At the end, it is your time and your money wasted.
Good luck.

Pix

Thks Pix, yes, you are right, it is my money and my time...

But what "if"...it works...what would you do "if" I show everyone O.U. on my build?
Would you replicate it?...or you would just start denying it and Nahing it?

Just asking...

Cheers

Ufopolitics

Ufopolitics,

You do some excellent work - thanks for sharing! You will, most certainly, achieve your objectives IMHO.

Thanks much SolarLab,

Greatly appreciated, basically when coming from someone like You!!

I also admire your work, you do incredible research and developments, and deep analysis and graphics.

Yes, it should work, and will work...previous studies and experiments show very promising results.

Best regards

Ufopolitics

rakarskiy,

Your "solution" linking material forces, magnetics, and electromagnetics appears, for me at least, to be quite brilliant!
A "speed" or velocity element [squared] is found in nearly every system, and the equations used to describe them
[per second per square meter].

To quote, in part, from your writings (this is worth repeating in my opinion):

"In mechanics, speed works. And the capaticance of an electric capacitor is the charge (charge capacity)
divided by the voltage (we read the speed)."  [dx/dt]   "Next, we draw a conclusion about the mechanism
of electromagnetic induction, and another type of hidden induction, on which other solid-state devices
probably work (Kapanadze, S Mark ..)"

Linking "electromagnetic and mechanical" systems via "spin permeability of vacuum" is indeed a "very tricky moment."
A while back High Voltage was linked to the operation of devices similar to Kapanadze, Ruslan and Stalker but a detailed
physics connection was vague at best. Ref:

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=tkjqdoee4vq0ppjto421pt59q6&topic=4154.msg96356#msg96356

Your conclusion may well be that missing link.

This video might also be of interest:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0BOpiMQXQA
Thanks for sharing your insight and best regards,
SL

Hi rakarskiy,
You say "1 T = 1 volt per second per square meter, and 1 gauss = 0.0001 volt per second per square meter."
That is incorrect.
1 Tesla = 1 Weber per square meter. 1 Weber = 1 Volt • second. Therefore 1 T = 1 volt • second per square meter, not as you say.
bi

bistander,
Thanks for the good point, I didn't specify what the difference is. This difference is really significant. You can say "per second - n / s" or "" for a period of time "seconds n * s"
(* clarification Google will translate from Russian "в секунду" and "за секунду" is always "per second", in Russian this is the difference)
in the first variant, the expression refers to the parameter of the action at the moment of time (for example, the speed of the flow of water, the point moves on a segment m / s)
in the second option, the expression refers to the quantity parameter over a period of time (for example, Watt * hour, Watt * second)

Since "voltage = speed" when comparing electromagnetism and mechanics, we can conditionally put an equal sign  U (V) = v^ 2 (m^ 2/s^ 2)

Thus, 1 Tesla is a parameter of the speed of the magnetic flux (no density or force). We change the speed in the time interval, we get the corresponding parameter of the electric voltage around the conductor.

Е = q /(ε₀r^2)

The difference with the electrostatic field is only in its exceptional vortex structure (this is a dynamic electric field). Does not exist without a cause of its generative, at any given time.

Next, the basic formulas for EMF (vortex electric field)!

Е =dФ/dt  ( Ф=BS),    E = B*L*v,  E = 4.44*k*w*f*Ф 

At point-blank range, I do not see the manifestation of the Lorentz force. And the minus sign in the formula (Е = - dФ/dt) is absurd.

The reason is the same, the algorithm is the same, there are no Newtonian forces or even similarity. Forces are manifested only by the fact of counteraction / interaction of magnetic fields. In a conductor, the strength of the magnetic field is expressed in terms of current strength (in fact, this is the vortex magnetic field).

The strength of the current in the conductor, this is the result of the internal properties of a closed circuit, relates to an external magnetic field through the process of formation of an EMF. The current strength is related to the Ampere Force, and I have already specified how the EMF is involved here

http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/publ/free_energy_systems/rezultirujushhaja_sila_ampera/3-1-0-146


PS
the most interesting, what kind of animal is the magnetic flux, we do not answer. Perhaps this is the very structured ether about which there are disputes.

   

Greetings, SolarLab!

This is not my decision, these are Russian-speaking physicists who are engaged in science. I just took as a basis in the study.

If you are looking for an answer, where does the "additional energy" come from in the systems of electrostatic circuits, I will answer you "It is taken from a third-party electric field."

Quote from a high school physics textbook "One of the main ways of generating electric current in the body of a conductor is the creation and maintenance of an electric field in them (my editing around them)."

