can come in many ways, the death of Eugene Mallove, Suppression of Focus fusion (plus many more) and EVGRAY's death  are very creditable.

To sort through the mess [gain creditability from devices and prevent political and economic conditions] you can have a proposed granted research and development center, it doesn't take away from the fact that real free energy devices exist are suppressed and the government is [in part]  behind it.

Ask the disclosure projects 450 witnesses about the energy source in the UFO"s, and why the government wont let you know about it, ask Dan Aykroyd what happened the time his show was canceled when he was about to interview Greer. (right on the day)

Ask them why Nasa grants stopped for Eric learners device.
Go and Ask Tom Valone about Eric learner and his proton boron process

Wake up mark.


Offline markdansie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #916 on: October 08, 2007, 10:04:21 PM »
Dear Ash,
I find your comments rather emotive. Its funny how you talk about government suppression. In Australia I have seen the oppersite. yesterday the worlds largest windfarm was announced to be built in NSW and another friend of mine who started a solar company has grown from nothing to a company doing hundreds of millions of dollars owrth of business in a matter of a few months.
Surely these projects would be targets.
There is a lot of funding out there. I am of to NZ today to work on one (magnetic motor) which was funded in days for further development. I am also returning to Australia next week to review and test another electromagnetic device up in QLD. Once again if it lives up to its claims it will recieve large funding to commercialise it.
I travel the world many times a year and have yet to see any evidence of suppression first hand. In fact I see the oppersite.
I think your research institute idea is a good one, and one is being built in Australia if things go to plan next year. However there will be a screening process. As I found with many claims for OU around the world, most are based on mythology or self delusion. As can be seen, no one here has ever claimed the prize. That doesnt mean it cant be done...it just hasnt been done yet.
PS your little mate in Melbourne has proven using numerology that he is the new JC and has claims to the Throne in England. I also believed he made an ultimatium to the Australian government that if he is not made PM he will release info re his OU device to the world. Perhaps you should bring him onboard to help seek funding and as a political advisor.
well I am back to sleep now
kind regards
Mark

Offline linda933

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #917 on: October 08, 2007, 10:23:40 PM »
Dear Ash,
I find your comments rather emotive. Its funny how you talk about government suppression. In Australia I have seen the oppersite. yesterday the worlds largest windfarm was announced to be built in NSW and another friend of mine who started a solar company has grown from nothing to a company doing hundreds of millions of dollars owrth of business in a matter of a few months.
Surely these projects would be targets.
There is a lot of funding out there. I am of to NZ today to work on one (magnetic motor) which was funded in days for further development. I am also returning to Australia next week to review and test another electromagnetic device up in QLD. Once again if it lives up to its claims it will recieve large funding to commercialise it.
I travel the world many times a year and have yet to see any evidence of suppression first hand. In fact I see the oppersite.
I think your research institute idea is a good one, and one is being built in Australia if things go to plan next year. However there will be a screening process. As I found with many claims for OU around the world, most are based on mythology or self delusion. As can be seen, no one here has ever claimed the prize. That doesnt mean it cant be done...it just hasnt been done yet.
PS your little mate in Melbourne has proven using numerology that he is the new JC and has claims to the Throne in England. I also believed he made an ultimatium to the Australian government that if he is not made PM he will release info re his OU device to the world. Perhaps you should bring him onboard to help seek funding and as a political advisor.
well I am back to sleep now
kind regards
Mark

Amen, brother!  I would hope people doing serious work for humanity's future could calm down and use reason, critical thinking and good scientific method to carefully evaluate where best to place their efforts and resources.  Too many, it seems, are easily distracted by every unsound claimant in their zeal to promote their own endeavors. 

Thankfully, there are groups like the NEC who take science and use it as a tool rather than as a demonic plague to be avoided.  Keep up the good work, Mark, and keep stripping away the chaff.  I know and you know...the wheat will be found and harvested.

Linda

Offline ashtweth_nihilisti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 727
    • Panacea-BOCAF
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #918 on: October 09, 2007, 02:46:41 AM »
I came back to see if this user was removed as i have a personal message ,

it seems its still time wasting here.i don't think its funny mark , so don't get on your high horse and think energy suppression , the disclosure project and or focus fusion is FUNNY MATE,  because you are going to discredit your self. You cant refute that can you,

instead of telling me the disclosure project and focus fusion are real (try and refute that asshole)

you state

"PS your little mate in Melbourne has proven using numerology that he is the new JC and has claims to the Throne in England. I also believed he made an ultimatium to the Australian government that if he is not made PM he will release info re his OU device to the world. Perhaps you should bring him onboard to help seek funding and as a political advisor."

For malice Mark, who do you think your fooling mate.

And whilst i am at it, don't call a person i am investigating my little mate, and thirdly, i don't care what you think about panaceas concept Mark, good luck with your investments. i hope you think of me when your shares crash.

money subjugation and the status Quo are the weakest links Mark, you will see natural selection in your life time.Some one who thinks energy suppression isn't real, is in my suspicious books
Mark, so i will keep my eye on you , you wont get any where near any thing we are doing.

off the record i think personally your full of shit, and i don't trust you mate or need to, so your comments take you no where, and i will tell you nothing and take you no where.

who ever has request you can email me.

this banned user who goes back and edits its post is still rife here i dont have time for these threads any more.

