What do you think after seeing the testing of this device, is it possible to achieve overunity? I mean is there a possibility that this device produces an output power greater than the power required by the driving motor? or is it possible that COP > 1??? Sorry, I haven't taken precise measurements of the current (Amperes) which I will probably do soon. Do everything once the device is finished , Please Watch Test video >>> https://dai.ly/x8bc108  dont forget to subscribe

Another Test supply for DC Motor 24VDC, Output Each Coil 50VAC , Spec : 0.3mm enamel copper wire,  19mm Iron E Core total Coil 3 Coil, Neodymium Dia 3Cm x Thicknes 1.7Cm
https://youtu.be/j20LUd5pgbg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Jy_RIBCzUI
You are all racking your brain, and people claim that they have found a way to self-rotate.
And Mr. Rakarsky is also in our community. Let's all together ask to reveal the secret.

The best concept in the world can't  produce  overunity as it doesn't exist.
Wesley

Really?...

Really?...

It is nothing wrong in  being  an idiot in some sciences.
I'm an idiot in chemistry when compared to my level in physics, electronics, mechanics,
_{My friend in science critical  to himselves is  not that much of an Idiot in  math but he is outstanding in physics of  electromagnetism
Hopefully  some time in the future you will be able to say  similar phrase about yourself}




simple test.
You can find  me none -  not even one credible scientific publication supporting your statement  because:
<sub>1.overunity doesn't exist

2.overunity never existed and will never exist.

3.I assume that you don't understand the meaning of word</sub> overunity_{.
over-unity (English) Origin & history over- + unity- ("the number "1""), referring to the fact that
an over-unity device should produce more energy than it receives as input.
Coined to avoid patent rules that prevent impossible technologies such as perpetual motion machines being patented.}
 https://www.wordsense.eu/over-unity
 

(euphemistic) Free-energy; supposedly capable of perpetual motion
1994,
_{David Hatcher Childress, The Free-energy Device Handbook:
A Compilation of Patents & Reports, Adventures Unlimited Press (ISBN 9780932813244), page 90
Look for the"over-unity" ratio when calculating energy output versus input as a proof of free energy.}
 
2007,
Florentin Smarandache, V. Christianto, Hadron models and related
N_{ew Energy issues, Infinite Study (ISBN 9781599730424), page 96
The system behaves as an} over-unity _{device producing energy from atomic hydrogen by a repeated
dissociation and recombination of hydrogen atoms.
MAHG tube contains a vacuum tube filled with hydrogen at 0.1 atm and cooled by water.
explanation:}

_{system behaves as an} over-unity device

  _{doesn't mean  that system is an   over-unity  device.
Further verification can only reject any such statement.}
 
2008,
Mark P. Silverman, A Universe of Atoms, An Atom in the Universe,
_{Springer Science & Business Media (ISBN 9780387227610), page 25
"The Potapov device," the experimenters reported ruefully, "did not show any evidence of} over-unity _{performance in our tests.}
We can find no explanation for the failure of this Potapov device to perform as reported (300% over-unity)."

 however FREE ENERGY = Energy for Free
-exists as long as nature or someone else pays for it.


Wesley

...

WOW!!

First, you do NOT have to INSULT to explain whatever the FU..K your point is!!
SO YOU HAVE JUST OPENED DOORS SO I CAN RESPOND "ACCORDINGLY"...

The ONLY IDIOT HERE IS YOU,
Are you a PAID SHILL?
Or are you here to keep disappointing all researchers of Free Energy?

And so, you own a "LAB"?...

What the F..K for?...to play with wooden toys?
To show you are working on it?!!

Give me a FUC..ING BREAK, and get the F..K out of here!!

At first  I didn't insult you.
At second you have problem with English.
I named myself an Idiot with pride in chemistry , so to make it clear that it is nothing wrong
and is nothing to be ashamed of.   
____________________________________

in link  here:
look at:Re: Wesley's  Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum « Reply #3713 on: June 06, 2022, 08:49:00 PM »
I made philosophical explanation of FE- Free energy concept for clarity.

There you have a column called : patriotism   
-that in term of activity  doesn't go along with
modern physics and sciences in general .

So assuming that your perception in English is limited
I'm explaining it to you in plain English.

Sciences don't care about  patriotism in group  of interest, hobby, orientation, religion or approach.
physics is not behind emotions. Physics is the study of the interactions between the elements of information
Emotion is real, but it is not a force. Emotion would not be a fundamental concept in physics
You calling for patriotic unity in approach to a goal.
The goal is energy for free.

So far everything is Ok.
But don't try to convince someone good in  physics and bunch of  other people that overunity exists.
e.g : if word "Overunity"  was to be used as a name, - I'll have no problem with it.


 
Someone with possibly limited perception in English may require  more explanation   :
An energy-based model is a probabilistic model governed by an energy function that describes the probability of a certain state,
In physics, a model (or idealized model) is a simplified version of the physical system that strips away the unnecessary aspects of the situation.

Wesley

Wesley,

Are you absolutely positive about your statement here?  With all due respect, have you investigated all possible means of electromagnetic interactions?

Nope, obviously He has not investigated absolutely nothing...
Normally you will find a lot of frustrated researchers of F.E and O.U, that all the sudden become the worst of skeptics...

Someone once said "If advances in OU are made they will come not from scientists and engineers but from a commoner".  Why, because they don't know it can't be done!"

Regards,
Pm

Not necessarily so...not necessarily a "commoner"...but someone who have an Open Mind, that have many, many skills, many tools and equipment plus the time to make it happen...and is a very experienced researcher and developer...as not necessarily a wood worker...but a real experimenter that uses Logic and Common Sense as his primarily gudance...
Someone who does not have to abide, comply and agree with all the material that other mere mortals have written and tought over time...

Regards

Ufopolitics