Language:
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

### GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

Custom Search

### Author Topic: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world  (Read 142816 times)

#### pmgr

• Full Member
• Posts: 184
##### Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #1380 on: August 21, 2022, 04:22:55 AM »
katsaps also live in the USA, but I agree we will not specify a dude without a name, who distorts other people's names.
Newton's first law is secondary in its ontogeny to Coulomb's law. Just look at the formulas.
In general, all gravity is the attraction of charged bodies.
The second physics considers Amperes to be the movement of electrically charged particles, which in fact is a gross mistake.
only a vortex electric field moves around the conductor. This is the parameter of electric charge change as a result of permeability. The current strength is a parameter of "conditional" resistance to a change in the electrical parameter, it has a vortex magnetic structure.
The vortex magnetic field and the vortex electric field are like twin brothers, but they have differences. The electric field along the conductor is a conical spiral from a higher potential to a lower one. A vortex magnetic field will always have equal potentials at the ends. This is a property of magnetic flux. The current strength is also the same in all parts of the circuit.
Rakker, you can say all that above and with some things I agree (e.g. gravity force is very similar to electric charge force), but you still haven't addressed the fact that your units in your table are inconsistent as I have shown above. Your table needs corrections. It is not correct from a unit standpoint. And if you think it is, please list what units you use as standard units (e.g. V, A, m, s) and how other derived units are related to it (e.g. Coulomb and Weber).

If you can't do that, you lack the basic understanding that when writing down an equation, the units need to match on both sides of the equal sign.

#### rakarskiy

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 460
##### Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #1381 on: August 21, 2022, 11:53:08 AM »
I don't think anything to fix. Modern science is repelled in measurements, from the unit of electric charge (Coulomb).
That is: 1 Coulomb is the amount of charge that has passed through the cross section of the conductor, at a current strength of 1 A in a time of 1 s,
or current strength 1A = 1 Coulomb for 1 s.
I also associate the pendant with the volt:
By definition, the difference in electric potential between two points is equal to 1 volt if, to move a charge of 1 pendant from one point to another, work of 1 joule must be done on it. A volt is also equal to an electrical voltage that induces a direct current of 1 ampere at a power of 1 watt in an electrical circuit.
Now next:
By definition, a change in magnetic flux through a closed circuit at a rate of one Weber per second induces an EMF in this circuit equal to one volt.
All this is a vicious circle, logical chains, with science determining that Ampere is a unit of measurement for the strength of an electric current.
How does this same Current Force manifest itself in reality?
It manifests itself in the action of electromagnetic induction in a closed circuit.
The fact that the orthodox all agreed to consider this phenomenon as the movement of electrically charged particles is not confirmed in any way.
The current strength is directly related to the vortex magnetic field around the conductor.
From here we conclude that the current strength in the electrical system and the eddy magnetic field around the conductor are one and the same phenomenon, only in different measurement systems.
The movement is carried out by an electric field between potentials, and a magnetic vortex field (current strength) is a consequence with a different spin vector.

Quote
E  - is the electric field strength (in SI units - V/m);
D  - electrical induction (in SI units - C / m²);

H  - is the magnetic field strength (in SI units - A/m);
B  - magnetic induction (in SI units - T = Wb / m² = kg•s−2•A−1);
« Last Edit: August 21, 2022, 03:26:06 PM by rakarskiy »

#### bistander

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 279
##### Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #1382 on: August 21, 2022, 05:07:37 PM »
Rakker, you can say all that above and with some things I agree (e.g. gravity force is very similar to electric charge force), but you still haven't addressed the fact that your units in your table are inconsistent as I have shown above. Your table needs corrections. It is not correct from a unit standpoint. And if you think it is, please list what units you use as standard units (e.g. V, A, m, s) and how other derived units are related to it (e.g. Coulomb and Weber).

If you can't do that, you lack the basic understanding that when writing down an equation, the units need to match on both sides of the equal sign.

pmgr,

I agree with you.
Rak's problems:
He confuses the variables with the units of measure. This leads to circular reasoning and flawed logic.
Magnetic flux (or the magnetic field) is not a vortex, as he claims.
He speaks of "strength" of current. Nonsensical. Current is a rate. Like velocity. Like saying strength of speed.
He does not comprehend basic physics and refuses to recognize proven universally accepted fundamental concepts and definitions.
I see no point to him.
bi

#### rakarskiy

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 460
##### Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #1383 on: August 21, 2022, 06:10:21 PM »
Your problem is stereotypes. I have a consideration of action in an electrical circuit. Current strength, a very controversial concept in physics, what does this phenomenon refer to? The concept of ordered charges? what charges? and why the only manifestation is a vortex magnetic field?
You are attached to Newton's law as the root cause, but progressive thinking physicists themselves put it on the third. The first is Coulomb's law. If we were attentive, we could find an interesting gradation in my materials that I post here.
I got the impression that such an opus about moving charges was introduced intentionally.

PS: my view of the problem only clarifies what is blurry. Namely, in the action of electromagnetic induction. The main thing is that everything corresponds to Ohm's law, where voltage and current are different elements.

