Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Lithuania OU Experiment - Wesley's Theory + schematic+ explanation+step by step  (Read 15079 times)

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Lithuania  Experiment vs Colman  patent.
part#2

Physics can't be punished and is not based on beliefs about facts and doesn't recognize: magic, miracles, God, angels  devils hail and heaven 
or similar value , lack of value or BS. Physics doesn't care what you think agree or disagree  with.

You  want to  feel safe and understand what energy comes from right?
No one wants to be ignored, underrated, despite of your nationality gender sexual orientation or education.
Me neither .
but how to make you attracted to particle physics?
So why do I care?
I am not a pretty young lady although my wife ( psychologist) is.
https://youtu.be/op4GgbE8xWI?t=24
 :)
Please watch this video not because of beauty of my wife, but  because it is essential to you the researcher.
THIS VIDEO STARTS in RUSSIAN BUT it IS IN ENGLISH (Russian subtitles)

This video criticizes Russian science level  presented by  Russian PhD s  but it is done in very friendly way pointing at the nonsense
publicly  shared by some of them. I'm  assuming but not stating  :
- the  advanced age  of Russian scientists in the country where in 1960 average Russian died in age 55 says that they  had very much comfort  to live longer there.
At the same time such comfort  doesn't necessarily push for more of self education of already  appointed  members of Russian academy of science.
So it is possible that some of them "got frozen"   somewhere in  the  level of  the science at 1900ts while  modern science  rapidly moved on.
- to be delicate and gentle in wording. - In Russia/ former Soviet Union, a person was often politically elevated to get  the title of PhD.


_________________________________________________________
(videos with Colman patent and experiments are in my  YouTube )
- so if we can think about any possible something affecting health of experimenter than?
  than what?
  what is that?
  NEUTRON radiation??


Neutrons can be absorbed by other atoms and create radioactive isotopes.
The radioactive isotopes they  can produce radiation that's far more different than the neutron radiation itself.
Neutron radiation is the only one that can break atoms apart, creating radioactive material where none existed before.

Neutron activation:
Neutron radiation is the part of energy generation.
Quote
Neutron activation is the process in which neutron radiation induces radioactivity in materials, and occurs
when atomic nuclei capture free neutrons, becoming heavier and entering excited states.
The excited nucleus decays immediately by emitting gamma rays, or particles such as beta particles, alpha particles, fission products,
and neutrons (in nuclear fission).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_activation



______________________________________________________________

Is it true that Neutron radiation is dangerous?

You need to ask yourself  :
Is a gasoline in your  car tank dangerous and why?
Is natural gas in your stove dangerous and why?
Is coal in your stove or wood in your fireplace  dangerous and why?
Is pesticide, affecting your health and why you do not think about?

Most accidents happen because you didn't know, didn't expect, didn't care to learn and understand
and didn't pay attention. So if you are the researcher you need to know and understand:
1. A neutron is a neutral subatomic particle and is present in the nucleus of the atom and you are made from the atoms.
2. neutrons present in the nucleus differ in isotopes as isotopes have the same atomic number but different atomic mass. 
   https://www.vedantu.com/chemistry/neutrons

3.  neutrons are unable to ionize a gas. Therefore, they do not produce a track in Wilson's cloud chamber.
4. we have fast (cold) and slow(thermal)  neutrons neutron/fast-neutrons-high-energy-neutrons/
5.  is that true fast that  neutrons don't interact with matter..Or rather not...?
   Neutrons are neutral particles, therefore they travel in straight lines, deviating from their path only when they actually collide with a nucleus to be scattered into a new direction or absorbed.
   size of atomic particles is so small that in the atom distances between electron and  nucleus becomes really humongous and all of that space is empty and  represents vacuum.
   Free electron or positron or neutron that shoots out with the high-speed from the nucleus  or is traveling across the atom can simply fly out not hitting any atom.
   that is what happens to  the fast neutrons called also "cold neutrons." https://www.periodic-table.org/what-is-interaction-of-neutrons-with-matter-definition/
6. Neutron can become  different words are used   here but meaning is the same : hot,  slow, thermal, - if there is any moderator present.
   The function of a moderator such as heavy water or graphite in a nuclear reactor is to slow down fast neutrons till they become slow or thermal neutrons.
   so in: patent of Colman we are dealing with  presence of  graphite  as moderator.!!!
   so in: Lithuania Experiment  we are dealing with  presence of  ........... ferrite  chemical components
   and we try to find out if they could act as a neutron moderator.!!!

7. and yes we didn't specify yet what and how neutron radiation can over sudden be present in any of them.
8. chance of  hitting matter for slow thermal neutron vs cold fast neutron.
   
