Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Is this the first selfrunning overunity motor w/o batteries ? Mike?s motor  (Read 572537 times)

pese

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1597
    • Freie Energie und mehr ... Free energy and more ...
@all

some help to semiconductors.
in bedinis circuit are the mps8099 8599
it do not neet this special type number.

this is nothing else ordinaery chip inside
als following us or european type numbers.

(i selled over years transistor-chips to
transistor manufacturers - so i have the knowledge)

(give attention that this ony an 500mA device that
(possibly can replaced with 1Amp devices.)

Origine devices are :
US types   2N als EN MPS   2907(A) PNP   also 2905
                                     2222(A) NPN   also 2219

Euopean       BC327  PNP
                  BC337  NPN

If some ask over semiconductors ,pls use my e-mail

DMBoss

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Hey All.
I think that everyone should be focusing on getting replication information from Mike instead of asking him to do this and that test. More people need to replicate and then the questions can be divided among the working replications. As it is now poor Mike is going to have his head spinning from trying to do all the request tests. It appears now there are several people going their own way for replication without trying to duplicate exactly what Mike has done before changing the mix. This is doomed to failure. Mike appears to have a working unit so that is the best starting point instead of everyone thinking that they 'know' how it works.
..soap box on...
First there needs to be one or two moderators of a sticky post that contains exact replication information and these moderators should be the ones that can only update the post with current information. Already I see half a dozen circuit diagrams with conflicting information being posted. Which one is correct. We need a common depository of information such as wire gauge, winding resistance, size of form, magnets used, parts used, etc.... without having to read through hundreds of posts some of which are conflicting. This will also reduce the stress on Mike as everyone is asking the same questions every twenty posts. First Mikes states the resistance is 40 ohms and then it is 46 ohms of the windings. Some people think that this is trival but this can make a very big difference as it pertains to the length of wire used and the number of windings Mike put on the motor since he did not count the number of turns. At the current direction we will not have one working replication and people will be pissed at Mike when they should be pissed at themselves for not performing an exact replication. Please.. someone get this organized...
... soapbox off...

Hello:

new to this forum.  Have working O/U pulse motors on the bench... BUT don't ask for details as the work is proprietary!  Hydrocontrol above is correct, you are not asking the right questions, and not paying enough attention to the exact details of Mike's work.

A few turns the wrong way, wrong size, barium vs strontium ferrite magnets, and exact timing - any one of these parameters wrong by a small amount and your version will either not work, or work too poorly to overcome friction!

I have precise optical encoder/computer based feedback/control of Fire and Duty cycle timing of the pulses which I can change on the fly.  Resolved to 1/2 degree of mechanical motion of the rotor. You can only get a gain within a very narrow regime of timing of the FIRE [on] and DUTY[span before off] settings - IF you have everything else right.  i.e. geometry, materials, coil, core of coils etc.

Also it appears Mike has this wired inadvertently backwards based on the original scope traces.  It is not wired to be a "motor" based on the main coil trace.  The ON condition voltage should be the sum of the capacitor or battery voltage, plus the intrinsic Counter EMF being produced by the main coil as rotor turns!!!

The fact his trace shows the ON time at near zero volts, says the main coil is wired as a generator! (and applying an outside voltage to the generator mode, will then cancel the Counter EMF so to speak, and draw all the capacitor's charge out as a high current, dropping the voltage to near zero)

The exact size and radius and spacing of the magnets along with the exact material of the magnets is ultra important.  Also Bedini's drawing shows a hexagonal steel core inside the rotor magnets for flux return path, and this will interact with the coils aside from magnets too.  Has Mike used a steel core or air core for the rotor magnets?

I have a pulse motor version which can interchange coils of different wire size and turns counts.  one coil produces 105% gain and another 135% gain all things equal.  Also the "best" coil and core, and altering the magnets from 20mm dia x 40 mm long, to 25mm dia x 6 mm long alters the gain significantly too.  These changes aside from a very exact and narrow window of timing settings being required!

Ask the right questions or you will NEVER replicate this machine!  I would like to replicate it, but with a fully equipped CNC machine shop and extensive electronics and instrumentation - I am unable to even start without more detail.  Stabbing in the dark could take years and hundreds of trial and error steps.

Mike is getting in the range of 200% to 300% gain else it could not self run.  Something in his details is completely different than a "normal" pulse motor set up, as the best I have gotten so far is ~135% gain.

Cheers.

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Hi DMBoss,
great to have you here !
You are very welcome.

Yes, unfortunately Mike is a bit slow in answering questions
and we have to be patient.
He seems to have a heavy job besides his hobby,
so gets only time in the nights to play
with his "toy".

He now answered, that he will try to build a second device,
so he could replicate it himself.

I hope he will soon answer our questions to the exact
ohmic resistance of all 3 coils
and all other exact specifications.

Guys, documentation is very important.
I have lost already a circuit in a Xenon tube-
oscillator setup, where I only
realized later, that I had more gain in output,
but did change a few wires and did not note the
exact setup and later could not find anymore the exact
old setup...too bad..

so please document instantly all your circuits, so you could
later replicate it yourself.

