Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 523127
  • *Total Topics: 15575
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 1
  • *Guests: 8
  • *Total: 9

Author Topic: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money  (Read 14428 times)

Offline mikestocks2006

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 324
Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« on: January 27, 2007, 08:37:20 PM »
There are many posters here and in countless other boards working, experimenting, trying for OU devices.

Let?s say one or more, has finally found the way and built a demonstrable device that passes all the scrutinizes and creates free energy.

What?s next? And Why?
1.   Give it to the world for free? (yes/no)
2.   Or does he/she needs to be fairly rewarded for the discovery? (yes/no)

There are arguments about saving the world and making public/posting it across all sites possible plans and all, so if the answer is yes, then nothing more to discuss.

If the answer to 1 is no, please expand your thoughts.
But what of the inventor? Let?s say he/she spent his life savings and a significant portion of his life time to develop and build such a device. Doesn?t there need to be a reward?
Is he expected to do this just for charity and then fade away? That person had to fight hordes of naysayers and now he is supposed to help them out for free? His life was threatened, people ridiculed him. It was an uphill battle. We all know the stories some fist hand.

If the answer to 2 is yes, then how much?
What price does the ?world? must offer him to get the benefits of such a device?
Doesn?t his family deserve a better future? Enjoy life, good health, better amenities? More free time to enjoy instead of laboring 9-5 plus travel to make someone else rich?
Is there a price tag on that?

There are few organizations, and possible venture capitalists out there who would fund such a development. What is he to do? Sign over the designs for 1 million $$$, a billion?(just a figure,  or whatever). Then the technology is not be heard again.?

Some of these thoughts have been sparked after the Agimex  CRUSS , Russian developments, references on another thread. The deal was for 170 mill and nothing since?
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1899.0.html

There are others too, some from reading the SM devices threads (talks about multimillion deals there) but nothing very clear on the device so it can be readily replicated. Or anything on the market.
BTW, My greatest respect and kudos to all of us who trying here and elsewhere.

The specific device is unimportant to this thread. ( these 2 above are just simple quick examples)



What do you all think? What would you do and why?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline CLaNZeR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1059
    • Overunity.org.uk
Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2007, 09:03:54 PM »
Everyone to their own I suppose.

If I stumbled across summit then I would just share and sit back in having the comfort that I helped a little to letting others hit their goals.

I earn money from doing what I do for a living and playing with magnets is a hobby for me, so no big deal, have a bit of fun and share the knowledge. All hobbies cost money with no expectation of getting anything back from it, the enjoyment and experience is the reward as such.

If someone has piled their life and millions into summit then good on them, let them go make some money as this is the real world we live in and if that is what they need to do, then that is what they need to do.

One thing people play on is the saying of FREE ENERGY, I prefer to say ALTERNATIVE ENERGY, in other words an energy that is not raping the planet of it's resources but still is gonna cost you the same as what ya paying now, Alternative energy is not gonna suddenly stop the materialistic world that we live in from existing.

Regards

Sean.

Offline ResinRat2

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1242
    • Hydrogen Reactor Vids
Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2007, 10:49:11 PM »
My thought on the issue is very simple. I would give it away for everyone to see and use. The fact that people have died over this type of research makes it abundantly clear that such information needs to be released and printed everywhere possible, as quickly as possible.

Somebody like poor Stan Meyers, I look upon as unfortunately a man of greed. Even though his end was justified, he still would not release the truth unless HE earned the CASH. I know he tried to get his process into production, but he still held the details with an iron fist. "Jesus Christ is Lord" may have been on his dune buggy, but now he is dead and mankind is no better for it. He may well as not have lived at all as far as history is concerned. Now somebody else has to discover it all over again.

If you only care about yourself and MONEY, then your research is doomed to disappear. You may or may not survive, but in the end your effort will not benefit mankind.

This only shows me that it is our own human failings that hold mankind to the type of energy slavery we have today. Big Black Oil holds us by the throat, and only by human sacrifice and charity will we overcome its grip. Just let it go, tell everybody, and disappear into obscurity. That is mankind's only hope for freedom.

