Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Room for Free Energy and its Physics  (Read 3807 times)

Offline mrwayne

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Room for Free Energy and its Physics
« on: August 03, 2022, 04:33:43 PM »
This Thread will support the discussion on the energy generation technology shown in this video by content creator Markus Nenning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqbJWBtoFMQ




Offline mrwayne

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Room for Free Energy and its Physics
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2022, 04:45:25 PM »
This spread sheet was prepared independently, and based off the video.


Corrections were made regarding stroke lengths form actual versus the computer animation - So the spread sheet represents the actual system.


This is a Under Unity "Input" System which results in a Remainder Gain each stroke.


The Excess energy is accounted for, predictable, and repeatable - and can be verified with simple and clear understanding of Buoyant physics.

Update to this note: I have removed the spread sheet on August 12 - it was corrupted also, as the one Kaine loaded IF you have downloaded version 1.1- delete it.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2022, 04:09:31 PM by mrwayne »

Offline mrwayne

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Room for Free Energy and its Physics
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2022, 04:56:27 PM »
Notes:


1. This research has been my full time career for over 12 years
2. Every fact I share has been physically tested
3. Both the FBI and State have brought false claims against me and both dropped the claims
4. This system scales in a non linear scale
5. New physics have been unlocked in this research
6. All components of this system have completed Alpha testing, Beta design is progress


Enjoy

Most people figure this out quickly.


Air transfer serves several cost savings functions, the combining a standard buoyancy operation with the discovery of the "Travis Effect" is the primary reason a cost reduction Input Process is possible.

Mr Wayne



 
« Last Edit: August 04, 2022, 12:29:12 AM by mrwayne »

Offline mrwayne

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Room for Free Energy and its Physics
« Reply #3 on: August 03, 2022, 05:06:00 PM »
Having a "variable cost" method for Work being performed is provides a new opportunity.[size=78%] [/size]
Prior to the observation of the Travis Effect, it was believed that a specific amount of work should have the same energy value regardless of the method - this equal work and energy belief is what drives the idea of Gravity being conservative.


One single example of unequal work 100% proves that Gravity is not always conservative;


Watch Toms Video's:


Travis Effect https://youtu.be/VlhsXJfJuQA


Included on that channel are 4 other videos of great importance to this topic.


Enjoy


Mr Wayne





Offline Tarsier_79

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 80
Re: Room for Free Energy and its Physics
« Reply #4 on: August 03, 2022, 06:51:08 PM »
The above diagram shows unity. The power stroke is half the reset stroke length.

Quote
This spread sheet was prepared independently, and based off the video.
Corrections were made regarding stroke lengths form actual versus the computer animation - So the spread sheet represents the actual system.

Not sure why you double the stroke length in the spreadsheet, but with a corrected buoyancy stroke length, it comes out at 98%.... Unity.

Please provide an updated cad drawing, or an updated scale drawing with measurements showing correct dimensions.

It will come out as unity too.


« Last Edit: August 03, 2022, 08:39:45 PM by mrwayne »

Offline citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1000
Re: Room for Free Energy and its Physics
« Reply #5 on: August 03, 2022, 07:36:41 PM »
Mr. Wayne,


Please use your power as moderator of this thread to remove the distracting posts so the rest of us can follow your subject with out all the clutter.


I have not made a determination yet as to the validity of your claim but I am very willing to keep an open mind and learn.  So please continue to share.


Thanks for sharing,
Carroll

Offline mrwayne

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Room for Free Energy and its Physics
« Reply #6 on: August 03, 2022, 08:38:37 PM »
The above diagram shows unity. The power stroke is half the reset stroke length.

Not sure why you double the stroke length in the spreadsheet, but with a corrected buoyancy stroke length, it comes out at 98%.... Unity.

Please provide an updated cad drawing, or an updated scale drawing with measurements showing correct dimensions.

It will come out as unity too.


Please refrain from modifying the spread sheet to incorrect values.




The Production stroke length and the Reset stroke length are the same - and the ideal stroke length is 1/2 of the height of the inner displacer (Pod).


To All, my attached spread sheet has correct values, I have deleted the one attached to Tarsier.


Mr Wayne


Offline mrwayne

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Room for Free Energy and its Physics
« Reply #7 on: August 03, 2022, 08:41:34 PM »
Mr. Wayne,


Please use your power as moderator of this thread to remove the distracting posts so the rest of us can follow your subject with out all the clutter.


I have not made a determination yet as to the validity of your claim but I am very willing to keep an open mind and learn.  So please continue to share.


Thanks for sharing,
Carroll


Will Do,


Hope your enjoy your discovery.


Mr Wayne

Offline mrwayne

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Room for Free Energy and its Physics
« Reply #8 on: August 03, 2022, 08:53:38 PM »
Paid for and not paid for:


Prior to the Pod (inner displacer) and the Riser (outer layer) being pulled down, an air  valve is shut - not allowing the air to transfer.


When the Pod is pulled down it pulls the Riser as well (with the air trapped inside).


When the full pod travel is reached - the Riser is still its full production length past the Pod.


