Ok the situation is clarifying slowly. Thank you for posting MagnaTruth.

I still want to understand Richard's behavior. As you saw him, I think you could help us.

Why someone would create electrical-mechanical systems during one year, posting photos and talking in this forum, to finally trying to get money out of something that doesn't work? Doesn't he realize that without any proof, he won't make any money? Why is he lying? That's the main reason why I trusted Richard more than any other company creating O/U systems.

Perendev has made lots of money and never delivered anything but promises.

Sadly, there are many companies in the O/U "business" that follow their business model.

Time will tell how honorable Richard and Magnacoaster are, but his failure to remove my copyright material makes me uneasy.

Ok the situation is clarifying slowly. Thank you for posting MagnaTruth.

I still want to understand Richard's behavior. As you saw him, I think you could help us.

Why someone would create electrical-mechanical systems during one year, posting photos and talking in this forum, to finally trying to get money out of something that doesn't work? Doesn't he realize that without any proof, he won't make any money? Why is he lying? That's the main reason why I trusted Richard more than any other company creating O/U systems.

@magnacoaster  I would like to know how large each of the 4 different models will be.
Like do I need a forklift to carry the dreamhome version?
Could you post approximate size and weight for each of these units.
Thanks.

Richard

The fact is that you are using a video filmed by me on my camera for my personal use and using my voice over my specific objections and without compensating me. Copyright and other non-technical issues will be resolved in another forum.

I understand that you are not the only individual with a copyright claim against him. In fact, I believe the "Magnacoaster" logo itself has been used without permission by the copyright holder.

What I do find interesting is his reactions to critics - accusations of those having a personal vendetta against him when any form of professional accountability is requested. It seems that you have an axe to grind with him. If you look back a few pages you'll see that I am a drug addict who is in trouble with the law. Quite interesting, since I've never met the man and he can't possibly know anything about me. I know only what is available on the internet - it would be interesting to know more about what happens offline in these delusions of his.

Interesting discussions going on here! 
I just hope we get an answer soon on the question we all ask ourselves.

@All

I believe that Richard needs to step up and disclose a better video and results (measurable) and a way his device can be independantly tested by dis-interested third parties. Otherwise I feel he will go the way of the DoDo and the other non-existant OU devices.

The net result is to develop a self-fulfilling sympathetic resonance ... surrounded by an electromagnetic bubble ... and then create ... another EM bubble ... and then resonate the created bubble with that surrounding the earth.

However, this is not new at-all and something that Tesla had discovered,

Hi Funky,

I would like to learn more about this if possible.  It sounds like a small scale experiment could be performed using an inductor (coil) to create the large EM field (simulating the Earth's bubble) and another inductor to 'beat' (resonate) against it.

It sounds like a transformer with a source on each side.  Can you explain more - if not, maybe you can point me to Tesla's theories?  Perhaps I can help?

TC

P.S. I'm not worried about the MIB.

The first point I?d like to stress is the fact that in order to attain any form of over-unity, I believe you need the least amount of outside interference (i.e. : friction, heat, gaseous interaction, gravitation, magnetism, vibration) unless you explicitly use it the in the course of your energy conversion. I think that?s the idea with that air-tight container.

In any case, most of the stuff I imagined and drawn on paper is based on how to mitigate these interferences. As a matter of fact I concluded a while ago that oxygen was a major obstacle. It encourages heat and friction, so air-tight is a must if you don?t benefit from the excess energy created.

My other point is directed mostly to the ?scientific types?. I was a science maniac as a kid. But I eventually fell off the wagon, after discovering the dark side of science ? if you listen to your scientific guru for too long, what science doesn?t know, doesn?t exist. And eventually you clash with reality ? things happen but you don?t believe in them because you can?t explain them. It?s exactly the opposite of what true science is supposed to be. Instead of breeding open mindedness, it breeds the vilest of dogmas. Science is good and beneficial. Too much science is destructive.

So in conclusion I must say I don?t really care about this little soap opera of a battle you are having here. What I do mind is will this invention (even if in the end it isn?t true OU) bring down our energy bills and make this planet cleaner? What I also object to is the fact that some people waste a lot of bandwidth expecting a single answer to this problem when there are probably millions. Wise up and focus!