Thanks for your interest.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2007, 10:49:11 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline pese

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1598
    • Freie Energie und mehr ... Free energy and more ...
Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2007, 11:54:22 PM »
working for energy.
that is very good say.

we all work more than 75 % , hard working time
to earn only money to pay own bills for taken and used energy.
Pese

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3794
Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2007, 03:52:18 AM »
When we will work for an funktional and effective OU-system,
then we will need the patent award:
because the developpment of the system parts will cost money,
and you know that the commercial industry take a lot of money
for prototyp(e) level orders !
Do not be concerned about "soft" thinker,
anybody who think about free publikation,
they do not know reality,
if you have the chance,try to receive the patent award,
not the privat(e) consumer sector,but the industrial sector will be your
greatest concurrence !
Without award they will instandly replicating your invention,
and marketing under their conditions !
With own award you can mandate about worldwide selling conditions !
But: The commercial Patent Award is same like philological the "Dr."-degree,
it is not so easy as anybody think ! New Technical Standart !

In commercial value : the 1 EURO cent/KWH  e-generator,
as first step target !

S
  dL

p.s.:To our OU-administrator :"Patente sind Scheisse !"
       Without Patent-Law-power we can not get "ORDER"-POWER !

     
« Last Edit: January 28, 2007, 02:21:31 PM by lancaIV »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2007, 03:52:18 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3794
Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2007, 04:33:56 AM »
The OU-member target shall be :
-----------------------------------------------------------
U.S.A.: 5 US$/ton coal
Saudi-Arabia: 1$/llb crude oil

400$/ KW plant- 58% conversion to electricity efficiency

CO2-Emission-certificate :0,00425 US$/KWH

e-Distribution : 0,003125 US$/KWH

-----------------------------------------------------------
The OU-member target shall be the 0.75 Euro cent/KWH e-generator ,portable !

Good luck to perform this out 2 reality !!!

S
  dL
« Last Edit: January 28, 2007, 04:55:33 AM by lancaIV »

Offline ResinRat2

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1242
    • Hydrogen Reactor Vids
Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2007, 04:48:06 AM »
Right, get the patent.

Stan Meyers had a load of international patents.

Now he's dead and the patents don't work.

He went for the patents because he wanted the money. It did him no good, and it did the world no good either.

The way I see it, if a process of valid overunity is discovered, it needs to get out to the people as soon as possible so it can begin to be used and spread by the average tinkerer.
Forget the patent, just release the information so people can begin seeing that it works. Then everyone will start doing it, and even if after that someone patents it, it will be too late. Everyone will just start using it themselves.

Patents only control the earnings. If you do it on your own without trying to make money then no one can stop you. No one except the Government; but by then it will be too late to stop.

Forget it everyone. Open your hearts and do this for the world, mankind, and the freedom of your children.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2007, 04:48:06 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3794
Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #7 on: January 28, 2007, 05:09:50 AM »
Pardon resinrat,
only with the "power" of an patent award you will get
the possibility to reach the 0,75 Euro cent/KWH stage !
I think that you know ,from your professional experience,
that for not common technical parts you will have to pay,
at first, an higher price than for conventional parts !
Later,when these parts will be mass producted,the prices will fall
up to 90%/each !
"Free coal/Free crude oil "is natural mass production,but geographicaly endemic !
When we will use the patent monopol(e) to reach the minimum price level potential,
who,whose is not interested in max.-price-speculation,can be against our
"marketing philosophy" ?

S
  dL
 
p.s.: the effect is the target,not the kind of process !!!
        Patent publication,independant if new or old ,are ever commercial worthless,
        when the patent object description can not be replicated as written !
       
« Last Edit: January 28, 2007, 05:54:42 AM by lancaIV »

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3794
Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2007, 06:38:32 AM »
Introduce the 0,75 Euro cent/KWH P.O.D.- Generator:
you will receive a worldwide "e-Imperator" level !
You will be more important than  Mr. Gates or Mr. Buffet !
0.75 Eurocent/KWH is Thorvald L.-price/value level !
Do not be afraid about scepticians !

S
  dL

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2007, 06:38:32 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline ResinRat2

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1242
    • Hydrogen Reactor Vids
Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2007, 01:35:02 PM »
If Stan Meyers had freely published a paper that described the exact materials, procedure, and possible theory behind his hydrogen generating process then no one would have been able to stop it. Average inventors would have taken his process and developed it into a useful technology that would have transformed the entire world.

We could have called it the "Meyer's Hydrogen Generating Process". He could have been honored as a great scientist by us all. Instead he is dead and the process is lost. All this because he wanted the money!!

Please everyone, think of the future and our children. You will be dead within a hundred years from today, but your work will live on long after you are gone.

