Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory  (Read 3967 times)

Offline alan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 619
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #15 on: August 10, 2022, 04:53:00 PM »
You're welcome.

Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 998
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #16 on: August 10, 2022, 05:11:16 PM »
Which may explain why most of the FE inventors who had success spent a lifetime looking for answers.
And finally we go to the grave, without finding the answer.  :D
Quote
Жизнь как рояль,клавиша черная,клавиша белая. потом крышка(dead).
 Михаил Жванецкий.(outstanding Soviet humorist.)
Quote
Жизнь как зебра,полоса белая,полоса черная.А дальше?
А дальше жопа.(anecdote)

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7765
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #17 on: August 10, 2022, 05:12:03 PM »
Alan
I am contacting Pierre replicators or associates
Whom last I heard were not successful!


Would be incredibly happy to update a success


Also
Marathon man forum?
Spent many attempts to register just now
No user name would go through ?
Seems a problem with service provider ( his “anti bot “ vetting machine)
Please send him my email

Thanks

Chetkremens@gmail.com
EDIT
for comment below
I tried dozens of renderings
I will try again
Redid process and it worked ( no spaces)
Thanks

Offline alan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 619
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #18 on: August 10, 2022, 05:21:34 PM »
Try a usename without spaces.

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7765
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #19 on: August 10, 2022, 05:36:46 PM »
Pierre himself did close the loop. :) 
Part 2/4 to 4/4: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWvSe4GOz0A 
Closing the loop: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDp2VJkT76E&t=573s   
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=968Pwkmy-bo 

Marathonman's forum: 
https://figueramarathonman.boards.net/board/5/clemente-figuera-board


A repost for perspective on above exchange ( sorry for not including in my above post)


Chet K
Edit
Alan are you able to post link to self running marathon man Device ?
I presumed it would be top of page at Forum you linked to ?
Sorry as I am unable to find it !
Thanks 👍
EDIT #2 (I see screaming fisherman machine gun posting below ??)
Anyhow!
*Alan
Also the above you tube vids are reposts of Pierre’s work
Without his permission??
And still no Replication (I am told !)
Yes there are comments how Holcomb resembles Pierre build ?

« Last Edit: August 10, 2022, 09:41:06 PM by ramset »

Offline onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #20 on: August 10, 2022, 07:13:10 PM »
alan
Quote
Pierre himself did close the loop. :)
Part 2/4 to 4/4:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWvSe4GOz0A
Closing the loop:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDp2VJkT76E&t=573s   
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=968Pwkmy-bo 

That's an interesting setup similar to the Holcomb device and seems to have the right design elements.

For example, generally all of our circuits are based on lumped sums and uniformity. It is habitual behavior based on what we were taught and the science we know. So when we go to build a motor or generator we lump all the coils together then connect them to a common circuit in series or parallel. We tend to lump everything together and make it uniform because that's what science did and the people who created the science, ergo habitual behavior.

In fact, I'm always catching myself at the bench asking "what am I doing?", I'm simply repeating what others do without even thinking about it or questioning why. I know what I'm doing doesn't have a hope in hell of working because everyone else is doing it yet there I am repeating it.

I like these videos because most people would tell him he's doing everything wrong and wasting his time yet there he is apparently closing the loop. There may be something to this because I also got much better results by doing everything wrong...

Regards
AC


Offline seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 913
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #21 on: August 10, 2022, 08:46:34 PM »
STUFF CAN MOVE FASTER THAN LIGHT. OTHER WISE WE COULD NOT GET AN ATOMIC BOMB.
E= MC SQUARE.  TWO STUFFS COLLIDING INTO EACH OTHER EACH TRAVELING AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS EQUAL
C SQUARE. SO THE INNER CORE OF THE HOLCOMB AND THE OUTER CORE ARE THE MODULATOR AND THE CORE IN
BETWEEN THE TWO IS THE OUTPUT CURE. LET US SAY THAT TH INNER MODULATOR CORE MAGNETIC FIELD IS ROTATING
CLOCKWISE AND THE OUTER CORE IS ANTICLOCKWISE THEN SHAZMAM C SQUARE HAPPENS IN THE MIDDLE CORE.

Offline seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 913
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #22 on: August 10, 2022, 08:47:33 PM »
A LITTLE JUMPING KABOSOTER TOLD ME SO.

