Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Chas Campbell free power motor  (Read 721577 times)

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #1050 on: November 04, 2015, 04:21:46 AM »
if that flywheel is accelerating faster than 9.8m/s/s, then energy
can be extracted from this system..

energy extracted from where? from the gravitational effect on the down side of the flywheel?
What happens on the up side?
one half is going up, that takes away from the side going down to = 0
no matter how fast it turns. the equation holds true even down to the picosecond.
10,000,000 RPM, and its still the same.
up + down = 0
E = mgh
Pi r round  ( or are they squared?)

seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 991
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #1051 on: November 04, 2015, 04:26:14 AM »
well just recently in the news an engineer invented this new motor that
uses 30 % less power than any other motor on the planet..so which motor is 90% efficient.
the one that this guy just invented or the one that you allege is 90 % efficient..

seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 991
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #1052 on: November 04, 2015, 04:31:19 AM »
energy can not be created but can be extracted , converted, transform, transmitted and stored.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Taj4VA1L_vw just for your own enjoyment..

hoppfield

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #1053 on: November 04, 2015, 04:32:50 AM »
energy extracted from where? from the gravitational effect on the down side of the flywheel?
What happens on the up side?
one half is going up, that takes away from the side going down to = 0
no matter how fast it turns. the equation holds true even down to the picosecond.
10,000,000 RPM, and its still the same.
up + down = 0
E = mgh
Pi r round  ( or are they squared?)

  Can I have some fun with you sm0ky2 ? There are misperceptions in science. You seem to have missed them.
 Flywheels will never gain an advantage. This means everything you posted is redundant. A flywheel is basically an inanimate object yet you have some knowledge that the rest of us have missed.
  On the other hand, over unity is a process. It is a transfer of energy. The laws of physics can not be violated. In any instance, heat is related to kinetic energy. In your post, I saw no such reference.
 It is possible that a flywheel has it's uses. I just can't tell someone not to consider something.

seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 991
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #1054 on: November 04, 2015, 04:36:55 AM »
so if one goes into outer space out of earth bound gravity and one spin a flywheel
will it eventually stop.

hoppfield

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #1055 on: November 04, 2015, 04:48:18 AM »
so if one goes into outer space out of earth bound gravity and one spin a flywheel
will it eventually stop.

  It will. There is what scientists call the 5th Element which might be nothing more than those zippy little neutrinos.
 They have what is called the Cosmological model which is wrong. The basic reason why is that stars (suns) are moving faster through the universe than physics allows for. Basically, they should have suffered catastrophic failure but haven't.
  With a flywheel, it transfers energy. An early example of this is the term "balls out". This refers to generator at max rpm's using 2 weighted balls to control their RPM. This was in the days of dc power.
 The basic difference between ac and dc power is distance. C power suffers a high entropy rate and is still used in poor economies.
 With ac power, it is more expensive but suffers a lower rate of entropy over greater distances. There are other factors that decide whether an economy should use ac or dc power but that is a different subject.

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #1056 on: November 04, 2015, 04:59:39 AM »
@seychelles: "well just recently in the news an engineer invented this new motor that uses 30 % less power than any other motor on the planet..so which motor is 90% efficient.the one that this guy just invented or the one that you allege is 90 % efficient." if you are referring to the Keppe motor, then you are mistaken. If not, please give the name of the inventor.

a flywheel is passive, i.e. it STORES energy that was put into it; that energy can be extracted, but no more.

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #1057 on: November 04, 2015, 05:45:09 AM »
If you go through my prrio posts, I have linked many videos, let me gather them again.

Many videos, from many people. Some are HUGE and very expensive.. 100,000$ +.

Money talks to me more than forum people with no money.

Some people, seem to think this is worth spending money on.

I say its worth investigating. Nice work Jeg.

There is not much theory out there, regarding this flywheel effect, here is one of the major ones.

Is there more out there?

http://www.resonantfractals.org/Magnetism/Flywheel.htm

hoppfield

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #1058 on: November 04, 2015, 06:16:27 AM »
 this is the gravity part of the forum. If you guys missed this, who knows what else you have missed. I doubt it matters much, you know details.

