Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Energy Generation by moving Mag Field through Static Steel Core & Copper Coils  (Read 21312 times)

Ufopolitics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
Hello to All,


Here I will share the Spec's of my Exciter Coils.

They are wound with 23 Gauge wire and the winding sequence is shown on Graphic.

This Stator came off an AC Blower Induction Motor, which I previously tested with same armature, and the results were awful, very low output...so I stripped it.

And took it off its outer Housing...

This Stator have a total of 36 Tooth, so I used groups of nine (9) slots/tooth for each coil, and two would be dedicated to Exciiter and other two to the Main Output Coils.

There is a big difference on the Stator windings of Universal Motor Stators and Generator Stators, and I am not referring to the wider (spread over time) way to  wind them, but to the direction of windings...

In a Universal Motor, windings are Both following the same direction to wind, either CW or CCW, in order to generate a North and a South facing the Rotor/Armature...

In the case of a Generator, it is the Opposite, meaning Stator1 is wound CW and S2 is CCW, facing Armature...so, if we will energize them, they will both generate same polarity facing rotor.

This fact has to do with the way a Magnetic Fields vortex into Space...which eventually ends up by both Poles turning the same exact way...so both opposite coils will add up when connected in series, but, Hey, that is from "another chapter"... ;D

I start by Center Coil and winding outwards to next adjacent sub-coil, so, center would be Sub Coil 1, then SC2, SC3 and finally SC4...

Each Sub Coil have approx. 125-130 Turns, generating a Total Resistance whole Coil of 7.5-8.0 Ohms.

Some hints about winding these type of stator coils :

I built some copper wire Guides which will serve to keep wires all the way to the back of Stator Slot (very important), otherwise wires will start blocking the entrance for further winding (see Image Attached)

I may keep adding to this post later on "EDITS" at the bottom of this Post...as I have to move into the Brushes new arrangement following up...which was even more successful.


Cheers


Ufopolitics


EDIT 1: On the first image when I was ready to start winding sub coil#1...look at the copper guide front bent angle, and where it sets related to stator slot.

This guide settings will force wound wires to go all the way back on slot, as it gains height...and this will be very useful for further coils, to hold wire at the back of this sub coil#1...
« Last Edit: May 25, 2022, 02:51:21 PM by Ufopolitics »

Ufopolitics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
...And so, after done with a Sub Coil...

You bend straight the front part of the copper guide angle...and pull them out (see image)

It should slide under the insulation paper...so, not scratching the enameled wires... ;)

Cheers

Ufopolitics

Ufopolitics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
I have decided to migrate my Post from Holcomb Thread here...as I will show further developments in a near future:


A Brief summary...

We need to work more on our Developing and Research "Techniques"...As "enhancing" our "Powers of Deeper Analysis"...please, let me explain...

Yes, over the years we have being observing, reading, finding certain "anomalies" related to FE, and we have ignore them...or simply say "it was faked"..."a hoax"...
A very simple way to keep with the same B.S of Classic Sciences which have NOT delivered FE...and never will, unless We, as researchers, developers in the Private Sector...do it ourselves...

First thing that Clemente Figuera wrote, after succeding with his Patents back in 1908 was..."I never could have imagined it was so simple!!..."
Then Buforn tried to add "improvements" to Figuera Patent which was already working...and He screwed it off...

And yes, there has been "something" we all have been missing...to go deeper into it, to  study more and more..Magnetism, period!!

I mean, up to now, Science still have the ridiculous and rough,  "Iron shavings" as the only way to "visualize" a magnetic field...come on, please!!

After we all have Ferrofluids developed way back in time...after we all have Magnetic Viewing Film, after we have the Ferrocell  developed and patented by Tim Vanderelli, Books like Ken Wheeler "Uncovering the mysteries of Magnetism", awakening our ways to comprehend further on that beautiful Spectrum...

But we still invoke a few iron particles freely loose to "officially" understand how Magnetic Fields look like...Pathetic!!

What ufopoitics describing is new and game changing.

Thanks, Yes, this would be "game changing",definitively...beyond what ALL of You could ever imagine...beyond your wildest dreams...

I started playing with this tech a very long time ago...but, at that time, I was constrained (and may confess, also very stubborn) by the use of "Asymmetric Fields", and kept working for thousands of hours on the same, and only observing just a few "anomalies"...but nothing "galore"...so, I end up abandoning it...