Quote
  A fast neutron will not be captured, so neutrons must be slowed down by moderation to increase their capture probability
https://www.shabupc.com/why-slow-neutrons-are-more-effective-than-fast-neutron/

picture from below  courtesy of:
https://www.teachoo.com/12777/3451/Discovery-of-Electron--Proton-and-Neutron/category/Concepts/



Summary - SO WE HAVE :

fast  very energetic  (powerful)      neutrons  but  they are       too fast         in many cases to affect   us immediately.
slow and still  somehow energetic   neutrons and  they are not too fast  and in many cases      affects us immediately.
The same apples to their ability to  participate in energy "production" -(  energy can be extracted  but can't be manufactured)
Can we think about Neutron not like source of energy but a part of a mechanism in energy extraction?
 

More is yet to come.
Wesley
« Last Edit: January 15, 2023, 04:46:30 PM by stivep »

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418

You  want to  feel safe and understand what energy comes from right?



Does this mean that the Colman tube is putting out more power than it is taking in RF power in RF?
If you recalculate the energy of quanta  hv, which is orders of magnitude higher in the output?

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567

I made some additions to my comment from above  so please  read it again.
I'm in USA New York  and  I hope that I'm writing  not to the group  of some Rain Forest villagers  from
South  of America or Russians from  Siberia who may not understand English but to valuable researchers
trying to understand more.

Do People Speak English In Russia  :
Yes, they do, but not many people speak English in Russia, - "all" Russians do not speak it.
https://higherlanguage.com/do-people-speak-english-in-russia/ 

Wesley

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
here is interesting schematic
https://overunity.com/19335/lithuania-ou-experiment-wesleys-theory-schematic-explanationstep-by-step/dlattach/attach/189365/
Well, this reminded me of everyone's well-known scheme (only greatly simplified) of Ruslan, Alekseev, Stalker, and so on. Take a closer look. :)

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
 NEW FE 4-6kWh  24 hours a day
Please go to :
:Re: Wesley's  Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum « Reply #3922 on: Today at 10:08:41 PM »
Wesley

worldcup

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
@Stivep,

first light of hope in 2012 part #3 OF VIDEOS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrRc-xieWjE&t=580s

Could you share the schematic of this replication you made on above video ?
If you have improved this version over all this years, we would appreciate updated schematic.

It's 2023, yet we don't have any replication for OU device, know why! because no schematic laid out ,
everywhere we find pieces of Q/A.

You got everything sorted out , then why don't you post schematic for the above youtube device ?

waiting for doom's day ? - it would by late by then for everyone to joy the fruit of such devices...

i would like to replicate and i'm sure other's aswell.

and i'm sure you don't have anything to hide since device video is shown in public domain with configuration spoken out.

Regards and respect to BIG Wesely..

Kator01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 898
Wesley,


concerning your post #45 : "comedy at the russian academy of science.
I looked it up and wonder, if this small guy standig left with the blue jacket is the same Alexamder Shishkin who gave this report here.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcF-KSLIAWs


which was brought forth by Bob Greenyer[/size] :


https://remoteview.substack.com/p/investigating-a-reported-method-of


I am a little confused now about the validity of his claim about "this new type of radiation",
because Bob gives no indication in all his report on the profession of Alexander.


What do you know ?


Mike






stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
I am a little confused now about the validity of his claim about "this new type of radiation",
because Bob gives no indication in all his report on the profession of Alexander.
which was brought forth by Bob Greenyer :
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/investigating-a-reported-method-of
What do you know ?
Mike

I'm going to give you two answers: one is short  and another one is  long.
Short one first:

Wesley,
concerning your post #45 : "comedy at the Russian Academy of Science.
I looked it up and wonder, if this small guy standing left with the blue jacket is the same Alexander Shishkin who gave this report here.
Yes this is him.
Yes he is short not only in height.
His achievement  may not be originally his, and may have no value or much value.
His  actual mental  ability to progress in physics may be now very severely reduced in quality and that what is left is just an image
of post soviet loyalist who was lucky to eliminate competing others like him trying using Soviet methods  of suppression, to benefit from  Soviet/Russian dirt and corruption.


opinion expressed is my own
Wesley
« Last Edit: February 11, 2023, 06:05:13 PM by stivep »

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
And now the Long Comment:


Analysis of the video: New type of penetrating radiation - Alexander Shishkin will be in long comment.
Wesley
i understand that  some of you may  not understand:  mentality, behavior, fears, dangers, reactions, dependencies
in totally corrupted world where science is a tool in mafia like legalized system that doesn't care  about achievement
If they can't  do it they may steal it. All facts - factors and reality  is not what  really happened but what  they say has happened. 

