Author Topic: Build 2 (Read 41936 times)

Johnsmith · « **Reply #75 on:** January 29, 2022, 05:11:22 PM »

I'll probably quit work on AB Hammer's invention. Stefan Hartmann has said it is his invention and I accept what Stefan says.
I am going to have something built which I will give to AB Hammer as an invention which only he'll be allowed to patent. I'll
be able to reference a post in this forum and say it is what AB Hammer posted.
And since I live in the US, realizing a part of the Republic of Saxony history could be considered by some in the U.S. as being antisemitic
because while the Republic of Saxony was a part of Poland during Bessler's lifetime, it is now Saxony, Germany. As for what I will build
that will work, I'll be able to pay someone to build it for me. Then it will be professionally done with no controversy involved.
I will leave my videos up on my YouTube channel in case anyone wants to build AB Hammer's invention or if he wishes to build it himself.
With the 2 weight wheels being lifted together in the last video, if that was on the 4 weight wheel video then it might have worked. Then
as Mt 24 shows, if the top section that is expanded wide was still closed then you'd have the basic shift in balance of 2 weight wheels on
opposite sides of the axle moving upward.
And with Bessler's wheel, someone who is well liked like AB Hammer should build it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uAUoz7jimg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y2NNyeBz7U

Johnsmith · « **Reply #76 on:** January 30, 2022, 03:04:18 AM »

Is AB Hammer a pedophile? Ask Stefan.
The national police should investigate them.

onepower · « **Reply #77 on:** January 30, 2022, 03:34:16 AM »

John

Quote

Is AB Hammer a pedophile? Ask Stefan.
The national police should investigate them.

Just because you disagree with another person does not justify personal attacks nor slander. It is a weak argument on your part at best which has no bearing on whether the other party was more right or wrong in any sense of the word.

For example, Alan Turing
https://www.livescience.com/29483-alan-turing.html

Quote

Alan Turing was a British scientist and a pioneer in computer science. During World War II, he developed a machine that helped break the German Enigma code. He also laid the groundwork for modern computing and theorized about artificial intelligence.

An openly gay man during a time when homosexual acts were illegal in Britain, Turing committed suicide after begin convicted of "gross indecency" and sentenced to a procedure some call "chemical castration." He has since become a martyred hero of the gay community. In late 2013, nearly 60 years after his death, Queen Elizabeth II formally pardoned him.

Think about that, a man who had a lifestyle I and you may totally disagree with could have been responsible for every freedom we all enjoy today. Do I agree with his life choices, no I do not, however my right to disagree in no way reflects on Alan Turing's absolute genius nor the fact he may have saved the war and prevented Hitler from taking over the entire planet with his twisted authoritarian rule.

Your argument is weak my friend and blaming others for our own inadequacies and an inability to produce results is not the way...

Regards
AC

Johnsmith · « **Reply #78 on:** January 30, 2022, 04:37:07 AM »

Quote from: onepower on January 30, 2022, 03:34:16 AM

John
Just because you disagree with another person does not justify personal attacks nor slander. It is a weak argument on your part at best which has no bearing on whether the other party was more right or wrong in any sense of the word.

For example, Alan Turing
https://www.livescience.com/29483-alan-turing.html
Think about that, a man who had a lifestyle I and you may totally disagree with could have been responsible for every freedom we all enjoy today. Do I agree with his life choices, no I do not, however my right to disagree in no way reflects on Alan Turing's absolute genius nor the fact he may have saved the war and prevented Hitler from taking over the entire planet with his twisted authoritarian rule.

Your argument is weak my friend and blaming others for our own inadequacies and an inability to produce results is not the way...

Regards
AC

AB Hammer openly posted that he will call my father and I will be in trouble. Daddies do not like it when little boys do not do what grown
ups tell them to do. Stefan had no issue with this. It is pedophilia. Stefan deleting posts shows he supports AB Hammer. Google saved what he deleted.

As for Alan Turing, did he commit suicide because he was gay or because of the lives that he did not save? I doubt it was because he was gay but how many lives
were lost because of his math? I don't think he could live with that.

