Language:
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

### GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

Custom Search

### Author Topic: Veryy Big Contribution from Mr. Josep Newman for (FED Enthusiast)  (Read 1149 times)

#### JackJohn

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 84
##### Veryy Big Contribution from Mr. Josep Newman for (FED Enthusiast)
« on: June 08, 2022, 07:37:37 AM »
Just sharing my understanding about Free energy Device who's inspired by Mr. Joseph Newman's ideas
I'm not discussing About Mr Josep Newman Device but I'll try to explain How Mr Joseph Newman's ideas and techniques produce very large electromagnetic fields with very low power requirements way because this is very important and is the main requirement for achieving a free energy device.

Talking about generating electricity, it cannot be separated from 1. Strong magnetic or electromagnet (as an inducer) 2. Number of turns of enameled copper wire (conductor) 3. Speed ​​of changing induction poles (Frequency) 4. Number of Poles 5. supporting mechanical equipment

as I include in the picture of the physics formula below will explained that the strength of the electromagnet on the solenoid is determined by the Permeability of the Core X Number of turns coil wire X Current strength (Amp) / l (solenoid length)
While the voltage generated by the generator is based on the number of turns X Changes in the strength of the magnetic/electromagnetic field X cross-sectional area / time (seconds)

from the two formulas it is very clear that the strength of the magnetic/electromagnetic field is the main requirement for generating electricity.
How to produce a large magnetic/electromagnetic field with the lowest possible power required ??

Thanks to : Mr.Josep Newman who has contributed greatly in opening our minds which so far considers that a strong magnetic/electromagnetic field can only be achieved with a large current only, he showed that a strong magnetic/electromagnetic field can also be achieved by playing with the number of turns of wire. (proven, from the low amperage and the large number of turns of the copper wire used, it is able to produce very large torque on His device). we can see that All Of His device playing A lot of number of turns of wire.
we also know that each size of copper wire diameter has a different resistance / Meter,it's mean more long = more high resistance.
the more the number of turns of copper wire = the greater the resistance of the wire = the smaller the amperage that can pass =
the smaller the power required but the magnetic field strength remains large.

is it true ??
Here I include image in the form of specifications for 2 stepper motors from 1 Big company which have the same dimensions, the same torque produced  but requires almost half the power consumption, please see the picture,

pay attention to the wire resistance, the strong current supply,the torque, the inductance in the specifications picture shown. I marked
hopefully it can inspire you to be able to increase creativity in the process of creating a free energy device.
Because the key above will actually applycable to Almost ALL the concept of FED both Motor Generator, Motionless Generator and also Joule Thief,Solenoid Engine Generator Etc

"Every Inventor has a little secret hidden about his device, and that secret is the success key of his device" Quote By Me

So stop Just looking at device models or designs, stop replicating Free energy devices from inventors because you will never succeed. But never stop studying their concepts, ideas while trying to find and learn the secret key to the success of the device and and try to combine it with the existing physics formula. Listen to the inventor's explanation, see the detailed video, then it is very likely that you can find the key in a few sentences or words from the inventor.

the (Last) bottom picture can be ignored, because it's just an idea in my head >>> 1 pulse dc supply = AC output in the secondary coil + Back Emf from the primary coil
"the law of conservation of energy states that the total energy of an isolated system remains constant"
if we look at this sentence, we can conclude that the electromagnetic induction that occurs during the EMF will have the same strength as the electromagnetic induction that occurs during the Back EMF but different direction, which means it will produce an AC current in the secondary coil.
« Last Edit: June 08, 2022, 03:32:52 PM by JackJohn »

#### JackJohn

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 84
##### Re: Veryy Big Contribution from Mr. Josep Newman for (FED Enthusiast)
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2022, 07:52:17 AM »
to be continue
« Last Edit: June 09, 2022, 04:06:40 PM by JackJohn »

#### norman6538

• Hero Member
• Posts: 562
##### Re: Veryy Big Contribution from Mr. Josep Newman for (FED Enthusiast)
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2022, 06:44:20 PM »
The Newman motor has been around for years and I have not heard of any OU Newman motor. The Bedini motor was likely OU in that it did two things.
1. A motor ran - mechanical and
2. the back emf charged a battery.

If that back emf was used to run another motor then 1 power unit in would run 2 motors giving 2 mechanical outputs.

As for the Newman motor and neos the coils have to match the neos or there will be "deadlocked flux". I never use neos until the concept is rock solid proven.

I wish you success.

Norman

#### norman6538

• Hero Member
• Posts: 562
##### Re: Veryy Big Contribution from Mr. Josep Newman for (FED Enthusiast)
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2022, 06:57:03 PM »
Your drawing looks a lot like the Bearden MEG with mags added. A German Kunel patent used coils and cores and mags. And Kunel said it works but not as drawn  which probably meant not linear but circular as your drawing and the MEG.

