Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world  (Read 121763 times)

Offline Ufopolitics

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #630 on: June 06, 2022, 02:07:03 PM »
At the end, it is your time and your money wasted. ;)
Good luck.

Pix

Thks Pix, yes, you are right, it is my money and my time...

But what "if"...it works...what would you do "if" I show everyone O.U. on my build?
Would you replicate it?...or you would just start denying it and Nahing it?

Just asking...

Cheers

Ufopolitics

Offline SolarLab

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 347
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #631 on: June 06, 2022, 05:35:37 PM »
Ufopolitics,


You do some excellent work - thanks for sharing! You will, most certainly, achieve your objectives IMHO.

Over the past couple of months, as you might be aware, the Holcomb methods and techniques, in the form
of a pseudo Linear Generator (LinGen), have been studied by way of advanced Computer Aided Engineering (CAE).
Results of that analysis strongly indicate:

1. A magnetic field can be made to move, or slide (rotate), along a metal structure by way of only using
electical pulsing of Pole Coil/Windings. There are no moving parts if the pulses are created electronically
(as shown in the patent).

2. The magnetic field can be "amplified" or increased by way of using ferromagnetic metals for the
Pole pieces. This follows, to a great extent, the well known material BH Curve. It appears to perform
somewhat differently to what is commonly published, but the phenomenum is clearly present.

3. CAE output data strongly points to Excess Energy output as compared to standard generator
performance (as claimed in the patents).


CAE analysis is found in a series of posts in the OUR Forum under "Solarlab," with the brief final results starting at:
https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg99112#msg99112

Of interest are the "Co-Energy_Energy" and "Induced_Voltage_Coil-9" (the output Lap Wound Stator coil)
graphs [attached].Unfortunately only two cycles (16mSec -> took about 8 hours of processing) were simulated but the trend
line of the Co-Energy graph is quite enlightening.


A related, but off-topic subject here [soon to be investigated and published], focuses on the driver pulse
generation using electronic means (inexpensive microprocessor driving high speed SiC or GaN FETS) with
flow chart derived software - easily modified as required.
Again, great work and best wishes!

SL


Graphs are too large, sorry - will have to figure out how to reduce them.... stand-by?




Offline Ufopolitics

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #632 on: June 06, 2022, 06:07:35 PM »
Ufopolitics,

You do some excellent work - thanks for sharing! You will, most certainly, achieve your objectives IMHO.


Thanks much SolarLab,

Greatly appreciated, basically when coming from someone like You!!

I also admire your work, you do incredible research and developments, and deep analysis and graphics.

Yes, it should work, and will work...previous studies and experiments show very promising results.

Best regards

Ufopolitics

Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #633 on: June 07, 2022, 03:31:28 PM »
I want to inform you that the Holcomb system, like any other solid-state electromagnetic generator, including a synchronous electromechanical one, where the stator has slots, operates on a speed change system. The speed, paradoxically, is magnetic induction.
Magnetic induction is measured in Tesla and Gauss: 1 T = 1 volt per second per square meter, and 1 gauss = 0.0001 volt per second per square meter.
***********
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_flux
***********
I do not think that many will understand me, but today I nevertheless solved this problem. How simply the materialists have translated everything into material forces. But even two magnets is an interaction of fields. and the two bodies of the magnet attraction and repulsion is a consequence of the work of the fields.

The plate in the attachment, when borrowed from an alternative forum from Russian-speaking physicists. This is a comparison of two systems electromagnetic and mechanical. Only the spin permeability of vacuum (mechanics, gravity) remained unclear. A very tricky moment, similar to voltage in electromagnetism; In mechanics, speed works. And the capacitance of an electric capacitor is the charge (charge capacity) divided by the voltage (we read the speed).

Next, we draw a conclusion about the mechanism of electromagnetic induction, and another type of hidden induction, on which other solid-state devices probably work (Kapanadze, S. Mark ..)


Offline SolarLab

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 347
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #634 on: June 07, 2022, 10:53:42 PM »
rakarskiy,

Your "solution" linking material forces, magnetics, and electromagnetics appears, for me at least, to be quite brilliant!
A "speed" or velocity element [squared] is found in nearly every system, and the equations used to describe them
[per second per square meter].

To quote, in part, from your writings (this is worth repeating in my opinion):

"In mechanics, speed works. And the capaticance of an electric capacitor is the charge (charge capacity)
divided by the voltage (we read the speed)."  [dx/dt]   "Next, we draw a conclusion about the mechanism
of electromagnetic induction, and another type of hidden induction, on which other solid-state devices
probably work (Kapanadze, S Mark ..)"

Linking "electromagnetic and mechanical" systems via "spin permeability of vacuum" is indeed a "very tricky moment."
A while back High Voltage was linked to the operation of devices similar to Kapanadze, Ruslan and Stalker but a detailed
physics connection was vague at best. Ref:

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=tkjqdoee4vq0ppjto421pt59q6&topic=4154.msg96356#msg96356

Your conclusion may well be that missing link.

