Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Discussion board help and admin topics => Half Baked Ideas => Topic started by: FreeEnergy on May 01, 2005, 10:42:17 PM

Title: Gravity Powered, Liquid Surface Tension Engine.
Post by: FreeEnergy on May 01, 2005, 10:42:17 PM
http://drspark.com/idea001.php
Title: Support for engine.
Post by: Charlie Brown ARN on May 02, 2005, 10:15:02 PM
I think you are demonstrating a successful perpetual motion of the second kind machine. This means a machine that absorbs ambient heat while concurrently releasing hydraulic work. This is excellent. The community of scientists should check the underlying theory. As an inventor in the audience, here's how I see it: 1) Each capillary bore is a separate thermodynamic element. 2) The terminal reservoirs, top and bottom, are single thermodynamic elements where their share is distributed over all the capillary bores they are in contact with dividing it, reducing the energy they have at each capillary bore. 3) The working fluid within the capillary bore moves at random. 4a) Moving out of the bottom, it enters a higher pressure region so it takes a higher pressure lower volume form. 4b) moving out of the top, it enters a lower pressure region so it takes a lower pressure higher volume form. 5) A net volume will therefore climb each column. 6) The output of all the capillary bores will be aggregated. 7a) Heat is absorbed in lifting a mass of fluid a working height 7b) Mechanical energy is available as the fluid recirculates downward.

I believe that nanometer scale nozzles along the capillaries will multiply the performance several thousand fold.

Aloha, Charlie
Title: Re: Gravity Powered, Liquid Surface Tension Engine.
Post by: Charlie Brown ARN on May 03, 2005, 05:23:28 AM
I am loosing confidence in my feeling that a smooth bore capillary will have a preferred direction to release fluid flow in responding to brownian motion. I need to bake that idea more. I solidly believe that each of many nanonozzles will rectify brownian motion producing a fluid flow. I would avoid particle based coloring agents in the fluid. The whole experiment should be embedded in casting resin.

Aloha, Charlie
Title: Re: Gravity Powered, Liquid Surface Tension Engine.
Post by: gfcgamer on May 12, 2005, 07:48:49 PM
Hi!. Just try to see this project now....
instead of this, we use a twin tube 1/8 in spiral dived conected in the top to a central 5' tube with 1/8 pol out on the water tank. that pull up water agains gravity.? ?oblique way(spiral) the gravity doenst affect as
Vertical water flow down in a straight big 5' tube funil 1/8 escape.

I guess it is almost the same.... But using gravity to push water up? trough Gravity pressure , sucking water trough thiner tube in spiral avoiding direct gravity.

Does this device works?
Title: Re: Gravity Powered, Liquid Surface Tension Engine.
Post by: FreeEnergy on May 14, 2005, 01:52:11 PM
more details please... :)
Title: Re: Gravity Powered, Liquid Surface Tension Engine.
Post by: FreeEnergy on June 09, 2005, 12:28:21 PM
ok
(http://)
Title: Re: Gravity Powered, Liquid Surface Tension Engine.
Post by: Jim_Mich on June 09, 2005, 04:04:16 PM
Buoyancy is caused by pressure differences between the top surface and the bottom surface of an object immersed in a liquid. For instance one foot of water will have 0.43 pounds greater pressure at the bottom than at the top. It is this pressure difference that causes buoyancy.

In a capillary tube arrangement as shown in the picture you will not have the liquid pressure difference to push the floating cord. The liquid pressure at the bottom and top of the capillary tube will be near equal.

Jim_Mich