I spoke to John Bedini on the phone one time about the "Tilley Delorean" self charging elec motor car that ran on the NASCAR track in Tn. I was there personally and saw it but the wheel bearing went out and could not continue the run so we then went to Tilley's shop and examined it closely. Tilley had an armed guard at his fenced in property who was told to expect a group of 10 or so guys.
after several days John told me how he thought it worked but said lets keep the inventors secret. We did and both are dead now. If you like I can dig up the details and post them.

Norman

#### norman6538

• Hero Member
• Posts: 562
##### Re: Veryy Big Contribution from Mr. Josep Newman for (FED Enthusiast)
« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2022, 07:05:31 PM »
I am currently in survival mode because the US and World is so screwed up it may not continue as we have know it for many stupid reasons.

Everything that is presented to you these days is faked and green-screened to make it look like you were elsewhere. We have not seen the congress in session for some time so whats up with that? Various doubles are using masks to impersonate the real person because the ear lobs change from double to double and in one case the mask was coming loose at the neck. I have not had the time to look for the photos that support that.

BUT things are very very very WEIRD in the US.
Norman

#### JackJohn

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 84
##### Re: Veryy Big Contribution from Mr. Josep Newman for (FED Enthusiast)
« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2022, 04:10:33 AM »
The Newman motor has been around for years and I have not heard of any OU Newman motor. The Bedini motor was likely OU in that it did two things.
1. A motor ran - mechanical and
2. the back emf charged a battery.

If that back emf was used to run another motor then 1 power unit in would run 2 motors giving 2 mechanical outputs.

As for the Newman motor and neos the coils have to match the neos or there will be "deadlocked flux". I never use neos until the concept is rock solid proven.

I wish you success.

Norman

Thank you sir for visiting and enlightening
In my opinion, overunity or free energy devices are tool/Device that are able to produce more power than the power needed to work or you can say COP > 1 (as simple as that), but I'm sure other masters may not agree with me on this because in the previous post there was a debate on several master comments that the definitions of Overunity and Free Energy Device were different.
Regarding Mr. Joseph Newman, I am not very interested in the whole concept of the device and also do not want to replicate the device. For me the biggest contribution of Mr. Josep Newman is about how he opened our mindset about "generating a large electromagnetic field does not always rely on strong currents but can also by using a large number of turns of copper wire and only a little power" and this for me is the main key in creating a Free Energy Device

but as I said above if "Overunity or Free Energy Device is a device that is able to produce more power than the power needed to work / COP > 1 " Then I am very sure that Mr. Josep Newman's device is OU
Sometimes it's very funny when we see (students, researchers or scientists) who research Newman devices at that time firstly they know an sure after doing a lot of measurement that the device is successful and then change the statement otherwise. guess who is right?

#### JackJohn

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 84
##### Re: JUST SHARE IDEA
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2022, 03:13:10 PM »
This is sufficient to explain that the power that comes out of the secondary coil is the EFFECT of the movement of electrons in the primary coil which creates an electromagnet, so it doesn't take power from the primary coil directly

when the EMF and Back EMF processes occur, both will induce a secondary coil with a different polarity. so it can be seen in the picture on the right that the power from the power supply is only taken when the switch is on / during EMF and when the switch is off (Back EMF) then the power from the power supply is not taken while in the picture on the left we can see there are 2 inductions that occur and when entering the diode bridge then both (both positive or negative power will be DC voltage)

#### JackJohn

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 84
##### Back EMF Trapping Into Usefull DC power
« Reply #7 on: June 11, 2022, 12:27:16 PM »
Continuation from 1st Idea Picture (Simple Pulse DC into AC)
I remind you very specifically for taking power from Back EMF (D1 & D2), you must use Schottky Diodes having a voltage range of 1000V (this is one of the keys to successful Back EMF trapping), while Capacitor C1 must use an HV Capacitor in the 250V to 450V range.
"And the DC output from the Back EMF must always be connected to the load because if it is not given a load, the voltage will continue to rise until it exceeds the voltage limit of the capacitor C1 and will explode due to overload."

THREE ADVANTAGES OF UTILIZING BACK EMF

1. GET USEFUL DC POWER
2. SECURING THE ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT OF PULSE DC MODULE / PWM GENERATOR AND ALSO MOSFET POWER
3. From single pulse DC power input we can Get 2 Usefull DC Power output
« Last Edit: June 11, 2022, 03:46:15 PM by JackJohn »

#### JackJohn

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 84
##### Just words
« Reply #8 on: June 12, 2022, 09:52:36 AM »
Sorry for those who follow my post, for some time I will stop making posts, so that I can focus more on completing the FED device project from some of my ideas and just reminding my video channel to upload my device work progress

https://www.dailymotion.com/JackJohn-Device  Dailymotion