I think regarding the grenade coil your not right.
This will excite the standing wave uppon eachother... there are patents about this subject
Grenade swings the standing wave... as stated by Ruslan... kacher is infact the exciter.
You are definitely on top this device.
So the grenade coil is where we produce the standing waves.
One wave of high current, moderate voltage comes from the
push-pull. The other wave of high voltage, low current comes
from the Tesla coil. The anti-node of the standing wave has to
develop at the load. And to me, this load needs to be a bridge
rectifier and filter capacitor down to DC so that it is fixed at a
stable distance from the grenade coil. Connected to this bridge
rectifier and filter capacitor, we need a fixed load so that the
end of the transmission line has a fixed impedance, that way
we don't end up chasing an anti-node that is moving all over
the place.
With the above in mind, what characteristics does our grenade
coil have to have? We are talking about a transmission line
closed on one end and mostly closed on the other. Inside this
transmission line will be where our input waves cycle back-n-forth
with consistent nodes and anti-nodes that we can physically
predict where they are--with an anti-node positioned exactly at
our load. When I say waves, I'm not fully clear on what those
are. We have both current and voltage amplitudes. So an
anti-node of what are we looking for? Just current? Just voltage?
Will the current and voltage be in-phase?
Next, what frequencies do we need the push-pull and Tesla coil
to operate at? How do we select a bandwidth so that any drift still
keeps an anti-node positioned at our load? To me it is apparent
there is no reason to have each component to the standing wave
operate at the same frequency--one just needs to be a multiple
of the other; both have to fully fit within the transmission line.
It makes sense to tackle the more difficult one first.
On the push-pull side, the wavelength is so large, if we miss
getting a peak amplitude focused at the load, we're screwed
immediately. The Tesla side will have a much smaller wavelength so
it will be touchy. Getting a peak amplitude focused at the load and
staying there will take some serious work. The next challenge will
be to get both peak amplitudes to be the same polarity so when they
form a standing wave, they add instead of subtract.
In looking at this from a different perspective, scale seems critical.
There is only a certain region in which the components we can get
our hands on will work reliably. A small device will have frequencies
we cannot deal with and a large device will have displacement currents
that destroy the wiring. I think Ruslan has focused us in about the
best power output size where we might have a chance of success.
Which is fine by me if we can replicate these things reliably and just
make them for any device that needs power.
Sure wish I could get Ruslan to comment on what I'm saying here and
correct my mistakes. It would save us a boatload of trouble.