Holcomb LinGen Controller Update

F.Y.I.

STM32F7xx Controller design is in Alpha Test and it's pretty inpressive so far!

Took longer than expected to design using the ARM HAL TIM functions but it does not impact the
main processor - had a long learning curve w.r.t. the TouchGFX (LCD/Touch display functions) but
it's pretty cool - easily sets/changes the "Sequence Time/Interactions" - nice engineering  design
tool! New MOSFET & Drivers (US made) were also used - somewhat expensive but performed flawlessly.

Schematic and software might be uploaded to the web site soon. Keep an eye out...

SL

I'm still watching my PM

How the Holcomb generator works, and how the Figer generator may have worked, I really hope that I will soon check my theoretical part.
In any case, why do we need a gap, or why do we need a shift of one pole relative to the other in iron cores, and many more points, for example, the magnetic flux is identical to the flow of liquid in a pipe, etc.
I will give my version of this mechanism.

Everything is absolutely real, based on traditional physics, with minor additions and clarifications.

Sincerely.

I’ve removed the PMs from this rotor. I’ll be winding soon and reporting back.

Edit posted the wrong motor model. Can’t see the images via ios in this forum. So hopefully only the rotor is showing.

Kolbacict
Good to see you ( just saying


Jimboot
Snip
From A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity Vol 1, The Classical Theories p420
"The experiment of Tolman and Stewart gave a fairly direct proof that electric currents in metals are carried by "free" negative electrons.
A coil of wire was rotated at high speed and suddenly brought to rest: A pulse of electric current was produced, arising from the momentum of the electrons in the rotating coil, which caused them to continue in motion after the rotation of the coil had ceased.
End snip


A cousin ? (Thanks to Francois (F6) for wiki link )
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart%E2%80%93Tolman_effect


Snip above is from Member ION ( posted here as Vortex 1  link below…..
Was his very first post on this forum in 2006 )

https://overunity.com/1725/towards-an-acoustic-resonator-theory/msg18116/#msg18116


Respectfully
Chet K
PS
Jim
Please  feel free to remove anything not appropriate to ….?
Thanks for all you do for open source FE community…greatly appreciated!!

It could be Pandora's box!

http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/publ/free_energy_systems/sor_2_7_ssg/3-1-0-156

I removed the insult bit.

For those wondering how the Holcomb folks fared in the hurricane, the attached was posted on their Instagram page today.

Here's the first huge breakthrough of HES!

https://fb.watch/g5-3Fybmlk/

The video says that the Mu-metal and shielding
was the breakthrough in reducing the braking.

What about the electrical steel?
Is the Mu-metal the electrical steel?

From reading his patents, I get the feeling he uses the two terms electrical steel and
Mu-metal as both magnetic material.  The difference has to do with when in the
construction process the material is used.  The electrical steel is used early in thin sheets
to form the structure of the rotor or stator.  When he uses the Mu-metal is later on after
the structure is built and wound with wire.  For instance, you could fabricate the electrical
steel laminates without slots, having only holes for placing the wire coils.  If you did this
it would be extremely difficult to pack the wire in there once you stacked all the laminates.
Instead, you fabricate your laminates with hole/slots where the circumference is touching the
edge, form your coils, place them into these hole/slots from the side and lastly cover the exposed edge with
Mu-metal.  You end up with basically the same thing, only the later method is far easier
to manufacture.

Since they had the breakthrough with reconfiguring
an off the shelf device  with  mu-metal
for shielding the rotor, will doing the same thing
to other motor and generator designs reducing the
braking affect in those designs as well?

That's a great question.  I would suspect manufacturers to be doing this if it improves
efficiency significantly.

Is what is called braking in the video the same
as removing most of the back-EMF affect on
the device?

That's how in interpret it.  If you can spin an unloaded generator with a tiny motor and
then connect the generator to a load circuit and not have the generator reduce speed
in the process, you've successfully eliminated braking.

If I recall correctly, that was the basic aspect of all those Q-mo-gen devices we saw
when Sterling Allan was covering them--large generator with a much smaller motor.

e.g.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NhWHm4pjpk