Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

The brider view from
Re: FREE ENERGY USING MAGNETS
https://overunity.com/4679/free-energy-using-magnets/75/

simulation tool : https://de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Matlab?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=de&_x_tr_pto=wapp

wmbr
OCWL

Nice build. Looks like you are using a good amount of current. Have you done any measurements of the current? Also, it would be good to know how much drawing off of those coils is bogging things down. Runs pretty strong so far. Nice work.

Somewhere about 3 amps (based on what I seen it pull when hooked to my variable power supply).  I will get more data soon..

Regarding flyback capture with switching polarity driver coils--   I tried the circuit below left, but hit problems.  So now I am using the circuit on the right..  I would really like to pump the flyback into the drive battery.   My questions are:

1. Will the circuit on the right work?
2.  Is using an O-scope the only way to verify it's working?  I would assume the spikes are too quick for a multimeter to catch.  ?

Thanks!

Hi floodrod,

Back then I drew the circuit with switching symbols for a member so that he could understand the principle. The switch symbols represented a H-bridge but the two separate puffer capacitors were not a good solution for utilizing the captured DC voltages.

IF your present H-bridge is built from MOSFETs, then the body diodes in each 4 of them constitute a full wave diode bridge whose AC input is 'hard wired' to the H-bridge output i.e. across the coils to be switched and DC output of the diode bridge is 'hard wired' to the + and - points of the input supply rail feeding the H-bridge, you surely know these. I mention this because this inherent diode bridge across the input coils steers the flyback spikes to the supply rails and the battery immediately limits their amplitude to its own output level. The flyback current surely go back to the battery, to "charge" it in such scenario  but the question is whether there is enough idle time in-between the motor ON currents to receive the flyback current pulses coming to "charge". How a battery can be discharged and charged alternately within quasi milliseconds or less, this is a good question but eventually the resulting input current may get reduced by the amount of the flyback current.
 
You can separate the input supply voltage from the recovered flyback voltage by a diode inserted into say the incoming positive supply rail to pass through any motor input current but block the flyback spikes towards the input supply. And to help store the flyback spikes, an electrolytic capacitor can be connected directly across the H-bridge supply rail (after the series diode). In your schema, cut the wire between the battery+ and the electrolytic cap+ and connect them with a 5A or heftier diode, (anode goes to battery+). The spikes will raise the voltage across this capacitor above the input supply rail but the actual voltage level will fluctuate across this capacitor depending on the ON and OFF motor times. There can be setups where such diode does not do anything good, it means then it is not needed... 

So on your 1st question: yes the circuit should collect the flyback from the 3 drive coils as it is connected (assuming your H-bridge has 4 MOSFETs) and
on your 2nd question: inserting the series diode and checking the DC voltage level across the capacitor may indicate this, especially using an oscilloscope for this. If your arduino has the feature for adjusting the duty cycle of the control pulses to the input of the H-bridge, then try to reduce it to let have more OFF time vs the ON time, thus the voltage should increase across the capacitor (when the series diode is there, that is).

I assume your 3 collector coils feed (charge) the battery via the full wave bridge and this circuit is not shown in your above schematic (so the big capacitor across the DC output of this diode bridge you show in the video is not the one indicated in the schema), is this so?

How did you adjust the control of the solid state relay to switch it on at a best moment? I mean what did you consider for that? 
You can check the output current of the 3 collector coils after the diode  bridge and its capacitor to have an idea on how much it helps reduce motor currrent (besides the flyback current) to the 3 drive coils?

Edit: I think I misunderstood your schematic. So the series diode should be inserted to the other side of the battery+ whiere the wire goes towards the H-bridge+.  And the diode bridge shown in the schematic receives the AC voltage coming from the 3 collector coils but the solid state relay circuit is not shown.  Right?

Gyula

At 3 amps, it's pretty power hungry. The original adams was a bit power hungry as well though. But that is a pretty good chunk or power to try and make up with the Gen coils even though technically all of your coils are gen coils the way you have it. You are getting lenz drag from all of them but still much rpm is left to harvest from. Is your pulse width pretty wide on purpose to gain more speed possibly? I'm just curious, because it's clear you can crank the speed out and it can be powerful. But at what cost? I'm just curious how far you can increase that efficiency. You are at the fun stage of the project now. And the most frustrating tweaking stuff!!! This is where I like to cut power down to the very minimum that continues to run, and step it up slowly as I tweak everything. The adams motor I built many years ago I actually found that it was more efficient to me, not to treat the run coils as Gen coils. When I removed the bridge from it and worked to only collect the flyback, my current dropped, my rpms increased, and my Gen coils appeared to be doing better as well simply because they were being fed higher rpm. I felt in my motor, the added Lenz drag from pulling energy off my run coils hurt more than helped overall efficiency. Yours may be totally different. Just sharing my experience from past.  Please keep sharing. Love to see it.

