Total wonder that the Gov didn't just give him the same old gag order and shelve it for reasons of national security. Damn sure will put the electric companies out of business for the home. Not sure it can supply enough to power say a steel mill or auto factory.

I see this HES system as good for the electric companies
because I have heard that the electrical grid is stressed
at this present time.  Since the in line system cuts the
electrical power supplied by 50%, the power companies
will still make money at the same time as their would
be less of a demand on the grid.

It is the HES self contained systems that would alarm
the power companies.  That may be why the self contained
systems have not come out yet from HES.

With more and more electric cars and truck coming into
play, the grid demand will not go down.  So the power
companies may be trying to develop in-line systems
themselves so they do not have companies like HES
to share the money made from providing electrical
energy to it's costumers.

Just a guess of what the greedy large companies will do.

Lunkster

 

You are just obsessed with the solid state generator and have left out a very important piece of information.
https://fb.watch/gzj1xp4Drb/
Electromechanical converter of motor-generator type with possible СОР-4.
Do you know how many such electromechanical converters are in main networks, at industrial facilities? their СOP is not more than 0.7.
So the electricity generation revolution and the problem of electricity sellers is much bigger than you think at first glance!

After all, the entire magnetic gearbox simply consists of a set of ferromagnetic elements(bolts).
It doesn't get any easier!  And it really increases the speed of rotation of the magnetic field created by the rotating permanent magnet rotor. Has no one tried it yet ? If the rotation of the field is true, then this should worked. Or Holcomb knows the secret to creating "really" spinning fields. Which we don't know until.

Wonder if it would be fruitful to contact Paul Keane and ask a few questions.  Maybe he has actually witnessed the HES device in operation.

Almost laughable when the examiner refers to the device as a transformer.  I've never seen a cylindrical transformer where the fields are continuously powered with DC and switched sequentially from salient pole to salient pole.  Sounds pretty novel to me.

Also interesting how it is legally submitted no laws of physics have been broken because a third party validation has been completed by DNV GL along with a witness from SGS North America and a statement Mr. Holcomb has two commercial buildings running on the power sources described in the patent application.

Thanks L192,
So Holcomb's patent application was rejected by WIPO, like about one year ago. I noticed in that linked document that they mentioned the witness reports but apparently we're not impressed (neither was I). I also was very unimpressed when I read the patent application (s) and I am glad to see the authority recognize BS when they see it.
bi

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxo5g_xn2oc

Hahahaha,

Best Wishes, EMJunkie...

In the video, the switched DC generator is stated to use a standard 3 phase alternator stator unmodified.


The electrical rotor shown appears to be a straightforward 16 spoke design, with single coils on each spoke.


What is the lenz circumvention mechanism for this design?


We have not seen any instrumented tests for this design.


The rig appears to have three DC to AC 60Hz power inverters?

listener192
Do you think Lenz's rule causes the rotor to brake in the generator stator? The modern interpretation of Lenz's rule is incorrect. Lenz's original rule has a correct and different interpretation.
Bypassing the effect of electromagnetic attraction in the rotor / stator of the generator is possible only with the control of electromagnetic attraction (Adams, Tewari, etc.)
What mechanism Holcomb used in this case, I think, is not disclosed by any patent.

Issued Holcomb patents are not currently viewable in the patent database. Therefore, do not speculate with unverified information.

Solid state transformation/gain shown as COP-7.0. It goes without saying that turning such an indicator into an independent system is already an engineering decision.

In a simpler form for you:

1. initial energy is "H" [amp-turn/length unit or Orsteds]

2. process is material B-H -- conversion is simply Faraday (et. al.) both ways

3. output energy is "B" [Tesla or Gauss]

4. initial energy "H" in amp-turn/cm (orsted) - output energy is "B" in Tesla (gauss)

Both quantities are 'Magnetic Energy' but use different names/nomenclature to distinguish between the two.

Once you understand B and H - H is the source and B is the resultant so to speak. Pretty simple actually, maybe too simple,
but not for most. More of a KISS thing.

How ever you decide to configure this Gain in your device is entirely up to you as your the designer. Coil/Lap turns, material, source
Voltage/Amps, pulse sequence, drivers, control processor, Rotor/Stator size/shape, etc.

A great deal of efficiency is also gained by the "floating magnetic field" (rotating or sliding). Again,
as the designer it's entirely up to you how that is deployed in your design. It's all there for your use.

Too simple - maybe, but not really! See the referenced book for details and formulas. See the EM CAE for proofs.

<snip>

Hello SL,
I apologize for putting a reply to this old post of yours, but turns out it is pertinent to a point which I wanted to address on your recent our.com post. I am not a member there although I follow it. I attempted to join years ago but was ignored. So here's a cut/paste of the subject post:
______
See the attached .pdf for a brief explaination of the analytics (formulas) involved, including
a link to a good online physics calculator for iterative solving of "Faraday's Law."

Hopefully this is easy to understand for everyone and of some value!

SL


------------------------

 LinGen Technical Brief -Analytic-.pdf (217.78 kB - downloaded 13 times.)

 _________

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg102190;topicseen#msg102190
Reply#416

________

First off, in the pdf you state H to have units of Amperes/Turns. Is this a typo?

I have some more discussion, but need to take a break and wish to see if I get your attention over here.

Thanks,
bi