Ashtweth



Offline tomd000

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 47
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #919 on: October 10, 2007, 08:32:40 AM »
@Mark
   If there are so many funds available for alternative green energy what happened to Zhengrong Shi?

"That PhD - and subsequent work with his professors Martin Green and Stuart Wenham created a breakthrough for the viability of solar energy. But rather than start his revolutionary industry here he was lured to China with the promise of start-up funding and government assistance. The opportunity to keep Zhengrong Shi and the burgeoning industry in this country was lost as former NSW Premier Bob Carr laments."

http://sunday.ninemsn.com.au/sunday/feature_stories/article_2321.asp

I can't see how the Australian Govt. would be keen on funding anything that may jepodise all those export $'s. Australia has the largest deposits of coal in the world.

What has happened to the "hot rock" technology? I don't hear anything about that also. It was supposed to have a lot of potential.

Some months ago there was a feature story on tv about somebody involved with a solar cells who was moving to California to set up as he couldn't get enough interest here in Australia. The governator welcomed him with open arms.
« Last Edit: October 10, 2007, 08:59:33 AM by tomd000 »

Offline Freezer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 414
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #920 on: October 10, 2007, 02:59:20 PM »
Any ideas or suggestions would be welcomed.  I want to also incorporate other bessler wheel ideas into the same design somehow.  The section on top would be driven by gears, to rotate and pull the ball out of the sticky spot.

http://www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.com/magneticExp/adsitt/section2.htm

(http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/2742/wheel1jw9.jpg)

More ideas to come..
« Last Edit: October 10, 2007, 03:53:13 PM by Freezer »

Offline Jason

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #921 on: October 12, 2007, 05:51:40 AM »
Speaking of magnets, I was looking at an old foot powered sewing machine and came up with this design. I do not know how to make computer designs yet so I drew it by hand. I like the stair magnet design but I believe cylinders would be more weighty to create more torque. Jason

(http://)

Offline markdansie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #922 on: October 15, 2007, 11:25:36 PM »
Dear Stefan,
You were quick to kick of Humbugger, I would like you comments on these posts by Ash
"off the record i think personally your full of shit, and i don't trust you mate or need to, so your comments take you no where, and i will tell you nothing and take you no where."
"instead of telling me the disclosure project and focus fusion are real (try and refute that asshole)"
"Mark, so i will keep my eye on you "
I am always polite and sometimes challenging in my posts. I do work full time in researching energy claims (currently in New Zealand).
I feel Ash has brought a lot of discredit to himself and if he is demanding I be removed, on what grounds?
I have always had an open mind to new energy projects, but unless they are repeatable and have the ability to be reproduced by others I see little value. Often as in the case of Ash, claims are sensationalised and when no evidence, or when data is available, it comes down to conspiracy theories.
Many great technologies are being developed in solar and wind (have a look at freeenergynews) and I wills soon be returning to The USA where a project is being developed that has already been proven to reduce pollution and increase fuel economy 200 to 300%.
I also am the Real Mark Dansie Ash. I am a resident of Caniaba NSW and if you want to see if I am real I will be at Brisbane Airport on Wednesday at 3:35 pm arriving from NZ.
Next week I have been invited to test an electro magnetic device in QLD and will post my results at the NEC.
So Stefan ..are you going to play an even hand on this matter or are you going to allow the behaviour that Ash has exhibited to continue.
Kind Regards
Mark Dansie


Offline markdansie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #923 on: October 15, 2007, 11:32:50 PM »
@tomd000
You are correct in the government in Australia lets many projects slip away. However a lot of private money has been invested. The Silver solar cells in South Australia recieved $1 govt money and $20 private. I also know of another solar company recieved $38 last year private money.
the Hot Rocks is as far as I know still progressing.
I do not have info on all projects but i do know billions world wide are being invested in technologies like solar , wind and wave. there is one possible OU project out of Hungary that has recently recieved 40 million to continue.
You make a good point and I am sure many technologies still fall through the cracks...this is a shame. On the otherhand there are a lot of fraudsters out there that make it hard for the real developers. If data can be presented to support claims made by any techniology and its repeatable it is a lot easier to find funding.
Thank you for your comments and bringing those to my attention.
Kind Regards
Mark

Offline linda933

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #924 on: November 07, 2007, 12:45:50 AM »
From the Lawrence Tseung thread:

Participating in the AERO competition

I have discussion with Mr. Tseung on possibly participating in the AERO competition. The products that are already supported by the Chinese government (Wang, Liang, Tsing Hua, Chao etc.) will need government approval.

Quote
from Patrick Kelly
The ready-made product is the Chas Campbell electricity magnifier.   Just a brief note
to let you know that in the last two or three days, Chas has confirmed the excess energy in his system by letting it get up to speed and then disconnecting the motor from the mains and plugging it into the output generator, making it self-powered.

