In a way the King in the video is like a group of people who controlled this forum and besslerwheel.com.

Well.And it came to my mind that the boy
put the king in such conditions that he would say this, or say differently, a hopeless situation.
Unstable position. No balance. No way to catch the balance.  Like the Bessler wheel, in order
for it to turn, it does not have to find a point of equilibrium. This movie was not just offtopic.
Why does it work with information but not in the physical world ? 

Well.And it came to my mind that the boy
put the king in such conditions that he would say this, or say differently, a hopeless situation.
Unstable position. No balance. No way to catch the balance.  Like the Bessler wheel, in order
for it to turn, it does not have to find a point of equilibrium. This movie was not just offtopic.
Why does it work with information but not in the physical world ? 

  Your children's story is off topic. It explained why the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 was considered as being necessary.
And as I said, it might work as it is if I finish the build. Watch it at the 1:30 time, with a little moment before the level of
the axle the wheel is stopped by the retraction line.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkdhPM-hMdQ

  I will consider that you do not understand how to develop an idea. With using 2 weight wheels to see how much torque
is generated, I can compare that f = ma with 8 weights. The f would be the torque generated by an overbalanced weight
wheel. Then does mass x acceleration of the 6 other weight wheels agrees with what 2 weight wheels caused?
 If so then I can add more weight to 2 weight wheels and then do another acceleration/torque test. If that accelerates
faster, then when adding 6 more weights, how fast would the same relationship allow for? It is possible that because the
weight of the weight wheels would all have the same ratio, there might be no increase in how quickly the wheel rotates.
 Since I am using spherical bearings, will roller bearings have less resistance? And that is what I should find out next. As
you can tell, a spherical bearing has a lot of surface area. That might create more resistance than a roller bearing would.
 

I agree. There is such a moment.  But I would not focus on this. I meant something else.
Mind games, resourcefulness and logic. And i have saw in this some indirect connection
with Bessler's self-running wheel. :)You're right. I don't understand how this can work.
But I understand that I have to do something. This or other.
I still think that the electrical part should be added to this circuit.
As a carrier of energy from one part of the device to another. Bypassing gravity...

  If you need something to do, maybe you could think about why the weight wheel moves closer
to the axle of the wheel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-3MqrU8bTg
 And it is accelerating when it is doing so. This shows that it is not using energy to move towards
the axle. It is the interaction between those 2 weight wheels that cause the wheel to rotate.
 I'll be starting work on the design for my fail safe. I'll most likely have someone else build it. It will
be easy enough to work. Then I can have my surgery. Then I will be in a better situation for working
on what I showed you. Between now and when that happens, I might do some more work on it. One
of the reasons for the videos was to show my subscribers on YouTube what it is that I've been
working at so they'd better understand it.
 With my personal situation, I am handicapped/disabled for a reason. And this can help me to change
that and have a life.

p.s., with Bessler's clues, there are 2 that would suggest I can do 2 different things with this build. But
doing both things on the same wheel wouldn't help a wheel to work better. And this creates more that
needs to be done. And with the simple idea that I have, it would ensure success.
 With the 2 clues, one is using springs and latches. Gravity would compress the spring and then when the weight wheel
would need to roll out, release the latch and then the spring will push it outward. That would be a lot of work.
 The 2nd clue is also a lot of work but if it works as what I've done works, then a 60 rpm wheel would be possible. This
creates a problem of sorts. A slow rotating wheel wouldn't be that interesting but would be a part of Bessler's work.
 I can start working on the faster wheel while I'm pursuing my "sure thing". And this means that I'll be busy designing for
a while. After all, I can't ask wood workers for bids if I don't have a design for them to consider. And with my current
wheel, can its frame be adapted? I think so but that will be even more work. I've been aware of this for a long time.
And this could easily take until April or longer. And this is where I need to slow down. Things will go better that way.
 And thx4, if you want, I'll be able to show some more design work on the pendulum if you and Robinhood like.
 

