Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Serious HES derivative project proposal  (Read 29475 times)

Jimboot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1407
Re: Serious HES derivative project proposal
« Reply #165 on: May 29, 2023, 12:39:27 PM »
There is good news for today!
The slide shows the amplitude of a pulse system with a parametric winding on the core of the transformer (the winding is different from the transformer). The system receives from source to source and returns (DC 11.8V). The resistor (0.1 Ohm), from which we measure the current in the circuit, is located in the parametric winding circuit. On the slide is the most optimal mode. While I was working with the transformer topology system, there was no way I could cross a line greater than 1. Therefore, all my achievements in understanding how a synchronous generator works are most likely correct.

Слава Україні!
DO you have a link to your circuit or a blog post on this design? I'm not quite sure what you're doing but thanks for sharing. :)

rakarskiy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
    • Free Energy Systems (UA)
Re: Serious HES derivative project proposal
« Reply #166 on: May 30, 2023, 12:43:29 PM »
DO you have a link to your circuit or a blog post on this design? I'm not quite sure what you're doing but thanks for sharing. :)

Hello! I'm checking. I assembled a reverse test circuit, on a transformer. Got a picture that miscalculated. Current readings are taken from the resistor on the negative terminal of the DC source.
I put two resistors in my new circuit, one in the transformer circuit, the other in front of the negative terminal of the DC source. A strange scene takes place. On the resistor through the negative terminal of the source, the current has the same twist as when excited, although this is impossible. The combination of diodes must not allow this. As a result, the transistors burned out. In any case, a buffer capacitance is most likely required to discharge the circuit. I'll deal with this later.
(transformer and windings are the same)

Screenshot of the operation of a traditional flyback circuit

Screenshot of the new scheme ????????



PS
I am very good at diagrams. Checked the assembly several times. He made positions when the excitation went through the keys and there was no return (the current was locked in the core and windings). What happens in this combination, I still do not understand. There are various crazy assumptions. I will redesign the circuit and use two sources to excite and reset the reverse pulse! Let's get a look.

rakarskiy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
    • Free Energy Systems (UA)
Re: Serious HES derivative project proposal
« Reply #167 on: May 30, 2023, 02:22:28 PM »
I set up my "flyback converter" circuit with primary and secondary windings and got an interesting picture. If we compare the "amount" of current in the excitation pulse and the charge, we get one.

Screen watch

rakarskiy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
    • Free Energy Systems (UA)
Re: Serious HES derivative project proposal
« Reply #168 on: June 02, 2023, 01:11:24 PM »
I checked my converter. The winding parameters have been specially changed (logically, the system should move away from Unity). And so it happened. The concept is fully operational and coincides with the topology of the synchronous generator, and the Holcomb installation (Figer and others) considered in this topic. The transformer will not be Over Unity, it must be made a generator.


FIG.1     FIG.2

I did another calculation test, I entered the data into the circuit of the electronic simulator. The simulator is ideal and gives a linear calculation. See how close the point is.
The simulator does not take into account the features of the transformer. The topology is completely simplified in electronic simulators for very simple circuits.

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Serious HES derivative project proposal
« Reply #169 on: June 03, 2023, 08:57:22 AM »
Anybody will answered me,for what need this ring?

rakarskiy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
    • Free Energy Systems (UA)
Re: Serious HES derivative project proposal
« Reply #170 on: June 03, 2023, 12:47:23 PM »
 ;) Everything will be in the book, "Unity" is shown here, and then Over-Unity



Diagram

Cadman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: Serious HES derivative project proposal
« Reply #171 on: June 03, 2023, 03:46:06 PM »
To all,

If you have any interest in the original topic of this thread, it has been moved to https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4475.0


rakarskiy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
    • Free Energy Systems (UA)
Re: Serious HES derivative project proposal
« Reply #172 on: June 04, 2023, 09:38:30 AM »
;) Everything will be in the book, "Unity" is shown here, and then Over-Unity

Slightly corrected the placement of the 1 ohm resistor, from which the readings were taken with an oscilloscope.
The operation of a flyback converter with the return of energy to the source with the effect - Unity is shown.


Diagram



Once again a photo of the scheme  FIG1

pix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 500
Re: Serious HES derivative project proposal
« Reply #173 on: June 05, 2023, 01:33:05 PM »
There is no COP>1 in flyback.
Unless you will utilise permanent magnet, air gap and switching path MEG style.

rakarskiy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
    • Free Energy Systems (UA)
Re: Serious HES derivative project proposal
« Reply #174 on: June 05, 2023, 08:50:17 PM »
There is no COP>1 in flyback.
Unless you will utilise permanent magnet, air gap and switching path MEG style.