Until I saw Pierre Cotnoir development, read all his posts here*...and finally realized where my MAIN ERROR WAS...The "Secret"...which is already out  and spreading...
Then I finally understood almost everything, not only what I was doing wrong...but also allow me to understand all previous FE Technologies shown before...like Steven Marks TPU...like Don Smith's developments...like Kapanadze...etc,etc

Not collapsing the Main Field...but harvesting it, feeding it, while mutating only minimal small chunks to stimulate a movement...a Rotation.

Now, How successful and How far could you get??...equals how good You put it together...depends entirely on your building skills, the tools you own...and the effort you decide to waste on it...

However, I disagree that this Technology is...New?...sorry, but I do not think so:

That many "knew" way back about this tech but hid it, seize it?...Yes, definitively!!

Why?...

First, because it will reveal how wrong our Science have been for hundreds of years...when it could have been built such easily...effortlessly...and demonstrating that it could be done very long ago...The COP>1, Overunity, Motion Perpetual, etc,etc...

Second, and that I consider even more powerful...is that this technologies will also bring Us Antigravity...and time will tell...by simply altering in a certain way the molecules of steel and other alloys in a way never done before, counterways alignments of high speed traveling magnetic fields rotations...will eventually render a very light material, which will levitate...defying our "Gravitational Laws" plus breaking all the "specific weights tables for each material"...

Third and final (main reason for banning it)...By learning to "manipulate" the Magnetic Fields this way...we could eventually build very powerful EMP's (Electro-Magnetic Pulses) "Tools"...which could also end up in the making of powerful weapons...like the "Death Ray", developed and Patented by Tesla...way back, or as putting together a small and compact "Portable Venus Shooter"...All these "things" could be very dangerous...in the wrong hands...

However, going back to our Analisys Powers...we are still "constrained"...in our way of thinking...a vivid example:

WHY in this World DO WE STILL NEED A "STATOR-ROTOR-STRUCTURE" (or simply put: a Two Part Generator) where the so called "Rotor" does NOT Rotate??!!...

I mean, this is really laughable at...¿¿ A "Stationary Rotor"...??...really?

I mean, seriously...Why do we still need a "Rotor" whole structure and configuration, surrounded by a "Stator" which does not rotate?...(thinking)... ;D   

And so...why do we need a "Shaft" for a  "Rotor" that does not rotate...lol??!!

Bad concepts of "definition" applied above...which keep Us within the same loop, circling over and over...and part of that loop eventually keeps Us going back to the "successful apparatuses" which generates electricity by physically rotating a rotor (doh!!)...when ACTUALLY, there is absolutely no relation between the two systems whatsoever...

Why keep constraining to a completely useless "Rotor with Shaft" within a "Stator" structure?...when we all could move to a Full Static All New Configuration, which grants way more room and "comfort" to all windings and cores we will build in a near future?

I mean, do not take me wrong, I see it as a way to "start" a development with "things" that we all have "on hand"...however, start thinking about getting rid of all these no longer required structures, in order to give more room to more efficient and better engineered developments  ...for God's sake!!

All above sounds a bit too crazy, right?...

Or maybe "too ahead of these times"...


Ufopolitics

Ufopolitics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
Hi

I like what you just said about what things could look like in the future with free energy!
They are similar to what most FE researchers are striving for.
[...]
After you get the full operating FE systems running we
will all be excited to see it in operation.

So thank you again for all the hours that is being worked on it to
bring this technology to the world!

Lunkster


Hello Lunkster,

Yes, thank you, I  have duplicated my post here (for my own recall later on), which was originally posted by me on Holcomb/News/Thread

However, this Thread is only for Builders, who are or would be, willing to start a build based on my Main Topic and Development(s)

Although, I will accept some opinions or questions related to the build only.

All other posts related to general opinions, or just general comments would be removed.

It is ALL written at the beginning of this Thread

As I really appreciate your interest, I will please ask you to transfer your post as a quote to my last one (or as you like, without "quotes") on the Holcomb Thread (link above in blue) where I will respond about your opinions.

I will give you enough time, then I will delete your post here, plus my response.


I want to keep this Thread clean, so access to important data (for future builders) is available without having non related to build posts crowding it.

Thanks again for understanding and so I appreciate it.


Ufopolitics

Ufopolitics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
Hello to All,


Here is a short video about testing two different Stators configurations...first was the previous one I have shown here, versus an overlapped one, using same amount of wire lenght...lesser turns, as each coilis same size...


VIDEO: TESTING TWO DIFFERENT STATORS CONFIGURATIONS


Regards


Ufopolitics

Ufopolitics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
Hello,


Some images while I was winding the new tested stator, on previous video...


Ufopolitics

Ufopolitics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
Hello to All,


I will be winding the whole 36 slots Stator next week, it will be on a brand new 20 gauge wire spool that I just bought...