______________________________________________
Video of interest opens up in minute 2:06 In the beginning of it is mostly my wife. :)
I was just testing my editing software.
https://youtu.be/op4GgbE8xWI?t=126
Here in minute 2:06  Member of Russian Academy of Science Mr Shishkin talks  incredible nonsense.
He talks about gamma radiation from CRT, and danger of transmitting cell phones.
------------------------------
There is no gamma radiation from CRT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathode-ray_tube
comment: X-ray is not gamma. look at section:
Ionizing radiation
and there is no danger from transmitting cell phones apart from  photon 
dissipating in human body as a heat if phone of 2+W is too close to a head.
but almost nobody makes  cellphones with  more than 50mW today.
The reason for it is that energy level at cellphone frequency 2.4/5 GHz per period is too small.
Much higher frequency electromagnetic radiation (that is a visible light) is received by our eyes and is not dangerous too.
Only -electromagnetic in nature: ultraviolet, , and higher than that soft x-ray and then, gamma  is dangerous.

Quote
UV radiation has enough energy per period to break chemical bonds. Due to their higher energies, UV photons can cause ionization, a
process in which electrons break away from atoms. The resulting vacancy affects the chemical properties of the atoms and
causes them to form or break chemical bonds that they otherwise would not.
-what-is-ultraviolet-light.html
per period :
Quote
Energy is directly proportional to frequency. In other words, the higher the frequency, the greater the energy
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/frequency

___________________________________________________

https://youtu.be/DpLsaHWfpy0?t=984
The Shakhparonov Generator - Replication of Hutchison and LENR Effects in the 1980s
On the top of the page you see" magnetic monopole"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_monopole
as we know this "marketed"  " magnetic monopole" doesn't exist, however it is not theoretically impossible.
Some creationists may agree that God  is not theoretically impossible however they believe god is real.
But physics doesn't recognize both.

Mr Akexander Shishkin is mentioned here
https://youtu.be/DpLsaHWfpy0?t=1052

Here is a verbal statement concluding  Hutchison Effect,
Based on  the  statement of  some Russian who accidentally or  using political power of  fmr KGB, "got educated"
often on paper only and he was in need to produce some results - "some work" done.

The Entire  crowd  of these scientists in that Russian Moscow University Room shown in my video  is made from 70+
"Retirees." talking  in my opinion.- a nonsense or knowingly allow it, as it my hurt them if they say to much.
- messing up with Shishkin and main speaker may be painful as you don't know who's behind them.
https://youtu.be/op4GgbE8xWI?t=86
explanation:These who are behind their back could be former students now government officials, FSB(KGB)
or businessman or oligarchs or their children who received their education  due to bribes, directly or indirect benefits served to 
University decision makers  - who may be there  thanks to the same mechanism - including "fake"- approved PhD's Masters and so on.



Now  we have passionate Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project guy
who  doesn't shine at all.
assisted  by crowd  talking about Ether  and so on.. 

Is it enough for my wife psychologist to  call for  psychiatric evaluation? ( joke)


_______________________________________________

Summary:
My friend  there is nothing to analyze there.
Some Russians in 1980ties made some experiment using  Soviet Government money in  that absolutely corrupted  country in every possible level.
Including education.
Everybody there was this way: from  toilet paper, to everything you can possibly think of.
You could buy "everything"  or force others to give it  to you. .. that  what  Russia Was and now is much worse.
Putin says  war is good  and over 70% of Russians support him in it.

Western World  accepts
as Scientific  achievement :
Every experiment with repeatable results by independent "others"  can be applied as a credit the originator.
If not than it may be another Russian B.S.

_________________________________________

compare it to me.

 
I'm  absolutely solid and in line with modern physics in processes described.
there is no flaw  or visible flaw.
I say I have working device extracting energy form Schumann Waveguide and this energy is for  free so  we can call it  FE.
Dr James Corum  got over 200 patents on the process that is also used in it.
Zenneck wave is in use and is now solid branch used in commercial application e.g microstrips.

But.
Nobody wants to  repeat it and possibly by that  can't repeat it.
So in my case  that may mean that I didn't present  proof of working model, and the device may  not exist.
But chance is that I have it  and  is worth all money in the earth.
From my safety standpoint it is perfect.