Many thanks and be patient with Mike.

P.S: John Bedini did send me an email and will
soon present his motor on his website also.

Regards, Stefan.

DMBoss

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27

Also it appears Mike has this wired inadvertently backwards based on the original scope traces.  It is not wired to be a "motor" based on the main coil trace.  The ON condition voltage should be the sum of the capacitor or battery voltage, plus the intrinsic Counter EMF being produced by the main coil as rotor turns!!!

The fact his trace shows the ON time at near zero volts, says the main coil is wired as a generator! (and applying an outside voltage to the generator mode, will then cancel the Counter EMF so to speak, and draw all the capacitor's charge out as a high current, dropping the voltage to near zero)


To Illustrate my comment above, please see the attached image of a scope trace.  Scope is a 4 channel Tektronics TDS5034B with differential voltage probes, and clamp on current probe.

Channel 4 monitors the FIRE pulse from the digital feedback and control system using an optical encoder and PCI card with software to provide the pulse motor controller (using high capacity MOSFET's to switch fast and provide BEMF feedback or shunting).  Scope is triggered on the negative going pulse of the FIRE signal; which is an absolute shaft position based on the settings of the software and the absolute encoder signal.

Channel 1 is the coil voltage, and channel 2 is the current to that coil.  The math 1 waveform is the True instantaneous power of the coil. (measure and gating for the actual True power are not on in this shot)

You can see the intrinsic "Counter EMF" in the voltage trace before the drive power pulse is initiated.  The applied drive pulse (here from a battery) must rise above this "CEMF" produced by the motor coil/magnet else motor force will not occur.

Mike's trace shows no such condition.  He has got it wired "backwards" to normal "motor" operation. (which is part of the key as to why he gets something anomalous in my opinion) (combined with his third coil and it's switching regime too)

Cheers

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Hi DMBoss,
I know from former communication with you,
that you are a real expert and it is nice to see,
that you have these great measurement equipment and setups
and can tell us some real insights into the theory also.

Maybe you can try to replicate the Mike setup much more quickly
than others can do this over here.

It seems Mike?s setup is a Motor/Generator all in one device.
It also seems, that his main coil has more windings than the other 2
coils seems to be important , so the counter EMF is maybe suppressed
at the right moments...and the rotor so can freely move on or
gets a push forward...

Please post more of your insights, when you have the time to do so.
Many thanks in advance and please let?s crack the theory behind this
Mike motor together by brainstorming.

I hope Mike will soon post more scopeshots, so we
can compare it with your results.

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

Rosphere

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 482
@All,

According to http://solid-state-relay.crouzet-usa.com/
Crouzet part, GN-84131100
is replaced by 84137100

Let me introduce my friend: google!

AM

Ah, very nice.  Thank you.  Let us now hope that interchangeability is not affected; will this replacement part work equally well?

I suppose it would be rude to ask Mike to try this replacement part.  So, I will purchase one and slap it on my,... well, I guess I will need to build the rest of the motor from the ground up before I can try it out.

But I might accidentally introduce a random design variable or two.  If my replication does not work then do I blame the replacement part or do I blame something else?

Stefan, the other three at gnosis you mentioned earlier, do any of them plan to use this replacement part found by AhuraMazda, or some other part?

Rosphere

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 482
I do not need scope shots of this or that. I do not need him to try reed switchs or other setups. These things I can do when I have one running. I just want to duplicate what he has first then we all can figure out how it works later..

I agree.

DMBoss

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Hi DMBoss,
I know from former communication with you,
that you are a real expert and it is nice to see,
that you have these great measurement equipment and setups
and can tell us some real insights into the theory also.

Maybe you can try to replicate the Mike setup much more quickly
than others can do this over here.

It seems Mike?s setup is a Motor/Generator all in one device.
It also seems, that his main coil has more windings than the other 2
coils seems to be important , so the counter EMF is maybe suppressed
at the right moments...and the rotor so can freely move on or
gets a push forward...

Please post more of your insights, when you have the time to do so.
Many thanks in advance and please let?s crack the theory behind this
Mike motor together by brainstorming.

I hope Mike will soon post more scopeshots, so we
can compare it with your results.

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

Stefan:

My results use a much different geometry at present.  And there may indeed be some "quantum" level interaction with the actual transistors here, which my controller can not duplicate.

But the root details of the material, geometry, coil parameters are of utmost importance no matter what manner of control is used.

As to insights into the underlying principles - I am limited due to some proprietary concerns in what I can share.  Besides I do not believe that "freely sharing" info is the best way to get this technology to the masses.  I have proven on the bench that 100 year old patents work, and are over unity.  A patent is the most public of documents, in a standardized format so it can be replicated.  If literally hundreds of such "free sharing" occurrances to date has not done anything then sharing alone will not do the job!

Something useful has to be marketed to the massed to convince them, and to challenge the dogma of science to get off their programmed doctrine.  We know they will simply ignore, debunk with lies, or dismiss published accounts of O/U.  But a device that works, sold to millions of people, and they [acedemics] can no longer ignore it.

