Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Just another Don Smith thread  (Read 57208 times)

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #120 on: May 11, 2022, 07:50:22 PM »
Yes I know, incadescent bulbs will glow with HV supply.
But it is still no OU.
I was measuring input to HV trafo versus load on the output, increases as load increase.
Charge in one side of capacitor induces equal and opposite charge on the other side.




Cheers,
Pix

They will glow rat's ass as they say if you don't have enough power in that HV.
Watch the video carefully. Notice that power draw DROPS more bulbs he screws in.
This is not some illusion or deception. Bigger the load, less comes from the wall and
more from the ground.

Of course voltage on one side of the cap induces opposite charge on the other side.
The idea of Don's electron captor is to use just potential to disturb the electrons in
the ground without really doing work, similar to avramenko plug.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #121 on: May 11, 2022, 08:44:23 PM »
Don was big on left and right hand spin electrons. He writes in the book attached
above that they exist in pairs (right and left hand ones) in nature. We know electrons
repel and don't exist in pairs, unless we are talking electrons which are part of the atom
aka Lewis pair. Otherwise, closest to that is a Cooper pair when two electrons join
but that happens only in superconductors. Here is what mainstream guys say about
left-right spin electrons.

"Left and right handed refers to the chirality of an electron. Right handed chirality means
that the spin and momentum of the electron point in the same direction. Left handed
means opposite direction of spin and momentum. This distinction is made because
these two chiralities refer to two fundamentally different components of the elektron
wave function. In QFT a mass mixes these two components and that is why elektrons
doe not have mass as an elementary particle. Mass is generated by the Higgs-
mechanism and the breakdown of symmetry of the vacuum-states.

[...]

No massive free particles have definite heliticity (it is not conserved during free particle
propagation), so there is no such thing as a left-handed electron. However, using
projection operators, we can split the electron wavefunction into left-handed and right-
handed components. (They need not be equal in magnitude, but a pure left-handed
electron does not satisfy the Dirac equation and so does not exist as a free particle).
Then the weak nuclear force couples only to the left-handed component of the electron,
while the EM force interacts with both."

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/left-right-handed-electrons-whats-the-difference.36530/

Also, in diagram below he, like Richard LeFors Clark in his Diamagnetic Gravity Vortexes,
paints a misleading picture depicting a whole magnet as two opposite magnetic domains
with bloch wall in the center while in reality those are microscopic domains and when
they become aligned, in same direction for whole length of the ferromagnetic material
you got a magnet.

Of course, Tesla coil with grounded base has current peak at the base and current
node at the top and vice versa for voltage, but this is not what Don is referring to.

Since he is apparently talking about CW and CCW coils, parallel can drawn with other
tensor/scalar alternative physics.

http://www.villesresearch.com/ether.html#torsion%20field

tomd

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #122 on: May 11, 2022, 09:46:12 PM »
Can't remember where I found this, but I think it comes from Zilano.

Vortex 22

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #123 on: May 11, 2022, 11:37:43 PM »
Can't remember where I found this, but I think it comes from Zilano.
Hi,
I think this diagram is similar to one of Don device?
Not sure if it's works exactly like shown?

Vortex 22

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #124 on: May 11, 2022, 11:56:23 PM »
But
First question
Is that capacitor is polar?
Made from aluminum and Glass and copper?
The diodes and the spark gaps ? Not correct like in diagram!!

Vortex 22

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #125 on: May 12, 2022, 12:05:24 AM »
@tomd

there is also this 1 from zelina.

@Vortex 22

saw a fella on YT added a cap in series with ground of Barbosa & Leal electron captor and the video got a  :o reaction from them boys.

so the coils part of the captor is all fer show ... actually just a Don capacitor transformer. neat-o.

wlw
Hello
The electron captor of Barbosa and leal are made from battery !!!
Battery is just some kind of a  very huge capacitor!!!

Vortex 22

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #126 on: May 12, 2022, 12:11:06 AM »
Nothing is new under the sun!
The capacitor electron captor or the battery electron Captor
Works
Even Don Smith mention this
That battery+ diodes can collect free electrons!!!

Vortex 22

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #127 on: May 12, 2022, 12:48:34 AM »
Maybe
Coils can capture free electrons? Not any coils
If we power a cone or pancake coil,  how can I expect that there is any gain?

Free electrones will not just jump on coil?
I think, I know the answer but just theory until we see it in real life?

Vortex 22

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #128 on: May 12, 2022, 03:06:49 AM »
Sorry I am not familiar with Walter Russell concept.
One coil against the other?
North pole vs North or South vs South Pole?
Well that can work even with standard coils geometry!

But I really don't like this concept !!!
Because nature don't do this at her will !!!


Similar magnetic poles repulse for a reason
We should not break nature Law! It would a good idea to prepare our self for nature response !!!

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #129 on: May 12, 2022, 06:23:36 AM »
Regarding the bloch wall analogy projected to a bulk of a magnet and why i said
this is misleading in Don's and Richard LeFors Clark's diagrams.

Definition of Bloch Wall:

the boundary between two domains in a magnetic material marked by a layer
wherein the direction of magnetization is assumed to change gradually from
one domain to the other


In other words ferromagnetic materials consist of many tiny magnets normally
randomly oriented thus canceling out and if most of these are made to align
in same direction you got a big magnetic field. (shown below)

So bloch wall is when you got two of those little magnets aka "domains" next to
each other but they have different polarity and the "wall" is just a transition
boundary between them.