Who told you that traditional flyback converters should have Over Unity.
Here is the question in principle. Make the secondary winding work as a generator phase. (the secondary of the transformer and the phase of the generator are different according to the principle of interaction with the magnetic flux).
The gap is needed for the linearity of the change in the magnetic flux, I already wrote about this here.
As for the Magnet, it is a different device and more than real. More real than you can imagine.

rakarskiy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
    • Free Energy Systems (UA)
Re: Serious HES derivative project proposal
« Reply #175 on: November 11, 2023, 07:51:32 AM »
I contacted Ellen Holcomb with a question about legal claims against their company and the like. Got a relevant response, I quote an excerpt of her response :
"This lawsuit was an affair by people trying to steal our technology. It was so weak that even before the first trial, they asked our legal team for a settlement. Their partners filed another lawsuit in Florida trying to steal our building. They lost in court and have to pay our legal fees. This is what happens when you invent something of value - greedy people try to steal it. We are fighting them and winning."

She also said that they have confirmation of the technology's performance from SGS and DNV GL. I have no reason not to trust Ellen. I have already said that the Holcombe Energy System is a commercial project, the details of how the technology works is commercial information, admission to which is subject to the appropriate legal procedure.
I believe that blocking threads on the forum where we discuss this technology is in the interests of unscrupulous people who are working off vested interests, even in their misconceptions of physics. Holcomb's project with its static generator refutes the claim that a mechanical generator is a converter of mechanical energy into electrical energy.
This system works on the well-known principle of a synchronous generator with a core.  In this system there are technical solutions that allow to simulate the work of /rotation/ of a mechanical magnetic rotor in the commutation system of a static electromagnet, which creates a constant magnetic flux that repeats the work of the mechanical magnetic rotor without physical rotation.


____________________________________________________
My explanations of the operation of Holcomb's static generator:
https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2022/06/overunity-holcomb-energy-system.html


____________________________________________________
Cross-over solutions with electromechanical commutation of static rotor solenoids only:
https://rakatskiy-blogspot-com.translate.goog/2022/06/blog-post.html?_x_tr_sl=ru&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=ru&_x_tr_pto=wapp


If you know exactly how EMF is induced in the simplest core generator, you will definitely know how Dr. Holcomb's static electromagnetic generator works.

TommeyReed

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: Serious HES derivative project proposal
« Reply #176 on: November 11, 2023, 01:03:09 PM »
rakarskiy,

Here we go again, just because you talk to a women who would never tell you the truth in the first place doesn't make it legit.

The real facts are the people who got one of these system that don't work at all, in fact they use more energy then less.

Till this day, nobody has a working system that can show the world it really works!

 (Everything will be in the book, "Unity" is shown here, and then Over-Unity)

Rakarskiy, Sounds like you're trying to sale BS on this open source forum!


Tom

rakarskiy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
    • Free Energy Systems (UA)
Re: Serious HES derivative project proposal
« Reply #177 on: November 11, 2023, 01:43:21 PM »
TommеуReed, if you purchased a non-functioning device, there are legal avenues to resolve the issue. Bring up the fact of fraud, if not, then the fraudster may be you who speculates with the phrase "trust me, I know someone who was defrauded". Woman or man they are both owners, with the legal issues just in her control. I am not interested in the commercial side, only the technical side. It is not decent to discuss legal aspects on the forum. Holcomb do not disclose their decisions without proper legal formalization. So if there is a fact of non-working installation, it would be a court verdict. Can you provide it? If not, you better watch and chew your drool. According to the information, two lawsuits have been settled in favor of Holcomb. That is a fact.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Serious HES derivative project proposal
« Reply #178 on: November 11, 2023, 03:54:21 PM »
Although I'm skeptical about the content of  the design of Holcomb, I do agree with Rakarskiy .
Skepticism is  very much the right tool in any evaluation including my own.
It is also a tool  speeding up progress, as it puts a pressure on the promoters motivation, resulting in more detailed information and/or their faster response.
Let's legal action end, and we'll see  what's next
Wesley

bistander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 705
Re: Serious HES derivative project proposal
« Reply #179 on: November 11, 2023, 04:19:29 PM »
...
Let's legal action end, and we'll see  what's next
Wesley

According to the recent quote attributed to Ms. Holcomb, the legal action has ended.
Still no replication.
bi