Just another Don Smith thread

[Vortex 22]

Let's say we can drow electrons.... In order to charge a capacitor?
Input....cap ...water

By applying positive charges from the input on one side of the Cap...we can attract negative charges from the ground in the other side of the Cap ?
 But here one problem
In time
Positive charges will develop on the ground and negative charges will develop on the input
How can we solve this?

That's why it's very simple to charge a polar cap by this method
And it's very difficult to charge ac Capacitor

[pix]

Notice how pix never replied to me, some people are butthurt when corrected
and every single statement in his 'theory' is diametrically opposite to reality.

I try to minimise unnecessary ambitional disputes.
Once I will put my theory to the test, then I will respond to you.


Cheers,
pix

[nix85]

I try to minimise unnecessary ambitional disputes.
Once I will put my theory to the test, then I will respond to you.


Cheers,
pix

It's not a matter of dispute. Fact is B fields are not canceled and
capacitance lowers Q of RLC tank.

B fields cancel in bucking configuration which this is not.

[pix]

It's not a matter of dispute. Fact is B fields are not canceled and
capacitance lowers Q of RLC tank.

B fields cancel in bucking configuration which this is not.

I was refering to Don Smith concept with a bucking coils at secondary. And one coil has capacitor . Tuned to primary frequency.
Anyway, going to test this setup once find a time.
Cheers,
Pix

[nix85]

I was refering to Don Smith concept with a bucking coils at secondary. And one coil has capacitor . Tuned to primary frequency.
Anyway, going to test this setup once find a time.
Cheers,
Pix

You still don't get it, bucking coil is a non-inductive coil, here we got CW and CCW
winding but current in them is also in opposite directions (looking from the center)
two negatives give positive, magnetic fields do not cancel.

Also, it is ridiculous to say one coil has a cap. Cap is in parallel with both coils.
Another way to draw this circuit is with two inductors wound in same direction
in parallel in parallel with a cap, electrically, they are equivalent, only difference
is here one coil is flipped in space relative to the other, but so are the electrical
connections. It makes sense only if you are using diodes to block the bottom coil
from the cap. Again, mag fields do not cancel.

[Vortex 22]

Lenz is not something to be avoided, it should be embraced as one individuals observation, one individuals way of saying "this is what one can expect to happen if your systems are designed and operated in this manner." If and when we can change our perspective to one which is void of the need to circumvent Lenz, we can begin to appreciate his observation for what it is, and more importantly, for what it "could" be.

Lenz offered us a way to look at things, that's it. We can choose to follow his lead, or we can blaze our own trail guided by his suggestion.
I practice the latter. To truly neutralize the effect that Lenz has on your system you simply need to comprehend what he's saying.

[Vortex 22]

I don't mean to sound rude, nor come across as if I know something you cannot, however, support for my position can be found in the fact that none of you recognize what you are dealing with. You don't know how to look at your machines, despite the fact that your machines scream at you how they are to be viewed. There are times when this is very disappointing, even telling you how to do so the pointers are ignored, as you are sold on your own ideas. All good, you will find it eventually.
We have been programed to build XL dominant systems. This seed was sown deep in all of us. The time has come that we recognize what we already know, namely, the product of XL is voltage. If you want current then the reaction to change should yield that which we want and not that which we do not!
Regards

[Vortex 22]

So friends please don't waste your time day dreaming over what you can do with magnetism!
Magnetism is a dead end.

We will discuss this also. I say  "what we call magnetism" as what magnetism truly is we cannot use! As it is divine!
Regards

[nix85]

Clown keeps mudding the waters and bragging with hot air.
He knows not the the principles governing all on all scales.

Magnetism is not a "dead end", gravito-magnetism is the first child
of the Dominant stream, first child of God.

B field A field.... Resonance....

[Vortex 22]

Do you understand how this change in perspective leads one to being able to take energy without opposition? Like I suggested before, ignore the theory....comprehend what's being done, and when you get it it, perfect it. If you know what this is, prove it....put it to use charge a high uF cap...for starters....leave your meters out of this....comprehend, and
optimize first, then do all the measuring you want.

[Vortex 22]

My dogma....

A coil, or more proper a "reactor" is a mechanism which enables one to leverage opposition to change. From this perspective, one could consider it as a "control device", however, one must be specific regarding what one is "controlling and or attempting to control."

Regards

[ramset]

Nix
Your Gabriel Device


Tony ..


I got my wires crossed on that one .. was a while back !
Gonna touch base with a few builders to recollect?


Regarding your adversary (s) here
Very odd you are singled out for this tag team ( or one ?)treatment
When opening another topic would be much more useful ( for them / they?)
Respectfully
Chet K
Ps
Here in the past we had bored person(s) “play “ with certain members in very similar way


And then acknowledge it was all just a game ( when he/they even wore themselves out

[Vortex 22]

Do you see where your thinking is? It is totally entangled in the maze of the inductive reactive. Consider what it would take to transition a predominantly inductive reactive system, into a predominantly capacitive reactive system. The character of your apparatus must change from dominant XL or opposition to change in flux or current to dominant XC or opposition to change in voltage.

Regards

[nix85]

  You are a clown, you can keep blabbering about change of perspective
but it is exactly you who has a wrong perspective. "Magnetism is a dead end"
My my, what a joke you are.

There are milllion (in fact infinite) ways to get ambient energy lenzlessly
not just one. Don did it in certain number of ways, but he did not do it
in all the other ways equally or more valid.

Witts replication from Denmark

74w in 500w out

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jj1e60R3dtM

But don't get dismayed, keep entertaining us

"Do you see where your thinking is? It is totally entangled in the maze of the inductive reactive."

  Your confused drivel is taking poetic proportions.

[Vortex 22]

You are hell bent on getting people to see and accept your interpretation of this Don tech. That's counterproductive, because it's Don's perspective that we should be trying to view things from. So get off the damn soap box, stop preaching, go back to your lab and do something useful. You aren't helping here, hell you aren't even on topic.