Offline Dingus Mungus

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 859
Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2007, 02:20:28 PM »
I think what ResinRat is trying to say is maybe the best reward for such work is not money, but the dawning of a new age for humanity. While that cost/kWh may not be reached by one of us, if we publish and spread the word in a "open source" manor, some corporation will fill that market once the info is out there in the public. The trick to initiating this energy revolution will be making an exact process known to anyone willing to hear it once the technology is developed. If you can store and distribute the information fast enough there is no way to prevent those with pure intentions and funding from furthering our research.

If the goal is "free" energy one can't expect to turn any profit either...
~Dingus

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2007, 02:20:28 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Liberty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 524
    • DynamaticMotors
Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2007, 04:33:56 PM »
My thought on the issue is very simple. I would give it away for everyone to see and use. The fact that people have died over this type of research makes it abundantly clear that such information needs to be released and printed everywhere possible, as quickly as possible.

Somebody like poor Stan Meyers, I look upon as unfortunately a man of greed. Even though his end was justified, he still would not release the truth unless HE earned the CASH. I know he tried to get his process into production, but he still held the details with an iron fist. "Jesus Christ is Lord" may have been on his dune buggy, but now he is dead and mankind is no better for it. He may well as not have lived at all as far as history is concerned. Now somebody else has to discover it all over again.

If you only care about yourself and MONEY, then your research is doomed to disappear. You may or may not survive, but in the end your effort will not benefit mankind.

This only shows me that it is our own human failings that hold mankind to the type of energy slavery we have today. Big Black Oil holds us by the throat, and only by human sacrifice and charity will we overcome its grip. Just let it go, tell everybody, and disappear into obscurity. That is mankind's only hope for freedom.

Thanks for your interest.

If those that are serious about having this type of research and other devices made more openly available, they should be willing to help out and pitch in and make efforts themselves to join together with others of like mind to fund such efforts by inventors so the inventor doesn't have to absorb the entire loss for 'the world' and give it away.

Inventor's would be much more likely to open up without patent protection if there was a way to recover financially their expended efforts and living expenses by a general fund for inventors of free energy devices.  This fund could be funded by the generosity of individuals and companies that desire these devices.

As it stands now, there are people out there that want the technology to be given away for free, (putting the entire financial burden on the inventor) while they themselves do nothing to assist the inventor that has spent funds and much time and effort to discover and develop this technology.  Why don't others do their part to help out by contributing toward the effort to develop "invention funding for inventors" so inventors can feed their families too.  It is not usually so much a matter of greed as so many assume.  It is a matter of survival for the inventor and his/her family. 


Offline Dingus Mungus

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 859
Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #12 on: January 28, 2007, 04:58:49 PM »
Everyone is overlooking the obvious...

If the idea works and there is no patent sell kits and give away plans. There will always be people like us willing to spend a few hundred dollars to confirm or replicate anything that looks interesting. I Don't know about everyone else here but in my 3-5 years of research I've probably only invested a grand or two in to prototypes, reseach, and equipment. I think thats a minimal price for the richness this hobby adds to my life.

As for a FE researchers grant... It would never work... Too many people would take advantage, and not enough people would chip in. Plus who would decide who got the money? Sounds like it would become an animal farm analogy quickly. Think about it you're talking about paying a researchers living expenses... Anyone who needs that kind of funding needs to get a job in the field.

For now those who are more fortunate than fellow researchers in any given project can help fund people working on the same project. This ensures a dedicated team and all build information and costs are shared as a group. If all researchers are working on a seperate aspect of the same device this will also ensure ability to confirm results quickly and more rapid development stages.

Treat each project team as its own community and between the active team members you will be able to fund most if not all projects without any grants.

If the goal is "free" energy one can't expect to turn any profit...
~Dingus

Offline mikestocks2006

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 324
Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2007, 06:49:40 PM »
@all
 good diverse opinions and numbers so far

It is understandable in an idealistic world free energy should be free. I?m not sure one can summarily equate free energy = free of profit or money, but free energy, from not depleting resources and not harmful to the environment.

On the money side of the equation, how can this be given to the world population without money and profit in the equation.?

Think about this for a minute.
We are here typing on the keyboards, and experimenting on different levels with a variety of funds available to do so.

Most of us, if not all of us are or have been working for some company, a company that makes a product or sells a service at a handsome profit, so that company can afford to pay salaries, so we can afford to have a house and buy a pc to post here, and buy gadgets to experiment. Some of us are for hoby, otheres are much more serious spending more time and  $$$ because we want to and we can.!
The profit, money, is always part of the equation. Would anyone of us work for free?

Would this site be even up without $$$?  BTW thanks Stefan for setting it up and maintaining it.