And so, this is the best configuration I could design, conceive, using 100% of all slots, for a total of 18 coils, overlapped.
Each Coil embraces 8 slots, 9 tooth.

The coils windings are separated by the red equator line shown on graphic.
So, All North Coils will be wound CW, and Southern Hemisphere Coils would be wound CCW.
North Hemisphere have Nine (9) Coils
South Hemisphere have Nine (9) Coils

I will be leaving wires out (Termination/End and Start) between coils, in order to be able to measure independently each coil and the best pairing match...it should be at 180º...but we never know.

As depending on each output, I could separate by groups or combinations thereof, like (12/6)- (6/6/6)- (14/4) etc,etc)...in order to search for correct output for the section of Exciter Coils supply (Input)
As also in order to separate output groups for different tests and applications.

I know it will work, because I have already tested four coils in the same config on my previous video...this is just a matter of building more coils...using the whole 360º magnetic field rotating sweep.

Again, I will test and upload a video as soon as done winding, and setting everything, no matter if results are positive or negative.

I am still working on the Toroid Structure...as well.


Regards


Ufopolitics
« Last Edit: June 05, 2022, 06:57:41 PM by Ufopolitics »

Ufopolitics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
GENERATOR STATOR FULL WINDING STARTED...

I already started winding Stator with 20 gauge wire, according to previous shown diagram...slots only allow me 70-75 turns.


I already test Coil 1 yesterday, very successful test!!


Doing Coil#4...14 more to go...


Cheers




Ufopolitics
« Last Edit: August 07, 2022, 08:07:50 PM by Ufopolitics »

Ufopolitics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
Hello to All,

Here I will be uploading three short recent videos, where I will show the point where I am in the testing of the Virtual Field Rotation plus Generation of Energy as a result.

I have finished the full winding of 18 Coils on the previous Stator Core I have shown...however, I have tried already many different configurations as related to the way I connect Coils in between...and observing results.

On these three videos I have the configuration shown on Diagram, about the way I have interconnected all 18 coils...which is different from the way a typical generator have their Stator Coils connected between them.

On this case I have connected alternatively the coils from North Hemisphere to the coils from the South Hemisphere...
Meaning, C1 End is connected to C10 Start, C10 End is connected to C2 Start, C2 End to C11 Start and so on...
This way have given me a better result in acceleration gain of the rotation of the Magnetic Field.
However, the failed part is that it adds more resistance, hence less output amperage...but still, you will see on the videos I have pretty good amperage output...

Stay tuned to watch the videos in the coming posts.


Thanks


Ufopolitics

Ufopolitics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
VIDEO DEMONSTRATING VOLTAGE 2X OVERUNITY

Ok, so on this video I show how the Generator Stators Coils are connected, plus a simple test run showing Output Voltage above Input by Two times or 2X...


SIMPLE VOLTAGE OVERUNITY DEMONSTRATION VIDEO


So, I am feeding Field with 10V as I get Output of 20+ Volts in AC, and around 18.5 in DC...No Electrolytic Caps added on this test, which -of course- will increase Output DC Voltage above shown figures.


No load on this video...just checking V In versus V Out


Stay tuned for next video...


Thks


Ufopolitics

Ufopolitics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
On this video I clearly demonstrate that it is the Field Rotation what keeps the Generation of Power that comes at Output...By simply reducing the speed of rotation on the Rotary Switch to almost zero.

We can clearly see how the Lamp dims out, as Scope signals decrease (flatten out) to zero.

DEMONSTRATION OF FIELD ROTATION IS WHAT KEEPS ENERGY OUTPUT

Thanks for watching

Ufopolitics

Ufopolitics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
Sorry guys, I missed the Video where I loaded Generator with a 90 Watts Halogen Lamp...here it is:


LOADING GENERATOR WITH A 90 WATTS HALOGEN LAMP

Edit: I want to rectify that Current Probe Clamp blue sine wave, which is amperage, is showing (at all time) a Full amplitude (Plus and Minus currents) of close to two amps, or 20 mV which are two divisions on scope screen grid.
Not like I say on video, that is 1 amp total amplitude...but 1 amp from positive side plus 1 amp on negative side.

Thanks again


Ufopolitics

Ufopolitics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
Hello to all


Well, last night I conducted some tests after rewiring (not rewinding) the stator coils...I used the original config as itis used on generators...
which is all CW Coils in upper Hemisphere in series attached to lowerHemispheregroup also in series...
This is a simple way to connect coils, typically, but in my case it does gives me a very high resistance (20 Ohms) for this kind of coils use normally is around 4 to 5 Ohms.


