Hi all,

Bob Teal had the most advanced electric motor in the world that produced STRONG mechanical work (torque). The missing interview will be exclusively hosted here:
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy-alternative-energy-technologies/

Check out the thread:
"Bob Teal - Missing interview finally surfaces after decades of searching"

Also, a full length documentary TELLING ALL is soon to be released and it isn't holding anything back. You can guess who produced it.

Zero CEMF in the circut, high torque and COP of 4.0 to 8.0 COP!! Crossing this with Bedini's method for recapturing energy, you have the ultimate machine. High torque, high energy recapture, etc...

Only registered users of that forum will be able to see the free missing interview that also has mention of the full feature documentary.

You will learn everything that IS NOT in the patents!

http://www.esmhome.org/library/bob-teal/bob-teal-interview.html

Regards

Sean.

Here are also the 2 patents for download and the video
for download as WMV file:

http://www.free-energy.ws/bob-teal.html

Dr. Lindeman seems to sell a DVD now about it for around 30 US$.

The basic pronciple is the Newman principle.

I just had a look at the 2 patents.

A battery is used to pulse coils via mechanical switches and
then the BackEMF is used, as in Joseph Newman?s case, to drive
additional loads, like incandescent bulbs.
As the magnets inside the coils are attracted, there is
also a mechanical output , so the device also works as a motor.

As he stops the current flow from the battery to the coils immediately
via the mechanical switch, the Back EMF is charging up a capacitor
parallel across the switch and parallel to the cap are light bulbs as loads.

In Newman?s case , Newman  just does not use a capacitor in earlier designs,
but he just lets  the BackEMF jump via his commutator switch back to the
battery and use this sparking current to recharge the battery and
have in series incandescent bulbs, which then also light up
due to the RF current burst when the spark jumps and this pulses current
back to the battery.

As the magnets move inside the coils this will even enhance the
BackEMF as when the switch opens the coils are floating
and the still moving magnets induce a dB/dt into the floating
coils, which will increase the BackEMF voltage and energy.

All in all the whole output energy ( mechanical + electrical plus
wiring heating) will be more than the inputed electrical energy.

So the COP is > 1.

Regards, Stefan.

Lindemann Rotary Attraction Motor based on Bob Teal's attraction concepts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMzSzChCkrM

anyone going to replicate this and share?

I'm surprised no one has tried replcating this.  That motor in the video is putting out more than the equivalent 8 watts input.  But why is everyone so bent on trying to get OU on one invention alone? I said it before and I'll say it again, OU will be acheived when someone puts two or more technologies together so that one technology fills in the gap where the other is lacking. Why hasn't anyone applied this to the Newman or Bedini motor? Yet?

Why to this day, hasn't anyone shown on video the effects of hooking up a generator to the out put of these motors?  Why?  It makes no sense to go through all that experimenting and not follow through with solid results.  That Linderman device that those boys put together is producing enough horsepower and RPM to run an alternator as-is, and they already have a pully right on it!  Just put a freakin' car alternator right next to it and connect it 1:1 with a belt!  I get so frustrated when inventors don't follow through. 

That's it, I'm going to do it myself if I have to.  I've already built a successful miniature newman motor but I'm not posting results until I find OU by combining these technologies and putting a generator on the other end and show more watts out than in.

Bravo more replications! wish I could go about doing this as well, but I have alot on my table. I do wonder why there are coments made about no CEMF and no induction? Obviously if he has a coil there is induction (doesnt seem to be mobius or bifillar) and CEMF which drives the piston in the other direction. im confused.

I don't know either.  Perhaps because there doesn't seem to be a magnet in that particular model so no CEMF???  I don't know. If you look at the cracked open rotor, they shaved the iron off the sides of the armature, but where's the magnet??  It seems to only work by eletro magnetism attracting the dead steel armature.  I really can't say without testing this myself, but the fact that there is no increase in current under load is what gets me.  With a lot more windings added to this design (like a Newman motor) the thing could operate on higher voltages but much lower currents.  According to Newman's theories, the more windings, the less overall input watts for the same output HP.  I say, with both technologies put together, OU is possible.  I'll have to try it myself.