Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: IMPORTANT - key ingrediant for a working TPU  (Read 26374 times)

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: IMPORTANT - key ingrediant for a working TPU
« Reply #45 on: July 04, 2007, 05:32:21 AM »
You da man, Marco!  Light that bird's ass on fire!  Yeah!

No need for mobius or bifilar unless field of collector "interferes" with that of rotation.

Dare I say that "bifilar series" (not cancelling) might make sweet RMF coils since they create a very strong field - sure can't hurt.

$#!+ - probably find antigravity instead of electricity - LOL !!!

EDIT - just for you, Marco: see attached

« Last Edit: July 04, 2007, 05:57:14 AM by Grumpy »

joe dirt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 188
Re: IMPORTANT - key ingrediant for a working TPU
« Reply #46 on: July 06, 2007, 02:37:07 AM »
Quote

the coil i am building has no mobius nor bifilar coils.

M.

Are you thinking a Flux/electric capacitor ? watch the potential energy of a cylindrical
 cap turn into kinetic-induction, maybe?

it would fit with the television story,s (if there was any, i can,t seem to find one) but
 nevertheless rotating an electric field but not discharging it (destroy the dipole) can
 this create a self organising field ? yes,

http://www.mdatechnology.net/outreach/tech_update.aspx?art=3607

 and would fit in with anomalies about the old televisions...

If anybody has a plasma globe try placing a "ring" around it, see if you can make it
 swirl around...

It seems this this guy has the same thoughts

http://home.iprimus.com.au/longhair1/chap10.htm

i don,t have the time right now to read all the posts (more long work days) but this
 site is smoking...
Good Work Gentlemen and Ladies
Dirt

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: IMPORTANT - key ingrediant for a working TPU
« Reply #47 on: July 06, 2007, 06:16:24 AM »
Hi all,
I made no smart remarks to SM.  ;)
There was the issue about not touching the ring, the cage, and the permanent damage to his fingers and hands, and the damage control circuit. Mannix replied on this issue also. I showed respect to all, stopped immediately and built the damage control ciruit and the cage. I then replaced the GK4 with a dummy load to test the damage control circuit. I have since rejumpered the coil for sequential rotational firing. I have not turned it on since then. Everything that I tested after that has been frought with danger. ;) It is so easy to do the wrong thing I now have to find the right thing to do.

--giantkiller. With great respect to all...

turbo

  • Guest
Re: IMPORTANT - key ingrediant for a working TPU
« Reply #48 on: July 06, 2007, 10:14:19 PM »
hi GK
i never understood the cage because Steven did mention it won't work in a small box.
or were you using a diffrent cage with openings in it?

Marco.

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: IMPORTANT - key ingrediant for a working TPU
« Reply #49 on: July 07, 2007, 04:49:05 AM »
hi GK
i never understood the cage because Steven did mention it won't work in a small box.
or were you using a diffrent cage with openings in it?

Marco.

Only for testing with safety, my friends.

turbo

  • Guest
Re: IMPORTANT - key ingrediant for a working TPU
« Reply #50 on: July 07, 2007, 05:55:07 AM »
i do not undestand..
if you elliminate the effect by using a box then you won't see it right?

M.

Motorcoach1

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 307
Re: IMPORTANT - key ingrediant for a working TPU
« Reply #51 on: July 07, 2007, 10:27:21 AM »
@ Marco you can use a box (Farad cage )but the effects will not be as  great or up to power,it will be without it . In the testing stage there are many harmful effects in the research that may and can hurt you !  just be aware of what your doing  and the frequencies that your working at. beee safe thats all we are saying

turbo

  • Guest
Re: IMPORTANT - key ingrediant for a working TPU
« Reply #52 on: July 07, 2007, 12:40:01 PM »
if that is true i should have been dead by now.
i tested quite alot of coils and i have never noticed anything harmfull exept for the suspected RF noise.
Pherhaps you are talking about X-rays

Marco.

Dingus Mungus

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 859
Re: IMPORTANT - key ingrediant for a working TPU
« Reply #53 on: July 10, 2007, 09:11:26 AM »
I had seen in the live tests that were done the produced RF noise disconnected USB devices 5 feet away. While I'll agree the TPU is no where near as dangerous as people are making it out to be, thats a lot of RF noise to just hang out in... Especially with sensitive equipment that we need for propper measurements. A faraday cage is a pretty good idea to insulate yourself against any RF or even microwave being produced. Altho I should point out again that I belive the size of the mesh determines the frequency bandwidth the mesh will protect against.

@Marco
Does the device recieve a external frequency?
I mean besides the powered input frequencies.
Has an energy blocking effect via cage been observed already?
A propper cage and a "kicking" ring would need to be tested to know.

I'm hoping to have a good scope and HF pulse generator here soon.
Being killing my hands winding "just for fun" coils in the mean time.

~Dingus Mungus

NewAge

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Tubes inside the TPU?
« Reply #54 on: July 14, 2007, 11:43:42 AM »
Hi!
Sorry for the interuption, but does it mean that I should put the TUBES inside the TPU? Would there be enough space for that?