Johnsmith · « **Reply #79 on:** January 30, 2022, 03:55:44 PM »

For those who don't know, Alan Turing built what is considered is the world's first computer and it broke the Nazi's enigma code.
With encryption online such as is used for your passwords like when you log in to your bank, that's what the enigma code was.
And it seems the issue was that if a more complex enigma machine was built, could a better machine be built by Alan Turing and his friends?
If not then limiting the loss of life or basically saying we'll allow this many people to die so they won't know we broke their code might cause
problems for someone living with having made those decisions.
With AB Hammer, he might actually need a stay in a psychiatric hospital. This is in a literal sense. Yet he's never been banned from a forum.
And he hasn't worked at Bessler's wheel. That might show just how toxic this subject is even in forums that you would think would allow for
it to be considered.
This week (maybe tomorrow) I'll be able to go to the library and show what I should've built years ago and have given to AB Hammer. At least
this way I'll be able to show Christians that I can live according to the scripture in the Bible and AB Hammer is a Christian and knows the Bible
as well.
Matthew 5:40;
And if any man will sue thee at the law, and. take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also.

I will give AB Hammer everything he wants including my ileostomy. He will have my life in the US. I'll be able to move to another country where
a disabled Veteran who served Honorably in the U.S. Armed Forces can have a life. Luckily for me, the U.S. is not the only country that I have
lived in. And being from Ohio, USA does not make me an American just as being a disabled Veteran does not mean I deserve a life in the US.

Johnsmith · « **Reply #80 on:** January 31, 2022, 08:18:13 PM »

With this design, lead rises as it sinks......in water. And we know lead doesn't float. Then it can't rise as it sinks because
lead can't do 2 opposing things at the same time, right?
When lead sinks, it pumps air. Then because the bellow it is associated with will either sink or rise. It's pretty basic. Blow
the ballast tanks on a submarine and it rises. Fill the ballast tanks with water and it sinks. If you don't want to land on the
seafloor then air has to be left in the ballast tanks to maintain some buoyancy. That is how a submarine can hold position
at any given depth.
And some will say this can never work because lead doesn't float. And this is what I call my "fail safe". Professionally built
by a respectable wood worker, people will take notice. The issue is the tank. A small tank 40 in. x 40 in. x 18 in.
(1m x 1m x 45cm) holds .45m^3 of water or 118 gallons that weighs 990 lbs. or 450 kg.
That's why I can not build that at home if it is to be built right.
With my Bessler build, I'll probably put pulleys at opposite ends of a crossbar to show that the overbalance allows for both
sets of weight wheels to be lifted when it rotates. Bessler shows working together in so many of his drawings that anyone
familiar with them would find this is something that Bessler taught in his maschinen tractate and the first image that you
see might actually represent how retraction lines are connected. And I don't expect anyone to understand that.
http://www.orffyre.com/mt.html

p.s., with this, think Jules Verne 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea. Wood, copper and neoprene.

p.s.s., as for the Bible, since I have to give what I have to AB Hammer, that means it is now a sword and a shield. Yet Jesus
said do not bother people and be known by your walk. And because that does not describe Christians in the U.S>, I will need
to move to another country so I can have a life. It's like a famous baseball player (Yogi Berra) said about a restaurant;
Nobody goes there anymore, it's too crowded.
That describes the U.S.

p.s.s., 2 months ago I had less than 30 subscribers. My channel is more about documenting my work. With what I'll probably
do to my prototype is shorten the arms so it can be on its stand in a spare room I have. Weights being lifted when they're top
center will generate a lot of torque. It will just be testing a theory that resistance does not consume energy because it is not
doing any work. And yet some idiot will say the weight is moving. It won't be moving. The arm it is on will be moving away from it
so technically the weight on the wheel is in the same position as before to its fulcrum.

