Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

I wait and see when there will be allowed solar panels with radioactive material layer to put on the roofs.
Plus- phosphorus luminofore layer will make them less efficient from sun radiation.
Not so clever idea.

You, not developed, have been told; What! it's just
- for example !, and purely in a theoretical way !! ...
No need to wriggle once again
from myself - a blockhead!
Did I tell you? that you
- irradiated something - with radiation!? ? ?...

патент японии
добывание энергии:

Chinese Kapanadze
http://www.xjishu.com/zhuanli/60/201710402091.html

Can anyone download the full description after login?

nice 
https://patents.google.com/patent/CN107196522A/en

Thank You

Astrange question but were any of you alive in the late 60's or 70's ?
when offices had carpets and teenage girls ware nylon this and that and shoes had doc martin plastic soles
and every time one touched a filing cabinet  a spark would jump from the finger to the cabinet, imagine if that charge could be stored on a high repetition rate, Now there is a thought.

The Chinese device I haven't played with this device but is you have 2 wingdings one is 180 degree out of phase
with the other wouldn't that create simply generate standing waves ?

There's more going on here than is explicitly stated in the patent.
There are three capacitors in this circuit for a reason and that "signal"
line between the two capacitors in series isn't just for sampling voltage.

I think we are looking at a parametric resonator solution.  The driver
box is effectively shunting and releasing C₂ in-sync with the AC
frequency it is driving the input transformer.  When C₂ is shunted, the
overall capacitance of C₁ & C_X goes up and conversely, when C₂ is not
shunted, the overall capacitance goes down.  This is where you would
get a voltage gain at each cycle.  At the zero cross of the cycle, you
shunt C₂ and allow the voltage to increase and just before the peak,
you open the shunt, the capacitance drops and the voltage has to
increase.

It's a similar method to coil shorting, only instead of locking the
current in an inductor, here we just remove one of the series capacitors
from the circuit and add it back in right when we are near peak voltage
in the tank circuit.  I would suppose then, the voltage seen by the
secondary of the input transformer also increases and being a transformer,
the primary side voltage would also increase, which explains the
arrestor on the secondary side, which is there to prevent the control
box from exploding.

So what I can't really figure out is how the control box is driving the
input transformer.  It states its input is AC220V and if rectified, you
only have a limited voltage there and I would suspect the current
is fixed to some reasonably low current.  Otherwise you're just pouring
in watts which will eventually lead to self destruct.

In the past, I played around with parametric oscillators, but I did my
switching on the inductor side, kind of like Jim Murray's SERPS unit.
It didn't work well because you end up dealing with extreme back EMF
that squirts out and smokes transistors unless the transistors are super
fast and even then nature finds a way to bite you in the ass.  This
Chinese patent is rather novel in the way it uses capacitors to get the
same effect, but it surely isn't clear about the principal of operation.

I'll do some more experimenting with this.  I think I'll need to do
it with lower voltages though.  I don't have anything that will switch
4000 volts for sure.