This video might also be of interest:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0BOpiMQXQA
Thanks for sharing your insight and best regards,
SL



Offline bistander

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 263
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #635 on: June 08, 2022, 12:00:54 AM »
I want to inform you that the Holcomb system, like any other solid-state electromagnetic generator, including a synchronous electromechanical one, where the stator has slots, operates on a speed change system. The speed, paradoxically, is magnetic induction.
Magnetic induction is measured in Tesla and Gauss: 1 T = 1 volt per second per square meter, and 1 gauss = 0.0001 volt per second per square meter.
***********
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_flux
***********
...

Hi rakarskiy,
You say "1 T = 1 volt per second per square meter, and 1 gauss = 0.0001 volt per second per square meter."
That is incorrect.
1 Tesla = 1 Weber per square meter. 1 Weber = 1 Volt • second. Therefore 1 T = 1 volt • second per square meter, not as you say.
bi
« Last Edit: June 08, 2022, 02:54:20 AM by bistander »

Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #636 on: June 08, 2022, 07:04:12 AM »
Hi rakarskiy,
You say "1 T = 1 volt per second per square meter, and 1 gauss = 0.0001 volt per second per square meter."
That is incorrect.
1 Tesla = 1 Weber per square meter. 1 Weber = 1 Volt • second. Therefore 1 T = 1 volt • second per square meter, not as you say.
bi

bistander,
Thanks for the good point, I didn't specify what the difference is. This difference is really significant. You can say "per second - n / s" or "" for a period of time "seconds n * s"
(* clarification Google will translate from Russian "в секунду" and "за секунду" is always "per second", in Russian this is the difference)
in the first variant, the expression refers to the parameter of the action at the moment of time (for example, the speed of the flow of water, the point moves on a segment m / s)
in the second option, the expression refers to the quantity parameter over a period of time (for example, Watt * hour, Watt * second)

Since "voltage = speed" when comparing electromagnetism and mechanics, we can conditionally put an equal sign  U (V) = v^ 2 (m^ 2/s^ 2)

Thus, 1 Tesla is a parameter of the speed of the magnetic flux (no density or force). We change the speed in the time interval, we get the corresponding parameter of the electric voltage around the conductor.

Е = q /(ε0r^2)

The difference with the electrostatic field is only in its exceptional vortex structure (this is a dynamic electric field). Does not exist without a cause of its generative, at any given time.

Next, the basic formulas for EMF (vortex electric field)!

Е =dФ/dt  ( Ф=BS),    E = B*L*v,  E = 4.44*k*w*f*Ф 

At point-blank range, I do not see the manifestation of the Lorentz force. And the minus sign in the formula (Е = - dФ/dt) is absurd.

The reason is the same, the algorithm is the same, there are no Newtonian forces or even similarity. Forces are manifested only by the fact of counteraction / interaction of magnetic fields. In a conductor, the strength of the magnetic field is expressed in terms of current strength (in fact, this is the vortex magnetic field).

The strength of the current in the conductor, this is the result of the internal properties of a closed circuit, relates to an external magnetic field through the process of formation of an EMF. The current strength is related to the Ampere Force, and I have already specified how the EMF is involved here

http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/publ/free_energy_systems/rezultirujushhaja_sila_ampera/3-1-0-146


PS
the most interesting, what kind of animal is the magnetic flux, we do not answer. Perhaps this is the very structured ether about which there are disputes.

   

Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #637 on: June 08, 2022, 08:14:03 AM »
rakarskiy,

Your "solution" linking material forces, magnetics, and electromagnetics appears, for me at least, to be quite brilliant!
A "speed" or velocity element [squared] is found in nearly every system, and the equations used to describe them
[per second per square meter].

To quote, in part, from your writings (this is worth repeating in my opinion):

"In mechanics, speed works. And the capaticance of an electric capacitor is the charge (charge capacity)
divided by the voltage (we read the speed)."  [dx/dt]   "Next, we draw a conclusion about the mechanism
of electromagnetic induction, and another type of hidden induction, on which other solid-state devices
probably work (Kapanadze, S Mark ..)"

Linking "electromagnetic and mechanical" systems via "spin permeability of vacuum" is indeed a "very tricky moment."
A while back High Voltage was linked to the operation of devices similar to Kapanadze, Ruslan and Stalker but a detailed
physics connection was vague at best. Ref:

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=tkjqdoee4vq0ppjto421pt59q6&topic=4154.msg96356#msg96356

Your conclusion may well be that missing link.

This video might also be of interest:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0BOpiMQXQA
Thanks for sharing your insight and best regards,
SL

Greetings, SolarLab!

