Just another Don Smith thread

[Vortex 22]

The Don Smith Effect works very well
In my experiences using only Cap and diodes with no coils at all!
Using only small cap and 220 v and 50 Hz!!
Maybe this where Don formula came into play?

W=0.5 *CE*CP.S
How knows?

[nix85]

No one denies Don's effect(s) are real, he was a true practical master
of resonant induction ou.

His booklet in attachment.

[ramset]

Update on hosting some Don S experiments here
Yes it is in works
Will be calling researcher hopefully tonight…
To discuss how to get started here .


For clarity this researcher has seen bench results which are ( to be discussed)?


Also did get another mail from a different long time FE investigator today.
Asking about this ?
http://www.lovellpatentedtechnology.com/monothermal/what_is_monothermal.html


Hmm
Above is good Lanca question ( he is amazing internet sleuth … ( however only has one speed
“full speed post “


Sorry for interruptions
Respectfully
Chet K
Ps
I did see mention of caps here ( a need?
I have received many donations of equipment and some big caps too ..
Caps for electron beam microscopes
All are available to open source builders !

[Vortex 22]

Because I have done that many times
It's make sense to me that If I am using high voltage like 10 kV or high frequency like 30 kHz
The speed process of charging the Cap will go faster
But only experiment can tell the result !!!

[Vortex 22]

Because I really don't like to play with higher voltage?
Maybe
The coil can harvest too?
Not any coils can
Will setup a pancake coil under certain conditions to see th result?

[pix]

Regarding the pumping electrons from ground, he used a small tesla coil
to excite the cap plate, keep in mind tesla secondary is usually coupled
to ground through the air capacitively, thus closing the circuit.

Only way that demonstration would be truly as claimed is if tesla coil is not
grounded/earthed, like the small, battery powered chinese boosters.
The "million" volt ones produce up to 180kV (measured).
In short, it uses a single transistor oscillator
which powers a transformer converting 3-9V into 1500V
which charges a cap and when it charges to 1500V it fires
through a sparkgap into a small tesla coil amplifying it further
to 180kV or maybe even little more depending on the unit.
These units are complete, utter junk, they usually break down
within minutes, if it lasts few days it is a miracle.

Don't interpret this as debunking, i already shared a great video
of 1100W load being powered by 9W between a resonant transformer
and earth. So this effect has been confirmed many times.
It's just delicate and most fail.

Yea, the host in that Don's video claimed they run the small tesla coil
from a battery and made sure circuit cannot be closed, but we
have to take his word for that.

Tried this. No OU there.
Charging one side of HV capacitors with High Voltage AC  , connecting other side of capacitors to the ground through HV diodes.
I called it "Earth electrons pump".
It takes energy from the source to induce opposite charge on the other side of capacitor.


Cheers,
Pix

[Vortex 22]

If we find that coil electron captor really exist?
Then Will combine it with the capacitor electron captor?? Maybe this is Don Smith resonance talking about? Who knows

[nix85]

Tried this. No OU there.
Charging one side of HV capacitors with High Voltage AC  , connecting other side of capacitors to the ground through HV diodes.
I called it "Earth electrons pump".
It takes energy from the source to induce opposite charge on the other side of capacitor.


Cheers,
Pix

Take a good look at what happens, he is powering 1100W of bulbs between Earth (radiator) and resonant transformer with 8-9W input.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3dc-5tPc90

[nix85]

Backemf running a bulb and charging a battery

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwgDbE6gh44

[Vortex 22]

This is Don Smith electron captor?
Don't see it?

[Vortex 22]

The second
Capacitor electron Captor? The bigger one is powered by the the first one?

[pix]

Take a good look at what happens, he is powering 1100W of bulbs between Earth (radiator) and resonant transformer with 8-9W input.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3dc-5tPc90

Yes I know, incadescent bulbs will glow with HV supply.
But it is still no OU.
I was measuring input to HV trafo versus load on the output, increases as load increase.
Charge in one side of capacitor induces equal and opposite charge on the other side.




Cheers,
Pix

[Vortex 22]

We need to capture free electrons
Please
Forgot about standard coils
Even
Pancakes or cones coils will not capture electrones free under any condition!
But I need to play with coils to confirm?
So stay with capacitor electron captor, please

[nix85]

Yes I know, incadescent bulbs will glow with HV supply.
But it is still no OU.
I was measuring input to HV trafo versus load on the output, increases as load increase.
Charge in one side of capacitor induces equal and opposite charge on the other side.




Cheers,
Pix

They will glow rat's ass as they say if you don't have enough power in that HV.
Watch the video carefully. Notice that power draw DROPS more bulbs he screws in.
This is not some illusion or deception. Bigger the load, less comes from the wall and
more from the ground.

Of course voltage on one side of the cap induces opposite charge on the other side.
The idea of Don's electron captor is to use just potential to disturb the electrons in
the ground without really doing work, similar to avramenko plug.

[nix85]

Don was big on left and right hand spin electrons. He writes in the book attached
above that they exist in pairs (right and left hand ones) in nature. We know electrons
repel and don't exist in pairs, unless we are talking electrons which are part of the atom
aka Lewis pair. Otherwise, closest to that is a Cooper pair when two electrons join
but that happens only in superconductors. Here is what mainstream guys say about
left-right spin electrons.

"Left and right handed refers to the chirality of an electron. Right handed chirality means
that the spin and momentum of the electron point in the same direction. Left handed
means opposite direction of spin and momentum. This distinction is made because
these two chiralities refer to two fundamentally different components of the elektron
wave function. In QFT a mass mixes these two components and that is why elektrons
doe not have mass as an elementary particle. Mass is generated by the Higgs-
mechanism and the breakdown of symmetry of the vacuum-states.

[...]

No massive free particles have definite heliticity (it is not conserved during free particle
propagation), so there is no such thing as a left-handed electron. However, using
projection operators, we can split the electron wavefunction into left-handed and right-
handed components. (They need not be equal in magnitude, but a pure left-handed
electron does not satisfy the Dirac equation and so does not exist as a free particle).
Then the weak nuclear force couples only to the left-handed component of the electron,
while the EM force interacts with both."

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/left-right-handed-electrons-whats-the-difference.36530/

Also, in diagram below he, like Richard LeFors Clark in his Diamagnetic Gravity Vortexes,
paints a misleading picture depicting a whole magnet as two opposite magnetic domains
with bloch wall in the center while in reality those are microscopic domains and when
they become aligned, in same direction for whole length of the ferromagnetic material
you got a magnet.

Of course, Tesla coil with grounded base has current peak at the base and current
node at the top and vice versa for voltage, but this is not what Don is referring to.

Since he is apparently talking about CW and CCW coils, parallel can drawn with other
tensor/scalar alternative physics.

http://www.villesresearch.com/ether.html#torsion%20field