I am not writing about publishing anything.
When we wanted to do a deal with Kapanadze we had a system set up where we could
put energy into the grid. No fancy videos or investors needed.
Anyhow I am hghly sceptical  of Holcomb and predict that the company will eventually cease trading.
(Just like Magnacoaster, which was outed on this site.)
I also remember a certain Don Smith set up a company called EON, many years ago.
Then his son took over and changed the website to solar panels and wind generators and disappeared out of the public eye.
Which is the fastest rising electricity supply company in the UK? EON. Funny that.
They also claim to be using only free energy.  I passed their power station on Sunday. A tiny non-descript place.
I do wonder........

In UK EON is using two biomass steam power plants.
If your understanding of "EON using free energy" means wind and solar- then yes EON is a free energy company 
DUKES_5.11.xlsx (live.com)


Cheers,
Pix

There are many different devices, on third-party "free" forces, on renewable sources (such as biogas).
The main condition is the absence of carbon emissions and no third-party forces.
Personally, I'm interested in electromagnetic closed type. Holcomb and Figuera's system is just one of them.

Biogas is hydrocarbon, the same  natural source of energy like carbon and oil.
And burning biogas is no carbon free.

...
p.s.
Why no one pays attention at similarity of Holkomb's device and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induction_regulator ?
Which is used from 1930 years !

Or.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronous_condenser

Or as I've asked numerous times, the 3-phase wound rotor induction motor at stall. That is exactly what Holcomb describes.
bi

Cotnoir turns out to be how he commuted his windings.
Of course,it was on this forum, and everyone who desire to see it.
But I found it in saved last year's files.

p.s.
Why no one pays attention at similarity of Holkomb's device and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induction_regulator ?
Which is used from 1930 years !

switching is nothing more than an engineering solution, I had the same one!

Regarding the 3 phase generators in general, just to remind ALL coils are wound in same direction (CCW) as clearly seen in first attached image. Notice in this animation connections are wrong, one of the 3 coils of a single phase is flipped which should not be.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jaIHJUf110

Also, as diagram below shows, induced voltage is max when flux is 0 cause that is when rate of change is the greatest.

Two last images below show lenz law in action. If north flux passes across the wire as shown electron will be pushed up, no matter which way you close that loop, whether you make the flux enter the loop or exit it, irrelevant, electron will go up, always.

Same thing is visualized in last image, screenshot from great canadian documentary. Screenshot demonstrates the motor effect aka laplace's force, but it is just an inverse of lenz law, in fact it is one and the same.

In the screenshot electron is going to the right, toward the screen and wire is immersed in flux as shown. Left hand rule shows that wire is pushed downward and it is pushed downward cause flux of the wire and flux of the magnets are in same direction above the wire, thus repelling.

Exactly the same stands for the reverse, no current in the wire, wire is going up into the flux, electron will go to the right and magnetic field will be generated as shown, repelling above, pushing the wire down (lenz).

Again, no matter how you close the loop matters not.

Left hand rule also has 2 more applications, as shown in the documentary. If you curl your left hand fingers with the solenoid turns, your thumb is pointing toward the north pole. If you point your finger in direction of an electron going through a wire curved fingers show the direction of the flux around the wire. There is also a 3rd application of left hand rule shown in the documentary, not really important on macroscopic level for it is for a single electron, similar to the noted method of finding a north pole of a solenoid, curving fingers in direction of electron's spin around its own axis thumb points toward the north pole of the magnetic field it generates.

These are some fundamental principles that often get forgotten or are not understood well in the first place. All this must be absolutely clear if one wants to find a way-around lenz.

nix85,  I will note only the features:

All this can only be attached to generators where the magnetic flux from the field source crosses the conductor (conditionally, I say conditionally unipolar electromagnetic induction)
Its formula is:   E = B_mlv

In the stator slot and in the window of the transformer there is no relocation of the conductor by the magnetic lines, therefore a different form of electromagnetic induction operates there, which is calculated by the transformer formula:   E = 4.44Фf

the formula is transformer, but the principle of operation of a transformer and a generator is exactly the opposite. I have already installed this exactly.
In this video, the generator mode is just shown, although obviously the author himself does not suspect this.



The secret is very simple, you need a full and constant load.


  все

@rakarskiy And what kind of spinning generator did you see where wire does not cut the flux, it always does, iron core or not.

In all kinds of spinning generators, no matter which kind of winding is used, axial or radial, salient or non-salient, distributed or concentrated, flux sweeps across the wire cuts the flux. So you are wrong there.

What you wrote about two kinds of induction i have written many times already and to a far greater depth. First the distinction between flux cutting law E=Bvl and flux linking law E=NdΦ/dt (of which E = 4.44Фf is a derivation) i shared 3 years ago in thread linked below, and further division of induction into two distinct kinds Henry observed and PROVED, one weaker which cannot be screened except with iron and another that can be screened by any metal.

https://overunity.com/18391/two-kinds-of-induction-henry

This flux cutting formula is basically a variation of F = ILxB aka laplace's force i mentioned in last post aka the motor effect. As i have written in this thread of mine

F = ILxB force on a conductor in a magnetic field - laplace
as load increases, current in the conductor must increase to balance the forces: I = F/BL

And E = 4.44Фf formula for a transformer is as i said variation of Faraday's law of induction, and i shared it already multiple times

https://overunity.com/18878/reactive-current-parallel-rcl/msg567952/#msg567952
https://overunity.com/17735/kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion/msg577902/#msg577902

It is a well known fact that power in a transformer is proportional to flux time frequency according to a known formula for voltage across transformer primary or secondary is

E = 4.44 * number of turns * frequency * flux in the core

But for flux in the core to appear there first has to be current through the coil

This flux is proportional to input voltage and inversely proportional to frequency

E/f

Also what is shown in that video you shared where width of the secondary did not affect induction was known to me for years. Nothing strange about that.

Like i wrote in the linked Henry thread

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prXkW9l3MzM

We can see in the last video about leakage how guy explains flux prefers to loop on itself through the air, rather than go through the core surrounded by aluminum ring.

He clearly understands NOT, that this is very peculiar thing. Why would flux in the core care about a ring that is OUTSIDE of a core. This is the whole point.

Magnetic field is just an effect, ether is the true medium of transmission.

https://overunity.com/18391/two-kinds-of-induction-henry/msg541766/#msg541766

So i already shared all that and elaborated on all this in greater depth. I made it clear that the fact loop "knows" or "feels" the change of flux through it without a single line of flux cutting the wire PROVES induction is mediated through a higher order field, i suggest the A aka Vector field aka Aharonov–Bohm effect i spoke about countless times around here.

Now, as i have just proven, i have written here 3 years ago that flux cutting and flux linking are different phenomena and have further shared Henry's great work about even subtler division of induction into two different phenomena.

I have also shared Floyd Sweet's and Hooper's and others' work claiming the exactly same thing about MOTIONAL ELECTRIC FIELD etc.

They are all aspects of a single underlying phenomena, ALL is.

And it is very very important to seriously study Henry's two kinds of induction to get better understanding.

As for your claim "principle of operation of a transformer and a generator is exactly the opposite" that is simply wrong. And no, just having a wide secondary and full load is not the "secret".

The secret is to work around lenz, whichever kind of induction is at play.

Nix