Wiring the generator coils in series will multiply the voltage. Interrupted current can easily generate hundreds of volts. Just the opposite from what you're anticipating. A high voltage Capacitor in parallel with the charge battery is needed to regulate the voltage down.

Shorting the output coils at TDC will increase the power to the rotor. Controling the pole reversal causes the drag to propel the rotor rather than slow it down. This will result in increased acceleration and higher charging!

Thane's ReGenX coils have a tiny capacitor in parallel with the winding. We can control the timing of the Lenz pole reversal with a Reed switch or the inclusion of the Capacitor. The calculated resonance of the LC tank delays magnetic pole appearance because of this hysterisis loop. The Capacitor farad and coil inductance values determine the moment of maximum impedence. The mirror pole cannot form while the cap charge has the coil in resonance. Thane failed to get any patents awarded for this design, so it is free to use. Your motor will be the highest state of the art if you succeed.

Thinking about your concern for how power hungry your motor is at the moment. Here is something to consider, and something I am currently working on with my own motor design...

I'm not saying this is your answer by any means. Just adding a little food for thought if you begin changing coils a bit...

Sometimes it helps me step all the way back to the basics... Talking about the run coils... There are 3 ways to increase the magnetic field that they produce from each pulse that we are aware of immediately.
1. increase the number of turns
2. increase the amount of current
3. add an iron core
Now, we also want to keep resistance as low as possible. So finding that golden ratio here that matches each particular motor can be difficult.
Consider this. You already have the iron core. You also have the higher current. You really only have more turns to add to the coil to help any more here. Unless of course you use tank circuits and other manipulations, but I'm only talking about the very simple principles here.
I am going exactly opposite with my motor design currently. I am using very high number of turns from very small wire guage just to see the effect of doing exactly opposite. In my coils I have 2600 turns of 30awg in each coil. That of course has increased my resistance quite a bit per coil. And what I found is that I am get extremely efficient run, but much lower rpm and torque. I am getting over 500 rpm for less than 1/2watt of power. It runs on only about 14ma which is fantastic, but I have to push a much higher voltage to get there due to the high resistance of the wire. I am on the other extreme of the scale from where you are. There is a happy middle in there for each of our designs. From my experience, it looks to me like if you wanted to make a coil adjustment, your efficiency will go up if you use smaller wire. Your current draw will go down and the number of turns goes up. You will be making a trade cutting current while still trying to maintain as much torque as possible. Where is the happy median? Maybe just stepping up a few guages of wire might do you a lot of good without going to far with it and increasing your resistance to much like I have done. Also, the saturation point of your cores is something to think about as well. To thick of cores could also be very power hungry as well. With 3 amps cranking through there, that is probably not your issue here. And since you are using transformer cores, may not be an option to change much here anyway. But may be something to think about as you move forward. Somebody also mentioned, that you are not using the outer sides of your cores either. That is also a very valid point. That's just unused power laying there for the taking. But everything is of course a work in progress.
Now of course, our goals are probably completely different as well and makes a huge difference. In my design, I do not need high rpms. I want efficiency and to pull all of my power off the backend through gen coils. You on the other hand may be hunting for a much stronger torque than me, which would require much more current than mine does. Just all food for thought. I love the Adams motor design, but I quickly found myself drifting in my own directions and moved to air cored before I moved on to something else entirely. I found my air cored adams was more efficient but of course not as impressive. There always seems to be a trade off in every design. I'll keep changing and adapting like we all do.
Sorry for all my rant. Just sharing the part of my own experiments I'm currently working on that maybe you can learn from my mistakes and keep in mind.

An after thought... I'm not sure what kind of transformers you used for your coils. But do you happen to have some secondaries you could swap in on your cores to see what the higher gage wire would perform like? Just for an easy way to test out the side of the wire thickness scale?