Here is the CAD Diagram


Stay tuned for coming videos...


Ufopolitics

Ufopolitics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
Hello,

So, last night I did some tests with new wiring...lighting up a 120V/ 60 Watts Incandescent Bulb...
On these tests I was basically more focused on Amperage...Input versus Output

But I ran into some Amperage "anomaly" when adjusting the proper speed of the Rotary Switch...

And the thing is that I have been trying -for a while- to get Rotary Switch to reach a steady operational speed anywhere the 3000 to the 3600 RPM's...without the brushes to loose pressure, just a bit, but by loosing pressure there was some arcing and sparks whenever loading generator and lost contact and power went off...So, I am now running it at around 2000-1900 RPM's...

Anyways, here is the video after I adjusted brushes, by pressing them more against commutator.

REDO TEST VIDEO AFTER BRUSH ADJUSTMENT

The interesting part takes place after minute 5:21 on...and I uploaded some frames from this sequence...

However the amperage "anomaly" I  mentioned before, did not show up again after I did the brush adjustment on this video... :(




Ufopolitics

Ufopolitics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
Hello to All,

HOLLOW ARMATURE STATIC ROTOR

Sorry that I have been away for a while...I have ordered a few tools and equipment as some components I needed to keep making my Lab Testing.
While I have been working on all my CAD's, relating to better designs on ALL my projects...not just this one here.

But, I needed to rise some funds, some earnings, so I decided to take a course on dealing with a way to make money fast and in nice amounts...while it is very risky...Nope, do not get scared, nothing "illegal" about it...The "risk" relates that you could loose it all if you do not play responsibly, and organized, but primarily, very well trained....So, I am doing just that...getting trained to Invest on  the NYSE, basically buying and selling Stock Options...for myself only.

Now, getting back to this  project...I am working on a New Design Static Rotor, without taking apart the existing one I have...it is NOT good  to take apart "something" that is giving promising results...to go on a new "adventure"...which, could or could not work.

So, it would be just a matter of disconnect and reconnect the new one.

And so, here is a CAD, defining the basic structure of this new concept...

It has a lot of work to build it, but I am pretty sure it will work MUCH better than previous one.

Consists of 16 steel elements which I have cut from 3 old identical armatures...but before, I have drilled holes on each element, in order to run bolts-nuts, so after cutting them, they will not come apart...

The point here is to have all these 16 steel bars isolated between each others by a small gap...and using an Aluminum ring, top and bottom, to close them together,  according to my desired Diameter...so, it fits inside the Stator Core.

It would be a HOLLOW WOUND ARMATURE...where I will set inside a steel rotor, mounted on a  shaft and bearings...
The Inner Steel Rotor would be in charge to close the Magnetic Circuit, between Energized Coils across at 180º...As also to increase the strength of the Magnetic Field.
So, once I start spinning the Magnetic Field on the Static Coils and hollow Armature, this rotor will also spin, at the same ratio as the Field is rotating.

Rotor would be following the Rotating Field, attracted by the moving North-South Polarizations across at 180º.
This Rotor could serve as a Dual cooling fan, later on, to keep temp low on both, Static Rotor and Stator assemblies.

I will be making around three different Steel Rotor configurations, A, B and C.

A- Would be the heavier one, almost a full cylinder of steel, except for cutting off some metal off on both sides, as Lines A shows in a shaded area, in order to comprehend only Four Elements on each side, at 180º.

B- Is a lighter type, where I will cut off more metal out of it,  in order to compare output results, versus the A Type.

C- If, there is no substantial Output difference between A & B, then I will make the C Type Rotor, in order to be wound with a single coil...which I may just close it by a Diode (just as we see on a Brushless type Rotary Generator Rotor)...in order to increase the Field strength even more.

But, those (B & C Type) would be after I wind the 16 Coils, make the A Type Rotor and run several tests.

So, the Virtual Rotating Magnetic Field would be literally "jumping" every one steel element as the Rotary switch spins.

I believe this design will generate a much stronger Field than previous one I have...and much better defined movement on its traveling through Space/Time, as a better Resolution, since each coil would be spaced apart, overlapped, and not like before, where I literally have "8 Pairs of Coils", restricting a LOT the traveling distances of a  "Lower Resolution" Magnetic Field.

Please, if you are just commenting about my post, or whole Thread, do it on the Holcomb Thread.
I want to keep this Thread clean, for future interested serious builders only.

I highly appreciate it, Thanks!!

Ufopolitics