Did you happen to find out anything on the "one-way bearings" mentioned in the patent disclosure?

<sub>One-way Bearing  (from the patent disclosure)

At 7 line 32 thru 44 "one way" bearings are briefly discussed:
Note that during the rotation of the control shaft there is interaction with the output shaft which has the armature with the permanent magnets attached and both the control shaft and output shaft may try and turn the other in a different direction than desired. That is, for example, as the control shaft rotates in a given direction the output shaft may try and rotate it in the opposite direction (i.e. backwards). In one embodiment, the control shaft cannot be forced backwards by the output shaft if one-way bearings hold the control shaft. Likewise, in one embodiment, one-way bearings may be used to hold the output shaft so that it can only rotate in one direction. In one embodiment, the control shaft and the output shaft are each held by one-way bearings.

Further - At 7 line 45 thru 60:

In the specification and figures the control shaft as noted has attached to it the radial field control, this control shaft may be rotated, for example, by a motor or other rotating mechanism. What is to be appreciated is that the control shaft having the radial field control is able to control the armature rotating within a magnetic circuit. The magnetic circuit comprises the radial field control the armature having permanent magnets and the stator. The output shaft which is connected to the armature can rotate (assuming it is not overloaded or locked) and this rotary motion can be used. Thus, the input control shaft can control the output shaft.
While the description has shown two permanent magnets as part of the armature the invention is not so limited and any arrangement of magnets on the armature that yields a magnetic flux passing through the radial field control and
stator can be used.</sub>

<sub>For Non English audience I repeat text is on the picture :
 Motor model is  established now based on  used by inventor  Power supply/ we know speed and torque.
But interesting is that  the same  motor driving inventor device shown in two  different  instances in the same video shows:

motor IN at its 51 RPM speed shows 0.7 ft-lb
motor IN at its 33 RPM speed shows 0.1 ft-lb



while  inventor is trying to prove  gain of the device
___________________________________________________________________________</sub>





The inventor claim of more  energy OUT than IN
and  surprising evidence on measuring  equipment
was analyzed by me:
So look at picture and in video  and it is :
up to you  to   conclude
https://youtu.be/_gGLN2LxwkY?t=133

_{opinion expressed is my own}
Wesley

.

Wesley, please stop confusing the members with
unrelated screenshots..
These Input settings were taken at different RPM settings and surely the input power and torques are then different...
Regards, Stefan.

No problem.
I did the job nobody  else did equipment specs, model numbers  all data is in front of you.
IS THAT NON RELATED? ??
COMPERE THE NUMBERS  PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I was not making any judgement.
AT ALL!!!!!!!
I posted that what is on the video!!!
It is not RPM that matters.
It is torque at given speed that differs vs HP.

Re:picture here « Reply #138
at the picture here on the right
at RPM 35 torque is 0.2188
HP is 0.0014
at the  the same picture on the left
at RPM 50 torque is 3.412 look here !!!!
HP is 0.0032

Re: picture here Reply #137
at the picture on the upper right
at RPM 36 torque is 0.1289
HP is 0.0008
at the  the same picture at the bottom
at RPM51 torque is 0.7311 look here and compare it with another blue  up  there  !!!!
HP is 0.0069

please compare the colors of the numbers green to green, orange to orange !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and blue to blue!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

please look also at the connectors connection and cyan color line pointer   on the left hand side of the picture
_{look very carefully  on the very top of that connector little to the top right - is that something connected to it? I gave you device link and spec too just read it before you tell me to shut up.}
Re: Magnetic flux motor just patented that creates it's own electricity! « Reply #138 on: Today at 01:50:08 PM »
compare it  with the same device on the right side of that picture
do you see  something or you not? ?


who is confusing whom?

PLEASE ANSWER

Wesley

...
These Input settings were taken at different RPM settings and surely the input power and torques are then different...as long as the output power is integrated over several revolutions is always higher, the claims from the inventor are valid ..!
You always have to integrate the forces and torque to see the Average display values.
...
Regards, Stefan.

Hi Stefan,

You say "These Input settings were taken at different RPM settings".
I'm not sure. If you're referring to the side by side display readings, those are instantaneous data on the input shaft from the torque sensor at 2:19 and 3:38 minutes. They are not necessarily different RPM settings. The speed and torque varies rapidly due to cogging as seen on the strip charts on other video. I find it quite interesting this particular data.

At 2:19                      At 3:38                       Average
RPM -50                   RPM -35.                    RPM -42.5
ft.lb. +0.3412           ft.lb. -0.2189             ft.lb. +0.0612
Deg -123206            Deg -127904
HP   -0.0032             HP   +0.0014             HP    -0.0009

Simple averages do not yield correct power. The calculated HP using +0.0612ft.lb. & -42.5RPM = -0.00049HP. So integration is needed.

Also I wonder if negative torque is actually transmitted to the motor.  If so, the PWM controller may not tolerate it. But the polar moment of inertia of the shaft, gears, and armature may dampen it sufficiently.

Also I wonder the effects of one-way bearings that SL has mentioned.

The more we pick apart (I mean analyze) the apparatus, the more likely we are to discover its true operation.

In reading over the literature from the Futek torque sensor reminds me of their sensitivity to alignment and calibration. I've never used two in line like this and saw no other such reference to do so. Is there anything peculiar about it? And I'd like to see static torque calibration. This was always done when using these sensors with torque arms and precision weights.

And then, as mentioned previously, proof of pudding, loop it.

Regards,
bi

 

Here the only thing that will move this forward is a test report from an independent
3rd party certified test lab ( which community has access to)
Hopefully next few days will provide more info !


This has always been the standard for claims in our world!
Respectfully
Chet K

Hi panyuming,
What you show is a switched reluctance or stepper motor. Quite common. Typically multiphase so they are self starting and smoother. And no reports of OU of which I am aware.
Nice sketch.
bi

...
Your data can be more complete  if you add readings HERE TOO:
https://youtu.be/_gGLN2LxwkY?t=48  at: 0.37
...

This I find interesting. From the video linked above. Mike must turn up pressure on the brake caliper just before the green marker line. Before that, the input torque was back and forth across zero with an average close to zero. Pretty much no-load on the drive motor. Just enough to keep rotation at set RPM. Then when he adds load, both input and output increase about 0.5ft.lb. To me, the apparatus appears to add ~5.5 ft.lb., not multiply torque.
bi

{edit- comment added}
I'd like to see the output sensor reading with the caliper completely off the disc, true no-load.

At yellow line. 5.75 ÷ 0.15 = 38.3 gain
At green line.  6.65 ÷ 1.1 = 6.05 gain