I'd like to set up a project where we figure out hidden information crucial to the workings of specific inventions.
The premise is simple. We've seen various promising technologies get shelved for whatever reason. Greed and/or paranoia from the inventor, a sell-out inventor, a tragic accident, etc. Like the many roads that lead to Rome, many avenues to have technologies to accompany their respective inventors into the afterlife.
This documentary outlines how effective even laymen viewers were in military intelligence applications.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WUaS_Ynd_MA friend of mine is a clever guy, holds a highly regarded position firmly in the mainstream world, but is also a remote viewing instructor. He tells me that the viewing is more effective of the viewer has expertise in the target. So a gardener will more easily recognise specific trees and plants in a location they don't even know by name and place, just a randomized case file number, and then the impressions and bits of information come in.
So the ideal people to remote view specifics in the lesser understood works of Tesla, Keely, etc, are people just like frequent this forums. As a theorist, engineer, or builder. A builder would more likely intuit how something was attached, the engineer what it is doing there. You catch my drift.
I feel this approach is well worth a try to gain clues on how to get things to work. A clue a builder would see, an engineer could know a great possible reason for and vice versa.
Remote viewing sessions are very scientific in setup. A target is set, reduced to a randomized number, and then the number is presented to a viewer, and they don't have the slightest clue what they're going to look at. This prevents prejudice to color the readings, which would render all findings a waste of time.
So for a target YOU want to learn more about, you'd work together with a second researcher, and then the 3rd, 4th etc would be doing the full blind viewing.
I'm asking my friend to teach me how to define targets in a way that is likely to bring the best results. If we as a group get out sht together, perhaps I can get targets defined by us in front of well trained highly gifted viewers. Most would be less inclined to be into free energy, but more than make up for that in accurate high resolution output.
Obviously target could be such as "Bessler's gravity wheel, presented on date xyz at the palace of king suchandsuch." To get from viewers ideally whether Bessler was for real or a fraud, and if real: what principles and mechanisms made it work.
Countless more targets will be defined I'm sure. The best result, we get when more of us get involved in the reading. Groups that do this for investments can be quite effective, I've heard first hand. We don't even need to know the future, the past is already great. However, if we manage to target a future OU invention (invention of the century in certain journal?), that would be neat as well, given enough detail. The benefit the future offers is that the veil will have come off eventually, and more descriptive documentation will be out there to be viewed.
Go see the documentary and then convince yourself and others why you of all people would be in the 15-20% that are actually rubbish at this, when most people aren't rubbish at all.
Let's not suggest targets here, that would ruin our results. Let's discuss progress and set targets for each other off-forum.
Here is a quite tutotial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Thq8sVv0lpsKeep a black pen and some printer paper ready or print out the attached template for your convenience.
Once you've practiced a bit on generic targets like offered in the above video, and want a free energy target, I'll do my best to set one to high standards. It will unlikely be what YOU want to see, it a community shared service kind of deal. Someone else will be taking a stab at your preferred targets and publishing results.