Ohm's law, (which for some reason is not fundamental). Ohm's law is mathematically expressed by the formula: I = λE, where: λ is the conductivity of the conductor material, then ρ = 1/λ, hence the well-known Ohm formula is derived: I = U/R

In physics, there is such a concept of EMF (E) as an “element of concentration”, used to describe the operation of galvanic sources. In a simple concept, you need a third-party source of EMF (E from the side) to maintain current in the conductor. The mathematical formula looks like this: I = λ(E+E from the side)

In conductors, there is such a thing as electrostatic induction. Where an external electric field immediately causes the polarization of the conductor. So, the mechanism of conductor polarization is a manifestation of the potential difference of the electric field at the ends of the conductor. Actually the same EMF (vortex electric field). I see no difference in the end result, with the appearance of EMF around the conductor through electromagnetic induction.

This device is just designed to create electrostatic induction with the formation of an EMF on the surface of a conductor stretched through it.

Electrostatic induction is not OU. You have to maintain source charge to induce  exact opposite charge in conductor.
Tried this concept. It works, there is flow of current from the ground, but load on HV drive also rises.


Cheers,
Pix


PS. "Grenade" coil is just a transmission line. It is wound this way to squeeze certain length of conductor and minimise inductance.

pix,

In mechanics, there is such an effect - "exomechanical", when two sources of torque (static and dynamic) act on the same load. A crank press with a flywheel works on this principle. One trouble is not a constant action, but by periods of charge-discharge (it is on this principle that the "Earth Engine" installation of the Energy Inductance Company works.
The principle that I am describing provides for the low-cost creation of an electric field for a reactor, with electrostatic induction on a conductor closed in a circuit with a load. In my version, two circuits are connected into one. We get an analogy with mechanics.
I'm glad that you have your opinion, but I won't give up mine until I check it.
Earth in my version is needed only as a zero driver for a high-voltage circuit, but the system can work without earth at all.

Sincerely.

Attached mechanical equivalent to "Tesla" style energy accumulation. Resonator accumulates "low grade" energy into more useable.
There is no "free energy".
But a lot of "low grade non useable" energy around us that could be converted to useable.
Closed loop will not give you any OU. You need to have some source.
Those who do nod understand concept of a thermodynamic heat pump will not understand so called OU.



Cheers,
Pix

Attached mechanical equivalent to "Tesla" style energy accumulation. Resonator accumulates "low grade" energy into more useable.
There is no "free energy".
But a lot of "low grade non useable" energy around us that could be converted to useable.
Closed loop will not give you any OU. You need to have some source.
Those who do nod understand concept of a thermodynamic heat pump will not understand so called OU.

Cheers,
Pix

pix

everything is much simpler, we take the usual formula for kinetic energy:     Ek = 1/2mV^2

1)  Ek = 1/2 * 1 kg * 10 m/s ^2  = 50 J

2)  Ek = 1/2 * 1 kg * 50 m/s ^2  = 1250 J

we increased the speed by 5 times from the first option, and the energy increased by 25 times.


pix, so the whole secret of OU is speed!   

PS

And with EMF, we have two speeds, the speed of the flow in Tesla [volt * second / square meter], and the rate of change of this flow around the conductor [Hz (number of times per second]!
Here's a puzzle for you to think about.

...and to increase speed of a given mass takes energy.
When you accelerate your car you increases your kinetic energy, but on the expense of fuel.


PS. Regarding Tesla resonator. Rate of change is constant, it is resonance of secondary. What matters is a constant influx of energy from primary that is trapped in secondary. Method of utilization of that "high grade trapped energy" may vary. Exact mechanical equivalent of such mechanism I did attached as pdf in my previous post. Tesla is a beautifull utilisation of low grade energy compressed into high grade useable one.

Oh pix, you are tricky, in your arguments you are similar to "an adherent of the Commission on Pseudoscience of Russian Ostriches" Do not be offended, I have seen enough of these adherents.

We consider the simplest crank press, drive power 8.5 kW at 800 rpm, torque 101 Nm.
The force on the press table develops at 10 kilonewtons, at 8 rpm of the crank shaft.
8:1 downshift torque will increase to 1 kN, (speed down, power up)!

In this case, the press develops a force of 10 kN eight times in 1 minute, while the motor makes 800 rpm. (time span 1 minute)
7.5 seconds per revolution, while the pressing action itself is up to 2 seconds.
2 seconds * 8 times/revolution = 16 seconds.
16/60 = 0.26 of a period of one minute.
10 kN * 8 * 0.26 = 20.8 kN.

And so with a decrease from the motor on the shaft of 1 kNm, and the press developed 20.8 kN, while doing the work of pressing 8 parts.