He says that the speed maintains perfectly well and he has put a 75-watt lamp on it as an extra load.  This is COP = infinity as the user's input power is zero while the output power is either 75 watts or 825 watts depending on how you view it.
 

We may be able to work with Chas Campbell, Gaby, Ash, Kelly and others to produce a prototype that can meet the requirement of the AERO competition.

It should be fun! US$ 200K plus USD $5million for the next two years is incentive enough for me. 8) ;D ;) :)
 
Forever Yuen



Interesting that $5,200,000 US isn't enough to get Patrick Kelly, Ashtweth, Gaby and Charles to even respond to your suggestion!  Could it be that the "news" of Charles Campbell now having a self-running machine that produces excess power is another big fat delusion? 

If there were any substance to this third-hand report, one might think it would raise a response or two!  Where is the excitement?  The hoopla?  Better yet...where are the corroborating reports and videos? 

This sounds like a good time for Mark Dansie to visit Charles and check it out, maybe.  Or has everyone lost all belief in the non-credible claims and fourth-party reports of this motley crew?

Linda

Offline zero

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 149
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #925 on: November 07, 2007, 09:18:26 AM »
Hmm,
 
 Maybe some dont like the Idea of Selling Out their fellow brothers and sisters.

 Some people do have a conscience.

Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8012
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #926 on: November 07, 2007, 10:42:29 AM »
This the last message I received from Chas:

From: chas campbell
To: Patrick Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 12:37 PM
Subject: simple test

Patrick as I told you in a recent e mail as soon as posiable I would build a unit to test using your simple idea , I am now delighted to let you know the results were as follows using the same .075 motor that has a speed of 1430 RPM and driving my 3.5 KVA alternator I was able to loop the motor back to one of the outlets on the alternator without loosing any speed I was then able to plug into the second outlet a bed lamp with a 75w bulb and yes they both  worked.The unit I assembled has a flywheel that is unbalanced as a mater of fact its like standing in front of a fan, one of the bearings over heated and no mater how I tried I could not stop the belt slipping on the motor . so a hell of a lot of improvments could be made. I do hope you will continue to show interest in my project and any simple advice you can give me would be wellcome .Chas   

Offline wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #927 on: November 07, 2007, 09:03:37 PM »
Does anyone know what simple idea Chas is talking about? I am scheduling my builld of my Alernative design #2 - The 3-6-9- unit in January 2008 so any other info that can help this would be great.

Offline weri812

  • TPU-Elite
  • Full Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 161
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #928 on: November 08, 2007, 07:32:37 PM »
to ALL

I noticed in the pulley flywheel setup  that the rpm on Alternative design #2 - The 3-6-9- unit

are wrong the 6-9 pulley at B runs at only one speed   see picture
the same with 6-9 at D   and 3-6 on flywheel
 so if you start with the  generator speed then  calculate the speeds going backwards
then you wind up with the speed of the motor that you will need.  By the way the gen set needs about 15hp minimum to work.  I do have the gen  and will  get  bearings and pulleys  at a later date and try to make this work.    AND if I am wrong on my  figures   please speak up.
I am no expert.  If need be  email here (weri812 at aol.com)

thanks
wer

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #929 on: November 09, 2007, 03:28:36 AM »
This the last message I received from Chas:

From: chas campbell
To: Patrick Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 12:37 PM
Subject: simple test

Patrick as I told you in a recent e mail as soon as posiable I would build a unit to test using your simple idea , I am now delighted to let you know the results were as follows using the same .075 motor that has a speed of 1430 RPM and driving my 3.5 KVA alternator I was able to loop the motor back to one of the outlets on the alternator without loosing any speed I was then able to plug into the second outlet a bed lamp with a 75w bulb and yes they both  worked.The unit I assembled has a flywheel that is unbalanced as a mater of fact its like standing in front of a fan, one of the bearings over heated and no mater how I tried I could not stop the belt slipping on the motor . so a hell of a lot of improvments could be made. I do hope you will continue to show interest in my project and any simple advice  you can give me would be wellcome .Chas   

We are doing a number of things to help Chas.

(1) Reproducing his unbalanced device in China.  The Lee-Tseung theory already predicts that unbalanced rotation can lead out gravitational energy.  Chas confirmed it.  It is now a matter of multiple replication.

(2) Giving Chas a bearing that can stand high overheating without deforming.  This bearing is another invention of Wang Shum Ho who met similar problems.  The bearing essentially has multiple slits on the outer cylinder allowing for the metal to expand. 

(3) The over-heating of the bearing is a demonstration of the Lead Out gravitational energy having nowhere to go in the system.  Thus the external load could be appropriately increased.  We are optimistic on meeting the AERO competition requirement of 72 hours with 1KW output - even with the existing Chas device.

This post will be repeated in the Lee-Tseung Lead Out theory thread.  Please post your comments there.

Lawrence Tseung
Helping Chas win the AERO competition Leads Out International Cooperation.