Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Will the EU use this non-obvious method to get money from the general-public ?  (Read 450 times)

Offline ideas99889

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
The question
Will the EU use things like the new charge on fossil-fuel companies, to get money from the general-public ( instead of from private-companies ) to prevent the economic decline of the EU ?

Explanation of the non obvious method I am highlighting
In other words, will the EU use non obvious methods, like the "solidarity contribution on excess profits" detailed on https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_5489, which 'may' most likely be passed on to the electric-power-station-companies, which 'may' most likely pass it on to the households/consumers, with the 'majority' of these households/consumers completely bearing the burden of the increase in the electricity-price and not receiving any significant compensation from their government.

Note - Some households, will be compensated, as stated in the https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_5489, but you would think that the majority will not be compensated ( or not significantly ).

Or, in other words, since 2020, much of the EU has been surviving on reserve-funds, possibly gradually weakening the EU, will this reach a point where the EU has to regain this money ( FROM THE 'GENERAL PUBLIC', NOT, FROM PRIVATE COMPANIES ), but does not want to do it in an obvious way like raising income-taxes etc, so it may try methods like the above, which in the end only result in the general-public replenishing the EU funds.

Obviously the EU does not want to consider directly effective measures like Partial-Nationalization of electricity-companies, for  example, Nationalization of the part of the administration of electricity-companies that issue bills to households, or, change it so that it is the government itself that sends / issues electricity-bills to households ( and maybe Nationalization of specific parts of the hardware infrastructure of electricity-companies ).

Yes, after reading https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_5489, my theory does or may sound far fetched, but posting it anyway.


Offline ideas99889

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19

Just a 'summarization', and, a 're-type' of the original question.

________________

The question
Is there any mechanism to prevent the EU's new "temporary solidarity contribution" from being passed on to electricity customers / causing higher electricity bills ?

  - The "solidarity contribution on excess profits" detailed on https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_5489

  - In other words, what would prevent "oil, gas, coal and refinery sectors" from raising the price of their products.
________________

The Question
Will the EU use methods which are non-obvious to households to get money from households ?
  -  Things like the new charge on fossil-fuel companies, to get money from the households ( instead of from private-companies ) to prevent the economic decline of the EU ?

Explanation of what the result of the non-obvious method I am highlighting may be
In other words, will the EU use non obvious methods, like the "solidarity contribution on excess profits" detailed on https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_5489, which 'may' most likely be passed on to the electric-power-station-companies, which 'may' most likely pass it on to the households/consumers, with the 'majority' of these households/consumers completely bearing the burden of the increase in the electricity-price and not receiving any significant compensation from their government.

Note - Some households, will be compensated, as stated in https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_5489, but you would think that the majority will not be compensated ( or not significantly ).

Or, in other words, since 2020, much of the EU has been surviving on reserve-funds, possibly gradually weakening the EU, will this reach a point where the EU has to regain this money ( FROM 'HOUSEHOLDS', NOT, FROM PRIVATE COMPANIES ), but does not want to do it in an obvious way like raising income-taxes etc, so it may try methods like the above, which in the end only result in the households/consumers replenishing the EU funds.

Obviously the EU does not want to consider directly effective measures like Partial-Nationalization of electricity-companies, for example, Nationalization of the part of the administration of electricity-companies ( or the "oil, gas, coal and refinery sectors" and "renewables, nuclear and lignite" mentioned in https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_5489 ) that issue bills to households/customers, or, change it so that it is the government itself that issues electricity-bills to households ( and maybe Nationalization of specific parts of the hardware infrastructure of electricity-companies ).
________________