Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world  (Read 121283 times)

Offline Feb2006

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #540 on: May 28, 2022, 08:24:26 AM »
Hope you get there, but still Holcomb 1 Rakarskiy 0.

Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 444
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #541 on: May 28, 2022, 08:52:43 AM »
Hope you get there, but still Holcomb 1 Rakarskiy 0.

The first was Figuera in 1902 (Just because the rights and the demonstration unit are redeemed for 60 million pesetas (320 kg in gold equivalent).

Holcomb is not the first, trust me! Just look at the dates of the patents, solid state generators in fact.

About my rating:
"Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people." Eleanor Roosevelt

Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #542 on: May 28, 2022, 11:13:24 AM »
Rakarskiy, help me rotation "крутилки Слободяна"
I am understanding,that it is just toy.
It gives no practice use.
But Holcomb's device is too hard to make for a loner.
And this will be the start.

Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 444
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #543 on: May 28, 2022, 11:36:21 AM »
Rakarskiy, help me rotation "крутилки Слободяна"
I am understanding,that it is just toy.
It gives no practice use.
But Holcomb's device is too hard to make for a loner.
And this will be the start.

I no longer consider Andrey's devices, after his death, I made such a rule for myself. But I can say that they are no less complicated than the calculation of electronic control by turning the field in a solid-state rotor. The apparent simplicity is self-deception. It is more difficult to make a simple device. Moreover, Andrey himself said that his "twist" works on a barely manifested effect.
Holcomb is difficult in control (electronics and a program with power keys), and the generator circuit is calculated according to the rules for a synchronous generator.

The systems of Robert Holcomb or Park Jae-sung are the same synchronous generators that we know. The excitation system of the rotating field in the stator has been changed to the algorithm for switching electromagnets, according to the armature timing. 

Offline pix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #544 on: May 28, 2022, 12:44:40 PM »
I no longer consider Andrey's devices, after his death, I made such a rule for myself. But I can say that they are no less complicated than the calculation of electronic control by turning the field in a solid-state rotor. The apparent simplicity is self-deception. It is more difficult to make a simple device. Moreover, Andrey himself said that his "twist" works on a barely manifested effect.
Holcomb is difficult in control (electronics and a program with power keys), and the generator circuit is calculated according to the rules for a synchronous generator.

The systems of Robert Holcomb or Park Jae-sung are the same synchronous generators that we know. The excitation system of the rotating field in the stator has been changed to the algorithm for switching electromagnets, according to the armature timing. 


AMEN!

Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #545 on: May 28, 2022, 02:35:54 PM »
But I can say that they are no less complicated than the calculation of electronic control by turning the field in a solid-state rotor.
Well, looking by the video clip, you can’t say that there is something complicated.
If this device rotates itself, you can move on from it.
But I'm trying to do it while there are no thoughts.
But you have explanation videos.
But  I not achieve sucsess still.

Offline Ufopolitics

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #546 on: May 28, 2022, 06:55:34 PM »

A Brief summary...

We need to work more on our Developing and Research "Techniques"...As "enhancing" our "Powers of Deeper Analysis"...please, let me explain...

Yes, over the years we have being observing, reading, finding certain "anomalies" related to FE, and we have ignore them...or simply say "it was faked"..."a hoax"...
A very simple way to keep with the same B.S of Classic Sciences which have NOT delivered FE...and never will, unless We, as researchers, developers in the Private Sector...do it ourselves...

First thing that Clemente Figuera wrote, after succeding with his Patents back in 1908 was..."I never could have imagined it was so simple!!..."
Then Buforn tried to add "improvements" to Figuera Patent which was already working...and He screwed it off...

And yes, there has been "something" we all have been missing...to go deeper into it, to  study more and more..Magnetism, period!!

I mean, up to now, Science still have the ridiculous and rough,  "Iron shavings" as the only way to "visualize" a magnetic field...come on, please!!

After we all have Ferrofluids developed way back in time...after we all have Magnetic Viewing Film, after we have the Ferrocell  developed and patented by Tim Vanderelli, Books like Ken Wheeler "Uncovering the mysteries of Magnetism", awakening our ways to comprehend further on that beautiful Spectrum...

But we still invoke a few iron particles freely loose to "officially" understand how Magnetic Fields look like...Pathetic!!

What ufopoitics describing is new and game changing.

Thanks, Yes, this would be "game changing",definitively...beyond what ALL of You could ever imagine...beyond your wildest dreams...

I started playing with this tech a very long time ago...but, at that time, I was constrained (and may confess, also very stubborn) by the use of "Asymmetric Fields", and kept working for thousands of hours on the same, and only observing just a few "anomalies"...but nothing "galore"...so, I end up abandoning it...

Until I saw Pierre Cotnoir development, read his posts...and finally realized where my MAIN ERROR WAS...The "Secret"...which is already out  and spreading...
Then I finally understood almost everything, not only what I was doing wrong...but also allow me to understand all previous FE Technologies shown before...like Steven Marks TPU...like Don Smith's developments...like Kapanadze...etc,etc

Not collapsing the Main Field...but harvesting it, feeding it, while mutating only minimal small chunks to stimulate a movement...a Rotation.

