Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method  (Read 5798 times)

Offline perpetual

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
Re: Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method
« Reply #15 on: April 10, 2023, 02:25:46 PM »
Most beautiful demonstration of basic Skinner principle

Small energy is required to change the tilt of the axis

weight falls continuously with big energy gain.

I think it would be even better if tilt angle was slightly lesser.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTWwp5qUY3U

Nix

Offline Thaelin

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1088
Re: Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method
« Reply #16 on: April 10, 2023, 07:32:02 PM »
  So with one way bearings and a large flywheel with heavy off center weights, a small drive motor would in fact turn a gen head at a much larger rate. The flywheel would drive a universal on the bottom to the take off under the weighted flywheel. Hmm. This is worth a play with.

Offline perpetual

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
Re: Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method
« Reply #17 on: April 10, 2023, 11:47:58 PM »
I think regular bearings would do, but apart from that pretty much so, heavier, bigger the better.
It would be even better if turning handle in the video was 3,4 times smaller, tiny basically,
so you get a real impression how tiny the input is vs the power of torque due to eternal free
falling. I would only make the tilt angle slighly lesser, my intuition tells me it would be even better.

Nix

Offline perpetual

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
Re: Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method
« Reply #18 on: April 15, 2023, 07:36:48 PM »
Karra Green Energy, another rare photo little more close up and clearer.

Nix

Offline perpetual

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
Re: Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method
« Reply #19 on: April 15, 2023, 10:41:01 PM »
Two overunity books

Energy Invention Suppression Cases Compiled by Gary Vesperman with the help of numerous contributors from 2007

and

New Sources of Energy by Alexander Frolov from 2021

Nix

Offline perpetual

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
Re: Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method
« Reply #20 on: April 19, 2023, 04:10:39 AM »
Interesting one from India. Notice it is almost noiseless except when hammer misses the spring.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvY7O4sKRRM

BTW if you want to read about how India was 12,000 years ago, read this (but only if you are capable of seeing that this is the book of TRUTH).

https://www.sacred-texts.com/atl/dtp/dtp20.htm

Full book color illustrated (very rare) here

https://www.mediafire.com/file/p4qc95220yu491o/ATLANTIS.rar/file

Nix

Offline Willy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method
« Reply #21 on: April 19, 2023, 04:30:23 AM »

Offline perpetual

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
Re: Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method
« Reply #22 on: April 19, 2023, 04:35:09 AM »
It is. BTW you still have not confessed your sins...

Nix

Offline Willy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218

Offline perpetual

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
Re: Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method
« Reply #24 on: April 19, 2023, 05:02:55 AM »
Ah the blindness. Just like in the example below, it is the fact that falling weight hits multiple times, every time it bounces back counter torque on the big wheel is minimal or nothing, while on the rebound fall it imparts significant toque. This one has no springs but principle is exactly the same.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbCnzsFjvQU

And to also remind of this one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MmSp9DsnME

Nix

Offline Willy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method
« Reply #25 on: April 19, 2023, 06:41:30 PM »
It is. BTW you still have not confessed your sins...

Nix

Specifics please. Exactly what one fact or fiction is it that you dispute.

Offline perpetual

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
Re: Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method
« Reply #26 on: April 19, 2023, 06:57:00 PM »
Specifics please. Exactly what one fact or fiction is it that you dispute.

You know what i refer to...

You claimed pressure at the bottom of the tube rises with height of the tube.

And that energy input/output is the same.

Nix

Offline Willy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method
« Reply #27 on: April 19, 2023, 07:05:37 PM »
Sorry buddy, not even close to being specific enough.

You called for the duel / affaire d'honneur.  The one challenged (I) gets to decide
the weapons of choice, not the challenger (you).

Offline perpetual

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
Re: Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method
« Reply #28 on: April 19, 2023, 07:13:00 PM »
Sorry buddy, this is 100% specific, more than enough.

You don't get to decide anything, you made false claims, now you have to admit it.

To quote you

The taller the tube the greater the pressure at its bottom.

[...]

But the energy inputs are equal. This is one of the things that makes it a tough proposition (buoyance based energy experiments).

So, you claimed pressure at the bottom rises with height of the tube and that there is no energy gain here.

Both claims are 100% wrong. Admit you are wrong.

Nix

Offline Willy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method
« Reply #29 on: April 19, 2023, 07:27:19 PM »
1. "So, you claimed pressure at the bottom rises with height of the tube "

2. "and that there is no energy gain here."

No I will not respond to this. More specific please.

1. To eliminate all confusion, you must first describe HERE IN, for me, that tube and the conditions it is under.

2. Only after #1 is satisfied, will I move on to the second.