The difference between me and some Russian fakers is that  I don't deal with anyone money,
I don't try to make  flashy videos like John  Hutchison to attract investors, or just to show
how good and  smart I'm and you  are not. :)

John ended  as some very exotic, eccentric image of his popular past in some forgotten  rural  area  after he sold   everything he had.
Again his achievement  was Non-replicable and John was never solid in physics or solid in anything at all.
His success was presentation  of  visually attractive visual  material that  despite if it was  true or not  was  quite convincing.

and in the contrast :
 
I'm giving you absolutely solid  physics, but not yet
attractive visual  material.
conclusion:
instead of looking at me - look at yourself who you are,  the TV BS watchers, or  analytical beings?
Blame yourself of who you are and who you are not  or not yet.
Can I be wrong?
Yes I can but chances are very small.


____________________________________________________

comments under the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpLsaHWfpy0&t=153s
are talking about:  sprites, galactic jets and neutron stars!  cathode ray, Plasmoids!,"black holes" 
atomic/galactic, cooling down as a dissipative system.  BIPOLAR jets. "dark matter"  the Aether.       
crystalline lattice break/end , Dislocations. Broken flux with an electron.


GUSHHHHHHHHHHHHH.................................
What the .......................................F...


Your comment is appreciated.
Analysis of the video: New type of penetrating radiation - Alexander Shishkin will be in next comment.
opinion expressed is my own

Wesley
« Last Edit: February 11, 2023, 10:58:45 PM by stivep »

Kator01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 898
Wesley,


thank you for the long explanation although I did'nt want you to go too far into this rabbithole :)
Now that I have looked the video the third time I understand the situation.
Funny this remark of Mr. Bulushenkov at the end of the scene before they wanted to show him the door (ridiculous )


Quote
you can do nothing, you have old films use repeatetly !!


That was the kicker  >:(


You should not worry about the image of your profile, members here have, I know how well scientifically funded your are. I read here since 2000 but doesnt post very often.


One remark about your work of Schuhmann waveguide: there are many reasons for not beeing able to repeat it.
Here is another one:
In  germany the regulations by the state-controlled frequency-band administration ( Bundesnetz-Agentur)  are such that it is almost impossible to run such a device without going to jail...thats the key point


You can not hide a device like this. Germany is not such a wast country like US, population-densitiy is high.
If you would build a big Farady cage around it , you will still have some percentage of ground-wave left.


Anyway thank you for these deeper  insights into russian scientific community


Mike




worldcup

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
@Stivep,

first light of hope in 2012 part #3 OF VIDEOS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrRc-xieWjE&t=580s

Could you share the schematic of this replication you made on above video ?
If you have improved this version over all this years, we would appreciate updated schematic.

It's 2023, yet we don't have any replication for OU device, know why! because no schematic laid out ,
everywhere we find pieces of Q/A.

You got everything sorted out , then why don't you post schematic for the above youtube device ?

waiting for doom's day ? - it would by late by then for everyone to joy the fruit of such devices...

i would like to replicate and i'm sure other's aswell.

and i'm sure you don't have anything to hide since device video is shown in public domain with configuration spoken out.

Regards and respect to BIG Wesely..

Hello,

@Wesley , desperately waiting for your response on this!

Regards

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
I'm  not in my place  now.   I'll try my to respond when I'm back.
I'm commenting now with material  that was previously prepared.. and ready to go.
Wesley

worldcup

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
I'm  not in my place  now.   I'll try my to respond when I'm back.
I'm commenting now with material  that was previously prepared.. and ready to go.
Wesley

Hello,
I am so very blessed as well as so much more grateful that actually, you bring so much change in
life with the true sense. Thank you for taking the time to do this, I’m beyond grateful.

so far, as lithuiana exp preparation, i have procured copper wire, proper dimension cardboard tube, ferrite rod, few other small suffs..
(after my assembly i will post video on build setup with all measurements, so even layman can replicate)

Doesn't matter who replicates this, the original creator's and invetor's would/should always be credited along with experimenters like 'wesley'. Original inventors might have some reasons to not openly share this technology, even though they want this tech to get public.
totally understood, with due respect.

But they can help people like me replicate this, who are willing to take risk or say whatever.

To all the inventor's of whatever technology they owe and want it to get public without getting into trouble, is to open source
it with dummy accounts on forums,social media,youtube..  (Video or PDF, build plan). Plain english ,no deep technical wordings.
just spread it like wild fire and it will domino effect.

