Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Matter is made of waves - insights into spherical standing waves -animations too  (Read 8754 times)

bob.rennips

  • elite_member
  • Full Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 182
http://www.glafreniere.com/matter.htm

The above document is a mine of information. We know in the TPU that there is an interaction of waves. Steven marks has talked about two spherical fields rotating. We have discuseed standing waves, colliding waves etc. etc.

If only to looks at all the animations it will be well worth your while browsing through these pages. As they say one picture is worth a thousand words. In this case 1 animation is worth a thousand pictures.

If you scroll down to the bottom of the main page I found the sections on:

planee standing waves, Spherical standing waves and magnetic fields to be incredibly fascinating.

There is one part that says, and I'm paraphrasing here, as I can't find the exact page yet. Standing waves will absorb energy from transverse waves- the lens effect is what he called it. He postulates that this is how the electron (which is considered a wave) keeps going, by absorbing energy from the ether waves.

So fast forward to TPU land. What if Steven Marks is setting up a magnetic standing wave, that has the precise frequencies to ABSORB energy from say ... magnetic field of the earth, or shcumann resonance ????

gn0stik

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 302
Sounds interesting bob. I'll go read up.

gn0stik

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 302
Ahh, yes. I've read this before. Very interesting stuff. He goes into detail about of a lot of stuff that Bearden writes has written about without being too heavy on the math. Excellent site.

ronotte

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 417
Hey, it's a great reading...THANK for it.

ronotte

Darth Vader

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
hello, Bob Rennips.

that is amazing, it also explains the enormous heating due to the magnetron effect.

D.

d3adp00l

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 442
A physical example of this energy absorbtion would be a transverse wave caused in a piston motor and the wave structure of a turning crank.

But I am still not convinced. A little better description than, "and that explains gravity" when I had not seen anything about gravity until that time. For all he know it could be a particle causing that wave he speaks of. I still stick to my thoguhts, gravity is a net result of weak nuclear interaction, em is the result or strong nuclear interaction. Light is something (probably an electron) traveling faster than the speed of light which leaves a wave length equal to the distance it travels above the speed of light for 1 chronon, for that duration of time it acts like a single entity in that distance (like a wire) and since it has charge and that charge is based on spin, the charge changes in the above mentioned distance and therefore has both electric and magnetic properties. Now figuring if that charge it truely magnetic and giving off electric, or if its electric and giving off magnetic, and how that gives us the properties of matter that the elements exhibit, well I havn't gotten that far yet.
But it is very much worth reading.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2007, 08:41:08 AM by d3adp00l »

bob.rennips

  • elite_member
  • Full Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 182
deadpool - cant say I'm entirely convinced by the arguments put forth in the paper. BUT I guess it's a hard balance between writing something that only a handful of people could understand and 'dumbing down' to some extent to make it more accessible. In quite a few places he lost me on where he was going but I feel I now have a better grip on how different waves interact -  it has definitely improved my visualisation. Hopefully a few weeks and I'll understand more.


d3adp00l

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 442
One point that I am trying to build in my mind is this. A spherical wave, if the wave is sperical then the wave type must be longitudinal waves. Similar to sound waves, not saying that anyone is right or wrong here, but as it stands the "standard model" defines light as two transverse wave going the same direction and on planes 90 degrees out from the other. Next big question is how does subatomic particles like quarks etc come into play. I will be reading a few times no doubt,(when I don't have a 102 fever and can actually think).

But I do enjoy the point that matter isn't matter at all. Like the greeks straped to the bench watching the shadows on the wall, our reality could be an illusion of sorts. I definity can't say he's right/wrong, but to say that all the interactions of everything in the universe is an ultra microscale example of pulsating emf fields would be fine by me.

By the way just to clarify, I believe the "standard model" is an overcomplicated convolusion of guesses, that needs to complicated itself more to explain things yet unexplained. Our dear friends the math/physist need to be able to let go of old dogma and try again. Every great step have done just that, and it is usually more simple than the previous theorys.