Now, How successful and How far could you get??...equals how good You put it together...depends entirely on your building skills, the tools you own...and the effort you decide to waste on it...

However, I disagree that this Technology is...New?...sorry, but I do not think so:

That many "knew" way back about this tech but hid it, seize it?...Yes, definitively!!

Why?...

First, because it will reveal how wrong our Science have been for hundreds of years...when it could have been built such easily...effortlessly...and demonstrating that it could be done very long ago...The COP>1, Overunity, Motion Perpetual, etc,etc...

Second, and that I consider even more powerful...is that this technologies will also bring Us Antigravity...and time will tell...by simply altering in a certain way the molecules of steel and other alloys in a way never done before, counterways alignments of high speed traveling magnetic fields rotations...will eventually render a very light material, which will levitate...defying our "Gravitational Laws" plus breaking all the "specific weights tables for each material"...

Third and final (main reason for banning it)...By learning to "manipulate" the Magnetic Fields this way...we could eventually build very powerful EMP's (Electro-Magnetic Pulses) "Tools"...which could also end up in the making of powerful weapons...like the "Death Ray", developed and Patented by Tesla...way back, or as putting together a small and compact "Portable Venus Shooter"...

However, going back to our Analisys Powers...we are still "constrained"...in our way of thinking...a vivid example:

WHY in this World DO WE STILL NEED A "STATOR-ROTOR-STRUCTURE" (or simply put: a Two Part Generator) where the so called "Rotor" does NOT Rotate??!!...

I mean, this is really laughable at...¿¿ A "Stationary Rotor"...??...really?

I mean, seriously...Why do we still need a "Rotor" whole structure and configuration, surrounded by a "Stator" which does not rotate?...(thinking)... ;D 

And so...why do we need a "Shaft" for a  "Rotor" that does not rotate...lol??!!

Bad concepts of "definition" applied above...which keep Us within the same loop, circling over and over...and part of that loop eventually keeps Us going back to the "successful apparatuses" which generates electricity by physically rotating a rotor (doh!!)...when ACTUALLY, there is absolutely no relation between the two systems whatsoever...

Why keep constraining to a completely useless "Rotor with Shaft" within a "Stator" structure?...when we all could move to a Full Static All New Configuration, which grants way more room and "comfort" to all windings and cores we will build in a near future?

I mean, do not take me wrong, I see it as a way to "start" a development with "things" that we all have "on hand"...however, start thinking about getting rid of all these no longer required structures, in order to give more room to more efficient and better engineered developments  ...for God's sake!!

All above sounds a bit too crazy, right?...

Or maybe "too ahead of these times"...

Yes, indeed, so, do not take me "too seriously"...lol


Ufopolitics

Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 444
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #547 on: May 28, 2022, 08:21:22 PM »
Ufopolitics, good revelation!

Only the Holcomb Energy System, bears no resemblance to the Figuer solid-state design.

Figuera is an impulse system, just like in this patent https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/f1/73/db/bddc31a19a8100/CA2357550A1.pdf

I agree with you, the system will close these effective, simple technologies. They will change the energy as such.

Sincerely.

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3350

Online bistander

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 263
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #549 on: May 30, 2022, 09:02:09 PM »
Happened across an excellent tutorial on RMF, Rotating Magnetic Field.

https://youtu.be/YYQayMrK4Fo

bi

Offline Ufopolitics

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #550 on: May 31, 2022, 06:57:14 PM »
Hello,


I am quoting here Lunkster's post, which "was" (now deleted) on my Building Thread...responding to my previous one here...


Ufopolitics


Hi

I like what you just said about what things could look like in the future with free energy!
They are similar to what most FE researchers are striving for.

I also see the new designs looking a lot different from the current ones.
In order to get more people interested in this new technology, replications
need to be generated and verified by third parties.

Also the amplification of electrical energy using industrial steel
needs to be demonstrated in its very basic simplest form.

What I mean in its simplest form is like when the function of
one of the following devices are explained;  FET,  Transistor, or photo cell.

After this happens, then many people will jump on board and will be
working on the bench with ways to improve and implement
this technology.

I am glad to see all the work that is currently being poured
into investigating this technology and we need a lot more people doing it.

After you get the full operating FE systems running we
will all be excited to see it in operation.

So thank you again for all the hours that is being worked on it to
bring this technology to the world!

Lunkster

P.S.
It would be nice if someone would start a thread with replicated FE
devices that have already completed third party verification on them.

Offline Ufopolitics

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #551 on: May 31, 2022, 07:45:33 PM »
Happened across an excellent tutorial on RMF, Rotating Magnetic Field.

https://youtu.be/YYQayMrK4Fo

bi

Thanks Bistander,

Indeed it is a great Tutorial!!...excellent animated graphics!!

So, I am guessing that now you do could establish the difference between what I have explained prior, versus these Three Field Phases set at different Angles?

