Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world  (Read 121765 times)

Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #645 on: June 08, 2022, 12:27:39 PM »
They won't take us in, my friend Rakarsky, no matter how hard you try. :(
Among several billion people there is no place for the two of us.
Too many humiliating procedures to go through, even if it happens.
It is more difficult only, perhaps, to make a perpetual motion machine. ;D

And who should take it? It's their problem, not mine. Everything goes according to plan.

I see they want to disable Holcomb's generators and invalidate them. It will be easier when people can make their own generators, which is what I'm striving for. And my arguments, some angry. I love to annoy the trolls out of the system.
There is an expression, it's nice to hear a lie when you know the truth. Messenger of lies, pitiful in your eyes.

Offline pix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #646 on: June 08, 2022, 03:52:23 PM »
Oh pix, you are tricky, in your arguments you are similar to "an adherent of the Commission on Pseudoscience of Russian Ostriches" Do not be offended, I have seen enough of these adherents.

We consider the simplest crank press, drive power 8.5 kW at 800 rpm, torque 101 Nm.
The force on the press table develops at 10 kilonewtons, at 8 rpm of the crank shaft.
8:1 downshift torque will increase to 1 kN, (speed down, power up)!

In this case, the press develops a force of 10 kN eight times in 1 minute, while the motor makes 800 rpm. (time span 1 minute)
7.5 seconds per revolution, while the pressing action itself is up to 2 seconds.
2 seconds * 8 times/revolution = 16 seconds.
16/60 = 0.26 of a period of one minute.
10 kN * 8 * 0.26 = 20.8 kN.

And so with a decrease from the motor on the shaft of 1 kNm, and the press developed 20.8 kN, while doing the work of pressing 8 parts.
You described a simple machine. Leverage. No OU here.


Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #647 on: June 08, 2022, 04:01:37 PM »
You described a simple machine. Leverage. No OU here.

Result OU!
the input of force into the device is 101 Nm (costs are 8.5 kW), the output of the force that does the work is 20,000 N !
It is paradoxical that they did not ask: where from?

Good luck with your search for OU.  ;)  :D

Offline pix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #648 on: June 08, 2022, 04:41:55 PM »
Result OU!
the input of force into the device is 101 Nm (costs are 8.5 kW), the output of the force that does the work is 20,000 N !
It is paradoxical that they did not ask: where from?

Good luck with your search for OU.  ;) :D
Wrong. Wrong.Wrong. :o


Power= (Torque x rev/min)/9559  [kW]


Your example input power :
Pin= (101[Nm] x 800 [1/min] )/9500 = 8,5 [kW]


Output power:
Pout = (10100 [Nm] x 8[1/min])/9500 = 8,5 [kW]


Of course taking mechanical losses COP<1.
You will not get OU from leveraging simple machine  :D


Cheers,
Pix




Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #649 on: June 08, 2022, 04:55:46 PM »
Quote
Your example input power :
Pin= (101[Nm] x 800 [1/min] )/9500 = 8,5 [kW]
Output power:
Pout = (10100 [Nm] x 8[1/min])/9500 = 8,5 [kW]

Resulting force on the shaft work 20000 [N] 

quite a bit more, probably the engineers should not have bothered installing the flywheel.


Offline pix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #650 on: June 08, 2022, 05:34:09 PM »
Resulting force on the shaft work 20000 [N] 

quite a bit more, probably the engineers should not have bothered installing the flywheel.


It does not matter. Calculation based on your data.
Simple machine. Leverage of torque. COP<1.


Cheers,
Pix

Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #651 on: June 08, 2022, 09:56:21 PM »

It does not matter. Calculation based on your data.
Simple machine. Leverage of torque. COP<1.


Cheers,
Pix

Agree, this example fails. We take real abs, not my fantasies!

Quote
Specifications KD2128E
Single-crank press, single-acting, open, non-tilting KD2128E Designed for the manufacture of parts from sheet material using cold stamping operations: punching, hole punching, bending, shallow drawing, etc. It is used in procurement workshops of enterprises in the automotive, tractor, instrument-making, radio-electronic and other industries with large-scale and mass production.