So it's not like magnet is made of two big magnetic domains of opposite spin,
both sides are pointing in same direction.

Demonstration of magnetic domains, bloch wall would be empty space between
nearby domains of different direction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgwReDkpq6E

This woman sheds some light on misuse of the term bloch wall by certain people.

https://youtu.be/vTV1EVb-V2c?t=2055

With that said, however, center of the magnet and center of any object is a special
place where ether focalizes, if this center is altered gravitational field is produced.
I cannot stress the importance of this enough.

Keely was first to reveal this possibly the most important detail of occult study.

From KeelyNet

Levity Rings

1) Keely - uses two methods

For Thrust (or levitation)

An artificial neutral center is created which causes the natural neutral center of the test
mass to be drawn towards the artificial center with an attraction proportional to the
energy flowing through the artificial neutral center.

For Weight Increase or aggregation of additional mass

When the artificial neutral center is superposed onto the natural center, the aether flows
increase proportionate to the entraining amplitudes flowing through the artificial neutral
center thus causing an increase in weight and a gradual INCREASE in the mass density.

For Levitation

A wire or ring is placed around the object. The ring is fed with a frequency that resonates
with the neutral center of the mass. Such a resonance, properly directed can cause what
Keely calls "high vortex action" to decrease or increase the aether flow through the mass
neutral center. This flow creates the equivalent of a soliton, or a self-contained standing
wave with extremely high rotational velocities on the perimeter of the mass. Such a flow
directly controls the "weight" of the mass by exceeding the Flotte 'Z' axis or better stated,
by creating a higher potential in the mass aggregate than that of the surrounding media
for ejection of the mass to one more favorable to its energetic level.
Keely also reports a cooling effect of the local air when the anti-grav effect was in
operation.


Schauberger also had something to say about the neutral center.....

"Hence by altering the inner-atomic structure, we can displace the centre of
gravity and thereby achieve that which we regard as pure, resistance-free motion"


Also contactee Dan Fry was told exactly the same thing by Alan, a guy whose
ancestors emigrated from Earth (below).

And this center is of great importance for a magnet too. Below is a comparison
of a magnetic field of a Faraday generator if it's aligned with Earth's N-S or not. (Zirbes)

So there is much to this neutral center thing, it's just that it's not a bloch wall.



nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #130 on: May 12, 2022, 09:43:56 AM »
Also, an interesting view at the atom comes from the Inner Circle, group of astral
people public would erroneously call "ghost" (OH THE IRONY, if they only knew...)
'channeled' by Mark Probert in the 50s, quote from the book The Magic Bag

It clearly tells the same thing we heard from Tassel, how lines of light cross
to generate "matter". Each line carrying in itself a substance - matter of smaller
order - all matter being but voids in the ether (Koilon), standing waves...

And how atom is made of bunch of forcefields.

And that matter moves in periodical quanta. This was confirmed by mainstream
only circa 10 years ago when it was found neutron falls "in steps".

And how nucleus "breaths" electrons in and out creating em fields.

Very interesting stuff.



« Last Edit: May 12, 2022, 12:01:06 PM by nix85 »

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #131 on: May 12, 2022, 11:15:01 AM »
Here is an interview with physicist Martin Tajmar on
Gravitomagnetism, cooper pairs etc.
Here he says "neutron is falling down in steps".
Meaning motion of matter in time is quantized.
Mainstream is just discovering this.
But we see this is said in above paper from the 50s.

Also as i already explained many times in the Iargan
Unified Field Theory we have 6 axis/phases of time
and each axis is oscillating AC with finite frequency
and matter like a diode catches impulses in one
direction only, thus matter and antimatter propagating
in time in opposite directions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRb-1WApJKs

If anyone wonders about the intro/outro song, it's

Real Life by Simple Minds

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bttu7o3iU_0

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #132 on: May 12, 2022, 12:42:23 PM »
Another just as valuable view at time-space mechanics comes from
a book by Doreal, author of well known Emerald tablets of Thoth.

Vortex 22

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #133 on: May 12, 2022, 12:49:07 PM »
Hello,
You all are really doing great research, but are still falling victim to mainstream! Think about it, if mainstream
had the answer you would have it! Anything this big, and of this great an importance they cannot hide, nor
would they want to! You are placing all of your faith and beliefs in what they have already spoon fed you. Those
in high positions who know and use this technology (and have been for years even before Tesla!) love the fact
that you choose to be ignorant of the facts! And the simple truth is that our science is not so much wrong as it is
incomplete, powerful men with a plan established its foundation in quicksand!
It is up to each and everyone of you to come up with his/her own answer in the language of the layman! When
you finally comprehend the fundamentals, regardless of what level you consider yourself to be at, we will be
speaking the same language! Keep your questions simple and well thought out and the answer will be
structured and organized.

Vortex 22

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
Re: Just another Don Smith thread
« Reply #134 on: May 12, 2022, 01:10:06 PM »
This forum is filled with minds which practice putting the carriage
before the horse. Folk build circuits and hope that by tweaking them
this way or that, they will tickle out more energy than they put into the
circuit. I find it fascinating how the thought of finding the seat of the
surplus has never entered their minds?! All are hell bent on measuring,

obsessed with perfecting each other's understanding and solidifying our
acceptance, and strict adherence of laws which they themselves have yet
to comprehend.