Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU  (Read 279923 times)

mflynn44

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU
« Reply #30 on: April 19, 2007, 03:26:48 PM »
Pardon, mosfet connected this way?

I see in Otto's drawing that the side of the lamp not connected through the 50 turn coil to the IRF840 is connected to +12 volts while your drawing shows the lamp connected to -12 volts. Your MOSFET is correct but the circuit won't work as you drew it.
« Last Edit: April 19, 2007, 03:48:33 PM by mflynn44 »

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU
« Reply #31 on: April 19, 2007, 04:34:24 PM »
...

Here you have a link that somone of you alreday postet not so long ago.

http://magnetism.fateback.com

With this link and my little 50 turn control coil youre now able to built a 100W TPU.

...

Otto

http://magnetism.fateback.com/Overunity.htm

(Maybe Turbo's TPU really did work after all.)

(EMDevices tried like hell to get everyone to look at NMR.)

Nice article - pretty much sums it all up. 

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU
« Reply #32 on: April 19, 2007, 05:31:38 PM »
.


« Last Edit: April 20, 2007, 01:59:36 AM by innovation_station »

Rosphere

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 482
Re: Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU
« Reply #33 on: April 19, 2007, 06:16:24 PM »
I would like to help Otto by sharing a little information for those of us trying to replicate this test.

Today I drove to my special electronics parts store.  I was told that IRF840 is now NTE2385.  The package says, "replaces ECG2385."  So I asked the nice lady behind the counter to allow me to look at her cross reference information catalog.  There it was, IRF840 = NTE2385.

By the way, I was told the part would cost me less than $2.00.  I planned to buy six.  However, it was actually over $7.00.  I purchased only two.

FYI-Rosphere

Rosphere

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 482
Re: Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU
« Reply #34 on: April 19, 2007, 08:40:17 PM »
Dont ask me, just follow!!!!
You dont see anything in my pictures, dont understand what I want, to be short youre ignoring me!!! OK.
Because Im really tired I dont want to respond for a while. DONT ASK ME ANYTHING. I WILL NOT RESPOND.

Let me know when you feel like communicating.

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU
« Reply #35 on: April 19, 2007, 08:44:18 PM »

.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2007, 02:01:13 AM by innovation_station »

gn0stik

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 302
Re: Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU
« Reply #36 on: April 20, 2007, 01:01:57 AM »
.removed
« Last Edit: April 20, 2007, 07:18:40 PM by gn0stik »

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU
« Reply #37 on: April 20, 2007, 01:57:24 AM »


.




« Last Edit: April 20, 2007, 07:49:22 PM by innovation_station »

gn0stik

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 302
Re: Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU
« Reply #38 on: April 20, 2007, 03:49:10 AM »
Not offended, annoyed. I'm sorry if I made you feel bad. I sometimes post without thinking it through, my temper gets the best of me on occasion. 

Again, Otto, sorry for derailing.

sulake

  • Guest
Re: Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU
« Reply #39 on: April 20, 2007, 11:05:55 AM »
Quote
IN FRONT OF YOUR NOSES IS A 5W TPU!!!!!!

There's no doubt of the power cause the bulb is glowing, but the 5W of electrical energy comes straight from the electric company and your paying every electron of it  ;D
Please, let's not try to make them any richer.

Did I just wasted 2.24 merers of expensive copper wire?
(http://www.jarkonkotisivu.org/temp/50rounds.jpg)

rensseak

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
Re: Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU
« Reply #40 on: April 20, 2007, 11:37:54 AM »
Quote
IN FRONT OF YOUR NOSES IS A 5W TPU!!!!!!

There's no doubt of the power cause the bulb is glowing, but the 5W of electrical energy comes straight from the electric company and your paying every electron of it  ;D
Please, let's not try to make them any richer.

Did I just wasted 2.24 merers of expensive copper wire?
(http://www.jarkonkotisivu.org/temp/50rounds.jpg)

can you please also explain why and how if there is no connection to the grid?

Mannix

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 564
Re: Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU
« Reply #41 on: April 20, 2007, 11:51:33 AM »
Quote
IN FRONT OF YOUR NOSES IS A 5W TPU!!!!!!

There's no doubt of the power cause the bulb is glowing, but the 5W of electrical energy comes straight from the electric company and your paying every electron of it  ;D
Please, let's not try to make them any richer.