Offline seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 913
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #23 on: August 10, 2022, 08:52:20 PM »
TO TEST THIS IDEA BUILD TWO OF AS PER THIS UTUBE. THEN
SHAZAM. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po-yib77vgA&t=192s

Offline seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 913
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #24 on: August 10, 2022, 09:06:10 PM »
FOR ANY PERMANENT MAGNET OR ELECTROMAGNET TO EXHIBIT  ELECTROMAGNETISM, MOST OF THE SPINNING ELECTRONS AND THE REST OF THE CORE OF THE MAGNET IS IN RESONANCE WITH ETHER. HENCE THE ETHER IS INDUCED INTO A VORTEX SPIN OF NORTH AND SOUTH SPINNING AT OPPOSING SPEED OF LIGHT WHICH EQUAL TO TWICE THE SPEED OF LIGHT AROUND THE MAGNET OR ELECTROMAGNET. A MAGNET IS ACTUALLY AN ETHER LENS. IT FOCUS
THE ETHER INTO A VORTEX WHICH WE CLASSIFIED AS MAGNETISM.

Offline Ufopolitics

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #25 on: August 11, 2022, 01:08:43 AM »
alan
That's an interesting setup similar to the Holcomb device and seems to have the right design elements.

Hello AC Cowboy... :)

Is not just "similar" it is based exactly on the same Theory...Rotating the Magnetic Field...not as Sophisticated as HES, because using relays...and a cheap Arduino Microprocessor...however, Pierre is reusing the BEMF to refill the Ultracaps, not the cause of OU here...

Ufopolitics

Offline SolarLab

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 347
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #26 on: August 11, 2022, 04:55:36 AM »

Hope this is somewhat useful, or at least interesting; and it's in the right thread (they change around a bit).

Checked the DZ_Gen archive and found about 2.6Gb of data. Too much to post here - but there were two
"NOTES" files that are attached and some of the links appear to still work (these are likely still in the old threads).
 ------------------------------------------------------

A quote from Pierre via Luc:

 https://overunity.com/17653/pierres-170w-in-1600w-out-looped-very-impressive-build-continued-moderated/msg518854/#msg518854

I received a very bad message from Pierre:

it only rotates a magnetic field, you will not get much voltage with it as there's something else I kept secret. It's like an engine with no pistons, it won't start. It's the same thing for the dz generator, the important thing is not what we see but rather what you don't see.

I have seen too many people who want to take credit in my place. So my contribution stops here. You'll have to discover the rest on your own. I can tell you it's not easy to achieve, it took me nearly 2 years to find the solution as rotation is only one aspect of the dz, it's really more complicated than that. 

At least people will be able to learn how to rotate a magnetic field but it will stop there, they won't get the result I have.
I even still have issues to fix but I think I can solve everything with my second prototype that's presently being built and will take several months. It all need to be started from the beginning, new circuit, new more powerful coils and a new sequence program that looks to be complicated.   

So I wish you the best of luck with the continuation and beware of those who try to keep the information for themselves and don't reveal anything else. I wonder why, humm
When I've applied for a patent I can show you the rest of the version 2 dz generator but not before. Thank you.

================= on or about 25 March 2018 ==========
Well, that's unfortunate to loose Pierre's trust. I knew something was up but I didn't want to alarm the group. I thought once we had this new moderated topic and Pierre could see we are serious researchers and truly want to work together with him to understand the effect and then further improve it, in time would come to understand that Erfinder's information was all a purposeful sabotage to stop the research.
I'm quite sure Pierre has lost trust in me (mentioning Patent) with all the misinformation Erfinder posted about me in the first topic which none of it was translated and if Pierre used google translate that would causes even more confusion as it does a really bad job from English to French.
What Erfinder did It's an old tactic call divide and conquer.  You must all remember how Arron did the same thing to get Eric Dollard to himself.
Anyways, what can we do other then move forward with what we have. Maybe if Pierre sees we don't give up and work together he will understand that all that was misinformation purposely done to divide us so we give up and go our separate ways.
So, the question now is will you guys let that happen?  or will we stay and work together?
Please post your truthful replies as I'm sure Pierre is reading what's going on.

Kind regards Luc

-----------------------------------------

Nice part is we can now simulate this device for varification or to discover the "not seen" "missing pistons"   ;)   

Pierre also mentioned somewhere about having only 4 poles instead of the current 6 in his second generation build - easy to test!

