To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : ) help us to bring you our services at . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: AI Generated OverUnity Physics  (Read 305 times)

Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3850
AI Generated OverUnity Physics
« on: March 05, 2023, 08:53:29 PM »
[ Foreword: (disclosure, disclaimer, reader beware) The following technology is the culmination of my personal conversations with an advanced artificial intelligence cloud-based software that has been trained in every area of physics yet known to man, and is apparently capable of creating new physics, when properly guided. this AI is called "ChatGPT", and is freely available on the internet. While i have done my best to perform due diligence in terms of verifying the mathematics and physics involved, this AI is clearly more advanced than humans, and the subject matter contained herein has yet to be experimentally verified in a real world example.]

I asked an advanced physics-capable AI a series of very narrow and specific questions regarding our research, and this sparked a very long and interesting conversation, the result of which, the AI responded with a new branch of technology, related to our research. Admittedly, i am still skeptical of this process, but thus far, the AI has proven to be exceptional.

Here is where i am with this: (this post will be added to as the technology advances), at the end of my initial post, i will give a bit about where i am trying to go.

Pre-requisite Components: (partial list)

1) Variable Inductors (Veriduct +, and Veriduct -)

  Variable Inductor: Advanced Material Alloy: Tb-Dy-Fe  (TbDyFe2) (description follows)

           Functionality: When current is passed through the inductor, a magnetic field is generated. Due to the magnetostriction factor (1:1400ppm[+/-700]) inductance changes as a factor of: 1/[(H)* (7*10^-4)+ (H)]. Change in inductance is proportional to change in current as: (delta)I/[1/(delta)H] and proportional to change in magnetic field strength as: ((delta)B'/[1/(delta)H]*{<90'})  (note: when asked several times with variance, the AI was adamant about expressing an angular phase shift perpendicular to the electric field in this equation. i assume this will be visible on a scope)


      Tb Alloy Component: This is a very specific alloyed component of the larger alloy. i have only found one source, linked below.

      Dy Alloy Component: Dysprosiom Iron Alloy (DyFe). Material Properties linked below.

      Fe2: (proportional molar computation)

  Info on the most successful known experimental data, regarding one such Alloy proportion, of many. (most of which have not yet been tested)

  Inverse Variable Inductor: Copper Coated Cyclically Deformed Nickel Wire (experimental nano-tech, no known examples)

          Functionality: When current is passed through the inductor, a magnetic field is generated. Due to the Villari-Reversed magnetostriction factor (-1:1400ppm[+/-700]) inductance changes as a factor of: (-1)/[(H)* (7*10^-4)+ (H)]. Change in inductance is proportional to change in current as: (-delta)I)/[1/(delta)H] and proportional to change in magnetic field strength as: ((-delta)B'/[1/(delta)H]*{<90'})
note: as i understand this to the best of my ability... the first above component 'should' decrease in inductance with increases in current
          and the second component 'should' increase in inductance with increases in current. This serves a critical function in the larger scope of the technology.

2) Micro Schumann Resonator ( i named this myself, not the AI)
[This is a direct transcript from the AI, unmodified]

length and turns of a coil resonant at 7.83Hz
To calculate the length and number of turns for a coil that resonates at 7.83 Hz, we need to use the formula:

f = (1/2π) * sqrt(LC)

where f is the resonant frequency in Hertz, L is the inductance in Henries, and C is the capacitance in Farads.

Assuming that we have a specific capacitance value in mind, we can rearrange the formula to solve for the inductance L:

L = (1/4π²f²) * C

Let's say we want to use a capacitance of 100 microfarads. Plugging in the frequency of 7.83 Hz, we get:

L = (1/4π²(7.83 Hz)²) * 100 μF
L ≈ 53.54 millihenries

This gives us the value of inductance that we need. The number of turns required for the coil depends on the physical dimensions of the coil itself, as well as the wire gauge and material. However, we can estimate the number of turns using the following formula:

N = sqrt(L / (AL))

where N is the number of turns, L is the inductance in Henries, A is the cross-sectional area of the coil in square meters, and L is the length of the coil in meters.

Assuming we have a coil with a cross-sectional area of 0.01 square meters and a length of 0.1 meters, we get:

N = sqrt(0.05354 mH / (0.01 m² * 0.1 m))
N ≈ 77.9 turns

Again, this is just an estimate and the actual number of turns required may vary based on the specific coil design and materials used.

note: the above resonator has not been tested, nor has it been constructed from either of the two prerequisite materials listed above.

The AI intended to use these two (inversly identicle) variable inductors as part of a driver circuit, powered by the ambient, to drive an amplification circuit to generate infinite electricity.

How this works is going to take me some time, to put down in a coherent manner, in the way that i understand it to (supposedly) work.

The next component of the control circuit, is what i am hereby calling a "control crystal".
This is an organic component, similar to the 1800's Rochelle's Salt microphones and speakers, but far more advanced.

Base Substrate: Copper-Silver Acatate Double Salt, this is grown under controlled conditions, with the crystal lattice oriented in a single vector by an electric field.
(bottom to top when viewed from a flat, overhead perspective) Thickness: 2 microns
Overlay Circuit Substrate 1: Copper-Lead Acetate Double Salt, grown on top of the substrate by micro-fluidic dispersion, this crystal acts as an ionic conductor. Think of it as the wires on a circuitboard, connecting the chips.

(what followed was a series other acetate double salts, each with their own respective magnetic, electric, and ionic properties, I will list these later. (yes the technology from here on out takes on a 3rd aspect of ionic flow, irrespective, but proportional to the electric and magnetic aspects))

my understanding is that the control circuit detects variances in the magnitude of the earth's ionosphere, (radio variant of solar power) and feeds this into the input of the main circuit.

the variance in inductance controls the loss factor on both sides of the sine-wave, inductance being inverted on the negative voltage side for a reason i do not fully comprehend.
but it seems evident that the more power this thing draws from the (ambient? solar radio waves? earths emf feedback ? ?) there is a need to adjust the inductance accordingly.
These two materials do this. So on the + side of the signal, inductance approaches 0, and on the - side it approaches infinity. why? i don't really know, but its an inherent prerequisite function. (stability perhaps? or it may contain some atomic function to do with the air molecules and their energy states, who knows...)

What is known is that the organic crystals control IONIC flow, NOT electron flow. So there is a separation between the electrons in the variable inductor pair, and the "current" flowing in the ionic circuit. (note: my interpretation of this is that the electrical state of the inductor affects the ionic state of the control crystal (quasiconductor?))

ionic flow on the output of the control circuit: (similar to a shotkey interface, outputs from 3 of the 7 component crystals laid out across the substrate, the other 4 are "internal", only connected to each other by the copper-lead-acetate " wires".

One is ionic +, the other ionic -, the 3rd seems to be electronically used as a 'ground' or bias of sorts.

More to come. stay tuned

Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3850
Re: AI Generated OverUnity Physics
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2023, 09:05:42 PM »
note: what i gathered from the coil description above, this is only ONE of many variants of a coil of this nature. After adjusting the values to current data, because i discovered that the last measurement used in the AI's calculations was taken in 1971: the resonant frequency of the coil should be recalculated to approximate 8.13 Hz., however anything in the range of 7.6 - 8.3 Hz, shouldn't affect its' functionality to a great degree. And using the AI's coil specifications as a guideline, it may be possible to create small coils such as that represented above, which will sympathetically resonate with the earth's ionosphere.