Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Why can't countries mod national security laws, to put overunity on the grid ?  (Read 2925 times)

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3400
Do aikula and kapanedze work as claimed - more energy delivered than fed by user?
No Akula nor Kapanadze manifested nonsense of OU.
They didn't explain  the process of conversion but they clearly stated about energy conversion form environment.
Wesley

Offline tonygiang

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 45
In my view , FE has many advantages for both energy security . It has the ability to be distributed, in contrast to the traditional grid which is centralized. Through 2 wars in Yugoslavia and Ukraine today is clear. Depends only on the level of understanding of the governments of the countries about FE. But this seems far-fetched...

Offline Paul-R

  • without_ads
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2069
No Akula nor Kapanadze manifested nonsense of OU.
They didn't explain  the process of conversion but they clearly stated about energy conversion form environment.
Wesley
But the real question is this: Are they getting more energy out than the energy that THEY put in?

Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 462
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
The basis of the energy industry is the production and sale of electricity (no matter what hydro, hydrocarbon, nuclear, solar or wind power plants), production (gas, oil, coal), production and sale of hydrocarbons as fuel elements for production, transport or electricity generation).
The next appearance of a device available for production that will produce electricity from nothing will not only revolutionize, but also cause a deep crisis in the global economy.
When the world was moving from horse-drawn transport to ICE transport, there was a small but devastating crisis in the feed (forage) segment. This crisis was not noticed, so the process was long, but many who lived this simply became beggars, it even came to suicide.
In our age of global market coverage, it is difficult to imagine the extent of the peak in the market for power generation, fuel extraction, etc.
In any case, the world needs to go through this unpleasant moment and be ready for it.

Offline skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 421

  Why can't countries modify national security laws, to install overunity on their electricity grid ?


You don't need a grid, if you have a device which supplies 'free energy' 24/7.
And i'm not aware of any laws which forbid the use of such a device, as long as it is not dangerous for the environment.

But the problem is: there is no such device.

Offline ideas99889

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
.
« Reply #20 on: August 31, 2022, 04:34:49 AM »
.

Offline ideas99889

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
You don't need a grid, if you have a device which supplies 'free energy' 24/7.

But the problem is: there is no such device.

Generally speaking, to make secret overunity-power-amplification palatable for governments to install on the grid, under their national-secrecy-laws, it would be essential to maintain the grid, and to continue suppressing overunity devices outside of power-stations, to keep things as people know it, and if people want overunity devices, they can have them without putting it on tv.

NOTE - My definition of suppressing is simply not mentioning the existence of overunity on mainstream media like public tv, and governments not publicly acknowledging it's existence.  But still allowing it on the internet.   However, what about private-transport departments in governments and residential/business electricity providers, surely they would need internal policies regarding overunity-generators in private cars or homes etc, to ensure some types of regulations are met or to investigate accidents.

Me, I need overunity-devices in the shape of common batteries, to not buy batteries, and, overunity powered earbuds ( with effective noise-cancellation ).

Amplification-transformers, that's thicker wire on the secondary/output coil ( obviously to collect more, and thicker wire has less resistance ).
   Also on Amplification-transformers, I recently read that the 'spacing' is also a factor, but it didn't actually detail it, so I only assume that it referred to either, ( 1 ) - The spacing between each winding on the secondary/output coil,  or,  ( 2 ) - The diameter of the windings of the secondary/output coil around the core, I think that one is less likely.

Offline Paul-R

  • without_ads
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2069

NOTE - My definition of suppressing is simply not mentioning the existence of overunity on mainstream media like public tv,
What device or technoplogy do you have in mind?


Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 462
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
You don't need a grid, if you have a device which supplies 'free energy' 24/7.
And i'm not aware of any laws which forbid the use of such a device, as long as it is not dangerous for the environment.

But the problem is: there is no such device.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLHMn3HbhDg

Offline conradelektro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1843
I want free energy, but too many people do not want it. Therefore you can not have free energy. Much more people haven to really want it, before it can come.


If you want something, you will get it. But only, if you really want it. The more you want, the more you get. But your „I want it“ has to be really sincere. „I am not sure I want it“ clearly is not enough.

Offline Paul-R

  • without_ads
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2069
I want free energy, but too many people do not want it.
Can youi name anyone who, when asked if they would like unmetered energy, said "No"?

The problem is that few people believe it is possible and so fewer people are working on it. This applies particularly in resource rich environments like universities.