Model kd2128e
Start of series production 1984
Rated force, kN 630
Slider stroke, mm 100
Distance between table and slider, mm 340
Distance between table and slider, mm 340
Power of the engine of the main movement of kW 6,3
Table size width/length mm 480/710
Machine dimensions Length Width Height (mm) 1500_1690_2890
Weight kg 5400

Good luck deciding that here is efficiency <1

Offline SolarLab

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 347
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #652 on: June 08, 2022, 10:07:13 PM »
Greetings, SolarLab!

This is not my decision, these are Russian-speaking physicists who are engaged in science. I just took as a basis in the study.

If you are looking for an answer, where does the "additional energy" come from in the systems of electrostatic circuits, I will answer you "It is taken from a third-party electric field."

Quote from a high school physics textbook "One of the main ways of generating electric current in the body of a conductor is the creation and maintenance of an electric field in them (my editing around them)."

Ohm's law, (which for some reason is not fundamental). Ohm's law is mathematically expressed by the formula: I = λE, where: λ is the conductivity of the conductor material, then ρ = 1/λ, hence the well-known Ohm formula is derived: I = U/R

In physics, there is such a concept of EMF (E) as an “element of concentration”, used to describe the operation of galvanic sources. In a simple concept, you need a third-party source of EMF (E from the side) to maintain current in the conductor. The mathematical formula looks like this: I = λ(E+E from the side)

In conductors, there is such a thing as electrostatic induction. Where an external electric field immediately causes the polarization of the conductor. So, the mechanism of conductor polarization is a manifestation of the potential difference of the electric field at the ends of the conductor. Actually the same EMF (vortex electric field). I see no difference in the end result, with the appearance of EMF around the conductor through electromagnetic induction.

This device is just designed to create electrostatic induction with the formation of an EMF on the surface of a conductor stretched through it.

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=tkjqdoee4vq0ppjto421pt59q6&action=dlattach;topic=4154.0;attach=40758;image

That is, according to the abbreviation from the Kapanadze scheme - "current amplifier". I described the principle and physics above.

My simple version of the device according to this principle in the figure  https://strannik-2.ru/media/kunena/attachments/587/525258.jpg


This is the base, everything else is engineering creativity.

Sincerely.

PS
Formula:  E=mc^2,  can be read as follows, that a particle with a mass (m), upon reaching the speed of light squared (c^2), becomes light.

Hello Rakarskiy,    (this will be very brief since it's somewhat off topic)

The Ruslan Generator (Kapanadze device) has been the subject of analysis for a long time - documented in one form or another as far back as 12/08/16.
For a bit more information on the project see the attached pdf.

My approach in attempting to explain the "excess energy" focused on a "Travelling Wave Tube" analogy since I have some experience that area. Whether correct or not, I concluded the extra energy was formed by a pseudo "Velocity Modulation" phenomena based on E=mv2 (electron energy increases by the square of it's velocity - as shown in the video referenced above) and electron bunching.


High voltage pulses were generated by a Tesla or Katcher coil and when propagated around the Grenade coil and, with proper timing and physical spacing, caused an excess energy within the system.  A protoype seemed to demonstrate this postulation since HV and physical adjustments followed closely with some very preliminary CAE analysis.

However the system was highly resonant (easily disturbed by even hand waving) and it appeared to be very subject to Atmospheric Electric activity (a thunderstorm even 200 miles away caused the system to become unstable).  A work-around or fix is yet to be determined.

The exact "coupling mechanism" physics is still uncertain, to me at least.

Regards,
SL

Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #653 on: June 09, 2022, 08:34:19 AM »

The exact "coupling mechanism" physics is still uncertain, to me at least.


Hello SolarLab!