This is not my decision, these are Russian-speaking physicists who are engaged in science. I just took as a basis in the study.

If you are looking for an answer, where does the "additional energy" come from in the systems of electrostatic circuits, I will answer you "It is taken from a third-party electric field."

Quote from a high school physics textbook "One of the main ways of generating electric current in the body of a conductor is the creation and maintenance of an electric field in them (my editing around them)."

Ohm's law, (which for some reason is not fundamental). Ohm's law is mathematically expressed by the formula: I = λE, where: λ is the conductivity of the conductor material, then ρ = 1/λ, hence the well-known Ohm formula is derived: I = U/R

In physics, there is such a concept of EMF (E) as an “element of concentration”, used to describe the operation of galvanic sources. In a simple concept, you need a third-party source of EMF (E from the side) to maintain current in the conductor. The mathematical formula looks like this: I = λ(E+E from the side)

In conductors, there is such a thing as electrostatic induction. Where an external electric field immediately causes the polarization of the conductor. So, the mechanism of conductor polarization is a manifestation of the potential difference of the electric field at the ends of the conductor. Actually the same EMF (vortex electric field). I see no difference in the end result, with the appearance of EMF around the conductor through electromagnetic induction.

This device is just designed to create electrostatic induction with the formation of an EMF on the surface of a conductor stretched through it.

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=tkjqdoee4vq0ppjto421pt59q6&action=dlattach;topic=4154.0;attach=40758;image

That is, according to the abbreviation from the Kapanadze scheme - "current amplifier". I described the principle and physics above.

My simple version of the device according to this principle in the figure  https://strannik-2.ru/media/kunena/attachments/587/525258.jpg


This is the base, everything else is engineering creativity.

Sincerely.

PS
Formula:  E=mc^2,  can be read as follows, that a particle with a mass (m), upon reaching the speed of light squared (c^2), becomes light.





Offline pix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #638 on: June 08, 2022, 10:05:32 AM »
Greetings, SolarLab!

This is not my decision, these are Russian-speaking physicists who are engaged in science. I just took as a basis in the study.

If you are looking for an answer, where does the "additional energy" come from in the systems of electrostatic circuits, I will answer you "It is taken from a third-party electric field."

Quote from a high school physics textbook "One of the main ways of generating electric current in the body of a conductor is the creation and maintenance of an electric field in them (my editing around them)."

Ohm's law, (which for some reason is not fundamental). Ohm's law is mathematically expressed by the formula: I = λE, where: λ is the conductivity of the conductor material, then ρ = 1/λ, hence the well-known Ohm formula is derived: I = U/R

In physics, there is such a concept of EMF (E) as an “element of concentration”, used to describe the operation of galvanic sources. In a simple concept, you need a third-party source of EMF (E from the side) to maintain current in the conductor. The mathematical formula looks like this: I = λ(E+E from the side)

In conductors, there is such a thing as electrostatic induction. Where an external electric field immediately causes the polarization of the conductor. So, the mechanism of conductor polarization is a manifestation of the potential difference of the electric field at the ends of the conductor. Actually the same EMF (vortex electric field). I see no difference in the end result, with the appearance of EMF around the conductor through electromagnetic induction.

This device is just designed to create electrostatic induction with the formation of an EMF on the surface of a conductor stretched through it.





Electrostatic induction is not OU. You have to maintain source charge to induce  exact opposite charge in conductor.
Tried this concept. It works, there is flow of current from the ground, but load on HV drive also rises.


Cheers,
Pix


PS. "Grenade" coil is just a transmission line. It is wound this way to squeeze certain length of conductor and minimise inductance.

Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #639 on: June 08, 2022, 10:29:03 AM »
Electrostatic induction is not OU. You have to maintain source charge to induce  exact opposite charge in conductor.
Tried this concept. It works, there is flow of current from the ground, but load on HV drive also rises.

Cheers,
Pix

PS. "Grenade" coil is just a transmission line. It is wound this way to squeeze certain length of conductor and minimise inductance.

pix,

In mechanics, there is such an effect - "exomechanical", when two sources of torque (static and dynamic) act on the same load. A crank press with a flywheel works on this principle. One trouble is not a constant action, but by periods of charge-discharge (it is on this principle that the "Earth Engine" installation of the Energy Inductance Company works.
The principle that I am describing provides for the low-cost creation of an electric field for a reactor, with electrostatic induction on a conductor closed in a circuit with a load. In my version, two circuits are connected into one. We get an analogy with mechanics.
I'm glad that you have your opinion, but I won't give up mine until I check it.
Earth in my version is needed only as a zero driver for a high-voltage circuit, but the system can work without earth at all.

Sincerely.