Thks again, I really enjoyed the video!!

Regards

Ufopolitics

Offline rakarskiy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 444
    • Personal Systems Free Energy (UA)
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #552 on: May 31, 2022, 08:25:33 PM »
Some more information!

A very good video about the magnetic holder (from a guy from the city of Kharkov, Ukraine), or rather about what kind of field appears in an iron core when a wire is pulled through it with current.
A good and clear example of where the own field in the stator comes from when the phase is under load.

Sincerely, Rakarskiy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J912WdC7Od4&t=1692s
(video language russian)

Online bistander

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 263
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #553 on: June 01, 2022, 04:24:39 AM »
Thanks Bistander,

Indeed it is a great Tutorial!!...excellent animated graphics!!

So, I am guessing that now you do could establish the difference between what I have explained prior, versus these Three Field Phases set at different Angles?

Thks again, I really enjoyed the video!!

Regards

Ufopolitics

No, I don't know what you're talking about. Look again at this:
http://www.ece.umn.edu/users/riaz/animations/spacevecmovie.html
We're talking about the magnetic flux density field B vector represented by the black arrow traveling around in circular motion (rotating) with constant magnitude. As you call them "Three Field Phases", I guess, or the phase currents or H vectors are represented by the blue, green and red arrows that change in magnitude but are at constant angles, meaning they pulsate and don't rotate. So it is this black vector, not the other three, that is the sum or resultant that compares to the rotating magnetic flux field of the wound rotating member which you strive to replace.

You could not distinguish any difference between the resultant field produced from balanced 3-phase stator winding as demonstrated in the video and a RMF from a wound rotor or PM rotating. The flux or magnetic field or main field has no signature or feature from the number or angle of phases. This can be clearly seen in the mathematical proof to which I linked.
bi

Offline Ufopolitics

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world
« Reply #554 on: June 01, 2022, 03:01:35 PM »
No, I don't know what you're talking about. Look again at this:
http://www.ece.umn.edu/users/riaz/animations/spacevecmovie.html
We're talking about the magnetic flux density field B vector represented by the black arrow traveling around in circular motion (rotating) with constant magnitude. As you call them "Three Field Phases", I guess, or the phase currents or H vectors are represented by the blue, green and red arrows that change in magnitude but are at constant angles, meaning they pulsate and don't rotate. So it is this black vector, not the other three, that is the sum or resultant that compares to the rotating magnetic flux field of the wound rotating member which you strive to replace.

OMG Bistander...for God's sake man!!

You keep repeating the resultant vector (B Field)...or the "magnetic flux density field"...
Flux=Flow...there is nothing "technical" about the word "flux"...it means "flow" or the emanation that a magnetic field, or several fields produces, generates...and it varies, depends upon many factors...we could vary that flow/flux according to field input...attenuate it or increase it...collapse it or maintain it constant.

Point is, flux is NOT a Field...it is the resultant "product" generated by the field.

In the case of the 3 phase, there are 3 Fields which generate 3 different flow/flux...but due to the space time situation, it's 3 flux coincides into a single flow. However, independently, each field dies/collapses, at certain timing, no matter if the next incoming field will "take over" the flux supply...and that is the difference!!

I was also collapsing the fields before, and there were not just three fields, but many, many more...and, as a matter of fact, due to the brush-element contacts, there were always a way to keep previous field "a bit alive" before full development of next one...however, it did not do the effect we are seeing here...and that you will also see very soon...

These Systems do not like "bumps" in their "resolution" over time, meaning, fields coming down, while another one rising...
In that graphic it looks so fine...referring to that resultant B Field, which looks very steady, and smoothly moving...but in reality it ain't doing so!!...there are "bumps" every time each field start going down, to then rise when the next is coming up...
And You know that perfectly well!!

It is similar to the "direct currents" obtained by a 4 bridge rectifier from AC...is it really a straight, smooth line without any interruptions?
NO IT IS NOT!!...it is a "bumpy" up-down curves...diodes just "cut" the down side of sinewaves, leaving the upper positive curves...not a straight line.

You could not distinguish any difference between the resultant field produced from balanced 3-phase stator winding as demonstrated in the video and a RMF from a wound rotor or PM rotating. The flux or magnetic field or main field has no signature or feature from the number or angle of phases. This can be clearly seen in the mathematical proof to which I linked.
bi

Of course I can see it very clearly, and it is the complete opposite of what we are looking for...this is just a three field setup, trying to unify into one, the spread angle is 120° between the three, which makes it a VERY LOW BELOW, DOWN, RESOLUTION FIELD.

And even in a Four Pole setup, it is still 90° angle diff, which is still huge.

In the arrangement I have, which is 8 pairs of coils, totaling 16 coils IS STILL a VERY LOW RESOLUTION FIELD, and we are talking 22.5°...even though it is being fed by real DC, not bumpy curves...However, the difference is that I am not collapsing the MAIN FIELD at any time.

It is either "you can not see" or "you do not want to see"...

Cheers

Ufopolitics