This cartoon was made in the Soviet Union, when it was impossible otherwise.
You don't have to pay attention to it.  I just wanted to say that if we were as
resourceful as that boy, we would have had a perpetual motion machine by now...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3XfSe_LAFA

  That is what has been so frustrating about this forum and besslerwheel.com, they have aggressive people in
the other forum. This forum used to be as bad. People who were willing to try were openly ridiculed. And what
some said was that as private builders, they can tell you how to work. Then if someone who did work and was
successful, the private builder would get credit for teaching how to build for them.
 That is not working together. If people work together then credit should be shared. An example would be like the
2 oscillation pendulum, if thx4 and Robinhood like my design, build it and it works, then we would need to
share credit. In the U.S., that would be considered as socialism which is considered like communism. It is not
capitalism. 
With what I am working on, I have realized what it is that I need to know. I will need to make the frame into an
actual wheel. Then with the 4 weight wheels that I have, if what I know is correct (if = если или можть быть)
when it might need a push to work.  Когда Я вишаль Береа, Кентукий, УСА Я начинаю Русский яазыке. I
wasn't from Berea like my mother so to socialize with people I learned some Russian and then back to
perpetual motion.
 I think with different descriptions of Bessler's wheel that different wheels are being described. And while I
could pursue all of his clues, those can come after demonstrating a working wheel. And this would be using
the 4 weight wheels that I have. Then if that works, I'll be able to pursue a show that I want to do in Utrecht,
Netherlands because they have this book I've posted a link to before;
https://www.uu.nl/en/utrecht-university-library-special-collections/collections/early-printed-books/scientific-works/das-triumphirende-perpetuum-mobile-orffyreanum-by-johann-bessler
 In a couple of weeks I'll be able to demonstrate what could allow for a 4 weighted wheel to work. I would only
be demonstrating the mechanics because I'd be using this wheel to demonstrate the mechanics. Then everyone would know what
I am building; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_aUN2hWyMs
 

Do you intend to build a self running device ?

What is the basic principle ?

Why might it produce energy ?

I wont criticize you if you say that you don't know.

  In the most simplistic, basic terms that I can think of;

 The retraction disc creates what is known as "ersazt" gravity. Ersatz means not genuine. And then like the Moon
orbiting the Earth at night, it moves closer to the Earth. This shows the Sun's gravitational effect on it. And like Bessler's
wheel, when a weight is orbiting both the retraction disc (what Bessler called a drum) and then the wheel, it is drawn
closer to the 2 bodies it is orbiting around.
 And when the Moon is between the Sun and the Moon, it is further from the Earth. And with Bessler's wheel, when a weight
is orbiting the retraction disc (what Bessler called a drum) it is closer to the center of its orbit.
 I'm not sure why you don't understand so basic as to why the Moon and the Earth have their unique wobbly orbit around the
Sun when F = G(M1M2/r^2) explains it in simple to understand terms.
 Basically if someone has taken the time to learn algebra, trigonometry and geometry as well as maybe rebuilding an engine
and working a lot with mechanics, they might understand that the weight wheel does not resist the motion of its arm. This
is because as the wheel rotates the retraction lines maintain a 90° relationship to the retraction disc and the axle of the
wheel. What Bessler did was shift the pendulum so it would swing from the axle of the wheel. To someone like you it is
known as magic. And basically, I've done the math.

p.s., your sarcasm is duly noted as you've spent no time learning anything about this. And it kind of shows
that you're not familiar with math, mechanics or science. The question is Can you keep up? And I know you can't.
Your word games show what you know.

' ' ' '

"Centrifugal force is the apparent force, equal and opposite to centripetal force".

They much like unto Newton's action and reaction co-define one another.

I am more certain now than even before. You have no understanding of what
you are talking about.  Half of what you say has no meaning.  Not only this
but you reveal a decide lack of integrity on your part. It's no wonder
(as you have previously stated) that you are disliked and end up in petty quarrels
on these forums.  It is    you      that does not understand the mechanics.

You should keep to your word and stop positng in your topic, as you previously
stated that you would.  At least until such time as you have learned how to
communicate.