Offline pix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #640 on: June 08, 2022, 11:13:29 AM »
pix,

In mechanics, there is such an effect - "exomechanical", when two sources of torque (static and dynamic) act on the same load. A crank press with a flywheel works on this principle. One trouble is not a constant action, but by periods of charge-discharge (it is on this principle that the "Earth Engine" installation of the Energy Inductance Company works.
The principle that I am describing provides for the low-cost creation of an electric field for a reactor, with electrostatic induction on a conductor closed in a circuit with a load. In my version, two circuits are connected into one. We get an analogy with mechanics.
I'm glad that you have your opinion, but I won't give up mine until I check it.
Earth in my version is needed only as a zero driver for a high-voltage circuit, but the system can work without earth at all.

Sincerely.
Attached mechanical equivalent to "Tesla" style energy accumulation. Resonator accumulates "low grade" energy into more useable.
There is no "free energy".
But a lot of "low grade non useable" energy around us that could be converted to useable.
Closed loop will not give you any OU. You need to have some source.
Those who do nod understand concept of a thermodynamic heat pump will not understand so called OU.



Cheers,
Pix

Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 998
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #641 on: June 08, 2022, 11:20:10 AM »
They won't take us in, my friend Rakarsky, no matter how hard you try. :(
Among several billion people there is no place for the two of us.
Too many humiliating procedures to go through, even if it happens.
It is more difficult only, perhaps, to make a perpetual motion machine. ;D



Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #642 on: June 08, 2022, 11:24:07 AM »
Attached mechanical equivalent to "Tesla" style energy accumulation. Resonator accumulates "low grade" energy into more useable.
There is no "free energy".
But a lot of "low grade non useable" energy around us that could be converted to useable.
Closed loop will not give you any OU. You need to have some source.
Those who do nod understand concept of a thermodynamic heat pump will not understand so called OU.

Cheers,
Pix

pix

everything is much simpler, we take the usual formula for kinetic energy:     Ek = 1/2mV^2

1)  Ek = 1/2 * 1 kg * 10 m/s ^2  = 50 J

2)  Ek = 1/2 * 1 kg * 50 m/s ^2  = 1250 J

we increased the speed by 5 times from the first option, and the energy increased by 25 times.


pix, so the whole secret of OU is speed!   ;) ;) ;)

PS

And with EMF, we have two speeds, the speed of the flow in Tesla [volt * second / square meter], and the rate of change of this flow around the conductor [Hz (number of times per second]!
Here's a puzzle for you to think about.

Offline pix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #643 on: June 08, 2022, 11:30:03 AM »
pix

everything is much simpler, we take the usual formula for kinetic energy:     Ek = 1/2mV^2

1)  Ek = 1/2 * 1 kg * 10 m/s ^2  = 50 J

2)  Ek = 1/2 * 1 kg * 50 m/s ^2  = 1250 J

we increased the speed by 5 times from the first option, and the energy increased by 25 times.


pix, so the whole secret of OU is speed!   ;) ;) ;)
...and to increase speed of a given mass takes energy.
When you accelerate your car you increases your kinetic energy, but on the expense of fuel. :)


PS. Regarding Tesla resonator. Rate of change is constant, it is resonance of secondary. What matters is a constant influx of energy from primary that is trapped in secondary. Method of utilization of that "high grade trapped energy" may vary. Exact mechanical equivalent of such mechanism I did attached as pdf in my previous post. Tesla is a beautifull utilisation of low grade energy compressed into high grade useable one.

Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #644 on: June 08, 2022, 12:12:09 PM »
...and to increase speed of a given mass takes energy.
When you accelerate your car you increases your kinetic energy, but on the expense of fuel. :)


PS. Regarding Tesla resonator. Rate of change is constant, it is resonance of secondary. What matters is a constant influx of energy from primary that is trapped in secondary. Method of utilization of that "high grade trapped energy" may vary. Exact mechanical equivalent of such mechanism I did attached as pdf in my previous post. Tesla is a beautifull utilisation of low grade energy compressed into high grade useable one.

Oh pix, you are tricky, in your arguments you are similar to "an adherent of the Commission on Pseudoscience of Russian Ostriches" Do not be offended, I have seen enough of these adherents.

We consider the simplest crank press, drive power 8.5 kW at 800 rpm, torque 101 Nm.
The force on the press table develops at 10 kilonewtons, at 8 rpm of the crank shaft.
8:1 downshift torque will increase to 1 kN, (speed down, power up)!

In this case, the press develops a force of 10 kN eight times in 1 minute, while the motor makes 800 rpm. (time span 1 minute)
7.5 seconds per revolution, while the pressing action itself is up to 2 seconds.
2 seconds * 8 times/revolution = 16 seconds.
16/60 = 0.26 of a period of one minute.
10 kN * 8 * 0.26 = 20.8 kN.

And so with a decrease from the motor on the shaft of 1 kNm, and the press developed 20.8 kN, while doing the work of pressing 8 parts.