With the underwater water wheel, lead is about 10.3 times denser than water. Water is about 816 times denser than air.
When lead is attached to a bellow or a float, then the total weight and volume are considered as one object or mass.
https://letstalkscience.ca/educational-resources/stem-in-context/why-do-ships-float

Johnsmith · « **Reply #81 on:** January 31, 2022, 11:49:34 PM »

My channel will determine what I do and when I do it. Next week I'll make a video showing both of the wheels that I've built.
The Ode to Bessler and the prototype. And I will explain how I'll test how torque can rotate a wheel and show how the weights
are moving because the wheel is moving and not the weights.
This is basic cause and effect which goes back to Newton when he published his book En Principia for short back in 1687.
Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica. Bessler was 7 at that time. You could almost say that Newton's book in Engleske is
The Philosophy of the Natural Principle of Mathematics. Or how does mathematics allow us to understand our solar system?
That's basically what the title suggests. And physics is actually based on his literal title.
The 2nd video will show if the prototype has enough torque to rotate a wheel that lifts 2 weights. This is because gravity acts
on everything equally and the drum is not lifting the weights as Bessler said it is. He said what you would understand but the drum
doesn't rotate and the wheel does.

And then for fun we can consider math and what it allows for. When physics and mechanics meet, it is called engineering.
Physics does not allow for flight while engineering does. Physics is as Einstein said, to understand Odin's thoughts.
Engineering perverts the natural order of things.

Unless someone has specific questions about how lead can float or an airplane can fly, I'll need to focus on my next video. And if
you've ever gone fishing, you know the bob (float) doesn't sink unless you have a lot of lead weight on your line. Interestingly
enough I have fished from the fjords of Norway to the Puget Sound in Washington State, USA. I've lived in both places.

Johnsmith · « **Reply #82 on:** February 01, 2022, 03:37:42 AM »

If you like Rock music, there is this; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_B90VnG6FR0
And what my mother would've loved; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQ7vU401MrA
With perpetual motion, it is about conservation of energy. It is about converting energy
from one form to another. With music, strings and vocal chords change how the air moves.
Sound is nothing more than molecules vibrating. No speaker puts out sound. It transfers
kinetic energy to molecules in the air. Sound is never produced. It is only perceived.
And just something else for you to perceive; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3jcOWp71-Q
She is training to be an opera singer and she is French.
And since her goal is to sing in the opera; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZJr8rZcoiA
This is a perpetual motion forum and in calculus limits are set, why do we set limits?

How you know, how to find limits in calculus; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJZm-zp639s
What hurt me was not having a text book with homework assignments. Those would be helpful.
And as we all know, music Rocks!!

p.s., math helps us to understand values in mechanics. Kind of why we know why something moves.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSlEIzSwVho

Johnsmith · « **Reply #83 on:** February 01, 2022, 04:52:22 AM »

Nazis didn't kill my father. He could run faster. And perpetual motion is impossible. It is.
And I've asked a Jew to work with me. It is a fücked up world. She knows my situation.
It's a different world today. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nco_kh8xJDs

It is a different world today. People need to learn to work together.

ie., power comes first. Those who do the work, it is to show to those in power.

p.s., if I was born 20 years earlier; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKCDc8Eg_-U
Today we need to know math. In the 40's and the 50's, in the U.S. they were called nerds.
Times have changed.

Johnsmith · « **Reply #84 on:** February 02, 2022, 04:37:15 PM »

I'll be needing to buy some plywood. I'll need to make a "ring" around the outer part of my build. Then
it will look like an actual wheel. This is because I'll need a place to mount pulleys. Then this will fit another
part of the description of Bessler's wheel. A curved board was placed around the outside of it so you
couldn't see past it. This made the frame rigid. Otherwise the frame could twist and break.
I'll be making a video of with what I showed in here and explain the modifications I'll be making to my
current build.. I'll also show where Mt 24 shows a shift in force that is unique to Bessler's drawings. And it is
also in 8 sections. Witnesses said that they heard 8 knocking sounds per revolution.
With the modification I'll be making, I'll only lose 3/8" or about 1 cm of overbalance. And since I'll be needing
to rout parts that will be 32" (81.25 cm) across, I'll only be able to work on those parts on Sunday when my
neighbor is in church. And I will need to make numerous small parts so the left and right side of the frame
can be connected so they'll be rigid. That will mean a lot of gluing and letting glue dry which will slow things
up as well. If you consider trusses, just a basic truss will be needed. When it's built everyone should get it.
And this is kind of why I want to enjoy all of the work that I'm doing, it is a lot of work.

