Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

It looks like you are running that air core in that last video. I was watching a zero force motor test from tinman that showed putting the core inside it really hurt the performance. Are you seeing the same thing with this setup? It is the sideways coil configuration. Just curious. Also, is your rpm triggering only once per rotation or is it catching both magnets and it's actually half the speed shown? Looking good, just gaining info on your setup.

It's happening because of a 2" piece of rebar sits in the coil about 1" from the bottom.  I have an air gap at the bottom of the core- then the 2" stub of rebar that comes up under 1/2 way the coil. Then about 40-50% of the core above that is air. About 60% of the core is air.

It's working on attraction pulses.  The rebar is in a perfect position to attract the incoming magnet (where it always gets stuck at the pole) and sends the rotor right past the sticky spot and out the top..  No stick coming in or going out really.  And the rebar stub makes it possible to go the way it never want's to go- with current.. 

If I use a full core, I can get it going as fast the other direction, but using 15X as much input power- because then it's going against current like always.. My last post used 2 trigger spots, 1 each magnet. My RPM meter was catching 1 magnet- it only works on 1 polarity. Before I read 1300+, right now I got 1050 RPM.  I been playing with the timing / sensors the last hour seeing how efficient I can get it.  I can get it going quicker, but then I am pulsing outside my window and the amps creep up a bit.  I only want to pulse in the window to keep those amps below 0.00

If the wife lets me, tomorrow I plan to wind another bifilar coil for the other side.  And get a better collection circuit hooked up so I know it's working. 

One thing I said, but I'll say again.  Getting the rotor to spin with current flow is was difficult.  It doesn't want to go in that direction.  But that little core stub floating in there solved that..

Here is a video of the whole motor setup from top to bottom.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VRG9quRn4A

Gday F

I haven't read back all through the thread. Can you post the drive circuit? I may be able to suggest a way to measure the current more accurately if you like.

Also, have you thought of using an interrupted LED timing circuit? It is more accurate and more controllable, you can adjust both the timing and the length of the pulse.

But I still believe that the conclusions of the coil moving past the permanent magnet better close and disclose by contacts or relay. This does not require us to spend any energy and power sources.
True, in this case, the interaction forces will be much weaker than in the case of passing current through the coil. That's what pushes us away from this method...

This is an example of spinning correctly--  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHeX6ar-22U

I am able to do even quicker using magnets on top of the rod.  This is the direction I will be going

Let's not get discouraged if your device doesn't do the impossible. Don't forget where you started. Yes it may not be doing exactly as you had hoped. But you went from a motor than runs on 60 watts to one that runs over half as good for less than 1 watt. That's a massive step in the right direction. Also, don't be afraid to take a small win when you get one in this field. It may not be your goal, but who says the motor side has to generate the electrical energy back to make it ou? Sometimes hooking a small generator to a super efficient motor may be exactly the answer you need. 2 separate halves, working in unisom, could give you what you seek. I'm only throwing that out there because I see a partial win here and the last video seems to be an attitude change as if you are disappointed. Just don't forget what you have accomplished and learned on the way! After all, the inventor of the post it notes was actually trying to make the world's strongest super glue. But I think he ended up doing okay..

I am actually excited it's rotating in the right direction at all.  I think I know how to do it.  I been bench testing and all this add's up.

1. Core polarity does not change if you raise or lower the core.  The wire is still twisting around the core the same direction if the core is fully through or only partially through. You can totally have the NORTH of the core on the South side of the coil..  How this affects electric generation is to be seen yet.

2. The core gets more flux inside than an air coil.  The core over-powers the air core side. 

3. Raising the core is essential for 2 reasons.  to attract the magnet past the the stick point on the way in- and to get that other end of the magnetized core as far away from the rotor as possible so it does not hinder the exit.

While I stew on all this- I will take some time to investigate my previous experience- why the motor sped up when I loaded the generator coil. I looked closer at the setup when it was doing that..  I noticed the rotor was not even close to the middle of the coil.  It was way down..  Past the center line.

So I powered the coil and hand tested to see the reactions.  When the rotor magnet is in line with the bottom of the core- the coil kicks the rotor out hard. and it has like barely any resistance coming in because the top pole is so far away.

There might be something to this-  The alignment of where the magnet passes the coil skews how the coil's poles affect the rotor.  You certainly have 1 pole affecting the rotor more than the other. 

I am going to check into this more soon

Just a thought, while you wait for your parts. Do you have a thinner bolt to use? Like, 1/4" maybe. And wedge some paper in there so the core is pushed against the furthest edge inside the coil. Then at the bottom place a thicker piece of metal about 1" tall or so just below the thinner bolt. Just curious if maybe the thinner core is still enough to pull it in, but as it comes in, it may have a slightly stronger attraction to the lower 1" which is thicker and pull the magnet just past the center spot so that it aligns that little bit better on it's own for your pulse? I think I explained it right. Basically what you have now, but thicker at the very bottom, and thinner and more away by just a bit on the way up. Just a thought that may help you get that extra 1/4" past the center you may want to line it up better??