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #1059 on: November 04, 2015, 07:14:27 AM »
eka elektirik

AG energy

Technokontrol

These 3 startups, has huge builds.

Smaller builds, too many to mention.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoyDX0A02gw

This one from bangladesh, is interresting.

Perhaps the goal is to create some kind of resonance of impulses within the belt. BY making the power input disconnect and reconnect somehow, or have a double pulley with really shitty connection and bumps.. The motor can be seen as a drag if we depower it, the conection can also be bumpy or eccentric. Not the flywheel, I dont suggest eccentric theory of flywheel, but you may try, From what I see of claimed working device I see no eccentricity of flywheel itself.

Exept for Pejic on his prototype bycicle,, but that seems to dissapear in his metal box.

As Krstan was telling.

Ag energies, use hydraulic input power, box that seems to be loose big flywheel, BIG shaking, box is getting pummeled.

A hydraulic Osillator of some sort,  there is the deliberate looseness of the chain, the box had very shaky structure. Technokontrol, almost identical.


ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #1060 on: November 04, 2015, 07:38:19 AM »
If you are very smart, you can guess whats in that sealed box.

Me I know, whats in there, I think I know, not really secret its analogous  to the pulley build I have been studying Hydraulics alot lately and paying careful attention to these 2 videos.

Hydraulics better.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCkID5jDZks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkbeTlqlLr4

You need money for hydraulics, these guys had big bucks invested lol.

Do you even know the price of all these machined parts? Could you even left this stuff around to even make this thing?

Frank2025

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #1061 on: December 30, 2015, 07:45:55 PM »
Hi, somebody of you could replicate the chas campbell system?

Frank2025

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #1062 on: December 30, 2015, 09:09:57 PM »
Hi somebody of you could replicate the chas campbell?

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #1063 on: December 30, 2015, 09:25:13 PM »
Replicate, yes; produce OU, no.

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Chas Campbell free power motor
« Reply #1064 on: December 30, 2015, 10:38:49 PM »
the original Chas Campbell wheel was a giant mechanism with rolling balla to off-set the center of gravity.
After that idea was hammered into the ground and proven to be invalid,.. these flywheels started coming into play.

Now, the same man once again "stumbles" upon a working prototype, which no one has yet to observe definitively in operation

ok, let's for a minute ignore the obvious violation of a conservative gravitational field theory.
and ponder the situation(s) where this may be possible.

Now, I've gone around and around (haha) with this concept for several years and the only solution I can come up with is as follows::


Let us suppose a flywheel has a minor cyclical perturbation.
an imbalance, that causes the wheel to wobble or vibrate.

and let us further suppose that the vector of this vibration is only allowed to propagate along the horizontal axis.
We shall further define this motion to be to the left and right of the center of rotation (looking into the axis)

This will behave similar to a gyro in motion along a horizontal axis. There will be an upward force counter to the gravitational.
two other things occur, momentarily - gravitationally induced friction on the axle is reduced.
                                                       and tension on any belts is also reduced for a moment.

Now, if there were an addition of an offset weight placed near the rim of the wheel
in the right location, to be in phase with the axial vibrations, such that it may exploit these factors
and as well as the physical offset to the (avg) center of rotation during the right gravitational moments.
what I mean by that is, let's take the simplest example, where frequency of the vibrations of the axle are 2x the rpm.
for instance: if the wheel was rotating clockwise to your perspective, the offset weight would be in the
lower-left quadrant during the time when the axial-vibration is moving to the right.
the offset weight moves into the upper-left quadrant while the axle shifts left.
the weight is in the upper-right quadrant while the axle shifts to the right again.
and the weight is in the lower-right quadrant when the axle shifts back to the left.

This is the only scenario I can come up with where momentum (from our perspective), could still be at a rate in which OU could be possible.

in reality, performing any one of these things is a feat of engineering.
Doing all of them at once, in phase with one another - that may be for a NASA laboratory, not some guys garage....