p.s., I had 2 credible individuals tell me that they would not let me pursue perpetual motion.
I always had the same answer, they tried to stop Rock and Roll and they failed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OFESufsZG0

Johnsmith · « **Reply #85 on:** February 02, 2022, 11:39:12 PM »

With a video, what I'd like to show is placing a ring around the wheel I've built. And then show what I'll
be doing instead because it is a prototype. This way people will understand that there is a difference
between a finished product and an idea that is being pursued.
With Bessler's wheel, there are 2 drawings that show he connected opposing weights. With Mt 134, with
the lines being further away from the hub (axle) it does change the appearance. And as both drawing
show, Bessler shows 2 lines connecting opposing weights. And it does require 2 lines, one on each side
of the wheel and not the hub. A swing also requires 2 lines. This is because like a weight wheel, it is equally
supported on both sides.
Years ago I started building Bessler's clues. A lot of people didn't understand the mechanics involved it
seems. And taking things literally doesn't work with Bessler. With Mt 134, if the wheel were rotated 90°,
then you'd have a line on each side of the wheel connecting both the top and bottom weights. Usually
Bessler shows 2 levers with weights connected together. In that drawing, he shows nothing but a line.
While there are 143 drawings in what John Collins and his friends did, no one has ever made sense of them.
In a way it's like learning analytical trigonometry (am being serious), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvSI2yS5M1w
Might be why so many people had issues with me. How can someone consider Bessler's work without working at it?
What I'm doing, it shows I put the work in. And with calculus you can just go f(x) = dy/dx which can simplify things. What
is the change in rise over run? Of course basic trigonometry and algebra allows for it to be considered. People should
know how something in an expression cancels something else out. This would allow for an overbalance to be realized.
And if what I do works and some people will decide to build one. At the same time, they'll probably want to be a part of
the show that I want to do in Utrecht.

p.s., I have one advanced design that would use water instead of rocks or lead, And in Bessler's time, lead would have been extremely expensive.
Today, 10 lbs. costs about $40. With it in 3 or 4 oz weights, it's about $60. And when pouring 1 lb weights, using lighter weights is better.

p.s.s., with what I'll be showing on my YouTube channel, it will most likely be posted here first. Then when I make the video, you guys will probably
say "so that's what he was talking about".

Johnsmith · « **Reply #86 on:** February 03, 2022, 01:49:25 AM »

A Russian singer who moved to Finland; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5nUo6G5qw4

A Finnish group; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kmiw4FYTg2U&list=RDKmiw4FYTg2U&start_radio=1

If you know history, the Vikings created the Kiev Rys (pronounces Roos). What lead to Russia. Russia literally
means the Rys and I (Rys ee Ya). That means Russia and me or myself. Ya or the backwards R is Ya meaning
I or myself such as mne (MHE in Russian) or to me. Please allow for phonics and the Cyrillic alphabet.
I'd like to think that everyone will enjoy Natalia Tsarikova's singing. Hers or Nightwish.

With music, the cd Great Wave of Horns by Russenorsk; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzIxIaF30gc&list=OLAK5uy_kpBovTGZTVvJCouHHnm_pjT5DNng4U54Q

Russenorsk is a language that was developed by fishermen from both Norway and Russia. Also, Russia has never gone to war against Norway.
The ties between the 2 countries go back to the beginning of Russia. The Rys taught trade and government. It is an "olde" relationship the
people's have.

With Russenorsk, it is the Russian and the Norwegian. With languages, "the" is not a word in Russian. Rys ee norske (Norske refers to the language while Norge refers to
Norway itself) kind of shows what those words mean. With Rusian, it might be руск и норск. In English, that's roosk ee norsk. Roos ee norsk is a softening of the language.
Kind of why I visited Yekaterinburgh, Norway has a history with Russia.

p.s., I'll be working on my build. It is a lot of work. Russia, Norway, Finland and America? Just a distraction.