--create account and just go copy - pasting every platform--

Never trust VPN's (offshore aswell). Just get this browser and jet set go https://www.torproject.org/download/

or for advanced user's, get this operatign system https://tails.boum.org/

or   I am well connected with siriusdisclosure project and members from many years.
https://siriusdisclosure.com/energy/#device-criteria
(But chances of tech getting suppressed after awhile, 50%. Trust no one other than yourself)
I have full faith in 'Steven M. Greer', boyd bushman (RIP), bob lazar, etc to name few.
But there are those powers who can stop this guys aswell if they want to, so so so, think wisely live well)

or
PM me and share your technology, and i will spread it like wildfire with all my resources and skillset.
You can use this https://privnote.com/ to communicate over PM.

anyone needs any cyber security, etc like information/help then PM me, i'm your guy. And i dont charge any money :-), whatsoever.

This guy's had success with such tech and tried to keep it to themselves/suppressed - Akula, Adrian Guska,
DALY, SR193, Vasmus, many more from old era which i don't name, it's a big list.
Today we don't know their existence, dead or alive :[

Holding such tech isolated/suppressed wont get you fame, money, patent. Instead it will invite - stress, life threats, death, poverty and one day you die like TK.

Open source and you get - name, fame, money, patent, protection, whatnot...

Just wish me luck :-)

the variable air cap with 500pf with 25 Kv is costing me a fortune to buy, but i will arrange funds for those aswell.

one thing i must point out, the variable air cap with 500pf with 25kv is not accurate.

with the size of variable air capacitor (ganged with 3) we see in the lithuania video, its small 500pf, but 25Kv? no. 25Kv will have bigger dimensions,very big. i think that must be around 200 volts not Kv.
(wesley version had small air variable cap ,maybe 100 Pf/500 volts! or so)

Regards
« Last Edit: March 01, 2023, 11:29:43 AM by worldcup »

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418


with the size of variable air capacitor (ganged with 3) we see in the lithuania video, its small 500pf, but 25Kv? no. 25Kv will have bigger dimensions,very big. i think that must be around 200 volts not Kv.
(wesley version had small air variable cap ,maybe 100 Pf/500 volts! or so)

Regards
vacuum variable capacitor can be small.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
   The original schematic is here.
 please  fallow Arunas recomendation  about C1, C3
Lithuania OU Experiment - Wesley's Theory + schematic+ explanation+step by step
« on: January 10, 2023, 03:38:34 PM »I used original coil assembly winded by Aidas . He made:
 - one that was non separatable  shown  here:
 Re: Lithuania OU Experiment - Wesley's Theory + schematic+ explanation+step by step  « Reply #2 on: January 10, 2023, 11:13:37 PM »
 winded as  one assembly.

- and another one  shown in link from above  that was caduceus  alone with removable  pick-up coil.
  We used  original flyback  model shown on the  picture.  After I burn it  it didn't work with another (from different CRT/TV  ) flyback  transformer
  I had on stack.

After the  Lithuania Experiment  Guntis filed patent   you may try to find   when he  achieved "infinitely"  growing  bell shape
 on  the oscilloscope.
The major  reason for failure for the replicators is  that  energy transfer mechanism was not  specified nor  understood.
that applies not only to this particular design  but all  of possible designs including Akula, Kapanadze  etc.

Not knowing  what energy comes from and/or how is  converted  to usable  to us form is also  reason for rejection by  science as  design is  hard to replicate.
I really don't like to talk to much  about it  as after  mentioned by  video  I started to have problems with Some Russians and Venezuelans
visited me at  home telling me that people are dies  not  because  something works or not ,- but because someone  else started  to believe  that it  works and you have it.
- "recommending" me to stay  quiet.
___________________________________
Because  I wanted to understand the process I decided to go  with  Dr James Corum  patented , solution  having  scientifically
established basis.
The second  PART OF  Lithuania Experiment was  the coil arrangement on circular  ferrite  that was  600W/ 1kW
output from  two 1W generators. But if you look at way coil was winded we  are talking about very similar design.
In my channel there is video  with Arunas  tuning that device as it will not work  without tuning.
We thought that it is due to ferrite - transmutation of the ferrite yoke.- that was very unusual in its properties , as Russians didn't know or care about  side effects .
It was known at that time that something is not right, and something is harmful and people watching that TV sometime got sick from it.
 x-ray  from CRT, was excluded as  insignificant , so what was it?
 The ferrite made us all sick in few days . Aidas lost hair and I  suffered for months.
 
Re: Lithuania OU Experiment - Wesley's Theory + schematic+ explanation+step by step
  « Reply #1 on: January 10, 2023, 09:04:29 PM »

Note: both the   Flyback and Ferrite Yoke were  manufactured  by the same Lithuanian manufacturer by millions
for Russian  color TV Rubin till 1990ties and even little after that.
I suggested  to  ask Arunas for help   it was his project not mine.

Wesley
« Last Edit: March 02, 2023, 12:08:19 AM by stivep »