Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Andrea Rossi Plasma Reactor  (Read 4108 times)

hermesatar

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Andrea Rossi Plasma Reactor
« on: December 09, 2021, 07:19:40 AM »
 8 hours remains until Andrea Rossi show his E-Cat SKLed and E-Cat SKLep:

https://e-catworld.com/2021/12/08/dec-9th-ecat-presentation-thread/

9:00 am Miami time (US Eastern Time) is 15:00 Central European Time.

Best Wishes, Hermes   

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Andrea Rossi Plasma Reactor
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2021, 07:44:33 AM »
Greetings hermesatar

I'm pretty well certain  that Andrea Rossi's device has been shown to be a fake.

I realize that there are still believers out there.
            but
If you research (here at the O.U. forum) you may find evidence to form an opinion
based upon examination, rather than mere enthusiasm ?

   Best wishes
     Welcome to O.U. forum
         floor

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Andrea Rossi Plasma Reactor
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2021, 03:17:29 PM »
Is this working for anyone?
The live feed ?

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Andrea Rossi Plasma Reactor
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2021, 03:53:57 PM »
It's 9:52 am, 12/9/21  Miami time (US Eastern Time)

Link is not working

kampen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 132
Re: Andrea Rossi Plasma Reactor
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2021, 07:48:50 PM »
At my place The Netherlands/Europe it is working.

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Andrea Rossi Plasma Reactor
« Reply #5 on: December 10, 2021, 03:05:50 PM »
Nothing here.

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Andrea Rossi Plasma Reactor
« Reply #6 on: December 27, 2021, 10:24:09 AM »
here is more about it:
https://ecat.com/dec-9-event


hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Andrea Rossi Plasma Reactor
« Reply #7 on: December 27, 2021, 10:29:04 AM »
Well, another typical Rossi demonstration, according to the motto: As you can see, you don't see anything ... ohhmann .. Well, really badly presented ... to buckle what he's doing, you have to look at it at least 3 times .. Here under the video in the description you can find some PDF files. where an attempt is made to explain something ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4_NyyIZq70&t=774s So I'll try to describe it ... Rossi probably has a cube-shaped box, about 10x10x10 cm,
where he claims that it would produce 100 watts constantly ... To operate the whole thing, he would only need about 1 watt ... Then it also has control electronics, which, together with the lamp, consume approx. 1 to 4.5 watts. On his experiment table you can only see a few not so bright LEDs in a reflection of the plexiglass plate, maybe from a headband LED lamp ...
but that is probably not the right LED lamp yet ... You can see this as a radiator in the end compared to a 98 watt? LED lamp ..
Hmm ... 98 watts seems strange to me, there are no such lamps, maybe he meant a 100 watt normal incandescent lamp ... hmm ... So his LED lamp should only consume about 4 watts, okay, the brightness was okay for 4 watts, but also not that extremely bright ...
They had talked about 10,000 lumens beforehand, it was definitely not that bright I would once to say.... For me it looked more like a 10 to 30 watt LED spotlight ... So it was definitely not brighter ... So I looked again, they had probably used a 98 (100) watt LED spotlight as a comparison, but the room was also illuminated much brighter,
even outside the spot area ... Well, they said, however, that they first need 1 million pre-orders before they want to have it produced ...
I think it won't work like that again .... 🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🙈

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Andrea Rossi Plasma Reactor
« Reply #8 on: December 27, 2021, 10:30:49 AM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4_NyyIZq70
What do you think about the presentation ?
Is it for real ??
Many thanks.

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Andrea Rossi Plasma Reactor
« Reply #9 on: December 27, 2021, 06:23:06 PM »
Hi; Stefan, I watched the video but it's almost impossible for me to say one way or the other.
It's a bit like the early micro CPU day's he needs to produce a project or device and publish it
for tech minded people to pace test it's capabilities time for monkeying around is to short
we need results on a global scale,

After looking on the Net for E--Cal (cold fusion) I found this same guy with less hair so
what you see isn't what you get, perhaps or perhaps not.


https://skepticalinquirer.org/2019/01/why-e-cat-is-a-hoax/

abbhawk

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: Andrea Rossi Plasma Reactor
« Reply #10 on: January 16, 2022, 05:58:19 PM »
First let me say, that im pretty sure that the E-cat work and is producing over unity energy. I just doubt that price is fair, since i think i know how to build it, I might see some trouble for product by time passing by. It is not a plasma reactor, i guess Rossi try to make it sound difficult to copy - but might not be. Let me tell you how i think it is made.
You might have heard about the H-cat - hydrogen catalysator. A little test where you take the catalysator from a car and send in a flow of hydrogen. Then the inside of catalysator will heat up to 500 celcius and a consistent flow of 100 celcius hot air coming out. Those who use this system for heating claim to save 60-70% on heating bill.
Rossi have told us that it contain atoms of hydrogen and oxygen, titanium and i think platinium.
I think E-cat is a vacuum closed system, where water is being seperated by normal electrolysis at high voltage but very low ampere, thats why he need to add 1watt of 220 or 110volt.
This hydrogen will hit a micro catalysator that will heat up to 500celcius in the chamber, where the walls are build of a thermoelectric material. I notice that Rossi own a patent on a thermoelectric material, this is what i think he use it for. This material send out 100watt/h for a long time.
When hydrogen hit the catalysator it willchange the combination of HHO to H2O and heat but now the water contain small bits of titanium and platinum from the catalysator. In a closed loop, the water will be reused for electrolysis.
I watch a video on youtube where a friend of Rossi said E-cat can be build from a few dollar spend on Ebay, this is how i think it is build. :)
I just in some doubt that his electrolysis can run for 100000 hours like Rossi say, without getting dirty inside...

IggyZ

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: Andrea Rossi Plasma Reactor
« Reply #11 on: January 25, 2022, 11:35:20 AM »
The man is either a fraud or just crazy / self delusional. He already could have won a Nobel prize but for whatever reason he choses to play (e-)cat and mouse with skeptics, believers and potential investors.

By the way. Rossi claims already 700.000 SKLEPS were ordered... https://e-catworld.com/2022/01/22/rossi-700k-ecat-sklep-orders-reached/

skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: Andrea Rossi Plasma Reactor
« Reply #12 on: January 26, 2022, 09:37:03 PM »
I watch a video on youtube where a friend of Rossi said E-cat can be build from a few dollar spend on Ebay, this is how i think it is build. :)
I just in some doubt that his electrolysis can run for 100000 hours like Rossi say, without getting dirty inside...
When it's so easy, why don't you build it ?

There are few things which cost more than a few dollars to build.
You are paying for the know-how, not for the material.