Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sorry but I have to keep going with this.

There is no need to flip the magnet.  Take a big bar magnet and only dip 1 pole in the coil and reciprocate.  One completely helps, one completely hurts.

The magnetic field rotates around the wire. It is the direction of rotation that you are changing. Picture this... take a bolt, and put a washer on it. Balance the bolt horizontal with the washer in the middle vertically. Push down on the side of the washer towards you and the washer rotates doward and away. Now do the same on the other side. Push downward away from you and the washer rotates downward and toward you. You pushed down the same on both sides but the washer rotated opposite. The washer simulates a cross section of a strand of wire. Same principle. The magnetic field will rotate depending on the circumstances. The direction the current flows will show you the direction the magnetic field will rotate and vice versa. Hence, the right hand rule. The picture added is just to show you how what you are doing may seem the same motion to you, but is perceived differently by the strand of wire.

That goes in line woth the changing inductance of the coil when magnets are away and against it. Another hard concept to explain right out the gate. But that is an expected result.

I have to question your layout of magnets passing the coil. I am not sure how you have it aligned. It seems like your new rotor is moving magnets parallel to the turns and not across the turns. This could be why you are not seeing any current flow and very little effect except for voltage. I could be wrong because I can't really tell how you have it laid out. Do you have any still shots that show wire wind direction and the direction the magnets move?

I also tried this way which produced 33% less volts

Edit-  It probably produced more like 50% less volts if you take into consideration the gap differences.  The dead center way had a much larger gap because I have a bolt and rod stud in the way

Edit... maybe it's right. I thought your magnets were centered on the core. The shaft is below the core isn't it? So just one magnet passes across the windings?

I tested both. Center and lower.  Center outperformed lower by a Large margin.

That was just a test- not the build. In the center should have just about the same amount of wires crossed perpendicular if I make the coil bigger than the circumference of the rotor path.  It should cut the wires at the prime voltage generation spot and wind down to parallel about when the zero line is approaching and polarity flips.  And center is the only way I can get 4 magnets to pass at once (that I can think of).

I can't think of any good reason not to have the one coil also be the prime mover. If I go that route- no need to extend it so much to the sides- because I want that end polarity juice to rotate the rotors easily. And if Russ is correct- drag is no longer a problem in this config.

I think I am decided. 1 large coil to cover the entire rotor path. Atleast double wound as you suggested. Maybe even triple. Wind around PVC pipe with a hole in the middle for a shaft to go through. 2 rotors (1 on each side). Pipe will have a hollow center so I can experiment sliding a core into each side.

I checked and current only flows 1 way in this configuration from zero point to zero point- and I can make it flow eitherway by changing rotation direction. And if sensor is positioned at zero line- I can make the rotor spin either way without problem.

I have been drawing and bench testing hours on end to try to make current go the same direction as induction as Russ says is possible,  it is VERY difficult. Getting the rotor to rotate in the correct way seems almost impossible if it even is possible.  No matter how hard I try, I can not make North want to attract North.  (LOL)...

The only window I am possibly seeing is boxed in yellow.  Pulse to initiate rotation and collect only at that moment and the rotor "MIGHT" go in the direction we want which matches the current.  The sinewave reaction looks like it will work- and during a bench test powering the coil, I can get a peek of movement the right way only in those 2 spots per pass.  The entire prime collection moments all hurt rotation and I see no way to get rotation to go the way we want without opposing incoming current to induction current direction.

I am not saying it will work, but if it does- capturing window will be small and weak.  Perhaps combining this with Rus's info on harvesting the dielectric capacitance can be used to collect at peak without affecting the rotor and delivering that small burst in the window of possible opportunity.

It's either go for this method or just make a nice long coil and produce as much as I can without bringing the rotor close to the poles to hopefully minimize as much drag as I can.

Decision time