Did I just wasted 2.24 merers of expensive copper wire?
(http://www.jarkonkotisivu.org/temp/50rounds.jpg)

Fantastic mate...we have been at this for years..now .because something is wrong with your results..we can all go home..LOL

Seriously.. have a look at Ottos picture then have a look at yours..see any thing different? did you change anything?

Did you apply your great experience and make an even better one?

This is what happens over and over ..its not just you and it is not personal I really do not mean offense..but what happens when we get to the Dangerous stage? which is not far off.

Thanks for sharing your results and picture, it is important to get thru this point..got any twin flex?  is the fet an irf840?

notice any sweet spots? tune very very slowly now..there is a delay .no ?then you could try a few things .direction of wind... I noticed a pot...what 4?

Please try again if you are willing.

Rosphere

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 482
Re: Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU
« Reply #42 on: April 20, 2007, 04:33:13 PM »
...have a look at Ottos picture then have a look at yours..see any thing different? did you change anything?

Sulake,

I think what Mannix means is the bit you have routed through the coil.  If you look at Otto's picture you will see a pair of stranded wires running through the coil.  Otto wrote, and you can see from his photos, that one of the pair is not connected to anything at all.

I slipped my coil off this wire pair during testing and it seemed to make no difference in my output.

Also, my batteries got very hot and today I find them both down a volt from yesterday.

I tried to replicate it as best as I could.  I have no idea if my replication is any better or worse than yours as I have received no feedback.  If you saw Monty Python's, Life of Brian movie you will remember the two prisoners where one was spat at in the face by the guard and the other prisoner was going on about how lucky he was to be spat at: "You lucky bastard!  You must be the guards pet then.  He never spat in my face!"  :D

Hang in there, man!

Rosphere--Questing, Stumbling

gn0stik

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 302
Re: Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU
« Reply #43 on: April 20, 2007, 07:36:43 PM »
Jason was again our hands last night. Mostly though we just sat, and listened and watched as he worked. He didn't really need any of our suggestions last night.

What he did. (I should probably let this come from the horse's mouth, but no post as of yet)

He built the circuit to the exact specs of ottos suggestions (what we have anyway). IRF840 50 turns magnet wire around a stranded collector. Connections made as per Otto's diagram.

Absolutely nothing. Low voltage, low lumins on bulb, if any. Three sets of eyes watching, everything seemed right. We got the same wave form, which IS an odd wave form, with the spike at the LEADING edge of the wave, that in itself is odd.

We swept the frequencies however, and found nothing of any real interest at specific frequencies. PS would not light the bulb, with or without the circuit. Not sure what we did wrong. A couple of people seem to be absolutely positive that it works, so any suggestions would be helpful. What we would like to know are values for

Frequency
Pulse Width
Power supply settings

Really, we need better documentation.

Experiment failed. Wailing and gnashing of teeth ensued.

So since it was such a short gathering, he decided to play with the circuit a bit since the short experiment was over, and we couldn't get it to work with the information we have presently. he set a cap in series with the bulb, the bulb glowed dimly, and played with the frequency a bit. At around 400khz it got a little bit brighter. About 4w output. However at the PS we noticed more current being drawn. No OU. It did give us a start though for a minute.

Strange thing about all this. At the beginning of the experiment, he tested the bulb at the power supply to see if it would light. No. then we got it to light in the circuit. Took it back out and re tested it at the PS again. AND IT LIT. Whisky Tango Foxtrot?

So he reconnected it in the circuit, and it was actually dimmer than at the PS.

This is with the cap in series however, which does not represent Otto's circuit.

This is all a very brief explanation so I don't write too much and bore people to death.

We need to know more about how this is done.. Better documentation, in order to reproduce the results. I'm sure we'd be willing to give it another go, as it's a simple and quick test.

JDO, or GK, if I made any mistakes in my recount of last nights events feel free to correct me.

Regards all,
Rich


gn0stik

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 302
Re: Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU
« Reply #44 on: April 20, 2007, 07:43:32 PM »
Oh, another quick note, we tried moving the lamp wire coil outside of the 50 turn loop and the bulb lit exactly the same. No apparent difference.

Just a note.

Rich