This is the most important question, how one kind of "energy" accelerates another kind of "energy". An electromagnetic circuit consists of two types of fields: an electric field and a magnetic field. There are no electrons there, these are two states of plasma, a structured ether in a state of a force field. The plasma of the magnetic field and the electric field has a manifestation in different, visible to us and invisible, spectra

Unfortunately, many do not even understand the difference between electromagnetic induction and interturn mutual induction. Ideas about the difference between the flux linkage of electric and magnetic fields. Even Faraday began his research with mutual induction, so the generator came up with an incognito with the initials P.M., who clearly understood or knew the difference.

How does the generator circuit work with a load, how does the circuit work when a transformer is inserted between the generator and the load?

I can say with a 100% guarantee that the electromagnetic induction of the generator winding, closed in a circuit with a load, works by analogy with a hydroelectric power plant system. When the blade absorbs the velocity of the water head (that is, the speed of the turbine blade must be half the velocity of the water jet from the nozzle that presses on the blade in order to obtain the corresponding force on the turbine shaft)

For the operation of a closed circuit of an electrical circuit: generator-load, the same alignment. Only the electrical parameter of the EMF is absorbed. The transformer has a different adjustment, it is calculated by the formula for bringing the load of the secondary circuit to the AC source of the primary circuit. The source of the primary circuit operates according to the generator circuit rule. Again, the circle is closed, I especially like the "chatter of general science" about the magnetic field in the core, at the moment of maximum current of the primary and secondary circuits.

The trouble for many is that they simply ignore the concepts of how the circuit works with the load and the source - the generator phase. Where CURRENT POWER (a vortex magnetic field that rotates rather than flows) is the result of balancing the potentials of the electric field, at the moment of balancing becomes a vortex around the conductor. This plasma of magnetic and electric vortex fields can be seen in a spark gap or electric arc. Perhaps this is the key point that changed my worldview about electromagnetism.
These questions are on the subject of the Holcomb generator, because if you ignore it, you are guaranteed to stumble upon a wall of paradoxes and misunderstandings.

According to the instrument of Ruslan Kalabukhov. The device is an option when the electric potential of the secondary circuit of the Tesla transformer tries to illuminate the electric field in a complex inter-turn converter (Garnet), while transferring "energy" from the primary circuit to the secondary circuit with a reinforcing element. That is, according to the formula I = λ (E + E from the side), they try to add the sides E[/glow ] + E of the source[ /b].

My opinion is that this method is too slippery, since it is not clear which moment is effective, is it utopia to combine mutual induction and induction in one section of the wire? . The main thing that I don't like is the transposed electric field of the secondary circuit of the Tesla transformer, I don't understand how the concentration process will take place? The concentration process is effective in a direct or pulsed current circuit. Second: LOAD of the secondary circuit, only fixed, destroys the process when the load changes. Thirdly: the Tesla transformer emitter in this version has an open field, that is, external communication can also affect. I do not consider this version successful.

My idea is to make an impulse system based on this principle. The only task left is to make the static electric field around the conductor move according to the vortex model. I think that there is one more thing that I need to think about thoroughly - the Zatsarinin transformer and the inductive-capacitive transformer. I worked with it and came to an approximate understanding of the picture. I will deal with this later.

At the moment,  is busy with a pulse electromagnetic static converter, it is simpler. Can be repeated by any craftsman in the garage with a minimum of training.

Sincerely.
« Last Edit: June 09, 2022, 07:57:25 PM by rakarskiy »

Offline pix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #654 on: June 09, 2022, 09:35:49 AM »
Agree, this example fails. We take real abs, not my fantasies!

Good luck deciding that here is efficiency <1
Are you kidding, right?
Please stop trying to convince me that simple machanical machine that utilizes torque leverage has COP>1.
EOT.


Cheers,
Pix

Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #655 on: June 09, 2022, 09:57:18 AM »
Are you kidding, right?
Please stop trying to convince me that simple machanical machine that utilizes torque leverage has COP>1.
EOT.

Cheers,
Pix

Hello pix!