How many proposed free energy inventions are on the Kelly net site? Or the internet as a whole? Thousands? Tens of thousands? Then what? Who?s building them.??? Who?s even looking at them?

So let?s get back to the first post. A device is designed and built that can do it.

How do 1 billion families on the planet get this device? Surely only an infinitesimal fraction of people around the globe has access and ability to read and understand the technology on the net let alone built it. Print brochures and sent to every address on the planet? For free? What company will run the presses and who is going to work there for free?

I?m talking realism here. Someone, some company will need to manufacture the device.
Do you think that company (s) will do it for free? To the ones amongst us that work for a living, would you take a 100% pay cut and work for free in such a company?
Who?s going to pay your bills, your family?s needs? Would you sell your house? Live in tent set up a small manufacturing plant (use the house sale as down payment) and built these devices for free? You can?t get a loan from any bank unless you have net income (net profit) to support interest payments for such a plant. Do you think your employees will work there for free?


It would appear for better or worst, that the money/profit must be a part of the equation.

And that brings me back to the first post.
Once you have the profit/money in the equation, the next to be answered is how much?
How much profit the company(s) would make and what of the inventor?

I?m just stating some thoughts as they relate to present day reality of our global system, seeking the reader?s opinions.

Offline wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2608
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Your thoughts on a side but important OU subject. Money
« Reply #14 on: January 28, 2007, 08:56:58 PM »
There is no one answer as a yes or a no.

It depends on the level of complexity of the device, does it require proprietary physical attributes that only a few companies can make, its size, if its 2 tons and produces 400 watts or if its hand size and produces 5000 watts. Do you need a degree in physics to understand it or can anyone apply it with standard peripherals. Eventually, you will have a myriad of methods to obtain free energy and one will suit your particular needs.

Also, the inventors story, years of work, level of debt, marital stress and emotional attitude, phobias, paranoias, I am god syndrome, gold digger entourages who have some financial vested interests, paranoia from getting your idea stolen, building prototypes, paying for patenting, paranoia again, doing demos for investors to take the next step always afraid that you will be either ridiculed or taken advantage of. These are all reality day to day struggles that inventors live with.

Also the age of the inventors. When you are in your late 60 or 70's, your outlook and urgency on the world will be different than the 20-30 year old inventor.

Ideally, this invention will be complex in its most intricate level, but simple to apply in its most outer level. So simple, that regular industry will understand it and be able to apply it in their machinations. The simpler the better.

I would speculate that such inventions will occur in varying levels.

If a TPU was advertised today, I am sure the governments will do all they can to eradicate it, because a hand held TPU would be considered a level 3 OU device, because of its compact size, power generating potential and a potential threat citing national security.

If the invention was a mechanical betterment of a physical motion producing OU that is then translated from motion to energy generation in a loop type formation, using most components already available on the market, regardless of 50-60hz and/or ac/dc current, such an invention is the ideal level 1 for an OU device. It will enable people to gradually enter this new potential without undertaking a peak learning curve. Such a device wll not be considered a potential threat givem its major design. If a device was using fusion, chemical reactions or other unstable reactions, this would be considered a level two device and again could go either way in its acceptance.

This is what will make everything else fly. Cars will start to move without oil, homes will function with the grid as backup, etc. So the ideal invention will not turn the world upside down, it will enable the world to keep turning but at a gradually shifting rate.

If the inventor is smart, he will patent it not as an OU device but as a general apparatus with some other logical excuse for its existence. Such a device patented will then open the door for usage of the device under its many disguises, until such time as enough people have latched on and the device is beginning to be used out in the open. By then it will be too late to try and puff it out. You have to realize that given the information age works both ways. OU proponents are quickly informed but so are the inhibitors. So playing dumb may be a blessing.

But all must understand that although the inventor will have devised one of the worlds most remarkable inventions, this does not mean that the person himself is remarkable. People are people, not gods. They have theirs faults, fears, skeletons in closets, regrets as well as aspirations, wants, needs and all sorts of obligations. Some inventors are extremely smart, but in  human terms can be the most hated character around, being hard to work with, reason with and deal with. So expecting altruism from a prick, regardless of his brain power is a no go. Some inventors have spent so much energy on developing their designs, that the though of all those years of surmounting so many obstacles does play its toll on a persons continued will to bring it too market. All those years, finally patented, finally a warehouse of product and this equals 15% of the work required to bring it to market. It's one damn big job, and once you have publicly committed to it, turning back the clock is impossible.

I only wish that the inventor in question has at least one person in his entourage who is honest enough to help him work these things out.

 

OneLink