Recall pundits scribbled equations on blackboards for months after the Wright Brother's flew a plane, apparently proving mathematically that heavier than air flight was impossible!  So even with one working model - or a dozen they will not change their dogma!

Sorry to preach here - but selling products that are O/U to the masses is the only way to change a large number of hearts and minds.  And then some things have to be kept quiet to appease the investors along the way.

Yes Mike is combining motor and generator action here by adding the 3rd coil.  You can "change hats" too as every motor can act as a generator and every generator as a motor.  That's part of the key here....

I already have a pretty good idea why his machine works - but need the details to replicate it properly. (some posts identified the right idea, but put it in the wrong place when speaking of negative impedance)  (if he has inverted the polarity of normal "motor" action as I postulated, then this makes a serious negative impedance action at the "main" coil - but alone this does nothing but make rotor drag - there's more to it)

cheers.

DMBoss

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
@All,

According to http://solid-state-relay.crouzet-usa.com/
Crouzet part, GN-84131100
is replaced by 84137100

Let me introduce my friend: google!

AM


But I might accidentally introduce a random design variable or two.  If my replication does not work then do I blame the replacement part or do I blame something else?


If I may attempt to clarify my cautions about replicating without exact details:

these devices are not unlike an internal combustion engine, in the sense MANY exacting parameters must be just right else you get no "fire"!

you must have the geometry of the engine right, the valve timing, the spark timing and energy, the fuel air mixutre has to be in a very narrow range - the outside air temperature affects the vaporization of the fuel - etc.

Anyone who has had their car not fire on a cold wet morning with bag plug wires knows what I mean!

Now before you ever knew how to make such an engine work, you see one and think you can go to your basement and make your own work!  Not so easy unless you know all the exact details of the operating parameters!

Get any one of the many influencing parameters out of the working envelope, and your car won't start.  Same with this device in an analogy sense.

It may be simple, but not necessarily easy!

To answer, you either blame yourself for not having all the details right, or Mike's machine didn't work.  I cannot see anything in his video to lead me to believe his machine does not work though.  But there may be hidden aspects - some impurity or flaw in a material or incorrectly relayed connections or the like.... or as mentioned a few hundred turns difference in coil  could make it not work too!

Cheers.

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Here is a writeup of user DOM,
who has tried to replicate the Mike motor,
but has notyet the right coil configuration.

But it is a nice guide for people wanting to rebuild the Mike motor.

I post this in 2 version, one in Microsoft WORD format
and one in OpenOffice ODT format.

As we are looking for OpenSource energy publishing,
we can also use OpenSource software.

Regards, Stefan.

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Here is the OpenOffice ODT version of the DOM document
attached to this message.
( You must be logged into the forum to be able to download it)

esaruoho

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
    • Lackluster / Esa Juhani Ruoho - melodic electronic music
heres a bunch of pictures and the video from the overunity forum, and some from gn0sis.
http://www.scene.org/~esa/merlib/bedinicole/bedinicolepack1.zip
http://www.scene.org/~esa/merlib/bedinicole/bedinicolepack1withoutvideo.zip
also, heres the gn0sis doc
http://www.scene.org/~esa/merlib/bedinicole/My_Replication_of_Windows_Bendini.doc


looking forward to seeing the john bedini version of mikes thing.



hydrocontrol

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 281
Stefan,
 Can you create ONE sticky with a list of questions and then fill them in as they are answered. I see no point in me (or anyone else) blindly building a replication if the basic information is not there to replicate from. I would love to try to replicate this but without correct information it is a waste of my time and materials. The form size of the coils is very important as well as wire size, each wires resistance, direction of windings, type of magnets, magnet purchase source, core material that magnets are attached too, shaft material, etc..
  The number of turns on the form is critical due to the magenetic field cutting across the # wire lines and since Mike did not count the number of turns we will need the above information to try to back calculate the number of turns. My initial calculations indicate the 600 feet of 28g wire was used but it makes a difference if that is spread over a 6, 8, or 12 inch diameter form as it will change the actual number of turns. Direction of turns can be critical as well. We need the basic information and it does not appear to exists so everyone is just randomly trying things. This is not a good way to replicate.
 No offence to Dom but posting information of what Dom did is interesting but since Dom's version is not self running it only muddies what is the correctly needed information. We can not have everyone building one like Dom's only to find out that Dom's will not work. We need everyone to build one like Mike's first and at the moment only Mike can provide that information that we need. Please Mike.. Take a couple of hours to measure and document what you have then post that information so the rest of us can start a real replication..  Thanks, Tom :)

barbosi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 261
Stefan,

I have few simple questions if you could ask:

1. The trifilar winding suggest all 3 coils have the same lenght. Did Mike use the trifilar winding in his motor?

2. Where is the start of the third coil? The schematic could be updated with just a simple dot.

Thanks.

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Hi,

Is it possible to use one coil, and curcuit, for each pair of magnets in the rotor?

One claims this is not an overunity motor, but what about the loss in bearings and air resistance? To overcome that, the motor has to be, right ?

Br.

Vidar