Absolutely no joke, these are the parameters of a real machine. There are also stone crushers. You, do not be surprised if the air conditioner has an efficiency greater than one.
In addition to the levers, there is a flywheel and an impulse kinematic chain. The effect it works on is called EXOMECHANICAL

https://rakarskiy.livejournal.com/12789.html
***

Sincerely

Offline SolarLab

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 347
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #656 on: June 09, 2022, 09:07:36 PM »
Hi rakarskiy,

Sorry but I have completely failed to understand your physics link between HV pulses and the increased energy in the Ruslan Generator type circuit.

For now I'll stick with the hypothesis focused around a pseudo TWT Velocity Modulation - used in Travelling Wave Tube design and can be simulated in CAE. Also, one of the original TWT patents had the HV run along the outside of the helical coil and claimed a power gain. Lots of good theory, applications and development information is available as well.

Will attemp to attach a pdf re: TWT Symposium with some good technical stuff to support my theoretical approach - 12MB so it might not work however.

Regards,

SL

FYI: Go to the last presentation [CST - Monika Balk] for insight into how the Ruslan/TWT integration fits CAE simulation.



Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #657 on: June 09, 2022, 10:12:20 PM »
Hi rakarskiy,

Sorry but I have completely failed to understand your physics link between HV pulses and the increased energy in the Ruslan Generator type circuit.

Hi SolarLab!

I have no accumulated information on technology, only sketches. In a simple variant, if we take the pulse circuit of a single-cycle converter, and apply a resistance of 2-5 kΩ in series with the diode to the primary coil, where the diode shunts the circuit, the electric field of self-induction that occurs will be high. In the secondary circuit, the current will be greater than with a conventional pulse. The reason is the electric field, which stimulates the induction of the secondary circuit from the magnetic field.
I don't know if there is such a technology somewhere, but I tried it. True, he abandoned it, postponing it for the future, switching to working out the resonant circuit of his model.

I met Dorokhov's field illumination, but the device is intended for medical purposes.
******
Quote
https://realstrannik.com/forum/attachment/40886
https://realstrannik.com/forum/attachment/40881?download=1

Sincerely!

Offline SolarLab

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 347
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #658 on: June 09, 2022, 11:07:26 PM »
Hi SolarLab!

I have no accumulated information on technology, only sketches. In a simple variant, if we take the pulse circuit of a single-cycle converter, and apply a resistance of 2-5 kΩ in series with the diode to the primary coil, where the diode shunts the circuit, the electric field of self-induction that occurs will be high. In the secondary circuit, the current will be greater than with a conventional pulse. The reason is the electric field, which stimulates the induction of the secondary circuit from the magnetic field.
I don't know if there is such a technology somewhere, but I tried it. True, he abandoned it, postponing it for the future, switching to working out the resonant circuit of his model.

I met Dorokhov's field illumination, but the device is intended for medical purposes.
******
Sincerely!

Hi Rakarskiy,

Interesting device but not sure what it's intended application is - medical pain relief... IDK?
Attached an English translated version FWIW. 

Not sure we're on the same page however. So, I will "bow out"at this point since it seems
this is really "off-topic" with respect to Holcomb.

Regards,
SL


Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #659 on: June 10, 2022, 08:50:04 AM »
Hi Rakarskiy,

Not sure we're on the same page however. So, I will "bow out"at this point since it seems
this is really "off-topic" with respect to Holcomb.

Regards,
SL

Hello SolarLab!

Probably not on the same wavelength. Everything is simple for me, the circuit engineering approach is secondary, and the processes in the circuit elements are primary. Until I get to the bottom of the primary, the latter is meaningless.
So it is with the stator system of a synchronous generator or a Holcomb static generator. What is the meaning of modeling inaccuracies? These are mistakes, even if they seem to be true.

In the system Kapanadze, Mark et al. are sure that there is electrostatic induction. It is this section in physics that seems to exist, but it is hushed up.

Link to document not solved in "how it works" answer:  http://www.sergey-osetrov.narod.ru/Projects/Boiler/Clever_transformer_from_Zacarinin.pdf
(attached english version)

to one reader who does not calculate what kind of device is in the material, I made the following link:     https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg567932/#msg567932

Good luck to you, in the ordeals of the search for truth.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2022, 11:21:48 AM by rakarskiy »