A bonus for you guys; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBcbtHFPf_c

Johnsmith · « **Reply #87 on:** February 04, 2022, 05:37:32 AM »

Next week I'll be posting another video. What people will need to understand is that when the ascending
weight wheels move closer to the axle, it is because the imbalance is causing the wheel to rotate, As Bessler
said, his wheel tries to find a balance but it cannot.
If the disc rotated to move the weight wheel closer to the axle of the wheel then the disc would be performing
work. Yet when the wheel itself moves the weight wheels, it is not because the wheel is not using energy to
perform that work.
This shows that resistance is causing the balance of the wheel to change as it rotates. And yet resistance causes
entropy and not conservation of energy. This is what everyone can consider and if need be, wrap a line around a
can. And if the line is weighted down on the other side of the can away from you then you'll notice that without
the can the line is closer to you. And that's basically the theory I am working with on what I call Bessler's Wheel.
And if I am right then I should be able to get the 8 weight wheel version working and maybe the 4 weight wheel
version.

p.s., this is basically using Occam's Razor to consider an idea. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/OCCAMRAZ.html
And with what I've been doing, I've limited how complex I'll build something. And with what I'm building, it
is what is required. This is why I've taken things one step at a time.

Johnsmith · « **Reply #88 on:** February 05, 2022, 05:37:41 PM »

This is to hopefully explain the basic principle better. And while using a string and something round is something simple, putting
it to use in a build is a lot of work. After my next video I'll be demonstrating with weights both below and above the axle in 2
different positions. This will show if it is more efficient lifting both weights. This is where with a good computer the frames per second
and the wheels rotation would show if it is more efficient or not.
The first illustration shows the math where the axle for the wheel and the drum have the same center or axle. Only the part of the
drum between the line segment A ---- B is used. The 2nd image shows 2 pulleys shifting the swing of the weight to be under the axle.
It took me a couple of months to grasp this. I think it is because when the weight is shifted it is supposed to restrict the motion of the
arm. And in this configuration, that does not happen.
I am at the library and will be working on a SketchUp drawing (actually 2) which will be included in my video. I'll show how I'll reinforce
the frame so it will remain rigid. I'll also show what I could do because it is a wheel. And I'll explain how stress or the weight of the
wheel influences what I'm doing.

p.s., if anyone tries what I've suggested, what's above everything is the fulcrum or top of the line. It can be placed anywhere as long as
it wraps around the cylinder to the right of the axle.

Johnsmith · « **Reply #89 on:** February 07, 2022, 02:07:07 AM »

This is a part of what I did at the library. I have my pc working again so will only need to go to the library
for video editing. I tried recording the screen when I moved the ring on to the frame but something wouldn't
let me do that.
With what I am actually building, I'll be able to add plates at the end of the arms for the pulley mounts. And
then to connect the different arms together I'll use either twine or artificial sinew. This will be to make sure
the frame is rigid.
And if I build something that works, I'll give 100% of everything to AB Hammer. This has to be considered his invention.
For the last 15 years everyone supported him. And as I've mentioned, even today at besslerwheel.com everyone will say
I have to give it to him. IMO I had my original Facebook page taken away from me because what I was posting wasn't
pleasing to AB Hammer. And people love the guy because he is a Christian. It is interesting that if this works, I might've
been able to have done it 10 years ago but he needed someone to build his invention for him so he could show how his
faith in Jesus got it built for him. And Christians are allowed to enslave people in Jesus name because it's all about building
a bigger church and having status in the church.
With the video I'll be making, I'll show 3 different tests to see how shifting the balance with the weight wheel above the
axle being positioned higher up its arm. Then after adding more pulleys and connecting 2 opposing weight wheels, will it
show the test was accurate? If so then that would suggest it can work.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Build 2 (Read 41936 times)

Johnsmith

Re: Build 2

Johnsmith

Re: Build 2

onepower

Re: Build 2

Johnsmith

Re: Build 2

Johnsmith

Re: Build 2

Johnsmith

Re: Build 2

Johnsmith

Re: Build 2

Johnsmith

Re: Build 2

Johnsmith

Re: Build 2

Johnsmith

Re: Build 2

Johnsmith

Re: Build 2

Johnsmith

Re: Build 2

Johnsmith

Re: Build 2

Johnsmith

Re: Build 2

Johnsmith

Re: Build 2