Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Just another Don Smith thread  (Read 61693 times)

alan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #345 on: February 14, 2023, 08:06:47 PM »
Good info! 

The devices of Figuera, Bearden (MEG) and Don Smith are very similar: 

This is according to my understanding: 
MEG is not a flux gating device! JLN is wrong. The magnet saturates the core, confines all curled A-vp inside the core, and the pulser coil is in the same direction as the flux of the PM, the coil creates a pulse on top of the PM flux to create the E=-dA/dt around the coil which is curl free. E=-dA/dt is done away with by the Lorenz gauge. I guess motional induction is used and transformer flux-linking induction is not occurring. 

The 2 outer coil of the Figuera device are in the same direction too, to create the curl-free A space (guess), and the imbalance in magnetic intensity creates a flux flow similar to the pulse in the meg, again motional induction is occurring. The 2 coils are harmonic, for instance  N(t) + S(t) = 1, N goes from 0 to 1 (Linear or as step pulses, dunno), S goes from 1 to 0. If N = 0,8, then S=0,2, constantly changing but the direction stays the same. 

Don, 2 partnered coils equal and opposite, primary creates a uniplar flux pulse inside both coils and they keep working against each other when the pulse goes off.

I see it like this analogy: Current is a rock, A-potential is the water, and B are the ripples in the water when a rock is thrown in. B = curl of the A smoke ring

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #346 on: February 15, 2023, 01:41:18 AM »
It is and it did not come easy, it is a result of years of relentless digging and correlating.

I would disagree Figuera's device and "Bearden's" MEG use same principle, BTW MEG is if you read PJKelly's book actually The Motionless Generators of Kelichiro Asaoka and it is a flux gating device, i mean the inventor himself clearly says it.

https://patents.google.com/patent/US5926083A/en

Like i said, for Figuera i believe he used two poles in opposition sliding left and right.

You start with a premise that A field is confined inside the core, but it is only B field that is confined in the core, A field radiates outward parallel with the coil turns. If you open the already linked article, you will see the figure 6 how A field radiates outside the coil even when B field is totally enclosed in it.

https://web.archive.org/web/19990221130932/http://www.tricountyi.net/~randerse/ortho1.htm

You then talk of bucking coils creating a unipolar flux. Firstly when coils are bucking, A fields are bucking as well, it is this cancelation of lower and higher order fields that is the principle of creation. This is how gravity fields aka life are created on all scales.

As i write on the blog under SIX AXIS OF TIME

"God/Self first imagines an infinite set of vibrations of infinite frequency and amplitude, then God/Self cancels those vibrations with interference, by opposing them with same set of vibrations but 180° out of phase along the 6 axis of time, giving them structure and creating the infinite, rotating 3D forcefield, a mechanism that enables nothing to be."

It is this destructive interference, this clash of the exact opposites that literally creates time-space and all life in it.

Also keep in mind when coils are not totally overlapping, such 'bucking' will only partially cancel out the fields.

Coils, that is, secondary LC tanks may be tuned at same frequency, harmonics, or neither.

But Don did not always use bucking coils and Don's Chinese replication did not use bucking coils, they are not necessary to get overunity, i spoke already about it here.

forest you are referring to saltycitrus replication, it was actually a group of people in China who replicated Don. Salty said adjusting the phase was the key to their success, presumably he meant delayed lenz. He used both secondaries in same direction proving there is no need for CW CCW. There is more on it in PJ Kelly's book. Here is the vid.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cni08WjLTcc

So, you do not need bucking coils and you do not need to worry about the A field.

It all comes down to switching flux (B) effortlessly.

This can be done mechanically or solid state.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #347 on: February 15, 2023, 04:36:55 AM »


truesearch

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #349 on: April 23, 2023, 02:35:13 AM »
nix85,


Regarding:
Quote
And another flux switching overunity transformer patent


That looks pretty simple . . . surely someone here has tried it out?

pix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 500
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #350 on: April 24, 2023, 11:08:07 AM »
nix85,


Regarding:

That looks pretty simple . . . surely someone here has tried it out?


It may only work in flygack mode + introduced air gaps.


nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #351 on: July 01, 2023, 02:55:46 AM »
There is no need for airgaps. Many overunity transformers prove this.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2023, 10:49:16 AM by nix85 »

Atti2

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #352 on: July 01, 2023, 11:57:13 AM »
And another flux switching overunity transformer patent

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/94/22/3b/00d949285d3956/WO1994001814A1.pdf


Hi.
Just because it is patented does not guarantee that it works. If you look closely, a similar method is the Bulgarian M.E.G. device.
But in the same system by examining the layout.
Here you can see:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-C3ggXDkTSw

Atti.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #353 on: July 01, 2023, 12:19:23 PM »

Hi.
Just because it is patented does not guarantee that it works. If you look closely, a similar method is the Bulgarian M.E.G. device.
But in the same system by examining the layout.
Here you can see:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-C3ggXDkTSw

Atti.

Hi.

Obviously just cause it's patented does not guarantee that it works, i say that myself. But when multiple people patent very similar method then rest assured there is something to it.

And i know very well it's similar to MEG, but this patent is from 1992. and Tom Bearden's MEG patent is from 2002.

And it's also similar to Flynn's transformers i also mentioned many times, patented in 1999.

alan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #354 on: July 03, 2023, 01:35:15 PM »
Been reading again but more attentively: So Don Smith is yet another inventor that uses motional induction by magnetic waves and the Heaviside non-diverged energy flow. Magnetic waves, that's why I thought Figuera needs N growing and S shrinking, and that the MEG is not a flux gater even though all texts seem to point to that, flux gating doesn't need high dA/dt by sharp input pulses, the waves in the same direction of the PM flux do need it, disruptive discharge can be useful for extreme high d/dt, that was the purpose of it. Flux switching has a natural time constant.