Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: The breakthrough in Free Energy - a system that cannot be debunked  (Read 13772 times)

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: The breakthrough in Free Energy - a system that cannot be debunked
« Reply #75 on: August 03, 2022, 07:42:01 PM »
I will be sharing more about the discovery on the board labeled "Wayne Travis Builder Board". Thanks!


Mr Wayne


Here is link
https://overunity.com/19204/room-for-free-energy-and-its-physics/msg569550/#new

Tarsier_79

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
Re: The breakthrough in Free Energy - a system that cannot be debunked
« Reply #76 on: August 03, 2022, 09:04:23 PM »
Mr Waynes spreadsheet does not match the diagram he uses to show his system. False values show a false over-unity.

On the other thread, I corrected one value, the stroke input vs stroke output. I ended up with a value of 98%.(This also falls within a close margin of error on the calculations I did based on the diagram below.) Mr Wayne immediately deleted the spread sheet. I asked him to correct either the diagram to represent the spread sheet, or update the spread sheet, which he refuses to do. I will re-attach his original spreadsheet below, and additionally the updated spread sheet. Will someone please validate my concern with this data?

Thank you.

Kaine.

mrwayne

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: The breakthrough in Free Energy - a system that cannot be debunked
« Reply #77 on: August 03, 2022, 10:16:32 PM »
Mr Waynes spreadsheet does not match the diagram he uses to show his system. False values show a false over-unity.

On the other thread, I corrected one value, the stroke input vs stroke output. I ended up with a value of 98%.(This also falls within a close margin of error on the calculations I did based on the diagram below.) Mr Wayne immediately deleted the spread sheet. I asked him to correct either the diagram to represent the spread sheet, or update the spread sheet, which he refuses to do. I will re-attach his original spreadsheet below, and additionally the updated spread sheet. Will someone please validate my concern with this data?

Thank you.

Kaine.


The Video is an illustration of function, not a imperial measurement - proper measurements can be tested in the data provided, at the link Ramset Provided - Thanks

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: The breakthrough in Free Energy - a system that cannot be debunked
« Reply #78 on: August 03, 2022, 10:37:39 PM »
Honestly to me this is all a confusing mess. I'm always the slow one but I much rather prefer simple illustrations rather than walls of text, references to videos and spreadsheet. They say when the student ends up confused it's not the student that is stupid but the teacher that is too stupid to teach.


Codwell did a very good attempt at illustrating this. Why don't you use his skills and some simple numbers to show the magic gain.

Tarsier_79

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
Re: The breakthrough in Free Energy - a system that cannot be debunked
« Reply #79 on: August 03, 2022, 10:43:54 PM »
As requested before. W.T. Please provide a correct diagram.

If you increase the power stroke, you have to increase the distance you move the buoyant container downwards.

If there is no gain in this diagram, and it shows unity, any variation of it will also show unity.

I am interested in truth only. Once someone provides a true OU device, I will be their biggest supporter and will happily back up any claims with evidence. The opposite also applies.