Offline lota

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 61
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #27 on: August 11, 2022, 07:48:39 AM »

Hello
you can't put the files on the Internet. Then you can download it.
Greeting
Lota

Offline Ufopolitics

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #28 on: August 11, 2022, 02:36:41 PM »
@Solar Lab

Thanks, great find!
However, most of it is on that Moderated Thread by Luc.

Also you could access all Pierre Cotnoir posts by searching Member: pedro1 All Posts
It is also very interesting...

Now, my opinion about Pierre comment below on the DZ Generator:

Quote
if only rotates a magnetic field, you will not get much voltage with it as there's something else I kept secret. It's like an engine with no pistons, it won't start. It's the same thing for the dz generator, the important thing is not what we see but rather what you don't see.

False, I have no problems at all to reach higher Voltages than Input...the problem lays on boosting Amperage above Input Amps, while keeping the higher voltage. (I do have a point where I boost Amperage above Input Amps, however, Voltage drops to mV...that is the "anomaly" I was referring to before)

Related to Pierre Cotnoir (pedro1) getting ANY Patent on his Generator...It is not going to be an "easy, piece of cake"...He will have Holcomb's Patents which are already granted...and ALL relates to the exact Field of Invention...

So, All Holcomb Patents will come up in the first search any USPTO Examiner do, or even any Patent Attorney He hires, must first do a FULL SEARCH, of any other Patent which is on the similar fields...and that will automatically call for a DENIAL of Cotnoir Patent.

Also SL, and unfortunately, I do not think any simulation will reveal the so called "missing pistons" he mentions as an example, about his "not revealed secrets"...

Regards
 
Ufopolitcs


Edit 1: I do not see that "secret" example as "an engine without pistons"...but, as an engine with everything on it...except there is a "pressure leak" on the pistons compression chambers...it will not start, no matter how much you crank it...just because higher pressures will not be achieved....just a bit more "technical".

Offline SolarLab

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 347
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #29 on: August 11, 2022, 06:08:12 PM »
@Solar Lab

Thanks, great find!
However, most of it is on that Moderated Thread by Luc.

Also you could access all Pierre Cotnoir posts by searching Member: pedro1 All Posts
It is also very interesting...

Now, my opinion about Pierre comment below on the DZ Generator:

False, I have no problems at all to reach higher Voltages than Input...the problem lays on boosting Amperage above Input Amps, while keeping the higher voltage. (I do have a point where I boost Amperage above Input Amps, however, Voltage drops to mV...that is the "anomaly" I was referring to before)

Related to Pierre Cotnoir (pedro1) getting ANY Patent on his Generator...It is not going to be an "easy, piece of cake"...He will have Holcomb's Patents which are already granted...and ALL relates to the exact Field of Invention...

So, All Holcomb Patents will come up in the first search any USPTO Examiner do, or even any Patent Attorney He hires, must first do a FULL SEARCH, of any other Patent which is on the similar fields...and that will automatically call for a DENIAL of Cotnoir Patent.

Also SL, and unfortunately, I do not think any simulation will reveal the so called "missing pistons" he mentions as an example, about his "not revealed secrets"...

Regards
 
Ufopolitcs


Edit 1: I do not see that "secret" example as "an engine without pistons"...but, as an engine with everything on it...except there is a "pressure leak" on the pistons compression chambers...it will not start, no matter how much you crank it...just because higher pressures will not be achieved....just a bit more "technical".


Hi Ufopolitics,

Looked at the Amps vs Voltage early on - using the "flat, so called LinGen" (4-N & 4-S) per module: modules were stacked in
series and/or parallel to to meet the various output requirements. Each module's output is independant, like battery cells; even
if the input pulses share driver sources. They are synchronized, much like paralleling ICE Inverter Generators. This is a big
advantage over the round rotating field housing. Easier to stack and fabricate as well.

Start-up (initial or after a long storage cycle) might be done using a "shaker style flashlight" technique. You need a "source" to
initially get it going (a crank so to speak). Efficient SiC or GaN MOSFET switching and Supercaps are likely needed (not tested in
the full configuration yet since SiC FETS just recently went from ~ $4.00US each to over ~ $40US). Supercaps have likely also
gone through the roof.

Simulations revealed there are "no missing pistons" as seen in the posted, very brief, LinGen analysis (unfortunately, due to
very limited forum resources, more comprehensive cartoons could not be attached). A KW+ generator is also viable.

The NOTES were included since searching through pages of "stuff" can be frustrating, if not futile!

--- Crank all you want, without a "source of power (battery or magnets...)" to initialize the system electronics/coils - it's a no go!

Regards

SL