Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory  (Read 653 times)

Offline onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 919
Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« on: August 05, 2022, 01:39:39 AM »
This is a thread dedicated to the working theory of the Holcomb device and others related to it.

Regards
AC

Offline onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 919
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2022, 02:30:11 AM »
Here is the gauge by which any real theory should be debated....https://blog.dtssydney.com/richard-feynmans-principles-of-scientific-thinking
Quote
The Feynman Principles:

   "The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool."
    "Scientific knowledge is a body of statements of varying degrees of certainty — some most unsure, some nearly sure, but none absolutely certain."
    "Permit us to question — to doubt — to not be sure."
    "Have no respect whatsoever for authority; forget who said it and instead look what he starts with, where he ends up, and ask yourself, 'Is it reasonable?'"
    "There is one feature I notice that is generally missing in cargo cult science (junk science) … It's a kind of scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter honesty."
    "If you're doing an experiment, you should report everything that you think might make it invalid — not only what you think is right about it."
    "Scientific knowledge is an enabling power to do either good or bad — but it does not carry instructions on how to use it."
    "If we suppress all discussion, all criticism, proclaiming 'This is the answer, my friends; man is saved!' we will doom humanity for a long time to the chains of authority, confined to the limits of our present imagination."
    "We make no apologies for making these excursions into other fields, because the separation of fields, as we have emphasised, is merely a human convenience, and an unnatural thing. Nature is not interested in our separations, and many of the interesting phenomena bridge the gaps between fields."
    "Mathematics is not just a language. Mathematics is a language plus reasoning. It's like a language plus logic. Mathematics is a tool for reasoning."
    "I learned very early the difference between knowing the name of something and knowing something."
    "The real problem in speech is not precise language. The problem is clear language."
    "The only way to have real success in science, the field I’m familiar with, is to describe the evidence very carefully without regard to the way you feel it should be."
    "And therefore when we go to investigate we shouldn’t pre-decide what it is we are trying to do except to find out more about it."
    "The exception tests the rule."
    "That is the principle of science. If there is an exception to any rule, and if it can be proved by observation, that rule is wrong."

AC

Offline SolarLab

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2022, 04:14:48 AM »
AC and Wesley,

You'll be happy to know you have convinced me that this whole Holcomb is a lark. No need for me to carry on with any more development. No one has even replicated it. Those tiny little magnetic domain things just can't rotate or slide, it's impossible and non of the greats in science seem to be able to explain anything either. 

Anyway, thanks for the great advice and guidance, it's helped me a lot in deciding to THROW IN THE TOWEL. To bad in a way since the simulations and all appeared to actually prove the concept at least. 

I'll check in from time to time just in case someone here has a break-through but I'm not optomistic. 

Breaks my poor little heart having put so much of my time and effort into something, just to find out it was all for not.  :'(   

Oh well - as you said - not my first (bad) rodeo!

Take care, and have a good one...

SL




Online kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 929
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #3 on: August 05, 2022, 12:24:09 PM »
Why are you upset, make double Milkovich pendulums, they promise a 12-fold increase. :D
But seriously, I have not yet voiced all my proposals on this topic.
One of them was, if you still spin the field faster than the speed of light, can a long-awaited miracle will be able happened ?

Offline Goat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #4 on: August 06, 2022, 03:58:34 AM »
Why are you upset, make double Milkovich pendulums, they promise a 12-fold increase. :D
But seriously, I have not yet voiced all my proposals on this topic.
One of them was, if you still spin the field faster than the speed of light, can a long-awaited miracle will be able happened ?
After looking at https://vimeo.com/675304867 at 2:00 minutes they show a test tube filled with a fluid showing the spin of the magnetic field, it doesn't seem to be spinning as fast as the speed of light or beyond. 

PG

Offline citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 969
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #5 on: August 06, 2022, 12:22:47 PM »

But seriously, I have not yet voiced all my proposals on this topic.
One of them was, if you still spin the field faster than the speed of light, can a long-awaited miracle will be able happened ?


How do you propose to spin the field faster than the speed of light?  You obviously can't move a magnet faster than the speed of light.  And you can't make the electrons in a wire move faster than the speed of light so how can you move a magnetic field faster than the speed of light?  Do you even know how fast light moves?


Carroll

Online kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 929
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #6 on: August 06, 2022, 02:20:47 PM »
Let's say the stator (or rotor) winding is three-phase, and the phase shift between currents in adjacent phases will be 10 ns (120 degrees). In this case, we obtain the frequency of the supply current 33.333 MHz (period duration 30 ns). To obtain a superluminal speed of rotation of the field, it is necessary that the diameter of the rotor be at least 2.865 meters.

Offline onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 919
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #7 on: August 09, 2022, 07:06:48 PM »
Did a little math on the Holcomb device...

Suppose we have three coil(s) sets and each of said coil set can operate over a given range of frequencies in order to produce X result. Let's say a frequency range of 100kHz for each coil set in large 1kHz increments and only one combination will produce the desired result. We now have 27 million possible combination and this is only if the coil windings, geometry, orientation, core material, core geometry etc... are all correct. So we could throw in maybe 100 more variables which is a major understatement and were now at only 2.7 billion possible combinations.

A person could start guessing however if we were to take one guess every minute it would take us around 85 years or a lifetime. Which may explain why most of the FE inventors who had success spent a lifetime looking for answers. This is why theory is so important to separate the wheat from the chaff and increase our odds of success.

Regards
AC

Offline Lunkster

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems Working Theory
« Reply #8 on: August 09, 2022, 07:45:42 PM »
Did a little math on the Holcomb device...

Suppose we have three coil(s) sets and each of said coil set can operate over a given range of frequencies in order to produce X result. Let's say a frequency range of 100kHz for each coil set in large 1kHz increments and only one combination will produce the desired result. We now have 27 million possible combination and this is only if the coil windings, geometry, orientation, core material, core geometry etc... are all correct. So we could throw in maybe 100 more variables which is a major understatement and were now at only 2.7 billion possible
combinations.

A person could start guessing however if we were to take one guess every minute it would take us around 85 years or a lifetime. Which may explain why most of the FE inventors who had success spent a lifetime looking for answers. This is why theory is so important to separate the wheat from the chaff and increase our odds of success.

Regards
AC

In the aerospace industry, the flight envelope has an infinite flight conditions for the operation
of the products.  We would test a limited set of parameters for the qualification tests that
would cover the most critical parts of the flight envelope.

When you look up parameters of electrical devises, the parameters are displayed
usually in lines that are generated from a few data points compared to all the
possible data points for that parameter.

So, development of FE devices should be tested the same way.
Test the parameters that could cause the most changes in the devices output first.
From the graph, move to the best operating point for that parameter and then go to the next parameter.

Now this is why it is important to create as much adjustability in the physical components
in the prototype so that you do not need so many different prototype builds.

Now with that being said,  Most of the best FE concepts have taken several years to get
to a manufacturable design.  Even then a lot of them are never seen again for different reasons.

Now as you go through the prototype build, it is good to think about how you can
use as many off the shelf components as you can in the design for the final prototype.

In larger companies you have several groups working together to bring products
to the customers.

How can FE people work together to speed up the process of OU devices.
FE development the way it currently is has a lot of disadvantages to it.

How can it be improved?

Lunkster