#### kolbacict

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1036
##### Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #1384 on: August 21, 2022, 08:09:31 PM »
I got the impression that such an opus about moving charges was introduced intentionally.
I remember something about how we were told at school about an old experiment.
How a  bay with a wire was untwisting, and abruptly stopped.
At the same time, voltage was fixed at the ends of the coil.
From which they concluded that the free electrons in the metal moved by inertia.

#### rakarskiy

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 460
##### Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #1385 on: August 21, 2022, 08:28:56 PM »
The whole problem is that the resistance of the conductor and the load is the resistance of its crystal lattice to the formation of a vortex magnetic field.
The electric field is a surface phenomenon for metallic conductors. You are well aware that these fields are parasitic for electrical engineering. To protect electrical appliances, the flow of electrical field formations into the ground is used. This is a grounding device.Electromagnetic induction is a circuit phenomenon when an existing electric field (internal element for dielectrics) is formed with a potential difference on metal contacts (surface element) closed in a circuit between the terminals and, in contrast to the movement of the electric field, arises to balance (magnetic vortex field). It is this moment that is written in the formula of electromagnetic induction:
E = -B  or  E = -Ф  =  [1V = -1Wb]
1V is the value of the electric field potential difference.
The force to balance the potential difference of the electric field, most likely arises from the Coulomb's Law  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb%27s_law
Electromagnetic induction of EMF guidance from a magnetic flux, this is the reverse process:  Ф = -Е

The emerging magnetic vortex field, in fact, does not oppose the movement of the electric vortex flow, but rather accelerates the process.
By increasing the resistance of the circuit, by introducing a consumer load, we ourselves slow down this process. This is actually energy, to stretch the process of balancing the potential difference of the electric field, and use the magnetic vortex sweat for consumer purposes. If we do not introduce an increase in resistance, we get a very powerful balancing process with the formation of a very strong and destructive magnetic field, which you know as a "short circuit", i.e. our conditional twisting of the rope leads to its destruction.

The conductor and load resistance works like a twisted rope. By the way, those who are well versed in the topic and know everything about the skin effect will understand me more, I hope.
Just because the electric field will not move, the movement of the electric field is associated with a vortex. EMF is a vortex structure. The conductor creates a counter vortex magnetic field.
For me personally, there are several questions that have not yet been fully clarified. Current strength (vortex magnetic field) is a mandatory phenomenon or there are exceptions. Episodes are known when the Electric field was transmitted in a loopless version, without a vortex magnetic field (current strength) along one wire.
« Last Edit: August 22, 2022, 08:22:03 AM by rakarskiy »

#### kolbacict

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1036
##### Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #1386 on: August 22, 2022, 08:20:42 AM »
And where, in this case, does the voltage appear at the ends of the coil during its sharp braking?
There are no magnetic fields there. Perhaps they were specially shielded for the purity of the experiment.

#### rakarskiy

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 460
##### Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #1387 on: August 22, 2022, 08:26:52 AM »
And where, in this case, does the voltage appear at the ends of the coil during its sharp braking?
There are no magnetic fields there. Perhaps they were specially shielded for the purity of the experiment.

Question for backfilling, how does a charge appear on an ebonite stick?
The unwinding of the conductor in insulation, the insulation in motion and its abrupt change in movement are probably the source of the electric potential.

#### kolbacict

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1036
##### Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #1388 on: August 22, 2022, 09:10:04 AM »
the insulation in motion and its abrupt change in movement are probably the source of the electric potential.
In such a case, there must obviously be the same potential at both ends of the coil. After stopped it.
But we have a potential difference.

#### rakarskiy

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 460
##### Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #1389 on: August 22, 2022, 09:43:13 AM »
In such a case, there must obviously be the same potential at both ends of the coil. After stopped it.
But we have a potential difference.

Вольтметр не меряет электрические заряды, он меряет разность потенциалов.

#### kolbacict

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1036
##### Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #1390 on: August 22, 2022, 05:19:10 PM »
Of course perfect truth indeed.
Але провід у котушці-провідник, і якби на котушці з'явився
якийсь заряд, потенціал на обох кінцях був однаковий.

#### rakarskiy

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 460
##### Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #1391 on: August 23, 2022, 06:43:29 AM »
Why did you decide that the electric charge is a monopole. Any sign of "charge" is determined by the spin. But the charge cannot be a monopole, in any case it has the so-called fulcrum "0" and the electric induction vector, and its signs depend on the spin, this is for the charge area of ​​static areas. In practice, around the conductor, the charge has the form of a spiral - EMF around the conductor. When measuring this charge, your instrument will always recognize it as the difference in spins at the ends of this conductor.

#### rakarskiy

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 460
##### Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #1392 on: August 23, 2022, 03:38:14 PM »
Since the material is directly related to the creation of solid-state and mechanical generators, I post the material in this thread

#### rakarskiy

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 460
##### Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #1393 on: August 27, 2022, 09:38:53 AM »
Such an interesting moment! The first position of the EMF form is fully confirmed for the solid version, where the saturation in the core changes.
Someone noticed it, or no one paid attention to it.
This is the essential difference between a generator and a transformer.

#### kolbacict

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1036
##### Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #1394 on: August 27, 2022, 10:39:42 AM »
This effect was noticed by me as well.
Only the coil was without a core.