When the Air valve is opened - the air quickly begins to transfers to the higher elevation (and lower pressure side) - and the riser loosing air lowers - by gravity and the pressure inside being lower than the water pressure above.


On the now production side (opposite) When sufficient pressure differential is reached to overcome the production cylinder - movement of riser B commences and the air flow speed increases and so both the vacating riser and stroking riser now move in concert.


No energy is required to lower the Riser during air transfer - it is a natural reaction powered by gravity.


So the riser during powered and gravity sink - moves twice the distance of the Pod, Half under power, and half by gravity.


The Powered movement is the same distance as the production stroke.


Thank you


Wayne

Offline mrwayne

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Room for Free Energy and its Physics
« Reply #9 on: August 03, 2022, 09:12:30 PM »

New Thinking Required: LAW 1. Designed inequality of work or cost

The Travis Effect demonstrates the ability to reduce the cost of work, A cost Reduced system has not value if the work in both directions is the same.


This is the first Law of energy causation;   


To have a remainder or "work available after system cost" one Direction must have a different Value than the opposite direction.


A work differential is function of design, an unequal, or asymmetric design does not happen in observable process in nature: it must be intelligently designed.


Markus demonstrated this with the moon versus Earth value of work on a 60 pound weight that weighs 10 pounds on the moon - its common sense to an observer that when equal work "cost" values are not equal - then a differential is required - just as in the moon example.


The minute I tested the Travis Effect - I said - if i can lift a load greater than the normally required air volume - should I not also be able to use that work to sink the volume normally required?


And the Answer is yes, and took on many intelligent designs to achieve a bigger goal - Clean reliable energy generation.


Mr Wayne


Offline mrwayne

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Room for Free Energy and its Physics
« Reply #10 on: August 03, 2022, 09:22:19 PM »
New Thinking Required: LAW 1. Designed inequality of work or cost

Mr Wayne


Law 1. Designed inequality of work or cost
Part (a)
Reliability of expectation and Measurement 


Since the work difference is a design feature, it is always measurable, predictable, and reliable.


A "remainder" is simply a value equal to the work differential minus system losses.
When the designed work differential exceed the systems losses, then a resultant "available source" will result.
Conversely, when the same system is run in reverse, and then the measured loss will be the same difference and plus the system losses..


While energy remaining has the appearance of creation, the reverse results in an non thermal, non potential storage energy destruction.


Mr Wayne




Offline mrwayne

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Room for Free Energy and its Physics
« Reply #11 on: August 03, 2022, 09:30:36 PM »

Law 1. Designed inequality of work or cost
Part (a)


While energy remaining has the appearance of creation, the reverse results in an non thermal, non potential storage energy destruction.


Mr Wayne


Law 1. Designed inequality of work or cost
Part (b)

Energy Creation/ destruction Scope application


When in the proper scope of designed differential energy can be generated and wasted outside the scope of a  thermal loss.


Thermal dynamics is the scope of conversion and consumption, and opposite and equal reactions, where the highest efficiency is attained by simplicity, reduction of loss, and friction.


Conversely Energy Causation can not be performed in a simple opposite and equal process - but it can be preformed with a series of simple systems; designed to be unequal.


Mr Wayne




Offline mrwayne

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Room for Free Energy and its Physics
« Reply #12 on: August 04, 2022, 12:00:41 AM »
What The Travis Effect revealed about the discussion of Over Unity


Unity is 1:1,
over/unity is OVER/ONE
anything >1/1 ....
Out put exceeding Unity. 


Unity does not mean Input, that appears to be an assumption seemingly built up over time, and with good reason - without the discovery of an unequal work value, relationships, or unequal energy cost - unity might as well be changed to "InPut" as in output/input.


Yet as it turns out, reducing the cost of doing work,means being able to do unity work at a reduced cost.

(which the "Travis Effect" example is only one method I am sharing here).


This means that the Internal cost to generate unity is less than unity value of production.


Knowing the difference and knowing which claim is being made is critical to an evaluator.


Ignoring this fundamental fact levies the evaluator unqualified to judge the merits of a technology.


If the goal of building a system that provides continuous, clean, and abundant energy is i fact the goal - then you had better learn the difference between a system that lowers cost below ideal, and provides real free energy, and one that magically claims to exceed unity.


Thanks


Mr Wayne




p,s,
I am continually seeing some say - its not over unity - to which I say - if you really new what your were saying - you are correct- but the system I have shared produced energy to be externally consumed without input, without consumption of a resource, and without conversion of a power source. Boom




Offline mrwayne

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Room for Free Energy and its Physics
« Reply #13 on: August 05, 2022, 02:06:59 PM »

Now - Observation is an interesting thing - Side "B" is raised to demonstrate the Volume of Air as compared to side A


Offline mrwayne

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Room for Free Energy and its Physics
« Reply #14 on: August 05, 2022, 02:14:11 PM »
In this picture, the same volume as the previous picture is floating a distance above the concrete block


Side "A" is almost ready to start preforming work, while side "B"


Now Side A could perform the work over a longer distance - and longer distance is more power.


But Power is not defined by distance alone, "Tines Distance and Mass" must be considered.